Abstract
We used a combination of field and laboratory approaches to address how the bioturbation activity of two crustaceans, the ghost shrimp Neotrypaea californiensis and the fiddler crab Uca crenulata, affects the microbial diversity in the seabed of a coastal lagoon (Catalina Harbor, Santa Catalina Island, CA, USA). Detailed geochemical analyses, including oxygen microsensor measurements, were performed to characterize environmental parameters. We used a whole-assemblage fingerprinting approach (ARISA: amplified ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis) to compare bacterial diversity along geochemical gradients and in relation to subsurface microniches. The two crustaceans have different burrowing behaviors. The ghost shrimp maintains complex, deep-reaching burrows and permanently lives subterranean, supplying its burrow with oxygen-rich water. In contrast, the fiddler crab constructs simpler, J-shaped burrows, which it does not inhabit permanently and does not actively ventilate. Our goal was to address how varying environmental parameters affect benthic microbial communities. An important question in benthic microbial ecology has been whether burrows support similar or unique communities compared with the sediment surface. Our results showed that sediment surface microbial communities are distinct from subsurface assemblages and that different burrow types support diverse bacterial taxa. Statistical comparisons by canonical correspondence analysis indicated that the availability of oxidants (oxygen, nitrate, ferric iron) play a key role in determining the presence and abundance of different taxa. When geochemical parameters were alike, microbial communities associated with burrows showed significant similarity to sediment surface communities. Our study provides implications on the community structure of microbial communities in marine sediments and the factors controlling their distribution.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The burrowing, ventilation and foraging activity of benthic macrofauna organisms affects key ecosystem processes of marine sediments, including organic matter remineralization, nutrient cycling, biogeochemical interactions and benthic–pelagic fluxes (Rhoads, 1974; Aller, 1982, 1988, 1994; Kristensen et al., 1991, 2000; Gilbert et al., 1998, 2003; Banta et al., 1999). Microbial abundances and activities have been shown to increase due to the complex biogeochemical interactions induced by bioturbation activity (Hansen and Kristensen, 1998; Lohrer et al., 2004; Kogure and Wada, 2005). The construction of burrows increases the sediment–water interface, offering additional surfaces for microbial colonization and chemical reactions (Aller and Aller, 1986; Meyers et al., 1987; Reichardt, 1989; Grossman and Reichardt, 1991; Marinelli et al., 2002). The transport of particles (bioturbation) and the flushing of burrows (bioirrigation) create 3-dimensional geochemical zonation patterns with substantial changes of redox-conditions and the formation of temporally and spatially dynamic microenvironments. Oxidized microhabitats often occur next to reduced sediment compartments thus allowing a tighter coupling of redox reactions (for example, nitrification—denitrification) (Mayer et al., 1995; Pelegrà and Blackburn, 1996; Tuominen et al., 1999; Svensson et al., 2001; Dollhoph et al., 2005). The flushing of burrows with oxygen-rich water by a deep-burrowing thalassinidean shrimp has been shown to transport oxygen as deep as 80 cm into the sediment (Ziebis et al., 1996a), whereas penetration depth of oxygen by molecular diffusion is typically only a few mm in coastal sediments (Revsbech et al., 1980; Glud et al., 1994). Only a thin film of surface sediment is generally oxic, containing molecular oxygen and allowing aerobic respiration. Below this zone the sediment is anoxic. The oxidized zone, characterized by a positive redox potential and the availability of other electron acceptors (for example, nitrate, ferrous iron), can extend deeper into the sediment.
One of the key questions in benthic microbial ecology is whether similar environmental conditions support the same microbial communities. One hypothesis is that the microbial assemblages in the oxic and oxidized zones surrounding the burrows are equivalent to communities in surface sediments. In contrast, it has been suggested that burrow walls support unique microbial communities that differ considerably from those found at the surface (Kristensen and Kostka, 2005; Papaspyrou et al., 2005, 2006). The question remains how microbial communities within burrows compare to the ambient sediment and to the sediment surface.
There are very few studies that have addressed the impact of habitat heterogeneity on microbial diversity in sediments (Hewson et al., 2007), mainly because it remains a challenge to quantify the large number of abiotic and biotic factors that shape the microbial habitat on different spatial and temporal scales. The majority of marine studies on microbial diversity have been performed in the water column (Hewson and Fuhrman, 2004; Hannig et al., 2006; Pommier et al., 2007; Fuhrman et al., 2008), with a focus on whether bacteria exhibit biogeographical patterns. However, the processes that govern these microbial distribution patterns in the field are still poorly understood (Suzuki and DeLong, 2002; Castro-Gonzalez et al., 2005; Fuhrman et al., 2008). Sediment systems harbor even higher abundances and a greater diversity of microorganisms (for example, Curtis et al., 2002; Torsvik et al., 2002), yet they remain sadly understudied (Jørgensen and Boetius, 2007). The correlation between habitat complexity and microbial diversity remains to be determined (Fierer, 2008). Bioturbated sediments provide ideal opportunities to compare microbial communities in relation to environmental parameters.
Fiddler crabs and ghost shrimp are among the most abundant bioturbating macrofauna in coastal areas all over the world. Their burrows have been acknowledged as important conduits for chemical exchange between the water column and the sediment, linking the activity of these crustaceans to nutrient recycling, organic matter degradation and primary productivity (for example, Kostka et al., 2002; Papaspyrou et al., 2005). In this study, we examined the impact of the bioturbation activity of the ghost shrimp Neotrypaea californiensis and the fiddler crab Uca crenulata on microbial community compositions in the sediment.
Methods
Study site
The investigations were carried out in a shallow lagoon located in Catalina Harbor, Catalina Island, CA, USA (33° 25.23′ N, 118° 19.42′ W) about 35 km southwest of Los Angeles, USA (Figure 1). The head of Catalina Harbor is a shallow (<2 m), low energy area of fine-grained sand, surrounded by beach and a gentle plain. Below the low-water mark, the sediments become more silty. The average tidal range is 1.1 m and tides are mixed, with the higher high water preceding the lower low water (Colbert et al., 2008a, 2008b).
Over the course of the experiment (June–August 2005), water temperature was typically 18 °C and salinity was 34.5‰. The two most abundant burrowing macrofauna were the Mexican fiddler crab Uca crenulata, Lockington, 1877 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Ocypodoidea) and the bay ghost shrimp Neotrypaea californiensis, Dana, 1854 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Thalassinidea), earlier known as Callianassa californiensis (Manning and Felder, 1991). Both species are typical inhabitants of intertidal areas along the west coast of North America and occur in high abundances of greater than 200 individuals m−2. They are representatives of two species-rich superfamilies, Ocypodoidea (Rafinesque, 1815) and Thalassinoidea (Latreille, 1831) (Martin and Davis, 2001), which occur worldwide with ∼100 (Bisby et al., 2007) and more than 500 known taxa (Dworschak, 2000), respectively.
Ghost shrimp (Thalassinidean) have increasingly attracted attention in benthic ecology because of their significant burrow architectures and their influence on biogeochemical processes and microbial communities (Aller and Dodge, 1974; Waslenchuk et al., 1983; Forster and Graf, 1992, 1995; Ziebis et al., 1996a, 1996b; Huettel et al., 1998; Kinoshita et al., 2003). Their burrows usually consist of a conspicuous upper Y or U-shape structure, which allows for easy flushing with overlying water. Burrows continue vertically into the sediment and often exhibit several galleries of interconnected chambers at distinct sediment depths (for example, Ziebis et al., 1996a). The deepest burrows reported to date reached 3 m (Pemberton et al., 1976). Most known species remain subsurface their entire life and maintain semi-permanent burrows that are constantly reworked. N. californiensis inhabits intertidal areas stretching from Alaska to Baja California. Its burrow architecture is complex, extending down to ∼76 cm with several branches with openings to the surface (MacGinitie, 1934; Brenchley, 1981; Swinbanks and Murray, 1981).
Fiddler crabs have a distinctively different burrowing behavior. They maintain simple J-shaped burrows, which usually have a single entrance and continue into the sediment at a 45° angle down to a depth of ∼20 cm, ending in a terminal chamber. They leave their burrows frequently during low tide to forage on algae, bacteria and detritus on the sediment surface (Zeil et al., 2006). U. crenulata is found along the west coast of North America from Santa Barbara, California to Central Mexico. Although these two burrowing crustaceans inhabit the same area, the difference in behavior, burrow construction and foraging has most likely a vastly different ecological impact and effect on benthic microbial communities.
At our study site, shrimp burrows reached an average depth of ∼20 cm, which seemed to be limited by a cohesive sediment layer found at that depth within the lagoon. Shrimp burrows consisted of several branches with three to four openings to the surface. Pumping activity of the permanently subterranean shrimp could be observed in the field by sediment ejections from the burrow openings. Crab burrows extended to a maximum of 10 cm depth and consisted of a single J-shaped tube. Fiddler crabs were often seen at the sediment surface or sitting at their burrow opening.
Sampling
A total of six sampling sites were chosen at 2-m intervals along a transect perpendicular to the shoreline, starting at the water's edge (0 m) and continuing to a distance of 10 m. Sites were named according to their distance from shore (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 m). An additional location in the same area (2 m parallel to the transect), but with no apparent macrofauna bioturbation activity served as a control site (non-bioturbated zone). Except for the 0 m site there was a visible photosynthetic mat at the sediment surface. The bioturbation intensity at each site was determined by counting the number of burrows within a 25 × 25 cm frame (10 replicates per distance). Four sediment cores were collected closely together at each of the 6 sites and at the control site for geochemical and microbiological analyses, using acrylic core liners (ø 5.4 cm, length 30 cm).
Microsensor profiling
Oxygen concentrations and penetration depths were determined during high and low tide conditions at the control, the 4 m and 10 m sites. In situ profiling was performed during low tide using a small benthic lander, to which modified micromanipulators were attached. Microsensors were connected to battery-powered picoammeters and signals were recorded directly on a laptop computer. During high tide sediment cores were collected and microprofiles were measured in intact sediment cores directly after retrieval. Microprofiles of oxygen were measured in vertical intervals of 250 μm using Clark-type amperometric oxygen sensors (Revsbech and Jørgensen, 1986; Revsbech, 1989; Unisense, Aarhus, Denmark). Microprofiles of sulfide with amperometic microelectrodes (Jeroschewsky et al., 1996) were also performed to a depth of 5 cm, yet no sulfide was detected and the measurements are not further discussed. Profiles of redox potential using microsensors were performed in 250-μm steps in cores containing burrows. For all measurements sensors were attached to motorized micromanipulators (Märzhäuser, Wetzlar, Germany), and driven vertically into the sediment in μm to mm steps, controlled by a computer. Signals were amplified and transformed to millivolt (mV) by a 2-channel picoammeter (PA 2000) (Unisense), and directly recorded on a computer using the software Profix (Unisense). Redox-potential sensors were connected to portable or table-top pH/mV meter (WTW-pH340, WTW GmbH, Weilheim, Germany; pH-m210 Meter Lab, Radiometer Analytical, Lyon, France). Oxygen measurements were also performed directly inside burrows by positioning the tip of the electrode inside a burrow and recording the change in oxygen concentration over time. Narrow aquaria were set up to observe the burrowing behavior and to perform detailed measurements in and around burrows. Two narrow aquaria (dimensions: 40 × 30 × 3 cm) were filled with sieved sediment (500 μm) from the study site. The first aquarium served as a control and did not contain a ghost shrimp, whereas to the second aquarium one adult shrimp was added. The aquaria were kept in the laboratory under running seawater and a simulated natural light cycle for 6 weeks. At this time the shrimp had established a burrow system and oxygen profiles were measured in vertical profiles (250 μm depth increments) in 2 cm horizontal intervals along the width of both aquaria. Fiddler crabs were also kept in aquaria. After they had established a simple burrow, they usually stayed at the surface or at the entrance of their burrows. Oxygen profiles measured in and around crab burrows revealed no oxygen transport into the burrows.
Geochemical and microbiological analyses
All four cores were sliced in 1-cm intervals under nitrogen atmosphere and each section was subsampled for further processing. All subsamples for one site (pore water and sediment) were taken from the exact same core. A second core was taken as a back up. Small samples of sediment (0.5 cm3) were frozen at −20 °C for the analyses of iron, a second subsample (0.5 cm3) was immediately frozen at −80 °C for molecular biological studies. Exactly one cm3 of sediment was fixed in 9 ml of filter sterilized (0.2 μm) formaldehyde/seawater solution (4% v/v) for the enumeration of microorganisms. Pore-water was collected using a pore-water press (KC Denmark, Silkeborg, Denmark) and samples (3 ml) for ammonium and nitrate analyses were frozen immediately. The remainder of the sediment section was used for the determination of porosity and organic content (Loss on ignition, LOI). Two sediment cores were taken directly targeting burrows of U. crenulata and N. californiensis for direct sampling of burrow linings for microbiological analyses.
Porosity was determined by drying a known volume of sediment at 65 °C for 24 h. The loss on ignition (LOI) was determined after combusting samples at 450 °C for 24 h. Ferric and ferrous iron concentrations in sediment samples were analyzed following procedures described by Lovley and Philips (1987), with modifications described by Kostka and Luther III (1994) and Thamdrup et al. (1994). This extraction procedure allows for the quantification of microbially reducible ferric iron in aquatic sediments (Lovley and Philips, 1987). Pore-water ammonium concentrations were determined by flow injection analysis modified for small sample volumes (100 μl sample) (Hall and Aller, 1992). The sum of nitrate and nitrite was determined spectrophotometrically after reduction of samples with spongy cadmium (Jones, 1984). The procedure was modified for the analyses of small sample volumes (0.5–1 ml). The small sample sizes allowed relatively high spatial resolution of the analyses.
Microbial abundances in the sediment were determined by direct counts of stained cells (acridine orange) using epifluorescence microscopy following the enumeration protocol by Epstein and Rossel (1995). For comparing microbial community structures the PCR-based whole-community fingerprinting approach ARISA (amplified ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis) (Fisher and Triplett, 1999; Hewson and Fuhrman, 2004; Brown et al., 2005) was applied. ARISA amplifies the intergenic spacers between the 16S and 23S rRNA genes using a fluorescent primer. Results are displayed as the amount of different PCR products of specific fragment length, which correspond to ‘operational taxonomic units’ (OTUs) (Brown and Fuhrman, 2005). DNA was extracted from 100 mg of sediment using the Qbiogene (Bio101) Soil DNA kit (Qbiogene Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA). Extracted DNA was quantified using PICO Green fluorescence (Molecular Probes Inc., Eugene, OR, USA) and diluted to 10 ng cm−3. PCR was performed using the universal primer 16S-1392F (5′-G[C/T]ACACACCGCCCGT-3′) and the bacterial primer 23S-125R labeled with a 5′ TET (5′-GGGTT[C/G/T]CCCCATTC[A/G]G-3′). The 50-μl PCR combined 200 nM of each primer with 1 × PCR buffer, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 250 μM of each deoxynucleotide, 2.5 units of Taq polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and 40 nM BSA (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA, catalog no. A-7030). Thermocycling consisted of a 5-min heating step at 94 °C, followed by 30 cycles of denaturing at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 56 °C for 30 s and extending at 72 °C for 45 s, and finished with a 10-min extension step at 72 °C. The products were purified using a Clean & Concentrator kit (Zymo Research Corp., Orange, CA, USA), quantified using PICO Green fluorescence and duplicates of 10 ng of purified products from each sample were run on an ABI 377XL automated slab gel sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Results were analyzed using the ABI Peak Scanner software where each peak displayed in an electropherogram represented one OTU and the peak area represented the amount of the OTU present. Peak Scanner outputs were transferred to Microsoft Excel (Seattle, WA, USA) spreadsheets for subsequent analysis and binning as described by Hewson and Fuhrman (2006). The program Primer6 (PRIMER-E Ltd, Lutton, UK) was used to further analyze the data sets and to perform a cluster analysis comparing the similarity (Bray-Curtis) of microbial communities found at different locations. Prior to clustering, OTU data was logarithmically transformed (log (x+1)) to achieve a normal distribution. PC-ORD (MJM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR, USA) was used to perform a canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) to determine the relationships between microbial communities and environmental parameters (ter Braak, 1986, 1995; Cetinic et al., 2006).
Results
Bioturbation activity
Based on the average number of burrow openings m−2, bioturbation intensity increased with distance from the shoreline (R2=0.9478, P<0.001) to a total of 870 burrow openings m−2 at 10 m distance (Figure 2a). We distinguished three general areas of varying bioturbation intensity: 1. Low bioturbation, corresponding to ∼100 burrow openings m−2 at 0 m distance, 2. Moderate bioturbation, corresponding to a number between 260 and 400 burrow openings m−2 at the 2 m and 4 m sites and 3. High bioturbation, reaching 560–870 burrow openings m−2 at the 6 m, 8 m and 10 m sites. U. crenulata burrows remained constant with distance from shore (∼170 burrow openings m−2) except for the shoreline where only ∼42 burrow openings m−2 were counted. In contrast, the abundance of N. californiensis burrows increased linearly with distance from 60 burrows m−2 at the 0 m site to 640 burrows m−2 at the distance of 10 m (Figure 2a). Using a simple calculation, based on the average number of burrows for each species and the mean dimensions of the burrows (crab burrow: ∼10 cm deep, ø 2.5 cm, shrimp burrow: ∼20 cm deep, ø 1 cm) this leads to an increase of the sediment–water interface by ∼600%. The tidal range and dry exposure of the near shore sites might be an explanation for the increase of bioturbation intensity.
Organic content and porosity
LOI (in % dry weight) varied little (0.84–2.8%) with depth or along the transect, except for the 8 and 10 m sites, where in the top 2 cm values reached 17.5% of the dry weight (Figure 2b). The photosynthetic mat at the sediment surface appeared to be thicker in this region, possibly contributing to a higher organic content. At the other sites, LOI was slightly higher in the top 2 cm (2.8%) than deeper in the sediment. Porosity was highest at the sediment surface (0.3–0.55) at all sites except for the control site where porosity stayed constant (0.2) throughout the sediment column (Figure 2c). Porosity decreased below the surface and stayed at values between 0.22 and 0.25.
Geochemical zonation
Microsensor studies
During both high and low tide conditions, oxygen penetration into the sediment increased from the non bioturbated zone at the 0 m site (∼1 mm) to deepest oxygen penetration (>6 mm) within the area of high bioturbation (10 m distance) (Figures 3a, b). Oxygen concentrations and penetration depths were slightly higher during low tide, decreased rapidly within the first mm at all sites but stayed at elevated concentrations deeper into the sediment at the bioturbated sites. During high tide the oxygen profile measured at the 10 m site showed subsurface maxima indicating oxygen transport deeper into the sediment probably within burrows. Detailed oxygen measurements in narrow aquaria (Figures 3c and d) showed deepest oxygen penetration to a depth of 3–4 mm in the sediment without shrimp (Figure 3c). The contour lines describe the heterogeneity of the sediment surface and show photosynthetic activity at the sediment–water interface with highest oxygen concentrations at the interface. In the second narrow aquarium deeper oxygen transport was documented within burrows and across burrow walls (Figure 3d, 25 cm width) creating radial gradients of oxygen concentration to a distance of ∼2 mm. Vertical oxygen profiles measured directly within a burrow opening of the ghost shrimp N. califoniensis compared with the sediment 5 cm away from the burrow (Figure 4a) illustrated also deep penetration (>2 cm) of oxygen-rich water within the burrow compared with oxygen penetration into the sediment by molecular diffusion (3 mm). Oxygen concentrations measured at a depth of 3 cm inside the burrow over a period of 35 min (Figure 4b) illustrated that oxygen concentrations were maintained at constant high levels (150–250 μM). These measurements were repeated for several burrows showing the similar pumping activity. Vertical profiles of redox-potential (mV) measurements, depicted as a contour plot (Figure 4c), showed an oxidized zone (positive redox-potential) of ∼2 cm surrounding a burrow. Similar measurements were performed on fiddler crab burrows, yet we were not able to document or measure an intrusion of oxygen-rich water into the crab burrow. No dissolved sulfide was detected in any of the field or laboratory measurements, despite the fact that sulfate reduction has been previously measured (unpublished data) in the exact same area. One explanation might be a precipitation of dissolved sulfide as iron sulfide.
Distribution of redox species
The distributions of the redox couples ferric/ferrous iron and nitrate/ammonium are illustrated as contour plots along the transect (Figures 5a–d). The profiles measured at the control site are not included in the contour plots. Here, the oxidized form of iron (Fe III) was only present in the top 2 cm, whereas reduced iron (Fe II) increased with depth to concentrations of 1200 μM cm−3 wet sediment. Similarly, nitrate was only present just below the sediment surface (20 μM), whereas ammonium showed a typical increase with depth starting at 7 μM at 1 cm sediment depth and increased to 110 μM at 10 cm sediment depth. In contrast, a comparison of oxidized and reduced species of iron and nitrogen along the transect showed a patchy distribution reflecting the presence of burrows and bio-irrigation activity. The distribution of ferric iron at the 0–4 m sites was similar to the control site, with high concentrations occurring in the top 2 cm (Figure 5a). With increasing distance (6, 8 and 10 m) and increasing bioturbation activity, this sharp surface peak disappears and ferric iron is present in fairly high concentrations also at greater depths. A deeper reaching zone of oxidized iron is especially apparent at the 6 m site. In a similar pattern the subsurface (2–3 cm) peak in ferrous iron concentration, which is still evident at the 0–2 m sites, disappeared along the transect. The subsurface decrease in ferrous iron at the 6–10 m sites seemed to mirror the zones with an increase in ferric iron. Similarly a decrease of ammonium at the 6–8 m sites was reflected in an increase of subsurface nitrate concentrations, especially at 6 m distance. Oxidation effects are primarily evident at the 6–10 m sites, which were characterized by dense populations of mainly ghost shrimp (Figure 2a).
Microbiology
Cell counts
Cell numbers were comparably low at the control site (Figure 6a) and remained rather constant (1.5 × 109 cells cm−3 sediment) throughout the 10 cm. In contrast, microbial abundances were up to a magnitude higher in the bioturbated areas (Figures 6b and c), reaching highest values at 10 m distance (20 × 109 cells cm−3 sediment). At the 0–4 m sites the depth profiles of cell showed highest values toward the sediment surface and a decrease with depth. At the 6 m–10 m sites cell numbers were generally highest at the surface and decreased rapidly to a depth of 5 cm, except for the 6 m site, where cell numbers were highest at 3 cm depth. Abundances remained more or less constant below 5 cm depth at values higher than at the control site (3–5 × 109 cells cm−3 sediment).
Clustering and similarity analysis of community fingerprints
Statistical analyses based on a Bray-Curtis similarity comparison of bacterial-community fingerprints as measured by ARISA in 1 cm, 2 cm and 8 cm sediment depths at all sites along the transect, showed a very distinct cluster of all surface microbial communities (Figure 7a). This cluster was distinct from the communities found at 2 cm and 8 cm, which showed a similarity of 40–65% to one another. A separate cluster for communities found at 2 cm and 8 cm depth showed a high similarity (>80%) between both depths. Highest similarity was found between samples collected in the bioturbated areas 2–10 m distance, whereas the communities at 0 m were less similar.
A comparison of the microbial communities sampled directly at the burrow walls of the two species U. crenulata and N. californiensis at the three depths (1 cm, 2 cm and 8 cm) showed separate clusters for the two burrow systems with less than 30% similarity between them (Figure 7b). The communities which formed at all three depths at the wall of the mud shrimp burrow showed highest similarity to the surface communities (Figure 8). In contrast, the communities in the crab burrow at all depths were more closely related to deeper sediment communities, although the communities at 1 cm and 2 cm depth appear to form a separate cluster.
A CCA biplot was used to compare the community fingerprinting data with environmental parameters. The CCA technique creates an ordination diagram where axes are created by a linear combination of environmental variables (ter Braak, 1986, 1995). The eigenvalue for each axis generated by CCA indicates how much of the variation seen in species data can be explained by that axis. In this case, Axis 1 explained 34.3% of the variance in species data (eigenvalue=0.473) and Axis 3 explained 4.9% of the variance (eigenvalue=0.067). Although Axis 2 explained 11.4% of the variance the P-value was >0.05 and so was not displayed. The right side of the ordination diagram is predominately occupied by surface samples with the exception of two samples taken at 2 cm depth at the 6 and 10 m sites. Whereas on the left side of the plot all remaining samples from depths 2 and 8 cm were located. Therefore, the CCA biplot supported the distinction between communities from the surface sediment and deeper sediment layers (Figure 9). The length of an environmental line (ferric iron, ferrous iron, nitrate, ammonium) represents the extent of species distributions change along that environmental variable. The orientation of the line represents the gradient of the environmental variable. The closer an environmental arrow is to an axis, the stronger is the correlation between that variable and the axis. There was a strong positive correlation of Fe (III) with Axis 1 (r=0.899), where the majority of surface samples were found. The plot also indicated a strong negative correlation of Fe (II) and ammonium with Axis 1 (r=−0.764 and r=−0.580, respectively) into the direction of the deeper samples. Nitrate correlated strongest with Axis 3 but also had a stronger correlation with Axis 1 (r=0.292) than all other environmental variables, which might be an indication that different environmental parameters contribute to the effect of nitrate on local microbial communities.
Discussion
Bioturbation activity and microbial communities
Despite the regional and global importance of macrofauna sediment reworking, reasonable estimates of bioturbation exist only for a limited set of conditions and regions of the World (Henderson et al., 1999; Teal et al., 2008). Although it has been known that burrowing organisms affect sediment biogeochemistry, the interactions are often complex and detailed investigations on the effect of geochemical microzonations on microbial diversity are scarce (Kostka et al., 2002; Lucas et al., 2003; Matsui et al., 2004; Papaspyrou et al., 2006). This is not surprising because studies on microbial diversity in marine sediments have also only just begun (Mußmann et al., 2005; Wilms et al., 2006; Wu et al., 2008). The impact of bioturbation is species-specific and activity dependent (for example, Pelegrà and Blackburn, 1996; Christensen et al., 2000; Marinelli et al., 2002; Solan and Kennedy, 2002; Mermillod-Blondin et al., 2004), therefore microbial communities associated with specific burrow structures most likely also show variability.
Our observations demonstrate that the two species of sediment dwelling crustaceans in the shallow lagoon of Catalina Harbor exhibit different bioturbation activities, which in turn have contrasting effects on the subsurface microbial communities associated with the burrows. Although the ghost shrimp lives permanently subterranean, is constantly reworking its burrow and flushing it, to maintain a certain oxygen level within the burrow; the fiddler crab builds a simple burrow in which it resides only occasionally and does not actively ventilate it. Oxygen transport into the shrimp burrow as well as into the surrounding sediment led to oxidation effects, which were documented also in the field studies by a decrease of reduced compounds and extension of oxidized conditions deeper into the sediment (Figure 5).
A key question in benthic microbial ecology has been whether distinct microhabitats harbor distinct microbial assemblages. This issue has been much discussed in microbial ecology and in the emerging field of microbial biogeography. Do habitats with similar environmental conditions promote similar microbial communities? It has been suggested (Kristensen and Kostka, 2005), that even if geochemical conditions in burrows are equivalent to the sediment surface, the microbial communities in and around burrow walls are most likely unique. This hypothesis has been explained by the great temporal variability of environmental conditions inside the burrows, but a greater physical stability of the burrow itself compared with a frequently disturbed sediment surface.
On the basis of our investigations, we suggest that the geochemical conditions at and around the burrow walls of N. californiensis burrows were very similar to the sediment surface (Figures 3d and 4c). Our community fingerprinting results (Figure 8) indicate that the oxic and oxidized zones associated with the shrimp burrow support microbial communities that are very similar to those found in the top 1 cm of the sediment (similarity of ∼55–70%). At all sample depths (1 cm, 2 cm and 8 cm) inside the burrows, the ARISA fingerprints clustered within the surface communities found at all sites and are very different from communities deeper in the sediment.
In contrast to the constantly bio-irrigating ghost shrimp, fiddler crabs may be called ‘temporary’ bioturbators. They establish a burrow but do not live below the surface. In the field, they are most often seen at the sediment surface or guarding the entrance of their burrow and do not seem to spend long periods within the burrows. We were not successful in measuring oxygen in any of the crab burrows and assume that they are not actively ventilating their burrows. The communities found within the crab burrows differed from the ones in the shrimp burrows (Figure 7b), showing more similarity to subsurface communities (Figure 8). At 8 cm depth the crab burrow communities did not differ significantly from any of the communities found at the same depth from all other sites. Interestingly, the crab burrow communities at 1 cm and 2 cm depth seemed to form a unique cluster, although showing closer similarity to subsurface than surface communities. This might support the hypothesis by Kristensen and Kostka (2005), who suggested that burrows support unique communities. Burrowing behavior is species-specific and to understand the effect of bioturbation on microbial communities one has to take into account the ecology of the macrofauna organisms.
Papaspyrou et al. (2005) studied the bacterial communities in burrows of the ghost shrimp Pestarella tyrrhena (Decapoda: Thalassinidea). They found a 10-fold increase of bacterial abundance associated with the burrow wall, which they attributed to the higher organic content compared with the surrounding sediment. They did not measure oxygen at the burrow wall or the surrounding sediment. Their study by molecular fingerprints (DGGE) of the bacterial communities suggested that the bacterial composition of the burrow wall was more similar to the ambient anoxic sediment. The authors therefore suggested that burrow walls have distinct properties and should not be considered merely as a simple extension of the sediment surface. Organic content and the quality thereof is certainly a structuring component for microbial communities. Oxygen is one of the strongest parameters affecting microbial communities in sediments, as it is the most favorable electron acceptor in the oxidation of carbon. It divides the communities into assemblages that vary in their oxygen requirements and tolerances (aerobes, anaerobes). The question is what are the key parameters structuring microbial communities. Another question is how to define ‘similar’. In our example, we define the similarity between burrow walls and their surrounding as the similarity in the oxic and oxidized conditions. We do not dispute that burrow walls may represent unique environments. It depends on a combination of factors and may vary among different burrow types, depths and compartments as well as oxidation events. Our study suggests that burrows can support similar microbial populations compared with the surface if the environmental parameters, that is, redox conditions are equal.
The argument that free-living microbes are ubiquitous (Finlay, 2002) and environmental parameters determine their presence has been suggested by the ‘Baas-Becking’ hypothesis (Baas-Becking, 1934: ‘everything is everywhere and the environment selects’). This assumption has been controversial for much of the last century (that is, reviewed in Hedlund and Staley, 2003; Ge et al., 2008) and recent studies have shown that the richness or diversity of microorganisms might be more complex (McArthur et al., 1988; Horner-Devine et al., 2004). Salinity, temperature or nutrient gradients have been identified to change aquatic microbial communities (Ward et al., 1998; Crump et al., 2004) and a more recent hypothesis has been that microbial composition and diversity patterns reflect the influences of both past events and contemporary environmental variations (Martiny et al., 2006; Ge et al., 2008). Hewson and Fuhrman (2004) found by comparing the diversity and richness of bacterio-plankton along a salinity gradient, that some taxa (or OTUs) are specific to distinct environments whereas others have a ubiquitous distribution from river to sea. So both might be true, there are microorganisms that are everywhere and others which are endemic. A lot more work needs to be done to address this.
Few studies on microbial diversity have been performed in benthic systems (Llobet-Brossa et al., 1998; Köpke et al., 2005; Córdova-Kreylos et al., 2006; Wilms et al., 2006; Hewson et al., 2007; Liang et al., 2007) and studies on the effect of bioturbation on microbial community structure remain extremely scarce (Plante and Wilde, 2004; Papaspyrou et al., 2005, 2006). Environmental parameters vary quickly, especially in coastal sediments. To adequately address the factors controlling biodiversity in sediments, the environmental parameters have to be measured at a resolution that accounts for this variability, which is unfortunately not always possible. Some laboratory and field studies (Korona et al., 1994; Haubold and Rainey, 1996; Rainey and Travisano, 1998; Zhou et al., 2002; Treves et al., 2003; Horner-Devine et al., 2004) suggested that environmental ‘patchiness’ played a role in the maintenance of the microbial diversity in soils and sediments. Patchiness comprises the complexity of environmental conditions that can vary along multiple spatial and temporal scales. Our examples show that the stability of environmental conditions over time supports the establishment of specific microbial assemblages. One remaining question is how quickly these communities develop as a result of varying redox conditions.
There are a number of different approaches to study the types of microbes present in an environment and their abundance. We used ARISA (Fisher and Triplett, 1999; Hewson and Fuhrman, 2004; Brown et al., 2005; Fuhrman, 2008) as a PCR-based community finger-printing method to characterize and compare the richness of different taxa (OTU's). This method results in data of discrete numbers, such as the total fluorescence of a specific fragment length, thus permitting statistical comparisons of species (OTU) richness. ARISA is a relatively inexpensive and fast way to compare bacterial community structures by analyzing the lengths of the intergenic spacers between 16S and 23S rRNA genes present in almost all bacteria. Therefore, archaea are not considered in this approach and some groups like the Planktomycetes might not be included in the analyses, if they lack linked 16S and 23S genes (Fuhrman, 2008). Nevertheless, this assemblage fingerprinting approach allows comparison of microbial richness along environmental gradients with a phylogenetic resolution, that is within 98% of 16S rRNA sequence identity, near the range widely considered to be bacterial ‘species’ or ‘ecotypes’ (Fuhrman, 2008).
Effect of bioturbation on biogeochemical cycles
The combined effect of the bioturbation activity of the two investigated crustaceans on the biogeochemistry in the shallow lagoon of Catalina Harbor showed an increase of microbial abundances (Figures 6a–c) at all sediment depths as bioturbation intensity increased (Factor 10 or higher). The overall increase of oxidized chemical compounds (ferric iron and nitrate, Figures 4a and c) reflects a significant increase of oxidation-reduction potential within the sediment. The statistical analyses (Figure 9) suggested that the availability of ferric iron correlated with all surface (1 cm) microbial fingerprints. Whereas the abundance of reduced nitrogen and iron species correlated with assemblages found deeper in the sediment. More investigations are needed to correlate environmental parameters with microbial diversity and activity. Another important next step in our investigations will be to determine the metabolic activities associated with distinct microniches. Microbial processes enhanced or induced by bioturbation activity may significantly contribute to element cycling at the seafloor.
References
Aller JY, Aller RC . (1986). Evidence for localized enhancement of biological activity associated with tube and burrow structures in deep-sea sediments at the HEBBLE site, western North Atlantic. Deep-Sea Res 33: 755–790.
Aller RC . (1982). The effects of macrobenthos on chemical properties of marine sediment and overlying water. In: McCall PL, Tevesz MJS (eds). Animal Sediment Relations (2): Topics in Geobiology. Plenum Press: New York. pp 53–96.
Aller RC . (1988). Benthic fauna and biogeochemical processes in marine sediments: the role of burrow structures. In: Blackburn TH, Sørensen J (eds). Nitrogen Cycling in Coastal Marine Environments. John Wiley & Sons, New York. pp 301–338.
Aller RC . (1994). Bioturbation and remineralization of sedimentary organic matter: effects of redox oscillation. Chem Geol 114: 331–345.
Aller RC, Dodge RE . (1974). Animal-sediment relations in a tropical lagoon, Discovery Bay, Jamaica. J Mar Res 32: 209–232.
Banta GT, Holmer M, Jensen MJ, Kristensen E . (1999). The effect of 2 polychaete worms, Nereis diversicolor and Arenicola marina, on decomposition in an organic-poor and an organic-enriched marine sediment. Aquat Microb Ecol 19: 189–204.
Baas-Becking LGM . (1934). Geobiologie of inleiding tot de milieukunde. Van Stockum & Zoon: The Hague, the Netherlands (in Dutch).
Bisby FA, Roskov YR, Ruggiero MA, Orrell TM, Paglinawan LE, Brewer PW, Bailly N, van Hertum J . (2007). Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life: 2007 Annual Checklist. Species 2000, Reading, UK.
Brenchley GA . (1981). Disturbance and community structure, an experimental study of bioturbation in marine soft-bottom environments. J Mar Res 39: 767–790.
Brown MV, Fuhrman JA . (2005). Marine bacterial microdiversity as revealed by internal transcribed spacer analysis. Aquat Microb Ecol 41: 15–23.
Brown MV, Schwalbach MS, Hewson I, Fuhrman JA . (2005). Coupling 16S-ITS rDNA clone libraries and automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis to show marine microbial diversity: development and application to a time series. Environ Microbiol 7: 1466–1479.
Castro-Gonzalez M, Braker G, Farias L, Ulloa O . (2005). Communities of nirS-type denitrifiers in the water column of the oxygen minimum zone in the eastern south Pacific. Environ Microbiol 7: 1298–1306.
Cetinic I, Vilicic D, Buric Z, Olujic G . (2006). Phytoplankton seasonality in a highly stratified karstic estuary (Krka, Adriatic Sea). Hydrobio 555: 31–40.
Christensen B, Vedel A, Kristensen E . (2000). Carbon and nitrogen fluxes in sediment inhabited by suspension-feeding (Nereis diversicolor)and non-suspension-feeding (N. virens) polychaetes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 192: 203–217.
Colbert SL, Berelson WM, Hammond DE . (2008a). Radon-222 budget in Catalina Harbor, California: 2. Flow dynamics and residence time in a tidal beach. Limnol Oceanogr 53: 659–665.
Colbert SL, Hammond DE, Berelson WM . (2008b). Radon-222 budget in Catalina Harbor, California: 1. Water mixing rates. Limnol Oceanogr 53: 651–658.
Córdova-Kreylos AL, Cao Y, Green PG, Hwang HM, Kuivila KM, Lamontagne MG et al. (2006). Diversity, composition, and geographical distribution of microbial communities in California salt marsh sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 72: 3357–3366.
Crump BC, Hopkinson CS, Sogin ML, Hobbie JE . (2004). Microbial biogeography along an estuarine salinity gradient: combined influences of bacterial growth and residence time. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 1494–1505.
Curtis TP, Sloan WT, Scannell JW . (2002). Estimating prokaryotic diversity and its limits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 10494–10499.
Dollhoph SL, Hyun JH, Smith AC, Adams HJ, O'Brien S, Kostka JE . (2005). Quantification of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and factors controlling nitrification in salt marsh sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 240–246.
Dworschak PC . (2000). Global diversity in the Thalassinidea (Decopoda). J Crust Biol 20: 238–245.
Epstein SS, Rossel J . (1995). Methodology of in situ grazing experiments: evaluation of a new vital dye for preparation of fluorescently labeled bacteria. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 128: 143–150.
Fierer N . (2008). Microbial biogeography: patterns in microbial diversity across space and time. In: Zengler K (ed). Accessing Uncultivated Microorganisms—From the Environment to Organisms and Genomes and Back. ASM Press: Washington DC. pp 95–115.
Finlay BJ . (2002). Global dispersal of free-living microbial eukaryote species. Science 296: 1061–1063.
Fisher MM, Triplett EW . (1999). Automated approach for ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis of microbial diversity and its application to freshwater bacterial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 65: 4630–4636.
Forster S, Graf G . (1992). Continuously measured changes in redox potential influenced by oxygen penetrating from burrows of Callianassa subterranean. Hydrobiol 235/236: 527–532.
Forster S, Graf G . (1995). Impact of irrigation on oxygen flux into the sediment—Intermittent pumping by Callianassa subterranea and piston-pumping by Lanice conchilega. Mar Biol 123: 335–346.
Fuhrman JA . (2008). Measuring Diversity. In: Zengler K (ed). Accessing Uncultivated Microorganisms—From the Environment to Organisms and Genomes and Back. ASM Press: Washington DC. pp 131–151.
Fuhrman JA, Steele JA, Hewson I, Schwalbach MS, Brown MV, Green JL et al. (2008). Latitudinal richness gradient in planktonic marine bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 7774–7778.
Ge Y, He JZ, Zhu YG, Zhang JB, Xu Z, Zhang LM et al. (2008). Differences in soil bacterial diversity: driven by contemporary disturbances or historical contingencies? ISMEJ 2: 254–264.
Gilbert F, Aller RC, Hulth S . (2003). The influence of macrofaunal burrow spacing and diffusive scaling on sedimentary nitrification and denitrification: an experimental simulation and model approach. J Mar Res 61: 101–125.
Gilbert F, Stora G, Bonin P . (1998). Influence of bioturbation on denitrification activity in Mediterranean coastal sediments: an in situ experimental approach. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 163: 99–107.
Glud RN, Gundersen JK, Jorgensen BB, Revsbech NP, Schultz HD . (1994). Diffusive and total oxygen uptake of deep-sea sediments in the eastern South Atlantic Ocean: in situ and laboratory measurements. Deep-Sea Res 41: 1767–1788.
Grossman S, Reichardt W . (1991). Impact of Arenicola marina on bacteria in intertidal sediments. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 77: 85–93.
Hall POJ, Aller RC . (1992). Rapid small-volume flow injection analysis for ∑CO2 and NH4+ in marine and fresh waters. Limnol Oceanogr 37: 1113–1119.
Hannig M, Braker G, Dippner J, Jürgens K . (2006). Linking denitrifier community structure and prevalent biogeochemical parameters in the pelagial of the central Baltic Proper (Baltic Sea). FEMS Microbiol Ecol 57: 260–271.
Hansen K, Kristensen E . (1998). The impact of the polychaete Nereis diversicolor and enrichment with macroalgal (Chaetomorpha linum) detritus on benthic metabolism and nutrient dynamics in organic-poor and organic-sediment. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 231: 201–223.
Haubold B, Rainey P . (1996). Genetic and ecotypic structure of a fluorescent Pseudomonas population. Mol Ecol 5: 747–761.
Hedlund BP, Staley JT . (2003). Microbial endemism and biogeography. In: Bull AT (ed). Microbial Diversity and Bioprospecting. ASM Press: Washington, DC. pp 225–231.
Henderson GM, Lindsay FN, Slowey NC . (1999). Variation in bioturbation with water depth on marine slopes: a study on the Little Bahamas Bank. Mar Geol 160: 105–118.
Hewson I, Fuhrman JA . (2004). Bacterioplankton species richness and diversity along an estuarine gradient in Moreton Bay, Australia. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 3425–3433.
Hewson I, Fuhrman JA . (2006). Improved strategy for comparing microbial assemblage fingerprints. Microb Ecol 51: 147–153.
Hewson I, Fuhrman JA . (2007). Characterization of lysogens in bacterioplankton assemblages of the Southern California Borderland. Microbiol Ecol 53: 631–638.
Hewson I, Jacobson-Meyers ME, Furhman JA . (2007). Diversity and biogeography of bacterial assemblages in surface sediments across the San Pedro Basin, Southern California borderlands. Environ Microbiol 9: 923–933.
Horner-Devine MC, Lage M, Hughes JB, Bohannan BJ . (2004). A taxa-area relationship for bacteria. Nature 432: 750–753.
Huettel M, Ziebis W, Forster S, Luther GW . (1998). Advective transport affecting metal and nutrient distributions and interfacial fluxes in permeable sediments. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 62: 613–631.
Jeroschewsky P, Steuckart C, Kuehl M . (1996). An amperometric microsensor for the determination of H2S in aquatic environments. Anal Chem 68: 4351–4357.
Jones MN . (1984). Nitrate reduction by shaking with cadmium—Alternative to cadmium columns. Water Res 18: 643–646.
Jørgensen BB, Boetius A . (2007). Feast and famine—microbial life in the deep-sea bed. Nat Rev Microbiol 5: 770–781.
Kinoshita K, Wada M, Kogure K, Furota T . (2003). Mud shrimp burrows as dynamic traps and processors of tidal-flat materials. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 247: 159–164.
Kristensen E, Aller RC, Aller JY . (1991). Oxic and anoxic decomposition of tubes from the burrowing sea anemone Ceriantheopsis americanus: Implications for bulk sediment carbon and nitrogen balance. J Mar Res 49: 589–617.
Kristensen E, Anderson ØF, Holmboe N, Holmer M, Thongtham N . (2000). Carbon and nitrogen mineralization in sediment of the Bangrong mangrove area, Phuket, Thailand. Aquat Microb Ecol 22: 199–213.
Kristensen E, Kostka JE . (2005). Macrofaunal burrows and irrigation in marine sediment: microbiological and biogeochemical interactions. In: Kristensen E, Haese RR, Kostka JE (eds). Interactions Between Macro-and Microorganisms in Marine Sediment, Coastal and Estuarine Studies 60. American Geophysical Union: Washington DC. pp 125–157.
Kogure K, Wada M . (2005). Impacts of Macrobenthic Bioturbation in Marine Sediment on Bacterial Metabolic Activity. Microb Environ 20: 191–199.
Köpke B, Wilms R, Engelen B, Cypionka H, Sass H . (2005). Microbial diversity in coastal subsurface sediments: a cultivation approach using various electron acceptors and substrate gradients. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 7819–7830.
Korona R, Nakatsu CH, Forney LJ, Lenski RE . (1994). Evidence for multiple adaptive peaks from populations of bacteria evolving in a structured habitat. Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA 91: 9037–9041.
Kostka JE, Gribsholt B, Petrie E, Dalton D, Skelton H, Kristensen E . (2002). The rates and pathways of carbon oxidation in bioturbated saltmarsh sediments. Limnol Oceanogr 47: 230–240.
Kostka JE, Luther III GW . (1994). Partitioning and speciation of solid phase iron in saltmarsh sediments. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 58: 1701–1710.
Liang JB, Chen YQ, Lan CY, Tam NFY, Zan QJ, Huang LN . (2007). Recovery of novel bacterial diversity from mangrove sediment. Mar Biol 150: 739–747.
Llobet-Brossa E, Rossello-Mora R, Amann R . (1998). Microbial community composition of Wadden Sea sediments as revealed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 2691–2696.
Lohrer AM, Thrush SF, Gibbs MM . (2004). Bioturbators enhance ecosystem function through complex biogeochemical interactions. Nature 431: 1092–1095.
Lovley D, Philips E . (1987). Rapid assay for microbially reducible ferric iron in aquatic sediments. Appl Environm Microbiol 53: 1472–1480.
Lucas FS, Bertru G, Höfle MG . (2003). Characterization of free-living and attached bacteria in sediments colonized by Hediste diversicolor. Aquat Microb Ecol 32: 165–174.
MacGinitie GE . (1934). The natural history of Callianassa californiensis Dana. Amer Midland Naturalist 15: 166–177.
McArthur JV, Kovacic DA, Smith MH . (1988). Genetic diversity in natural populations of a soil bacterium across a landscape gradient. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 9621–9624.
Manning RB, Felder DL . (1991). Revision of the American Callianassidae (Crustacea: Decapoda: Thalassinoidea). Proc Biol Soc Washington 104: 764–792.
Marinelli RL, Lovell CR, Wakeham SG, Ringelberg DB, White DC . (2002). Experimental investigations of the control of bacterial community composition in macrofaunal burrows. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 235: 1–13.
Martin JW, Davis GE . (2001). An Updated Classification of the Recent Crustacea. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County: Los Angeles, CA, Science Series 39.
Martiny JBH, Bohannan BJM, Brown JH, Colwell RK, Fuhrman JA, Green JL et al. (2006). Microbial biogeography: Putting microorganisms on the map. Nat Rev Microbiol 4: 102–112.
Matsui GY, Ringelberg DB, Lovell CR . (2004). Sulfate-reducing bacteria in tubes constructed by the marine infaunal polychaete Diopatra cuprea. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 240–246.
Mayer MS, Schaffner L, Kemp WM . (1995). Nitrification potentials of benthic macrofaunal tubes and burrow walls: effects of sediment NH4+ and animal irrigation behavior. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 121: 157–169.
Mermillod-Blondin F, Rosenberg R, François-Carcaillet F, Norling K, Mauclaire L . (2004). Influence of bioturbation by three benthic infaunal species on microbial communities and biogeochemical processes in marine sediment. Aquat Microb Eco 36: 271–284.
Meyers MB, Fossing H, Powell EN . (1987). Micro-distribution of interstitial meiofauna, oxygen and sulfide gradients, and the tubes of macro-infauna. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 35: 223–241.
Mußmann M, Ishii K, Rabus R, Amann R . (2005). Diversity and vertical distribution of cultured and uncultured Deltaproteobacteria in an intertidal mudflat of the Wadden Sea. Environ Microbiol 7: 405–418.
Papaspyrou S, Gregersen T, Cox RP, Thessalou-Legaki M, Kristensen E . (2005). Sediment properties and bacterial community in the burrows of the mud shrimp Pestarella tyrrhena (Decapoda: Thalassinidea). Aquat Microb Ecol 38: 181–190.
Papaspyrou S, Gregersen T, Kristensen E, Christensen B, Cox RP . (2006). Microbial reaction rates and bacterial communities in sediment surrounding burrows of two nereidid polychaetes (Nereis diversicolor and N. virens). Mar Biol 148: 541–550.
Pelegrà SP, Blackburn TH . (1996). Nitrogen cycling in lake sediments bioturbated by Chironomus plumosus larvae, under different degrees of oxygenation. Hydrobio 325: 231–238.
Pemberton SG, Risk MJ, Buckley DE . (1976). Supershrimp: Deep bioturbation in the Strait of Canso, Nova Scotia. Science 192: 790–791.
Plante CJ, Wilde SB . (2004). Biotic disturbance, recolonization, and early succession of bacterial assemblages in intertidal sediments. Microb Ecol 48: 154–166.
Pommier T, Canback B, Riemann L, Boström KH, Simu K, Lundberg P et al. (2007). Global patterns of diversity and community structure in marine bacterioplankton. Mol Ecol 16: 867–880.
Rafinesque CS . (1815). Analyse de la nature ou tableau de l'univers et des corps organisés. L'Imprimerie de Jean Barravecchia: Palermo, Italy. 224 pp.
Rainey PB, Travisano M . (1998). Adaptive radiation in a heterogeneous environment. Nature 394: 69–72.
Reichardt W . (1989). Microbiological aspects of bioturbation. Scient Mar 53: 301–306.
Revsbech NP . (1989). An oxygen electrode with a guard cathode. Limnol Oceanogr 28: 474–478.
Revsbech NP, Jørgensen BB, Blackburn TH . (1980). Oxygen in the sea bottom measured with a microelectrode. Science 207: 1355–1356.
Revsbech NP, Jørgensen BB . (1986). Microelectrodes: their use in microbial ecology. In: Marshall KC (ed). Advances in Microbial Ecology. Plenum Press: New York. pp 293–352.
Rhoads DC . (1974). Organism-sediment relations on the muddy sea floor. Oceanogr Mar 12: 263–300.
Solan M, Kennedy R . (2002). Observations and quantification of in situ animal sediment relations using time lapse sediment profile imagery (tSPI). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 228: 179–191.
Suzuki MT, DeLong EF . (2002). Marine prokaryote diversity. In: Stanley JT, Reysenbach AL (eds). Biodiversity of Microbial Life: Foundation of Earth's Biosphere. John Wiley & Sons: New York, pp 209–234.
Svensson JM, Enrich-Prast A, Leonardson L . (2001). Nitrification and denitrification in a eutrophic lake sediment bioturbated by oligochaetes. Aquat Microb Ecol 23: 177–186.
Swinbanks DD, Murray JW . (1981). Biosedimentological zonation of Boundary Bay tidal flats, Fraser River Delta, British Columbia. Sedimentology 28: 201–237.
Teal LT, Bulling M, Parker ER, Solan M . (2008). Global patterns of bioturbation intensity and the mixed depth of marine soft sediments. Aquat Biol 2: 207–218.
ter Braak CJF . (1986). Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67: 1167–1179.
ter Braak CJF . (1995). Ordination. In: Jongman RHG, ter Braak CJF, van Tongeren OFR (eds). Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 91–173.
Thamdrup B, Fossing H, Jørgensen BB . (1994). Manganese, iron, and sulfur cycling in a coastal marine sediment, Aarhus Bay, Denmark. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 58: 5115–5129.
Torsvik V, Øvreås L, Thingstad TF . (2002). Prokaryotic Diversity—Magnitude, Dynamics, and Controlling Factors. Science 296: 1064–1066.
Treves DS, Xia B, Zhou J, Tiedje JM . (2003). A two species test of the hypothesis that spatial isolation influences microbial diversity in soil. Microb Ecol 45: 20–28.
Tuominen L, Makela K, Lehtonen KK, Haahti H, Hietanen S, Kuparinen J . (1999). Nutrient fluxes, porewater profiles and denitrification in sediment influenced by algal sedimentation and bioturbation by Monoporeia affinis. Est Coast Shelf Sci 49: 83–97.
Ward D, Ferris M, Nold S, Bateson M . (1998). A natural view of microbial biodiversity within hot spring cyanobacterial mat communities. Microb Molec Biol Rev 62: 1353–1370.
Waslenchuk DG, Matson EA, Zajac RN, Dobbs FC, Tramontano JM . (1983). Geochemistry of burrow waters vented by a bioturbating shrimp in Bermudian sediments. Mar Biol 72: 219–225.
Wilms R, Köpke B, Sass H, Chang TS, Cypionka H, Engelen B . (2006). Deep biosphere-related bacteria within the subsurface of tidal flat sediments. Environ Microbiol 8: 709–719.
Wu L, Kellogg L, Devol AH, Tiedje JM, Zhou J . (2008). Microarray-Based Characterization of Microbial Community Functional Structure and Heterogeneity in Marine Sediments from the Gulf of Mexico. Appl Environ Microbiol 74: 4516–4529.
Zeil J, Hemmi JM, Backwell PRY . (2006). Quick guide to Fiddler crabs. Curr Biol 16: 40–41.
Zhou J, Xia B, Treves DS, Wu LY, Marsh TL, O'Neill RV et al. (2002). Spatial and resource factors influencing high microbial diversity in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 68: 326–334.
Ziebis W, Forster S, Huettel M, Jørgensen BB . (1996a). Complex burrows of the mud shrimp Callianassa truncata and their geochemical impact in the seabed. Nature 382: 619–622.
Ziebis W, Huettel M, Forster S . (1996b). The impact of biogenic sediment topography on oxygen fluxes in permeable seabeds. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 140: 227–237.
Acknowledgements
We are tremendously thankful to Jed Fuhrman and his lab members at USC, especially Ian Hewson, Josh Steele and Rohan Sachdeva for teaching and assisting us with the ARISA technique. We acknowledge all staff of the USC Wrigley Institute for Environmental Studies on Catalina Island, and especially Anthony Michaels and Lauren Czarnecki for continuing support for our laboratory and field studies. We are indebted to Ivona Cetinic for help with statistical analysis. We thank the Rose Hills Foundation for providing summer fellowships for VB to perform research on Catalina Island.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bertics, V., Ziebis, W. Biodiversity of benthic microbial communities in bioturbated coastal sediments is controlled by geochemical microniches. ISME J 3, 1269–1285 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2009.62
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2009.62
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Bacterial community composition in the Northern Gulf of Mexico intertidal sediment bioturbated by the ghost shrimp Lepidophthalmus louisianensis
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek (2024)
-
Sesarmid crabs as key contributors to the soil organic carbon sedimentation in tropical mangroves
Wetlands Ecology and Management (2023)
-
Polychaete Bioturbation Alters the Taxonomic Structure, Co-occurrence Network, and Functional Groups of Bacterial Communities in the Intertidal Flat
Microbial Ecology (2023)
-
Microbial diversity of sub-bottom sediment cores from a tropical reef system
Coral Reefs (2022)
-
Microbial diversity and ecological interactions of microorganisms in the mangrove ecosystem: Threats, vulnerability, and adaptations
Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2022)