Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review
  • Published:

Technology-supported dietary and lifestyle interventions in healthy pregnant women: a systematic review

Abstract

Overweight and obesity are associated with increased risk of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. However, the actuality of delivering effective lifestyle interventions in clinical practice is hampered by a high demand for resources. The use of technology to assist lifestyle interventions needs to be explored as a valid method of reducing strain on resources, and enhancing the effectiveness and population reach of interventions. The aim was to systematically review the literature on the use of technology-supported lifestyle interventions for healthy pregnant women and their impact on maternal outcomes. Online databases and registries were searched in March 2013. Primary outcomes of selected English language studies were fasting maternal glucose, incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and maternal gestational weight gain. Secondary outcomes were intervention uptake and acceptance, and dietary or physical activity modification. Studies whose subjects were diagnosed with GDM prior to intervention were excluded. The minimal number of eligible studies and varying outcomes precluded formal meta-analysis of the data. Initially, 203 articles were identified and screened. Seven articles, including five randomised controlled trials, met inclusion criteria for the current review. Results demonstrate several potential benefits associated with technology-supported interventions in pregnancy, despite minimal search results. Although communication technology holds potential as a safe therapeutic tool for the support of lifestyle interventions in pregnancy, there is a paucity of data on its effectiveness. Further RCTs examining the effectiveness of communication technology are required, particularly among those most likely to benefit from lifestyle interventions, such as overweight and obese pregnant women.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ACOG). ACOG Committee opinion no. 548: weight gain during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121: 210–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Health Service Executive. Guidelines for the Management of Pre-gestational and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus from Pre-conception to the Postnatal Period. Health Service Executive: Dublin, 2010

  3. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. NICE clinical guideline 62: antenatal care. 2010. Available at: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG62 (accessed on 13 May 2013).

  4. Health Service Executive & Royal College of Physicians Ireland. Clinical Practice Guideline Nutrition during Pregnancy. Dublin, 2013.

  5. Gaillard R, Durmus B, Hofman A, Mackenbach JP, Steegers EA, Jaddoe VW . Risk factors and outcomes of maternal obesity and excessive gestational weight gain during pregnancy. Obesity 2013; 21: 1046–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. National Maternity Hospital. Clinical report for the year 2011. 2011.

  7. Moody A . Health survey for England: chapter 10. Adult Anthropometric Measures, Overweight and Obesity. Department of Health (UK), Health & Social Care Information Centre: London, UK, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yogev Y, Catalano PM . Pregnancy and obesity. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2009; 36: 285–300. viii.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferraro ZM, Barrowman N, Prud'homme D, Walker M, Wen SW, Rodger M et al. Excessive gestational weight gain predicts large for gestational age neonates independent of maternal body mass index. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25: 538–542.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Walsh JM, McGowan CA, Mahony R, Foley ME, McAuliffe FM . Low glycaemic index diet in pregnancy to prevent macrosomia (ROLO study): randomised control trial. BMJ 2012; 345: e5605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Morisset AS, St-Yves A, Veillette J, Weisnagel SJ, Tchernof AJ, Robitaille J . Prevention of gestational diabetes mellitus: a review of studies on weight management. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2010; 26: 17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. O'Brien TE, Ray JG, Chan WS . Maternal body mass index and the risk of preeclampsia: a systematic overview. Epidemiology 2003; 14: 368–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Frederick IO, Rudra CB, Miller RS, Foster JC, Williams MA . Adult weight change, weight cycling, and prepregnancy obesity in relation to risk of preeclampsia. Epidemiology 2006; 17: 428–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Arendas K, Qiu Q, Gruslin A . Obesity in pregnancy: pre-conceptional to postpartum consequences. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2008; 30: 477–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Linne Y, Dye L, Barkelig B, Rossner S . Weight development over time in parous women—the SPAWN study—15 years follow up. Int J Obes 2003; 27: 1516–1522.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rooney B, Schauberger C . Excess pregnancy weight gain and long-term obesity: one decade later. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100: 245–252.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mamun A, Kinarivala M, O'Callaghan M, Williams G, Najman J, Callaway L . Associations of excess weight gain during pregnancy with long-term maternal overweight and obesity: evidence from 21 y postpartum follow-up. Am J Clin Nutr 2010; 91: 1336–1341.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Amir LH, Donath S . A systematic review of maternal obesity and breastfeeding intention, initiation and duration. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2007; 7: 9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kac G, Benicio MH, Velasquez-Melendez G, Valente JG . Nine months postpartum weight retention predictors for Brazilian women. Public Health Nutr 2004; 7: 621–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Oken E, Gillman MW . Fetal origins of obesity. Obes Res 2003; 11: 496–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Catalano PM, Ehrenberg HM . The short- and long-term implications of maternal obesity on the mother and her offspring. BJOG 2006; 113: 1126–1133.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cedergren M . Effects of gestational weight gain and body mass index on obstetric outcome in Sweden. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2006; 93: 269–274.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wrotniak BH, Shults J, Butts S, Stettler N . Gestational weight gain and risk of overweight in the offspring at age 7 y in a multicenter, multiethnic cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr 2008; 87: 1818–1824.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ruggiero LJ, Tsoh Y, Everett K, Fava JL, Guise BJ . The transtheoretical model of smoking: comparison of pregnant and nonpregnant smokers. Addict Behav 2000; 25: 239–251.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Anderson AS . Symposium on 'nutritional adaptation to pregnancy and lactation'. Pregnancy as a time for dietary change? Proc Nutr Soc 2001; 60: 497–504.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Inskip HM, Crozier SR, Godfrey KM, Borland SE, Cooper C, Robinson SM . Women's compliance with nutrition and lifestyle recommendations before pregnancy: general population cohort study. BMJ 2009; 338: b481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. Limiting weight gain in overweight and obese women during pregnancy to improve health outcomes (the LIMIT trial): a randomised trial. National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia): Sydney, NSW, Australia. 2007. Identifier ACTRN12607000161426. Available from https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=81642.

  28. ISRCTN. UK Pregnancies Better Eating and Activity Trial (UPBEAT): Improving pregnancy outcome in obese women; a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Current Controlled Trials, c/o BioMed Central: London. 2008. Identifier ISRCTN89971375. Available from http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN89971375; doi: 10.1186/ISRCTN89971375.

  29. ClinicalTrials.gov Lifestyle interventions for expectant mothers. National Library of Medicine: Bethesda, MD, USA. 2013. Identifier NCT01812694. Available from http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT01812694.

  30. Tones K, Tilford S (eds). Effectiveness, Efficiency and Equity. 3rd edn. Chapman and Hall: London, UK, 1994.

  31. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Quality standards: structured education. 2011. Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qualitystandards/diabetesinadults/structurededucation.jsp (accessed 4 October 2013).

  32. De Silva D . Helping People Help Themselves: A Review of the Evidence Considering Whether it is Worthwhile to Support Self-Management. The Health Foundation: London, 2011. Available from: http://www.health.org.uk/public/cms/75/76/313/2434/Helping%20people%20help%20themselves%20publication.pdf?realName=03JXkw.pdf (accessed 8 October 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Oteng-Ntim E, Varm R, Croker H, Poston L, Doyle P . Lifestyle interventions for overweight and obese pregnant women to improve pregnancy outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med 2012; 10: 47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gordon-Larsen P, McMurray RG, Popkin BM . Determinants of adolescent physical activity and inactivity patterns. Pediatrics 2000; 105: E83–E91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wardle J, Steptoe A . Socioeconomic differences in attitudes and beliefs about healthy lifestyles. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003; 57: 440–443.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG . PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses; The PRISMA Statement. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: 264–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Nagle C, Skouteris H, Morris h, Nankervis A, Rasmussen B, Mayall P et al. Primary prevention of gestational diabetes for women who are overweight and obese: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013; 13: 65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jackson RA, Stotland NE, Caughey AB, Gerbert B . Improving diet and exercise in pregnancy with Video Doctor counseling: a randomized trial. Patient Educ Couns 2011; 83: 203–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. ClinicalTrials.gov. Electronically-mediated weight interventions for pregnant and postpartum women. National Library of Medicine: Bethesda, MD, USA. 2013. Identifier NCT01331564. Available from http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT01331564.

  40. ClinicalTrials.gov. Personalised management of body weight during pregnancy. National Library of Medicine: Bethesda, MD, USA. 2012. Identifier NCT01610752. Available from http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01610752.

  41. ClinicalTrials.gov The MOTHER (Mobile Technologies to Help Enhancing Regular Physical Activity) trial for pregnant women. National Library of Medicine: Bethesda, MD, USA. 2011. Identifier NCT01461707. Available from http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT01461707.

  42. van Zutphen M, Milder IE, Bemelmans WJ . Usage of an online healthy lifestyle program by pregnant women attending midwifery practices in Amsterdam. Prev Med 2008; 46: 552–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Bot M, Milder IE, Bemelmans WJ . Nationwide implementation of Hello World: a Dutch email-based health promotion program for pregnant women. J Med Internet Res 2009; 11: e24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Barak A, Klein B, Proudfoot JG . Defining internet-supported therapeutic interventions. Ann Behav Med 2009; 38: 4–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Bogaerts AFL, Devlieger R, Nuyts E, Witters I, Gyselaers W, Van den Bergh BRH . Effects of lifestyle intervention in obese pregnancy women on gestational weight gain and mental health: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Obes (Lond) 2013; 37: 814–821.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Stuebe AM, Oken E, Gillman MW . Associations of diet and physical activity during pregnancy with risk for excessive gestational weight gain. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201: e1–e8.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Vinter CA, Jensen DM, Ovesen P, Beck-Nielsen H, JØrgensen JS . A randomized controlled trial of lifestyle intervention in 360 obese pregnant women. Diabetes Care 2011; 34: 2502–2507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. McGowan CA, McAuliffe FM . The influence of maternal glycaemia and dietary glycaemic index on pregnancy outcome in healthy mothers. Br J Nutr 2010; 105: 153–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Tufano JT, Karras BT . Mobile eHealth interventions for obesity: a timely opportunity to leverage. J Med Internet Res 2005; 7: e58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Vodopivec-Jamsek V, de Jongh T, Gurol-Urganci I, Atun R, Car J . Mobile phone messaging for preventive health care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 12: CD007457.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Barton AJ . The regulation of mobile health applications. BMC Med 2011; 10: 46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Rothert K, Strecher VJ, Doyle LA, Caplan WM, Joyce JS, Jimison HB et al. Web-based weight management programs in an integrated health care setting: a randomized, controlled trial. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2006; 14: 266–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Micco N, Gold B, Buzzell P, Leonard H, Pintauro S, Harvey-Berino J . Minimal in-person support as an adjunct to internet obesity treatment. Ann Behav Med 2007; 33: 49–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Polzien KM, Jakicic JM, Tate DF, Otto AD . The efficacy of a technology-based system in a short-term behavioral weight loss intervention. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2007; 15: 825–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Neve M, Morgan PJ, Jones PR, Collins CE . Effectiveness of web-based interventions in achieving weight loss and weight loss maintenance in overweight and obese adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Obes Rev 2010; 11: 306–321.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Arem H, Irwin M . A review of web-based weight loss interventions in adults. Obes Rev 2011; 12: e236–e243.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Murray E, Burns J, See TS, Lai R, Nazareth I . Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 4: Cd004274.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Lindström J, Ilanne-Parikka P, Peltonen M, Aunola S, Eriksson JG, Hemiö K et al. Sustained reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes by lifestyle intervention: follow-up of the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study. Lancet 2006; 368: 1673–1679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Guillespie P, Cullinane J, O’Neill C, Dunne F . Modeling the Independent Effects of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on Maternity Care and Costs. Diabetes Care 2013; 36: 1111–1116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Sherwin-Smith J, Pritchard-Jones R . Medical Applications: the future of regulation. Bull R Coll Surg of Engl 2012; 94: 12–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Oenema A, Brug J, Lechner L . Web-based tailored nutrition education: results of a randomized controlled trial. Health Educ Res 2001; 16: 647–660.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Worldwide Independent Network of Market Research. Connecting the world: mobile and social media trends – insights from the Worldwide Independent Network. 2012. Available from: http://www.redcresearch.ie/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Connecting-the-World-MEDIA-REPORT-IT-Tel-Syndicated-Study-Winter-2012-RED-C-WIN.pdf (accessed 12 August 2013).

  63. Eircom. Eircom Home Sentiment Survey. 2013. Available from: http://www.banda.ie/assets/files/eircom%20eHSS%20report%20April%202013.pdf (accessed 1 June 2013).

  64. Neuenschwander LM, Abbot A, Mobley AR . Assessment of low-income adults' access to technology: implications for nutrition education. J Nutr Educ Behav 2012; 44: 60–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Jensen JD, King AJ, Davis LA, Guntzviller LM . Utilization of internet technology by low-income adults: the role of health literacy, health numeracy, and computer assistance. J Aging Health 2010; 22: 804–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Hogan NM, Kerin MJ . Smart phone apps: Smart patients, steer clear. Patient Educ Couns 2012; 89: 360–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Matthews L . FDA drafting guidelines, seeks comments on medical apps. International Business Times 2011. Available from: http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/185387/20110722/mobile-apps-fda-proposes-guidelines-regulate-medicalhealth-apps-iphones-ipads-devices.htm (accessed 29 May 2013).

  68. Harelick L, Viola D, Taraha D . Preconception health of low socioeconomic status women: assessing knowledge and behaviors. Womens Health Issues 2011; 21: 272–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. McCartney DM, Younger KM, Walsh J, O’Neill M, Sheridan C, Kearney JM . Socio-economic differences in food group and nutrient intakes among young women in Ireland. Br J Nutr 2013; 31: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Fitzgerald N, Spaccarotella K . Barriers to a Healthy Lifestyle: from individuals to public policy – an ecological perspective. J Extension 2009; 48: 1FEA3.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Kreuter MW, McClure SM . The role of culture in health communication. Annu Rev Public Health 2004; 25: 439–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Verheijden MW, Jans MP, Hildebrandt VH, Hopman-Rock M . Rates and determinants of repeated participation in a web-based behaviour change program for healthy body weight and healthy lifestyle. J Med Internet Res 2007; 9: e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Eysenbach G . The law of attrition. J Med Internet Res 2005; 7: e11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was financially supported by the National Maternity Hospital (NMH) medical fund. It was carried out as part of an MSc programme at NMH where OOB is an MSc student working in the area of maternal nutrition during pregnancy, and whose post is funded by the NMH medical fund.

Author Contributions

OOB wrote the article, and the draft was discussed with and revised by FMM, MMC and EG.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F M McAuliffe.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O'Brien, O., McCarthy, M., Gibney, E. et al. Technology-supported dietary and lifestyle interventions in healthy pregnant women: a systematic review. Eur J Clin Nutr 68, 760–766 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2014.59

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2014.59

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links