Abstract
Increased fluctuating asymmetry (FA) of morphological traits occurs under environmental and genomic stress. Such conditions will therefore lead to a reduction in developmental homeostasis. Based upon temperature extreme experiments, relatively severe stress is needed to increase FA under field conditions. Increasing asymmetry tends, therefore, to occur in stressed marginal habitats. Genetic perturbations implying genomic stress include certain specific genes, directional selection, inbreeding, and chromosome balance alterations. It is for these reasons that transgenic organisms may show increased FA. As there is evidence that the effects of genomic and environmental stress are cumulative, organisms in a state of genomic stress may provide sensitive biological monitors of environmental stress.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Atkinson, D E. 1977. Cellular Energy Metabolism and its Regulation. Academic Press, New York.
Clarke, G M, Brand, G W, and Whitten, M J. 1986. Fluctuating asymmetry: a technique for measuring developmenal stress caused by inbreeding. Aust J Biol Sci, 39, 145–153.
Clarke, G M, and McKenzie, J A. 1987. Developmental stability of insecticide resistant phenotypes in blowfly; a result of canalizing selection. Nature, 325, 345–346.
Grell, R F. 1978. A comparison of heat and inter-chromosomal effects on recombination and interference in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 89, 65–77.
Hayman, D L, and Parsons, P A. 1960. The effect of temperature, age and an inversion on recombination values and interference in the X-chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica, 32, 74–88.
Hoffmann, A A, and Parsons, P A. 1991. Evolutionary Genetics and Environmental Stress. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Holloway, G J, Povey, S R, and Sibly, R M. 1990. The effect of new environment on adapted genetic architecture. Heredity, 64, 323–330.
Homyk, T, Szidonya, J, and Suzuki, D T. 1980. Behavioral mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. III. Isolation and mapping of mutations by direct visual observations of behavioral phenotypes. Molec Gen Genet, 177, 533–565.
Langridge, J. 1968. Thermal responses of mutant enzymes and temperature limits to growth. Molec Gen Genet, 103, 116–126.
Lenski, R E, and Nguyen, T T. 1988. Stability of recombinant DNA and its effect on fitness. Trends Ecol Evol, 3, 518–520.
Lucchesi, J C, and Suzuki, D T. 1968. The interchromosomal control of recombination. Ann Rev Genet, 2, 53–86.
Mansfield, T A, and Freer-Smith, P H. 1981. Effects of urban air pollution on plant growth. Biol Rev, 56, 343–368.
Neel, J V. 1941. A relation between larval nutrition and the frequency of crossing over in the third chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 26, 506–516.
Palmer, A R, and Strobeck, C. 1986. Fluctuating asymmetry: measurement, analysis, patterns. Ann Rev Ecol Syst, 17, 391–421.
Parsons, P A. 1961. Fly size, emergence time and sternopleural chaeta number in Drosophila. Heredity, 16, 455–473.
Parsons, P A. 1962. Maternal age and development variability. J Exp Biol, 39, 251–260.
Parsons, P A. 1987. Evolutionary rates under environmental stress, Evol Biol, 21, 311–347.
Parsons, P A. 1988. Evolutionary rates: effects of stress upon recombination. Biol J Linn Soc, 35, 49–68.
Parsons, P A. 1990a. Fluctuating asymmetry: an epigenetic measure of stress. Biol Rev, 65, 131–145.
Parsons, P A. 1990b. Risks from genetically engineered organisms: energetics and environmental stress. Funct Ecol, 4, 265–271.
Parsons, P A. 1990c. The metabolic cost of multiple environmental stresses: implications for climatic change and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol, 5, 315–317.
Parsons, P A. 1991. Can atmospheric pollution be monitored from the longevity of stress sensitive behavioural mutants in Drosophila? Func Ecol, 5, 713–715.
Plough, H H. 1917. The effect of temperature on crossing over in Drosophila. J Exp Zool, 24, 148–209.
Pursel, V G, Pinkert, C A, Miller, K F, Bolt, D J, Campell, R G, Palmiter, R D, Brinster, R L, and Hammer, R E. 1989. Genetic engineering of livestock. Science, 224, 1281–1288.
Reeve, E C R. 1960. Some genetic tests on asymmetry of sternopleural chaeta number in Drosophila. Genet Res, 1, 151–172.
Root, M. 1990. Biological monitors of pollution. BioScience, 40, 83–86.
Schultz, J, and Redfield, H. 1951. Interchromosomal effects on crossing over in Drosophila. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol, 16, 175–197.
Sciulli, P W, Doyle, W J, Kelley, C, Siegel, P, and Siegel, M I. 1979. The interaction of stressors in the induction of increased levels of fluctuating asymmetry in the laboratory rat. Am J Phys Anthrop, 65, 279–284.
Soulé, M, and Baker, B. 1968. Phenetics of natural populations. IV. The population asymmetry parameter in the butterfly Coenonympha tullia. Heredity, 23, 611–614.
Thoday, J M. 1958. Homeostasis in a selection experiment. Heredity, 12, 401–415.
Townsend, G C. 1983. Fluctuating dental asymmetry in Down's syndrome. Aust Dental J, 28, 39–44.
Trout, W E, and Hanson, G P. 1971. The effect of Los Angeles smog on the longevity of normal and hyperkinetic Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 68, S69.
Trout, W E, and Kaplan, W D. 1970. A relation between longevity, metabolic rate, and activity in shaker mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. Exp Geront, 5, 83–92.
Valentine, D W, and Soulé, M. 1973. Effect of p,p' -DDT on developmental stability of pectoral fin rays in the grunion, Leuresthes tenuis. Fish Bull, 71, 921–930.
Waddington, C H. 1956. Principles of Embryology, George Allen & Unwin, London.
Wiener, J G, and Rago, P J. 1987. A test of fluctuating asymmetry in bluegills (Lepomis macrochirus Rafinesque) as a measure of pH-related stress. Environ Pollut, 44, 27–36.
Zakharov, V M. 1989. Future prospects for population phenogenetics. Sov Sci Rev F Physiol Gen Biol, 4, 1–79.
Zhuchenko, A A, Korol, A B, Gavrilenko, T A, and Kibenko, T Y. 1986. Correlation between the stability of the genotype and the change in its recombination characteristics under temperature influences. Genetika, 22, 966–974.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Parsons, P. Fluctuating asymmetry: a biological monitor of environmental and genomic stress. Heredity 68, 361–364 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1992.51
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1992.51
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Palatal asymmetry assessed by intraoral scans: effects of sex, orthodontic treatment, and twinning. A retrospective cohort study
BMC Oral Health (2023)
-
A Dilp8-dependent time window ensures tissue size adjustment in Drosophila
Nature Communications (2022)
-
A Preliminary Investigation Into Women’s Sexual Risk-taking That Could Lead to Unintended Pregnancy
Evolutionary Psychological Science (2022)
-
Fluctuating asymmetry in the insular population of ayu, Plecoglossus altivelis ryukyuensis, estimating its genetic diversity at extinction
Ichthyological Research (2022)
-
Individual decisions drive the changes in movement patterns of ground beetles between forestry management types
Biologia (2021)