Sir,
We thank Pyott1 for his interest in our article.2 He rightly echoes concerns regarding the immoral exploitation of workers associated with manufacturing practices in the developing world.3 Although this concern and subsequent fair-trade comments are worthy of consideration, it should be remembered that the original article specifically documented our practical problems with inadequate instrument processing.4 In this context, the commonly voiced criticism of single-use instruments being more expensive than reusables is inaccurate if the sterilisation process leads to damaged, unreliable and non-functioning equipment. Guaranteed reliability of high-quality microinstruments is invaluable in the emergency setting. If this reliability cannot be guaranteed through the current sterilisation practices, or delays patient care, it is unsurprising that there is growth in the single-use market.
Dr Pyott's interesting comments regarding outsourcing of the sterilisation process may provoke further discussion, particularly regarding the cost effectiveness of such an approach. Creating a platform for such original independent debate was the intention of our controversy article regarding Green Issues and Ophthalmology.2, 5 We hope that the various issues raised will lead to clarity of thought and position among ophthalmologists, and promote open and honest debate regarding the way forward in these uncertain financial times. Both patients and doctors need to engage management to influence a long-term perspective on the investment/disinvestment agenda to safeguard clinical care.
References
Pyott A . Response to eyes, economics and the environment: should green issues drive changes in ophthalmic care? Eye 2011; 25 (3): 393.
Lockington D, Dutton GN . Eyes, economics and the environment: should green issues drive changes in ophthalmic care?—No. Eye (Lond) 2010; 24 (8): 1312–1314.
Bhutta MF . Fair trade for surgical instruments. BMJ 2006; 333: 297–299.
Lockington D, Macdonald E, Mantry S, Ramaesh K . A case for single-use disposable corneal forceps: equipment reliability should be the primary concern. Br J Ophthalmol 2010; 94 (3): 388–389.
Somner JE, Connor A, Benjamin L . Eyes, economics and the environment: should green issues drive changes in ophthalmic care?—Yes. Eye (Lond) 2010; 24 (8): 1309–1311.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lockington, D., Dutton, G. Response to Pyott re fair trade and ophthalmic instrumentation. Eye 25, 393 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2010.200
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2010.200