Correction to: Eye (2011) 25, 1457–1464; doi:10.1038/eye.2011.196; published online 19 August 2011

Since the publication of the above article, the authors have noticed that in Table 2, patients 6 and 7 were labelled incorrectly as being ‘Recurrent two times’. The correct table is shown below.

Table 2 Summary of cases

The typesetters would like to apologise for this mistake.