Surfactants are characterized by physical properties such as dispersibility, emulsifiability, permeability, wettability and bubble-forming capability. These molecules have both hydrophilic and hydrophobic moieties in their structures that can accumulate at interfaces, reduce surface and interfacial tensions, and form aggregate structures such as micelles, which consist of external hydrophilic moieties and internal hydrophobic moieties.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Chemical surfactants are currently used in various industrial fields including electronics, construction, mechanics, printing, papers and fibers.

Biosurfactant is a comprehensive term including all kinds of organism-derived surfactant materials, although it generally refers to a surfactant material synthesized by a microorganism. Biosurfactants produced in vivo or in vitro by microorganisms, such as yeasts, fungi or bacteria, are more eco-friendly than chemical surfactants in that they are non-toxic and biodegradable.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Although biosurfactants have complex chemical structures that are difficult to synthesize according to the conventional methods, these compounds are useful and can be used for specific purposes. Furthermore, biosurfactants have nearly the same effects as conventional chemical surfactants with regards to physical and chemical properties including surface tension reduction and temperature/pH stabilization.3, 4, 5, 6 Thus, like chemical surfactants, biosurfactants have wide applications in various industrial fields such as medicine, foods, cosmetics, cleaning materials, secondary oil recovery and the bioremediation of oil-contaminated land and seawater.4, 5

Aureobasidium pullulans is a ubiquitous yeast reportedly found in various locations. Research on A. pullulans has described (poly) malic acid,7 lipase,8 laccase,9 mannitol oils,10 biocontrol,11 lipid composition12 and siderophores.13 A. pullulans strains also reportedly produce biosurfactants of heavy oils.14 In a previous study, we reported the isolation of a novel biosurfactant, glycerol-liamocin, from the culture broth of Aureobasidium pullulans L3-GPY.15 Further study on the fermentation of this strain using a high glycerol content, led to the isolation of two new biosurfactants, aureosurfactin and 3-deoxyaureosurfactin (Figure 1), from its culture supernatant. In this study, we describe the isolation and structure determination of these compounds, as well as their biosurfactant abilities.

Figure 1
figure 1

Structures of aureosurfactin and 3-deoxyaureosurfactin.

For seed culture of A. pullulans L3-GPY, an inoculant was prepared by cultivating the producing organism for 48 h at 25 °C in a 50-l jar fermentor (KoBiotech, Icheon, Korea) with 25 l of the GPY broth medium containing 0.5% peptone, 0.5% yeast extract and 4% glycerol as a carbon source. The fermentation was aerobically carried out in a 300-l jar fermentor (KoBiotech) for 136 h at 25 °C with 200 l of the medium consisting of 0.5% peptone, 0.5% yeast extract and 4% glycerol as a carbon source.

The harvested culture broth was centrifuged twice at 15 000 r.p.m. to obtain the supernatant. The culture supernatant was freeze-dried, dissolved in water and then filtered with gauze to eliminate insoluble debris. The filtrate was partitioned twice between ethyl acetate and water. The ethyl acetate-soluble portion was concentrated under reduced pressure and subjected to a flash silica gel column chromatography eluted with chloroform: methanol (CHCl3: MeOH=50: 1→2: 1, v/v, stepwise). An active fraction (CHCl3: MeOH=50: 1 fraction) showing strong desired activities was concentrated and subjected to flash reversed-phase octadecylsilane (ODS) column chromatography eluted with 60, 70, 80 and 90% aqueous methanol to provide two active fractions, Fr. 1 (80% aqueous methanol eluate) and Fr. 2 (90% aqueous methanol eluate). First, fraction 1 was concentrated under reduced pressure and subjected to silica gel column chromatography eluted with chloroform: methanol (100: 1→5: 1, v/v, stepwise). Active fractions were then combined and concentrated under reduced pressure. The concentrate was chromatographed on a Sephadex LH-20 (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden) column eluted with 70% aqueous methanol, followed by a Sep-pak C18 cartridge (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) eluted with 50, 60 and 70% aqueous methanol stepwise. Finally, aureosurfactin was purified by preparative silica gel TLC developed with hexane: ethyl acetate (1:1, v/v). 3-Deoxyaureosurfactin was purified from active fraction 2, which was concentrated under reduced pressure and chromatographed on a column of silica gel eluted with chloroform: methanol (30:1→5:1, v/v, stepwise). Active fractions were combined, concentrated and subjected to a Sephadex LH-20 column chromatography eluted with methanol, followed by silica gel column chromatography eluted with hexane: ethyl acetate (20: 1→1:1, v/v, stepwise). An active eluate was concentrated and chromatographed on a ODS Sepak cartridge eluted with 50, 60 and 70% aqueous methanol, followed by preparative silica gel TLC developed with chloroform: methanol (15:1, v/v) to afford 3-deoxyaureosurfactin.

Aureosurfactin was obtained as a colorless oil. The MW of the compound was determined to be 404 by the ESI-mass measurement, which provided a quasi-molecular ion peak at m/z 427 [M+Na]+ in positive mode, and the molecular formula was established as C21H40O7 by high-resolution FAB-mass measurement (m/z 427.2671 [M+Na]+, Δ−0.1 m.m.u.) in combination with 1H and 13C NMR data. This molecular formula requires two degrees of unsaturation. The 1H NMR spectrum measured in CDCl3 showed signals due to four oxygenated methines at δ 5.05, 4.23, 4.08 and 3.81, one methoxy at δ 3.66, 12 methylenes at δ 2.47/2.41, 2.42, 1.80/1.62, 1.53 (× 2), 1.43/1.37, 1.37/1.26, 1.26/1.24 and 1.25 (× 4), and two methyls at δ 0.84 (Table 1). In the 13C NMR spectrum, 21 carbons were evident and assigned as two ester carbonyl carbons at δ 172.8 and 172.1, four oxygenated methine carbons at δ 72.7, 72.1, 69.5 and 66.2, one methoxyl carbon at δ 51.8, 12 methylene carbons at δ 42.7, 42.3, 41.3, 40.7, 37.7, 34.4, 31.7, 31.5, 25.0, 24.7, 22.5 and 22.4, and two methyl carbons at δ 14.0 and 13.9. All proton-bearing carbons were established by the HMQC spectrum and four partial structures, –CH2–CH(–O)–CH2–CH(–O)–CH2–, –CH2–CH(–O)–CH2–CH(–O)–CH2–, CH3–CH2– and CH3–CH2–, were determined by the 1H–1H COSY spectrum. The chemical structure was determined by the HMBC spectrum, which showed long-range correlations from the methylene protons at δ 2.47/2.41 (C-2) and the methoxy protons at δ 3.66 to the carbonyl carbon at δ 172.8 (C-1), revealing that the methoxy group was attached to C-1. The methyl protons at δ 0.84 and the methylene protons at δ 1.53 exhibited long-range correlations to the methylene carbons at δ 31.5 (C-8), suggesting the 3,5-dihydroxydecanoyl methyl ester. Another 3,5-dihydroxydecanoyl moiety was established due to long-range correlations from the methylene protons at δ 2.42 (C-2′) to the carbonyl carbon at δ 172.1 (C-1′) and from the methyl protons at δ 0.84 and the methylene protons at δ 1.43/1.37 to the methylene carbon at δ 31.7 (C-8′). Two 3,5-dihydroxydecanoyl moieties were connected by long-range correlation from the methine proton at δ 5.05 (C-5) to the carbonyl carbon at δ 172.1 (C-1′). Thus, the structure of aureosurfactin was determined as shown in Figure 2.

Table 1 1H and 13C NMR spectral data of aureosurfactin and 3-deoxyaureosurfactin in CDCl3a
Figure 2
figure 2

HMBC correlations of aureosurfactin.

3-Deoxyaureosurfactin was obtained as a colorless oil. Its MW was determined to be 388 by ESI-mass measurement, which provided a quasi-molecular ion peak at m/z 411 [M+Na]+ in positive mode. The molecular formula was established as C21H40O6 by high-resolution FAB-mass measurement (m/z 411.2736 [M+Na]+, Δ+1.4 m.m.u.) in combination with 1H and 13C NMR data. The 1H NMR spectrum in CDCl3 showed signals due to three oxygenated methines at δ 4.93, 4.28 and 3.88, one methoxyl at δ 3.69, 13 methylenes at δ 2.48, 2.32, 1.64/1.59, 1.57, 1.53, 1.50/1.42, 1.45, 1.30 (× 2) and 1.29 (× 4), and two methyls at δ 0.89 and 0.88 (Table 1). In the 13C NMR spectrum, 21 carbons, including two ester carbonyl carbons at δ 173.8 and 172.4, three oxygenated methine carbons at δ 74.3, 72.2 and 69.2, one methoxy carbon at δ 51.6, 13 methylene carbons at δ 42.3, 41.9, 37.8, 33.6, 33.9, 33.3, 31.8, 31.6, 25.1, 25.0, 22.6, 22.5 and 20.5, and two methyl carbons at δ 14.0, were evident. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were very similar to those of aureosurfactin, except that an oxygenated methine in aureosurfactin was replaced by a methylene in 3-deoxyaureosurfactin. All proton-bearing carbons were established by the HMQC spectrum and the 1H–1H COSY spectrum revealed four partial structures, –CH2–CH2–CH2–CH(–O)–CH2–, –CH2–CH(–O)–CH2–CH(–O)–CH2–, CH3–CH2– and CH3–CH2–, revealing that C-3 was reduced. The HMBC spectrum established two partial units, 5-hydroxydecanoate methyl ester and 3,5-dihydroxydecanoate. Finally, the structure of 3-deoxyaureosurfactin was determined by the long-range correlation from the methine proton at δ 4.93 (C-5) to the carbonyl carbon at δ 172.4 (C-1′). The relative stereochemistries of these compounds were deduced from related compounds, namely exophilin and halymecins.16, 17 The 13C NMR peaks were in good agreement with these known compounds and 3R,5R-dihydroxydecanoic acid. Thus, the relative stereochemistry of these compounds was deduced, as shown in Figure 2. However, absolute stereochemistry remains to be investigated.

Surfactant activity was determined by dissolving a compound in water, loading 20 μl of the resulting solution on Parafilm, and measuring the degree of spreading (Figure 3).18 The degree of spreading of a compound was represented by diameter. An equal amount of distilled water was used as a control. Surface tension variation of the purified surfactant solutions was determined using a Du Noüy ring tensiometer (Sigma Model 700 instrument, KSV Instruments Ltd, Helsinki, Finland) that is submersed in a liquid. As the ring is pulled out of the liquid, the force required is precisely measured to determine the surface tension of the liquid.19 Aureosurfactin and 3-deoxyaureosurfactin showed surface tension activities of 29.5 and 36.4 dyne cm−1, respectively, at 1.0 mg l−1. These activities were comparable to known biosurfactants, rhamnolipid, surfactin and sophorolipid.1 Due to the active components of A. pullulans L3-GPY culture broth, specifically aureosurfactin and 3-deoxyaureosurfactin, the findings presented herein suggest the usefulness of this material as a biosurfactant.

Figure 3
figure 3

Surface tension abilities of aureosurfactin and 3-deoxyaureosurfactin in aqueous solution dropped on hydrophobic film. 1 water; 2 aureosurfactin; 3 3-deoxyaureosurfactin.