Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Preoperative erectile function is the only predictor of the use of a high number of phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors after bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy

Abstract

It is well known that the administration of phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) may improve erectile function (EF) recovery after bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (BNSRP). The aim of our study was to identify predictors of the use of a high number of PDE5-Is (one or more per week) after surgery among 184 patients taking proerectile medications on demand. At a mean follow-up of 22.7 months, 116 patients (63%) recovered EF. Overall, EF recovery rates at 1- and 2- year follow-up were 47.3% and 65.4%, respectively. Overall, 43 (23.4%) patients used one or more PDE5-Is per week. Preoperative EF was the only predictor of the use of one or more PDE5-Is per week after BNSRP. This held true even after adjusting our analyses for age at surgery, body mass index and EF at 1 month after surgery. Particularly, patients fully potent before surgery had roughly 2.1-fold higher probability of using one or more pills per week compared with their counterparts with some degree of preoperative erectile dysfunction (ED; odds ratio: 2.16; 95% confidence interval: 1.03–4.37). In conclusion, preoperative EF represents the only determinant of the use of a higher number of PDE5-Is after surgery. Patients with better preoperative EF might represent individuals more motivated to achieve satisfactory sexual function after surgery. These observations should provide physicians with better preoperative patient counseling and management of postoperative ED.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdollah F, Sun M, Thuret R, Jeldres C, Tian Z, Briganti A et al. A competing-risks analysis of survival after alternative treatment modalities for prostate cancer patients: 1988-2006. Eur Urol 2011; 59: 88–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cooperberg MR, Vickers AJ, Broering JM, Carroll PR . Comparative risk-adjusted mortality outcomes after primary surgery, radiotherapy, or androgen-deprivation therapy for localized prostate cancer. Cancer 2010; 116: 5226–5234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ficarra V, Sooriakumaran P, Novara G, Schatloff O, Briganti A, Van der Poel H et al. Systematic review of methods for reporting combined outcomes after radical prostatectomy and proposal of a novel system: the survival, continence, and potency (SCP) classification. Eur Urol 2012; 61: 541–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J, Sandler HM, Northouse L, Hembroff L et al. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 1250–1261.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stanford JL, Feng Z, Hamilton AS, Gilliland FD, Stephenson RA, Eley JW et al. Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. JAMA 2000; 283: 354–360.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Boorjian SA, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Guillonneau B, Karnes RJ, Moul JW et al. A critical analysis of the long-term impact of radical prostatectomy on cancer control and function outcomes. Eur Urol 2012; 61: 664–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim SC, Song C, Kim W, Kang T, Park J, Jeong IG et al. Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: robot-assisted versus retropubic. Eur Urol 2011; 60: 413–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dubbelman YD, Dohle GR, Schroder FH . Sexual function before and after radical retropubic prostatectomy: a systematic review of prognostic indicators for a successful outcome. Eur Urol 2006; 50: 711–718, discussion 718-720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Briganti A, Capitanio U, Chun FK, Karakiewicz PI, Salonia A, Bianchi M et al. Prediction of sexual function after radical prostatectomy. Cancer 2009; 115 (13 Suppl): 3150–3159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rabbani F, Stapleton AM, Kattan MW, Wheeler TM, Scardino PT . Factors predicting recovery of erections after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2000; 164: 1929–1934.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bannowsky A, Schulze H, van der Horst C, Hautmann S, Junemann KP . Recovery of erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: improvement with nightly low-dose sildenafil. BJU Int 2008; 101: 1279–1283.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Montorsi F, Brock G, Lee J, Shapiro J, Van Poppel H, Graefen M et al. Effect of nightly versus on-demand vardenafil on recovery of erectile function in men following bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2008; 54: 924–931.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gandaglia G, Albersen M, Suardi N, Gallina A, Abdollah F, Castiglione F et al. Postoperative phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor administration increases the rate of urinary continence recovery after bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol 2013; 20: 413–419.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gandaglia G, Suardi N, Gallina A, Capitanio U, Abdollah F, Salonia A et al. Preoperative erectile function represents a significant predictor of postoperative urinary continence recovery in patients treated with bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2012; 187: 569–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Walsh PC, Donker PJ . Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol 1982; 128: 492–497.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Suardi N, Moschini M, Gallina A, Gandaglia G, Abdollah F, Capitanio U et al. Nerve-sparing approach during radical prostatectomy is strongly associated with the rate of postoperative urinary continence recovery. BJU Int 2013; 111: 717–722.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Padma-Nathan H, McCullough AR, Levine LA, Lipshultz LI, Siegel R, Montorsi F et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of postoperative nightly sildenafil citrate for the prevention of erectile dysfunction after bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Int J Impot Res 2008; 20: 479–486.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cappelleri JC, Rosen RC, Smith MD, Mishra A, Osterloh IH . Diagnostic evaluation of the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function. Urology 1999; 54: 346–351.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Briganti A, Gallina A, Suardi N, Capitanio U, Tutolo M, Bianchi M et al. What is the definition of a satisfactory erectile function after bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy? J Sex Med 2011; 8: 1210–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gandaglia G, Suardi N, Gallina A, Abdollah F, Capitanio U, Salonia A et al. Extended pelvic lymph node dissection does not affect erectile function recovery in patients treated with bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. J Sex Med 2012; 9: 2187–2194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Montorsi F, Briganti A, Salonia A, Rigatti P, Burnett AL . Current and future strategies for preventing and managing erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2004; 45: 123–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Edwards B, Clarke V . The psychological impact of a cancer diagnosis on families: the influence of family functioning and patients' illness characteristics on depression and anxiety. Psychooncology 2004; 13: 562–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G Gandaglia.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gandaglia, G., Gallina, A., Suardi, N. et al. Preoperative erectile function is the only predictor of the use of a high number of phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors after bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Int J Impot Res 26, 201–204 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2014.10

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2014.10

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links