Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Pediatric Short Communication
  • Published:

No evidence of large differences in mother–daughter and father–son body mass index concordance in a large UK birth cohort

Abstract

It has recently been suggested that there are substantial differences in mother–daughter and father–son associations of body mass index and obesity among contemporary UK children, but much larger studies of older cohorts have failed to find evidence of substantial sex-specific effects. We have tested this hypothesis using the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, a large contemporary cohort. Our analyses are based on 4654 complete parent–offspring trios (2323 with male offspring and 2331 with female offspring, all aged approximately 7.5 years). We found maternal body mass index to be a little more strongly associated with female than with male offspring body mass index (β=0.18 (95% confidence interval 0.16–0.20) for females vs 0.13 (0.12, 0.15) for males). However, associations between paternal body mass index and male compared with female offspring were very similar (β=0.16 (0.14, 0.19) for females vs 0.15 (0.12, 0.17) for males). Hence, our study suggests that there is no compelling reason to integrate the belief that there are large differences in parent–offspring body mass index associations with obesity prevention strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Perez-Pastor EM, Metcalf BS, Hosking J, Jeffery AN, Voss LD, Wilkin TJ . Assortative weight gain in mother-daughter and father-son pairs: an emerging source of childhood obesity. Longitudinal study of trios (EarlyBird 43). Int J Obes 2009; 33: 727–735.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lake JK, Power C, Cole TJ . Child to adult body mass index in the 1958 British birth cohort: associations with parental obesity. Arch Dis Child 1997; 77: 376–381.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kivimäki M, Lawlor DA, Davey Smith G, Elovainio M, Jokela M, Keltikangas-Jarvinen L et al. Substantial intergenerational increases in body mass index are not explained by the fetal overnutrition hypothesis: The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns. Am J Clin Nutr 2007; 86: 1509–1514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Golding J, Pembrey M, Jones R . ALSPAC study team. ALSPAC-the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. I. Study methodology. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2001; 15: 74–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Davey Smith G, Steer C, Leary S, Ness A . Is there an intrauterine influence on obesity? Evidence from parent–child associations in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). Arch Dis Child 2007; 92: 876–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Danielzik S, Langase K, Mast M, Spethmann C, Müller MJ . Impact of parental BMI on the manifestation of overweight 5–7 year old children. Eur J Nutr 2002; 41: 132–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S Leary.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leary, S., Davey Smith, G. & Ness, A. No evidence of large differences in mother–daughter and father–son body mass index concordance in a large UK birth cohort. Int J Obes 34, 1191–1192 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2010.60

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2010.60

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links