Abstract
Disinfection by-products in tap water have been found in some studies to be associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, but little is known about how water use and consumption might change during early pregnancy. Estimating water-related activities only at one time during pregnancy could easily lead to exposure misclassification. To evaluate changes in water use among pregnant women, we used data from a large epidemiologic study in which 1990 women were interviewed around 9 and 20 weeks' gestation. The water variables that were examined included ingestion of cold and hot tap water as well as of bottled water, showering and bathing. Changes were detected between early and mid-pregnancy for ingested cold tap water and showering. Thirty-three percent of the subjects changed cold-water ingestion by ≥1.0 liters/day and 44% changed their time showering by ≥35 min per week during this period. Increases in cold tap water intake were associated with age >35 years, income <$40,000, and non-Hispanic white ethnicity. We also found that the proportion of the total variation due to within-subject variability was 62% for hot tap water ingestion but only 35% for showering and ∼50% for cold tap water, bottled water and bathing. Limited resources in epidemiologic studies often require a decision between collecting data for a large number of people or collecting multiple measurements for a smaller number of people. The results in this study will be useful to researchers who need to determine where to invest their effort when assessing water-related exposures and should help in evaluation of previously performed studies.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 6 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $43.17 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barbone F., Valent F., Brussi V., Tomasella L., Triassi M., Di Lieto A., et al.. Assessing the exposure of pregnant women to drinking water disinfection byproducts. Epidemiology 2002: 13: 540–544.
Bove F., Shim Y., and Zeitz P. Drinking water contaminants and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a review. Environ Health Perspect 2002: 110 (Suppl 1): 61–74.
Bunker M.L., and McWilliams M. Caffeine content of common beverages. J Am Diet Assoc 1979: 74: 28–32.
Forssen U.M., Herring A.H., Savitz D.A., Nieuwenhuijsen M.J., Murphy P.A., Singer P.C., et al.. Predictors of use and consumption of public drinking water among pregnant women. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2007: 17 (2): 159–169.
Graves C.G., Matanoski G.M., Tardiff R.G. Weight of evidence for an association between adverse reproductive and developmental effects and exposure to disinfection by-products: a critical review. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2001: 34: 103–124.
Kaur S., Nieuwenhuijsen M.J., Ferrier H., and Steer P. Exposure of pregnant women to tap water related activities. Occup Environ Med 2004: 61: 454–460.
King W.D., Dodds L., Armson B.A., Allen A.C., Fell D.B., and Nimrod C. Exposure assessment in epidemiologic studies of adverse pregnancy outcomes and disinfection byproducts. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 2004: 14: 466–472.
Landis J.R., and Koch G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977: 33: 159–174.
Nieuwenhuijsen M.J., Toledano M.B., Eaton N.E., Fawell J., and Elliott P. Chlorination disinfection byproducts in water and their association with adverse reproductive outcomes: a review. Occup Environ Med 2000: 57: 73–85.
Promislow J.H., Makarushka C.M., Gorman J.R., Howards P.P., Savitz D.A., and Hartmann K.E. Recruitment for a community-based study of early pregnancy: the Right From The Start study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2004: 18: 143–152.
Savitz D.A., Singer P.C., Herring A.H., Hartmann K.E., Weinberg H.S., and Makarushka C. Exposure to drinking water disinfection by-products and pregnancy loss. Am J Epidemiol 2006: 164 (11): 1043–1051.
Shimokura G.H., Savitz D.A., and Symanski E. Assessment of water use for estimating exposure to tap water contaminants. Environ Health Perspect 1998: 106: 55–59.
Waller K., Swan S.H., Windham G.C., and Fenster L. Influence of exposure assessment methods on risk estimates in an epidemiologic study of total trihalomethane exposure and spontaneous abortion. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 2001: 11: 522–531.
Williams B.L., Florez Y., and Pettygrove S. Inter- and intra-ethnic variation in water intake, contact, and source estimates among Tucson residents: Implications for exposure analysis. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 2001: 11: 510–521.
Windham G.C., Swan S.H., Fenster L., and Neutra R.R. Tap or bottled water consumption and spontaneous abortion: a 1986 case-control study in California. Epidemiology 1992: 3: 113–119.
Wright J.M., and Bateson T.F. A sensitivity analysis of bias in relative risk estimates due to disinfection by-product exposure misclassification. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 2005: 15: 212–216.
Wright J.M., Murphy P.A., Nieuwenhuijsen M.J., and Savitz D.A. The impact of water consumption, point-of-use filtration and exposure categorization on exposure misclassification of ingested drinking water contaminants. Sci Total Environ 2006: 366: 65–73.
Zender R., Bachand A.M., and Reif J.S. Exposure to tap water during pregnancy. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 2001: 11: 224–230.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by a grant from the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research (Grant no. 2004-1546), a Cooperative Agreement (no. CR82455-01-0) between the University of North Carolina and US Environmental Protection Agency, and AWWARF contract No. 2579/2666/2741. We thank Yanfang Jiang, Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina for skillful programming.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Forssén, U., Wright, J., Herring, A. et al. Variability and predictors of changes in water use during pregnancy. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 19, 593–602 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2008.59
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2008.59
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Estimating drinking-water ingestion and dermal contact with water in a French population of pregnant women: the EDDS cohort study
Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology (2015)
-
The relationship between water intake and foetal growth and preterm delivery in a prospective cohort study
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (2010)