Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Classification of the distribution of cavernous nerve fibers around the prostate by intraoperative electrical stimulation during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

International Journal of Impotence Research volume 23, pages 56–61 (2011)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

We investigated the distribution of cavernous nerve (CN) fibers around the prostate by electrical nerve stimulation during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy to classify the distribution of the CN fibers. Electrical stimulation was performed on 30 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer; middle of the neurovascular bundle (NVB, point A), base of the NVB (point B), the rectal wall 1 cm posterolateral to the NVB (point C) and the lateral aspect of the prostate (point D). We measured the intraurethral pressure at the midportion to detect the changes in intracavernosal pressure. The mean maximum changes were 10.5±7.9, 11.6±8.8, 9.6±7.4 and 6.7±7.0 cm H2O at points A, B, C and D, respectively. The patterns of CN fiber distribution were divided into four groups: type 1 (23%), the bundle corresponding to the NVB; type 2 (7%), the bundle from the rectal wall to the prostate; type 3 (27%), the plate including NVB and posterolateral to NVB; and type 4 (43%), the plate between the rectal wall posterolateral to the NVB and the lateral aspect of the prostate. Distribution of the CNs in a bundle-like formation was considered to account for 30%, whereas a plate-like formation accounted for 70%. Understanding these four patterns of CN fiber distribution should facilitate accurate CN-sparing radical prostatectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Walsh PC, Donker PJ . Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol 1982; 128: 492–497.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Costello AJ, Brooks M, Cole OJ . Anatomical studies of the neurovascular bundle and cavernosal nerves. BJU Int 2004; 94: 1071–1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Takenaka A, Murakami G, Soga H, Han SH, Arai Y, Fujisawa M . Anatomical analysis of the neurovascular bundle supplying penile cavernous tissue to ensure a reliable nerve graft after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2004; 172: 1032–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lunacek A, Schwentner C, Fritsch H, Bartsch G, Strasser H . Anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: ‘curtain dissection’ of the neurovascular bundle. BJU Int 2005; 95: 1226–1231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Penson DF, McLerran D, Feng Z, Li L, Albertsen PC, Gilliland FD et al. 5-year urinary and sexual outcomes after radical prostatectomy: results from the prostate cancer outcomes study. J Urol 2005; 173: 1701–1705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dubbelman YD, Dohle GR, Schroder FH . Sexual function before and after radical retropubic prostatectomy: a systematic review of prognostic indicators for a successful outcome. Eur Urol 2006; 50: 711–718; discussion 718–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Takenaka A, Tewari A, Hara R, Leung RA, Kurokawa K, Murakami G et al. Pelvic autonomic nerve mapping around the prostate by intraoperative electrical stimulation with simultaneous measurement of intracavernous and intraurethral pressure. J Urol 2007; 177: 225–229; discussion 229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Menon M, Kaul S, Bhandari A, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, Hemal A . Potency following robotic radical prostatectomy: a questionnaire based analysis of outcomes after conventional nerve sparing and prostatic fascia sparing techniques. J Urol 2005; 174: 2291–2296; discussion 2296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Do M, Schwalenberg T, Winkler M, Dietel A et al. Intrafascial nerve-sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 931–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Savera AT, Kaul S, Badani K, Stark AT, Shah NL, Menon M . Robotic radical prostatectomy with the ‘Veil of Aphrodite’ technique: histologic evidence of enhanced nerve sparing. Eur Urol 2006; 49: 1065–1073; discussion 1073–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eichelberg C, Erbersdobler A, Michl U, Schlomm T, Salomon G, Graefen M et al. Nerve distribution along the prostatic capsule. Eur Urol 2007; 51: 105–110; discussion 110–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ganzer R, Blana A, Gaumann A, Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Bach T et al. Topographical anatomy of periprostatic and capsular nerves: quantification and computerised planimetry. Eur Urol 2008; 54: 353–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee SB, Hong SK, Choe G, Lee SE . Periprostatic distribution of nerves in specimens from non-nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2008; 72: 878–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaiho Y, Nakagawa H, Saito H, Ito A, Ishidoya S, Saito S et al. Nerves at the ventral prostatic capsule contribute to erectile function: initial electrophysiological assessment in humans. Eur Urol 2009; 55: 148–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Guillonneau B, Vallancien G . Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris experience. J Urol 2000; 163: 418–422.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kurokawa K, Suzuki T, Suzuk IK, Terada N, Ito K, Yoshikawa D et al. Preliminary results of a monitoring system to confirm the preservation of cavernous nerves. Int J Urol 2003; 10: 136–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsujimura A, Miyagawa Y, Takao T, Matsumiya K, Nakayama M, Tsujimoto Y et al. Significance of electrostimulation in detecting neurovascular bundle during radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol 2006; 13: 926–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Takenaka A, Murakami G, Matsubara A, Han SH, Fujisawa M . Variation in course of cavernous nerve with special reference to details of topographic relationships near prostatic apex: histologic study using male cadavers. Urology 2005; 65: 136–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Walsh PC, Marschke P, Ricker D, Burnett AL . Patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function after anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology 2000; 55: 58–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee SE, Hong SK, Han JH, Han BK, Yu JH, Jeong SJ et al. Significance of neurovascular bundle formation observed on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging regarding postoperative erectile function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2007; 69: 510–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, Tottori, Japan

    A Takenaka, N Hinata, M Honda & T Sejima

  2. Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Related, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan

    H Soga, M Muramaki, H Miyake, K Tanaka & M Fujisawa

Authors
  1. A Takenaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H Soga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. N Hinata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M Honda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. T Sejima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M Muramaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. H Miyake
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. K Tanaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. M Fujisawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A Takenaka.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Takenaka, A., Soga, H., Hinata, N. et al. Classification of the distribution of cavernous nerve fibers around the prostate by intraoperative electrical stimulation during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Int J Impot Res 23, 56–61 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2011.4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2011.4

Keywords

Search

Advanced search

Quick links