Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Enhancing DNA vaccine potency by co-administration of xenogenic MHC class-I DNA

Abstract

Intramuscular administration of DNA vaccines can lead to the generation of antigen-specific immune responses through cross-priming mechanisms. We propose a strategy that is capable of leading to local inflammation and enhancing cross-priming, thus resulting in improved antigen-specific immune responses. Therefore, in this study, we evaluated the immunological responses elicited through electroporation-mediated intramuscular administration of a DNA vaccine encoding calreticulin (CRT) linked to human papillomavirus type 16 E7 (CRT–E7) in combination with DNA expressing HLA-A2 as compared with CRT–E7 DNA vaccination alone. We found that the co-administration of a DNA vaccine in conjunction with a DNA encoding a xenogenic major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecule could significantly enhance the E7-specific CD8+ T-cell immune responses and antitumor effects against an E7-expressing tumor, TC-1, in C57BL/6 tumor-bearing mice. Furthermore, a similar enhancement in E7-specific immune responses was observed by the co-administration of CRT–E7 DNA with DNA encoding other types of xenogenic MHC class-I molecules. This strategy was also applicable to another antigenic system, ovalbumin. Further characterization of the injection site revealed that the co-administration of HLA-A2 DNA led to a significant increase in the number of infiltrating CD8+ T lymphocytes and CD11b/c+ antigen-presenting cells. Furthermore, the E7-specific immune responses generated by intramuscular co-administration of CRT–E7 with HLA-A2 DNA were reduced in HLA-A2 transgenic mice. Thus, our data suggest that intramuscular co-administration of DNA encoding xenogenic MHC class-I can further improve the antigen-specific immune responses, as well as antitumor effects generated by DNA vaccines through enhancement of cross-priming mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Donnelly JJ, Ulmer JB, Shiver JW, Liu MA . DNA vaccines. Annu Rev Immunol 1997; 15: 617–648.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gurunathan S, Klinman DM, Seder RA . DNA vaccines: immunology, application, and optimization*. Annu Rev Immunol 2000; 18: 927–974.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hung CF, Wu TC . Improving DNA vaccine potency via modification of professional antigen presenting cells. Curr Opin Mol Ther 2003; 5: 20–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tsen SW, Paik AH, Hung CF, Wu TC . Enhancing DNA vaccine potency by modifying the properties of antigen-presenting cells. Expert Rev Vaccines 2007; 6: 227–239.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng WF, Hung CF, Chai CY, Hsu KF, He L, Ling M et al. Tumor-specific immunity and antiangiogenesis generated by a DNA vaccine encoding calreticulin linked to a tumor antigen. J Clin Invest 2001; 108: 669–678.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Peng S, Tomson TT, Trimble C, He L, Hung CF, Wu TC . A combination of DNA vaccines targeting human papillomavirus type 16 E6 and E7 generates potent antitumor effects. Gene Therapy 2006; 13: 257–265.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Tseng CW, Monie A, Trimble C, Alvarez RD, Huh WK, Buchsbaum DJ et al. Combination of treatment with death receptor 5-specific antibody with therapeutic HPV DNA vaccination generates enhanced therapeutic anti-tumor effects. Vaccine 2008; 26: 4314–4319.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Tseng CW, Monie A, Wu CY, Huang B, Wang MC, Hung CF et al. Treatment with proteasome inhibitor bortezomib enhances antigen-specific CD8+ T-cell-mediated antitumor immunity induced by DNA vaccination. J Mol Med 2008; 86: 899–908.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Peng S, Trimble C, Alvarez RD, Huh WK, Lin Z, Monie A et al. Cluster intradermal DNA vaccination rapidly induces E7-specific CD8+ T-cell immune responses leading to therapeutic antitumor effects. Gene Therapy 2008; 15: 1156–1166.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim JW, Hung CF, Juang J, He L, Kim TW, Armstrong DK et al. Comparison of HPV DNA vaccines employing intracellular targeting strategies. Gene Therapy 2004; 11: 1011–1018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bodles-Brakhop AM, Draghia-Akli R . DNA vaccination and gene therapy: optimization and delivery for cancer therapy. Expert Rev Vaccines 2008; 7: 1085–1101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hung CF, Ma B, Monie A, Tsen SW, Wu TC . Therapeutic human papillomavirus vaccines: current clinical trials and future directions. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2008; 8: 421–439.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hung CF, Monie A, Alvarez RD, Wu TC . DNA vaccines for cervical cancer: from bench to bedside. Exp Mol Med 2007; 39: 679–689.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bansal A, Jackson B, West K, Wang S, Lu S, Kennedy JS et al. Multifunctional T-cell characteristics induced by a polyvalent DNA prime/protein boost human immunodeficiency virus type 1 vaccine regimen given to healthy adults are dependent on the route and dose of administration. J Virol 2008; 82: 6458–6469.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Luxembourg A, Evans CF, Hannaman D . Electroporation-based DNA immunisation: translation to the clinic. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2007; 7: 1647–1664.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rols MP . Mechanism by which electroporation mediates DNA migration and entry into cells and targeted tissues. Methods Mol Biol 2008; 423: 19–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Aihara H, Miyazaki J . Gene transfer into muscle by electroporation in vivo. Nat Biotechnol 1998; 16: 867–870.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mir LM, Bureau MF, Gehl J, Rangara R, Rouy D, Caillaud JM et al. High-efficiency gene transfer into skeletal muscle mediated by electric pulses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96: 4262–4267.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Peng B, Zhao Y, Xu L, Xu Y . Electric pulses applied prior to intramuscular DNA vaccination greatly improve the vaccine immunogenicity. Vaccine 2007; 25: 2064–2073.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Best SR, Peng S, Juang CM, Hung CF, Hannaman D, Saunders JR et al. Administration of HPV DNA vaccine via electroporation elicits the strongest CD8+ T cell immune responses compared to intramuscular injection and intradermal gene gun delivery. Vaccine 2009; 27: 5450–5459.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Fu TM, Ulmer JB, Caulfield MJ, Deck RR, Friedman A, Wang S et al. Priming of cytotoxic T lymphocytes by DNA vaccines: requirement for professional antigen presenting cells and evidence for antigen transfer from myocytes. Mol Med 1997; 3: 362–371.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Leachman SA, Tigelaar RE, Shlyankevich M, Slade MD, Irwin M, Chang E et al. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor priming plus papillomavirus E6 DNA vaccination: effects on papilloma formation and regression in the cottontail rabbit papillomavirus—rabbit model. J Virol 2000; 74: 8700–8708.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim MS, Sin JI . Both antigen optimization and lysosomal targeting are required for enhanced anti-tumour protective immunity in a human papillomavirus E7-expressing animal tumour model. Immunology 2005; 116: 255–266.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lori F, Weiner DB, Calarota SA, Kelly LM, Lisziewicz J . Cytokine-adjuvanted HIV-DNA vaccination strategies. Springer Semin Immunopathol 2006; 28: 231–238.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Le Borgne M, Etchart N, Goubier A, Lira SA, Sirard JC, van Rooijen N et al. Dendritic cells rapidly recruited into epithelial tissues via CCR6/CCL20 are responsible for CD8+ T cell crosspriming in vivo. Immunity 2006; 24: 191–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim TW, Hung CF, Ling M, Juang J, He L, Hardwick JM et al. Enhancing DNA vaccine potency by coadministration of DNA encoding antiapoptotic proteins. J Clin Invest 2003; 112: 109–117.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Lin KY, Guarnieri FG, Staveley-O'Carroll KF, Levitsky HI, August JT, Pardoll DM et al. Treatment of established tumors with a novel vaccine that enhances major histocompatibility class II presentation of tumor antigen. Cancer Res 1996; 56: 21–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim TW, Hung CF, Boyd DA, He L, Lin CT, Kaiserman D et al. Enhancement of DNA vaccine potency by coadministration of a tumor antigen gene and DNA encoding serine protease inhibitor-6. Cancer Res 2004; 64: 400–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shen Z, Reznikoff G, Dranoff G, Rock KL . Cloned dendritic cells can present exogenous antigens on both MHC class I and class II molecules. J Immunol 1997; 158: 2723–2730.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen CH, Wang TL, Hung CF, Yang Y, Young RA, Pardoll DM et al. Enhancement of DNA vaccine potency by linkage of antigen gene to an HSP70 gene. Cancer Res 2000; 60: 1035–1042.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ji H, Chang EY, Lin KY, Kurman RJ, Pardoll DM, Wu TC . Antigen-specific immunotherapy for murine lung metastatic tumors expressing human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein. Int J Cancer 1998; 78: 41–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the American Cancer Society (CF Hung) and National Cancer Institute SPORE in Cervical Cancer P50 CA098252 and the 1 RO1 CA114425-01 (T-C Wu).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T-C Wu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on Gene Therapy website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kang, T., Chung, JY., Monie, A. et al. Enhancing DNA vaccine potency by co-administration of xenogenic MHC class-I DNA. Gene Ther 17, 531–540 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/gt.2009.152

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/gt.2009.152

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links