Summary
Evolutionarily stable strategies are examined for genes affecting equal segregation and independent assortment. When a preferentially segregating allele incurs a cost of eliminating the other allele, it can invade a population only if some of the cost is reallocated to offspring containing the overrepresented allele.
Different autosomal genes in one individual may have conflicting fitnesses whenever they do not invariably segregate into the same offspring. Evolutionarily stable strategies are examined for the rest of the genome to “cohabit” with two alleles, α1 and α2, which are adapted to different circumstances and thereby provide unique opportunities for their carriers. The ESS for genes which are not linked to such an ecologically maintained polymorphism is for α1 and α2 to segregate from α1α2 heterozygotes in the ratio of their unique opportunities. Additional considerations usually operate to select positively for equal segregation, however. First, the combined effects of linked series of genes with distinct opportunities and linkage to invariably harmful alleles may cause the opportunities for heterozygous blocks of genes to average out towards equality. Second, genes which are linked with α and in linkage equilibrium with its alleles, and genes which cannot detect whether α1 or α2 offer more opportunities, have a risk-averting ESS when they cohabit equally with α1 and α2. Their cohabitation strategies generate selection for equal segregation and independent assortment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Alexander, R D, and Borgia, G. 1978. Group selection, altruism, and the levels of organization of life. Ann Rev Ecol Syst, 9, 449–474.
Andrews, P W, and Goodfellow, P N. 1982. Analysing the mouse T/t complex. Nature, 299, 296–297.
Bell, G. 1982. The masterpiece of nature University of California Press, Berkeley.
Bulmer, M G. 1980. The sib competition model for the maintenance of sex and recombination. J theor Biol, 82, 335–345.
Cameron, D R, and Moav, R. 1957. Inheritance in Nicotiana tabacum XXVII. Pollen killer, an alien genetic locus inducing abortion of microspores not carrying it. Genetics, 42, 326–335.
Charlesworth, B. 1976. Recombination modification in a fluctuating environment. Genetics, 83, 181–195.
Charlesworth, B, and Hartl, D L. 1978. Population dynamics of the Segregation Distorter polymorphism of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 89, 171–192.
Charnov, E L. 1982. The Theory of Sex Allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Clark, A B. 1978. Sex ratio and local resource competition in a prosimian primate. Science, 201, 163–165.
Cosmides, L M, and Tooby, J. 1981. Cytoplasmic inheritance and intragenomic conflict. J theor Biol, 89, 83–129.
Crow, J F. 1979. Genes that violate Mendel's Rules. Sci Amer, 240 (2), 104–113.
Dawkins, R. 1982. The Extended Phenotype. Freeman, Oxford.
Ghiselin, M T. 1974. The Economy of Nature and the Evolution of Sex. University of California Press, Berkeley.
Grant, V. 1975. Genetics of Flowering Plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
Hamilton, W D. 1967. Extraordinary sex ratios. Science, 156, 477–488.
Lamb, B C, and Helmi, S. 1982. The extent to which gene conversion can change allele frequencies in populations. Gen Res, 39, 199–217.
Leigh, E G. 1977. How does selection reconcile individual advantage with the good of the group? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 74, 4542–4546.
Liberman, U, and Feldman, M W. 1960. On the evolutionary significance of Mendel's Ratios. Theor Pop Biol, 17, 1–15.
Maynard Smith, J. 1971. What use is sex? J theor Biol, 20, 319–335.
Maynard Smith, J. 1974. The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts. J theor Biol 47, 209–221.
Maynard Smith, J. 1976. A short-term advantage for sex and recombination through sib-competition. J theor Biol, 63, 245–258.
Maynard Smith, J. 1977. Why the genome does not congeal. Nature, 268, 693–696.
Maynard Smith, J. 1978. The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Maynard, and Smith, J. A new theory of sexual investment. Behau Ecol Sociobiol, 7, 247–251.
Prout, T. 1953. Some effects of variations in the segregation ratio and of selection upon the frequency of alleles. Acta Genet, et Statist Med, 4, 148–151.
Prout, T, Bundgaard, J, and Bryant, S. 1973. Population genetics of modifiers of meiotic drive. 1. The solution of a special case and some general implications. Theor Pop Biol, 4, 446–465.
Scoles, G J, and Kibirge-Sebunya, I N. 1983. Preferential abortion of gametes in wheat induced by an Agropyron chromosome. Can J Genet Cytol, 25, 1–6.
Slatkin, M. 1975. Gene flow and selection in a two-locus system. Genetics, 81, 787–802.
Strobeck, C, Maynard Smith, J, and Charlesworth, B. 1976. The effects of hitch-hiking on a gene for recombination. Genetics, 82, 547–558.
Taylor, P D. 1979. An analytical model for a short-term advantage of sex. J theor Biol, 81, 407–423.
Thomson, G J, and Feldman, M W. 1974. Population genetics of modifiers of meiotic drive. II. Linkage modification in the Segregation Distortion system. Theor Pop Biol, 5, 155–162.
Turner, J R. 1967. Why does the genome not congeal? Evolution, 21, 645–656.
Williams, G C. 1975. Sex and Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Wu, C-I. 1983. The fate of autosomal modifiers of the sex-ratio trait in Drosophila and other sex-linked meiotic drive systems. Theor Pop Biol, 24, 107–120.
Young, J P W. 1981. Sib competition can favour sex in two ways. J theor Biol, 88, 755–756.
Zimmering, S, Sandler, L, and Nicoletti, B. 1970. Mechanisms of meiotic drive. Ann Rev Genetics, 4, 409–436.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lloyd, D. Gene selection of Mendel's rules. Heredity 53, 613–624 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1984.119
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1984.119
This article is cited by
-
Parallels between sexual strategies and other allocation strategies
Experientia (1985)