Introduction

Coat colour is one of the most strikingly variable and visible traits in mammals, making it a convenient tool for genetic analysis from the beginning of the last century (Searle, 1968; Silvers, 1979). In mammals, the first genetic studies were conducted on coat colour genetics. At present, 368 coat colour loci, including 159 cloned genes, have been described in mice (http://www.espcr.org/micemut/). The coat colour loci influence the development, differentiation, proliferation, and migration of melanocytes, the construction and transport of melanosomes, as well as the synthesis of melanin. Intriguingly, these colour genes are shared by different species (Jackson, 1994; Barsh, 1996). A notable example is the conserved role of the melanocortin 1 receptor in mammalian pigmentation (Andersson, 2003). Studies of melanocortin 1 receptor have provided valuable insights not only into the biology of pigmentation but also the evolution of domesticated animals (Fang et al., 2009).

The domestic pig displays a bewildering diversity in coat colour, which intrigued scientists for centuries. Two major colour loci and causative mutations have been well characterized in pigs: the KIT gene for the dominant white colour (Johansson Moller et al., 1996; Marklund et al., 1998; Giuffra et al., 2002; Pielberg et al., 2002) and the MCIR locus for coloured phenotypes (Kijas et al., 1998, 2001). For other colour phenotypes, such as belt (Giuffra et al., 1999) and black-and-tan (Drögemüller et al., 2006) in Western pigs, the causative mutation(s) has not yet been found.

Selective breeding during the long period has resulted in diverse coat colour phenotypes in Chinese indigenous breeds, including solid black, white (Lai et al., 2007), brown (Mao et al., 2010), belted and spotted (Xu et al., 2006) pigment types. In most breeds, all pigs share the same colour pattern as breed character. However, variable colours are allowed within the standard in a few breeds, such as Tibetan, Kele, and Dahe pigs (Zhang et al., 1986).

Tibetan pigs, renowned for their unique adaptability to the adverse living conditions of the Qinghai–Tibetan plateau, segregate for black, reddish, and silver brown colours (Figure 1). The colour variants fit an autosomal monogenic model of inheritance and the brown colour is a codominant trait. Heterozygous (B/b) animals display the reddish brown phenotype and homozygotes show silver brown (b/b), or black colours (B/B) (Zhang et al., 1986). Kele and Dahe pigs are two local populations from the Yunnan–Guizhou plateau classified as a single breed (namely, Wujin). A range of light to dark brown shades, as well as a black phenotype (Figure 1), has been observed in Kele and Dahe pigs. Different brown shades are caused by epistatic interaction between two loci (Lian and Wu, 1985). So far, the molecular basis of the brown phenotypes of Tibetan, Kele, and Dahe pigs remains elusive. Here, we report a genome-wide association study (GWAS) and haplotype-sharing analyses that characterize the responsible gene and subsequent detection of a genetic variant that appears to cause the brown colouration in Chinese breeds.

Figure 1
figure 1

Brown coat colour phenotypes in Chinese indigenous pigs. (a) A reddish brown Tibetan piglet. (b) A flock of Kele piglets with dark brown, pale brown, and black colouration phenotypes. (c) A black brown Dahe sow. (d) A silver brown Dahe sow.

Materials and methods

Sources of animal samples

Tibetan pigs were sampled from a multiplying population with brown colour variants in Guangdong province (n=127) and a nucleus herd with the solid black phenotype in the Gongbujiangda county of the Tibetan Autonomous Region (n=32). Brown Tibetan pigs are descendants of one brown boar and two brown sows from the Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture of Gansu Province. A total of 65 Tibetan pigs, including 32 reddish brown, 3 silver brown, and 30 black individuals from the multiplying population, were used for the genome-wide association mapping. Of the 65 pigs, 32 individuals from 4 families, clearly segregating for the brown phenotype (Supplementary Figure S1), were used for a genome-wide linkage analysis.

Black and brown-coated Kele pigs (n=86) were collected from the Hezhang county of Guizhou province. Of the 86 pigs, 48 pigs from 8 dam families, including 24 dark brown, 2 pale brown, and 22 black individuals, were used for the genome-wide association mapping. Brown-coated Dahe pigs (n=36) were sampled from the Fuyuan county of Guizhou province. A panel of 966 pigs from 27 breeds and wild boars representing a range of distinct coat colours (Table 1) were used for validation of candidate causative mutations. Individual phenotypes of Tibetan, Kele, and Dahe pigs were determined by direct visual inspection and photographs taken outdoors on a sunny day. Coat colour phenotypes of the remaining breeds were obtained directly from the breed registration association. Genomic DNA of all samples was extracted from ear tissues according to standard protocols.

Table 1 Genotype and allele frequencies of the TYRP1 c.1484_1489del (p.M495_G496del) mutation in Chinese and European pig breeds

Genome-wide association analysis and haplotype reconstruction

The PorcineSNP60 BeadChips (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) were used to genotype the 65 Tibetan and 48 Kele pigs on an Illumina iScan System following the manufacturer’s protocol. Bead arrays with call rate <85% were excluded for further analyses. GWASs were performed in a case-control way under the dominant model on all single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with a minor allele frequency >0.05 and call rate >95% by using PLINK (http://pngu.mgh.harvard.edu/purcell/plink/). The genome-wide significance was calculated by phenotype permutation testing (n=100 000). A genome-wide linkage analysis was performed using CRIMAP (available at http://linkage.rockefeller.edu/soft/crimap/). We assumed that the brown phenotype was inherited as a biallelic autosomal codominant trait with complete penetrance. Faithful haplotypes in the mapped interval were reconstructed with DualPHASE (Druet and Georges, 2010). The most likely responsible gene (TYRP1) was identified by the pig–human comparative map on the basis of the well-characterized coat colour genes.

TYRP1 sequencing

To detect genetic variants in the coding region of the TYRP1 gene, we designed six intronic primer pairs flanking TYRP1 exons 2–7 and one primer pair for the 3′-UTR from publicly available sequences (NM_001025226 and NC_010443.1). Primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table S1. Genomic DNA of 5 black and 6 brown Tibetan pigs, 6 Chinese and European wild boars, 48 pigs from 16 different breeds were amplified with these primers. Amplifications were performed in a 25-μl reaction containing 0.4 units Taq DNA polymerase (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) and a magnesium concentration of 2.0 mM at optimal annealing temperatures (Supplementary Table S1) using standard protocols. PCR products were bidirectionally sequenced with original PCR primers. Sequence data were assembled and aligned with ClustalX (http://abs.cit.nih.gov/clustalx/) to reveal genetic variants.

Mutation genotyping

A KpnI PCR-RFLP assay was used to genotype the TYRP1 c.1484_1489del mutation. Genomic DNA was amplified with primers for TYRP1 exon 8 (Supplementary Table S1) as described above. PCR products were digested with KpnI (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) at 37 °C for 4 h. The restriction fragments were separated on 2% agarose gels and genotypes were determined from the resulting band patterns. For genotyping the c.428G>A polymorphism, primers for TYRP1 exon 3 (Supplementary Table S1) were used to amplify a 736-bp fragment containing the mutation site. The resulting PCR products were subjected to SNaPshot analyses with an extension primer (5′-TTTTTTTTTTTTTACCTAAGTACAGAAGAAAAGAACC-3′) and the ABI PRISM SNaPshot Multiplex Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. SNaPshot products (0.5 μl) were mixed with 9 μl of formamide and 0.5 μl of GeneScan-120 LIZ Size Standard and separated by capillary electrophoresis in a 3130XL Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). The genotype data were finally recorded with GeneMapper 4.0 software (Applied Biosystems).

Results

Mapping of the responsible gene

Of the 62 163 SNPs on BeadChip (Ramos et al., 2009), 48 174 SNPs in Tibetan samples and 46 508 SNPs in Kele pigs had a call rate >95% and had annotated genomic positions on Build 7.0 of the Sus scrofa genome (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Projects/S_scrofa/). Four Tibetan pigs having an overall call rate <85% were discarded for further analyses. A final panel of 30 342 and 41 347 informative SNPs with minor allele frequency >0.05 was included in the GWAS on 61 and 48 successfully genotyped Tibetan and Kele pigs, respectively. The 30 342 SNPs were also used for a genome-wide linkage mapping analyses in four Tibetan families.

In Tibetan pigs, the GWAS identified the most strongly associated SNP (INRA0006065, nominal P-value=7.3 × 10−13) at 194.62 Mb on chromosome 1 (SSC1), followed by SNP (INRA0005584, nominal P-value=1.9 × 10−12) at 165.46 Mb on this chromosome. This association is 100-fold stronger than that for any other region in the genome (Figure 2a). By using linkage analyses on four Tibetan families, we observed that three SNPs (INRA0005874 at 182.55 Mb, ALGA0007793 at 184.00 Mb, and INRA0005944 at 188.64 Mb) in the INRA0006065–INRA0005584 region (∼29 Mb) showed complete linkage disequilibrium with the brown locus. These observations strongly support that the responsible gene locates in the 29-Mb region on SSC1.

Figure 2
figure 2

Genome-wide association mapping of the brown coat colour locus in Tibetan (a) and Kele (b) pigs. The black horizontal bars indicate the limits between the 18 autosomes. Evidence for linkage (y axis) is measured as log(1/p). Only genome-wide significant markers are shown. The genome-wide significant threshold was determined by 100 000 phenotype permutations. The green vertical dashed line represents the non-recombinant region in four Tibetan families.

In Kele pigs, SNP INRA0005944 at 188.64 Mb on SSC1 showed the strongest association (nominal P-value=4.6 × 10−9). SNPs ALGA0007745 at 182.29 Mb and DRGA0002004 at 196.38 Mb on SSC1 define the critical interval (∼14 Mb), as the association of SNPs in the interval is 100-fold stronger than that for any other region in the genome (Figure 2b). The mapped interval perfectly overlaps the 29-Mb region harbouring the Tibetan brown locus. This observation supports the assumption that a common mutation underlies the brown phenotypes in Chinese indigenous pigs. We, hence, reconstructed haplotypes around the mapped interval for all tested animals. A 1.5-Mb region from 183.1 to 184.6 Mb on SSC1 appears to be the crucial interval, as it defines the minimum shared haplotype among brown chromosomes from Tibetan and Kele pigs (Figure 3). We conclude that the causal mutation is located in this interval.

Figure 3
figure 3

Shared haplotypes in the critical region harbouring the brown locus between Tibetan and Kele pigs. Red bars indicate the brown haplotype and black bars represent the non-brown haplotype. Only haplotypes of five individuals faithfully reconstructed by the hidden Markov model (DualPHASE) on the basis of family information are shown. The boundaries of homozygous haplotype blocks are given in Mb. The Sus scrofa genome assembly (Build 7.0, available at http://www.ensembl.org/Sus_scrofa/Info/Index) is used as standard reference. The horizontal dashed green lines indicate the minimum shared haplotype block of 1.5 Mb.

As the quality of the pig genome annotation is still far from perfect, we inferred the gene annotation of the critical interval from the corresponding human region. The human orthologous region on HSA9 (assembly GRCh37) contains only three annotated genes, including one well-characterized pigmentation gene: tyrosinase-related protein 1 (TYRP1), which is at ∼200 kb from the homologous sequence of the SNP ALGA0007793 in the 1.5-Mb critical interval. In humans, TYRP1 mutations lead to oculocutaneous albinism type 3, known as Brown and Rufous OCA (Sarangarajan and Boissy, 2001). Moreover, TYRP1 plays a well-established and crucial role in mammalian pigmentation and refers to the classic brown locus in mice (Jackson et al., 1990; Zdarsky et al., 1990; Javerzat and Jackson, 1998). Mutations in TYRP1 are repeatedly associated with brownish coat colour in a number of domestic animals, including cat (Lyons et al., 2005; Schmidt-Kuntzel et al., 2005), dog (Schmutz et al., 2002), cattle (Berryere et al., 2003), and sheep (Gratten et al., 2007), as well as quail (Nadeau et al., 2007) and fish (Braasch et al., 2009). We, therefore, selected TYRP1 as the prime candidate gene and investigated whether mutations in TYRP1 might be responsible for the brown phenotypes in Chinese pig breeds.

Mutations in TYRP1

We designed PCR primers (Supplementary Table S1) to amplify all seven protein-coding exons and exon–intron boundary sites of TYRP1. Mutation screening of 5 black and 6 brown Tibetan samples, as well as 54 animals from 18 breeds, revealed 22 TYRP1 sequence variants. Of the 22 polymorphisms, 13 SNPs were located in introns and none altered the conserved splice sites. The intronic SNPs occurred in both brown-coloured and non-brown-coated breeds, and were therefore not analysed further. Of the nine mutations within the coding region, seven substitutions also segregated in both brown-coloured and non-brown-coated breeds (Supplementary Table S2), and were apparently excluded as the causative mutation. Two other coding variants result in amino acid changes: c.428G>A and c.1484_1489delTGGGTA (Supplementary Figure S3). The non-synonymous c.428G>A polymorphism at exon 2 leads to a transition from a histidine to arginine at amino acid 143 of the protein (p.143His>Arg). The 6-bp deletion in exon 8, c.1484_1489del, removes two amino acids from protein at positions 495 and 496 (p.M495_G496del), respectively. We performed alignment of the TYRP1 protein sequence from 13 vertebrate species and found that the hexanucleotide deletion occurs in a conserved transmembrane domain region predicted by SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/) (Supplementary Figure S3). The two exonic mutations are likely of functional significance and were hence analysed further. We used KpnI PCR–RFLP to genotype the deletion polymorphism using primers for exon 8 (Supplementary Table S1). The wild-type allele is represented by two fragments of 398 and 347 bp and the del allele by an uncut amplicon of 745 bp (Supplementary Figure S2). The c.428G>A polymorphism was genotyped by a SNaPshot assay (Supplementary Figure S2).

Association of TYRP1 mutations with brown phenotypes

We investigated the distribution of genotypes at the c.428G>A and c.1484_1489del sites in 966 pigs from 27 different breeds and wild pigs, representing a wide range of colour phenotypes. The analysis revealed that a majority of the non-brown-coated breeds segregated for the c.428G>A polymorphism (Supplementary Table S3). This excluded this missense mutation as the cause of the brown coat colour phenotype. Intriguingly, we found a perfect association of the c.1484_1489del mutation with the brown phenotype. All 121 brown-coated pigs from Tibetan, Kele, and Dahe pigs were homozygous or heterozygous for the del allele (Table 1). None of the 160 black Tibetan and Kele pigs, and 685 pigs from other 27 diverse pig breeds and wild boars had the del allele (χ2-test, P=4.41 × 10−212; Table 1). In Tibetan pigs, all the presumed heterozygous animals in the family samples (Supplementary Figure S1) carried the +/del genotype. Moreover, all heterozygotes had the reddish brown phenotype, whereas the del/del animals uniformly displayed the silver brown colouration, reflecting that this mutation perfectly fitted the proposed codominant model of inheritance for the phenotype. Kele and Dahe animals homozygous for the del allele show pale or silver brown colouration, indistinguishable from those observed in Tibetan pigs. However, discordant brown shades are observed among +/del animals of Tibetan (reddish brown), Kele (dark brown), and Dahe (black or yellow brown) pigs.

Discussion

Genome-wide association analysis on the basis of large-scale SNP scan is emerging as a new and powerful approach for high resolution genetic analysis in domestic animals (Andersson, 2009), but to our knowledge this approach has not yet been reported in pigs. In this study, we used newly developed PorcineSNP60 BeadChip to perform a genome scan for the brown coat colour locus in Chinese pig breeds. The majority of SNPs on BeadChip were originally discovered from western commercial breeds and wild pigs (Ramos et al., 2009). Applications of the chip in Asian breeds are hence cautioned for the ascertainment bias. Nevertheless, 64.1 and 66.5% of the SNPs on the chip are segregating in the Tibetan and Kele breeds with minor allele frequency >0.05, proving the usefulness of BeadChip in Chinese pig populations, although not as powerful as the chip did in western breeds.

The GWAS identified significantly associated regions in Tibetan and Kele pigs that perfectly overlap on SSC1, indicating that the brown mutation in the tested breeds is derived from a common ancestor. The mapped intervals are unexpectedly large (∼29 and 14 Mb). This is most likely caused by very strong linkage disequilibrium in tested animals. Chinese local breeds, including Tibetan, Kele, and Dahe pigs, have been endangered and their number and size have decreased dramatically in recent years resulting from the wide introduction of international breeds for commercial interests. A high level of inbreeding is hence expected to occur in these threatened breeds, leading to strong linkage disequilibrium and large mapped intervals in the GWAS.

Haplotype-sharing analysis further revealed a critical region of 1.5 Mb on SSC1 that encompasses only one pigmentation gene, TYRP1. We, therefore, investigated TYRP1 variants in a collection of diverse pig breeds and identified a strong candidate causative mutation: c.1484_1489del. The deletion causes a lack of two amino acids in a predicted transmembrane domain of the protein and is likely of functional significance. Of the TYRP1 functional variants affecting brown phenotypes in vertebrates, none affect the two amino acids. The protein-altering deletion showed complete association with the brown colouration across Tibetan, Kele, and Dahe breeds by occurring exclusively in brown pigs and lacking in all non-brown-coated pigs from 27 different breeds. The perfect association across breeds, together with high-resolution mapping of the responsible locus, positional characterization of the strong candidate gene, protein-altering nature, and concordant inheritance model of the mutation, collectively provide evidence of the casualty of TYRP1 c.1484_1489del for the brown coat colour phenotypes in Chinese breeds.

TYRP1 functional mutations usually show a recessive inheritance in vertebrates except for a dominant mutation causing the white-based brown in mice (Zdarsky et al., 1990). Interestingly, the c.1484_1489del mutation is inherited in a codominant way. One explanation is that the mutation is a dominant-negative mutation, which interferes with the wild allele and consequently leads to a different phenotype in the heterozygote. Alternatively, the brown phenotype might be caused by TYRP1 haploinsufficiency in Chinese pigs.

The causative mutation is probably of Asian origin and occurred after domestication, as determined by its absence in European breeds and wild pigs. It is not a recent mutation as brown-coated Dahe and Kele pigs have been reported as early as the seventeenth century (Zhang et al., 1986). Black Tibetan pigs and dark brown Kele pigs have always fascinated their human owners, whereas yellow brown-coated Dahe pigs are generally favoured compared with silver brown individuals (Lian and Wu, 1985). A molecular test for the c.1484_1489del mutation will give breeders an efficient and accurate tool to breed for brown phenotypes or to select against them.

More than a single TYRP1 mutation have been associated with various brown shades in mice (Jackson et al., 1990; Zdarsky et al., 1990; Javerzat and Jackson, 1998), cats (Lyons et al., 2005; Schmidt-Kuntzel et al., 2005), and dogs (Schmutz et al., 2002). We hence expected TYRP1 allele series for brown variants in Chinese pigs. Nevertheless, we did not identify other equivalently significant variants in the coding region of TYRP1 gene except for the common causative variant, c.1484_1489del. There are several possible explanations. The first is the involvement of epistatic effect of other coat colour genes. The interaction between TYRP1 and melanocortin 1 receptor has been shown to be important in pigmentation in dogs (Schmutz et al., 2002). However, we found that the epistasis interaction for TYRP1 and melanocortin 1 receptor did not explain the brown shades in Kele and Dahe pigs (Supplementary Table S4). A further investigation on other pigmentation genes, including dilution genes, is worthwhile. The second possible explanation is minor polygenic or modifier gene effects leading to variations in pigment intensity.

In conclusion, we have identified the c.1484_1489del mutation in the TYRP1 gene as the causative mutation for the brown colouration in Chinese indigenous pigs. This result provides the first direct evidence for the involvement of TYRP1 in pigmentation of pigs and advances the understanding of the molecular basis of colour variation in pigs. Our study also provides a genetic testing tool to breed for or against brown coat colour in Chinese indigenous pigs.

Accession numbers

The coding sequences of TYRP1 determined in this study have been submitted to GenBank with accession numbers GU345783—GU345801.