Abstract
An understanding of the genetic coordination of signal and response in communication systems is an elusive quest in many organisms. Two hypotheses currently exist to explain the mechanism of coordination and its evolution: (1) signal-response systems are a result of pleiotropic effects of a gene or genes controlling the neural network underlying both or, (2) independent genes produce the signal and response and selection acts similarly on the traits. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that independently assorting genes control the production of, and response to, a sex pheromone in the pine engraver beetle, Ips pini. We measured the genetic correlation of production and response in sons from two situations: wild-caught pairs where there was some level of assortative mating and after five generations of forced ‘no choice’ mating. If production and response are a result of pleiotropy then there should be no breakdown in the genetic correlation of the two traits under the ‘no choice’ mating. Both pheromone production by males and the response to it by males and females are highly heritable. Male response appears to be genetically unlinked to pheromone production; therefore it is likely that the traits are not a result of pleiotropy. Instead, assortative mating may maintain the phenotypic correlation between the pheromone blend produced and the blend to which that individual responds.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Alexander, R D. 1962. Evolutionary change in cricket acoustical communication. Evolution, 16, 443–467.
Bakker, T C M. 1993. Positive genetic correlation between female preference and preferred male ornament in sticklebacks. Nature, 363, 255–257.
Barton, N H, and Turelli, M. 1991. Natural and sexual selection on many loci. Genetics, 127, 229–255.
Becker, W A. 1984. A Manual of Quantitative Genetics. Academic Enterprises, Pullman, Washington, DC.
Birch, M C, Light, D M, Wood, D L, Browne, L E, Silverstein, R M, and Bergot, B J. et al. 1980. Pheromonal attraction and allomonal interruption of Ips pini in California by the two enantiomers of ipsdienol. J Chem Ecol, 6, 703–717.
Boake, C R B. 1991. Coevolution of senders and receivers of sexual signals: genetic coupling and genetic correlations. Trends Ecol Evol, 6, 225–227.
Breden, F, and Hornaday, K. 1994. A test of indirect models of sexual selection in the Trinidad guppy. Heredity, 73, 831–833.
Breden, F, and Stoner, G. 1987. Male predation risk determines female choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Nature, 329, 831–833.
Butlin, R K, and Ritchie, M G. 1989. Genetic coupling in mate recognition systems: what is the evidence? Biol J Linn Soc, 37, 237–246.
Charalambous, M, Butlin, R K, and Hewitt, G M. 1994. Genetic variation in male song and female preference in the grasshopper Chorthippus brunneus (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Anim Behav, 47, 399–411.
Crow, J F. 1986. Basic Concepts in Population, Quantitative and Evolutionary Genetics. W.H. Freeman, New York.
Doherty, J, and Hoy, R. 1985. Communication in insects. III. The auditory behavior of crickets: some views of genetic coupling, song recognition, and predator detection. Q Rev Biol, 60, 457–472.
Elsner, N, and Popov, A V. 1978. Neuroethology of acoustic communication. Adv Insect Physiol, 13, 229–335.
Falconer, D S. 1981. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 2nd edn. Longman, Essex.
Gimelfarb, A. 1985. Is offspring-midparent regression affected by assortative mating of parents? Genet Res, 47, 71–75.
Gimelfarb, A. 1986. Offspring-parent genotypic regression: how linear is it? Biometrics, 42, 67–71.
Hager, B J, and Teale, S A. 1994. Repeatability of female response to ipsdienol enantiomeric mixtures by the pine engraver, Ips pini. J Chem Ecol, 20, 2611–2622.
Heisler, I L. 1984. A quantitative genetic model for the origin of mating preferences. Evolution, 38, 1283–1295.
Von Helverson, D, and Von Helverson, O. 1975a. Verhaltensgenetische unterschangen am akustichen Kommunkationsystem der Feldheuschrecken (Orthoptera, Acrididae) I. Der Sang von Arbastarden zwischen Chorthippus biguttulus und Ch. mollis. J Comp Physiol, 104, 273–299.
Von Helverson, D, and Von Helverson, O. 1975b. Verhaltensgenetische unterschangen am akustichen Kommunkationsystem der Feldheuschrecken (Orthoptera, Acrididae) II. Das Lautschema von Arbastarden zwischen Chorthippus biguttulus und Ch. mollis. J Comp Physiol, 104, 301–323.
Herms, D A, Haack, R A, and Ayers, B D. 1991. Variation in semiochemical-mediated prey-predator interaction: Ips pini (Scolytidae) and Thanasimus dubius (Cleridae). J Chem Ecol, 17, 515–524.
Houde, A. 1992. Sex-linked heritability of a sexually selected character in a natural population of Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae) (guppies). Heredity, 69, 229–235.
Houde, A. 1993. Evolution by sexual selection: what can population comparisons tell us? Am Nat, 141, 796–803.
Houde, A E. 1994. Effect of artificial selection on male colour patterns on mating preference of female guppies. Proc R Soc B, 256, 125–130.
Hoy, R. 1974. Genetic control of acoustic behavior in crickets. Am Zool, 14, 1067–1080.
Kirkpatrick, M. 1982. Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution, 36, 1–12.
Lande, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 78, 3721–3725.
Lanier, G N, Classon, A, Stewart, T, Piston, J, and Silverstein, R M. 1980. Ips pini: the basis for inter-populational differences in pheromone biology. J Chem Ecol, 6, 677–687.
Lissemore, F. 1993. Sources of Variation in Male Mating Success and the Function of Frass-Clearing by Males in the Pine Engraver Beetle, Ips pini (Scolytidae). Ph.D. Thesis, Syracuse University, New York.
Löfstedt, C, Hansson, B S, Roelofs, W, and Bengtsson, B O. 1989. No linkage between genes controlling female pheromone production and male pheromone response in the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis Jubner (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Genetics, 123, 553–556.
Miller, D R, Borden, J H, and Slessor, K N. 1989. Inter-and intrapopulation variation of the pheromone, ipsdienol produced by male pine engravers, Ips pini (Say) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). J Chem Ecol, 15, 233–247.
Mustaparta, H, Tommeras, B A, and Lanier, G N. 1985. Pheromone receptor cell specificity in interpopulational hybrids of Ips pini (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). J Chem Ecol, 11, 999–1007.
O'Donald, P. 1980. Genetic Models of Sexual Selection. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Pomiankowski, A, and Sheridan, L. 1994. Linked sexiness and choosiness. Trends Ecol Evol, 9, 242–244.
Raffa, K F, and Klepzig, K D. 1989. Chiral escape of bark beetles from predators responding to a bark beetle pheromone. Oecologia, 80, 566–569.
Reeve, E C R. 1961. A note on non-random mating in progeny tests. Genet Res, 2, 195–203.
Roelofs, W, Gloer, T, Tang, X, Sreng, I, Robbins, P, and Eckenrode, C. et al. 1987. Sex pheromone production and perception in European corn borer moths is determined by both autosomal and sex-linked genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 84, 7585–7589.
Seybold, S J, Ohtsuka, T, Wood, D L, and Kubo, I. 1995. The enantiomeric composition of ipsdienol: a chemotaxonomic character for North American population of Ips spp. in the pini subgeneric group (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). J Chem Ecol, 21, 995–1016.
Teale, S A, Hager, B J, and Webster, F X. 1994. Pheromone-based assortative mating in a bark beetle. Anim Behav, 48, 569–578.
Teale, S A, and Lanier, G N. 1991. Seasonal variability in response of Ips pini (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to ipsdienol in New York. J Chem Ecol, 17, 1145–1158.
Teale, S A, Webster, F X, Zhang, A, and Lanier, G N. 1991. Lanierone: a new pheromone component from Ips pini (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in New York. J Chem Ecol, 17, 1159–1176.
Wilkinson, G S, and Reillo, P R. 1984. Female choice response to artificial selection on an exaggerated male trait in a stalk-eyed fly. Proc R Soc B, 255, 1–6.
Zar, J J. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Engle-wood, NJ.
Zouros, E. 1981. The chromosomal basis of sexual isolation in two sibling species of Drosophila: D. arizonensis and D. mojavensis. Genetics, 97, 703–718.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hager, B., Teale, S. The genetic control of pheromone production and response in the pine engraver beetle Ips pini. Heredity 77, 100–107 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1996.112
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1996.112
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Local, Geographical, and Contextual Variation in the Aggregation Pheromone Blend of the Spruce Beetle, Dendroctonus rufipennis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)
Journal of Chemical Ecology (2020)
-
Kairomonal Responses of Natural Enemies and Associates of the Southern Ips (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) to Ipsdienol, Ipsenol and Cis-Verbenol
Journal of Insect Behavior (2013)
-
High individual variation in pheromone production by tree-killing bark beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae)
Naturwissenschaften (2007)
-
Natural selection and divergence in mate preference during speciation
Genetica (2007)
-
Can chemical communication be cryptic? Adaptations by herbivores to natural enemies exploiting prey semiochemistry
Oecologia (2007)