Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Epidemiology

Under-reporting remains a key limitation of self-reported dietary intake: an analysis of the 2008/09 New Zealand Adult Nutrition Survey

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition volume 68, pages 259–264 (2014)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Background/Objectives:

The most recent New Zealand Adult Nutrition Survey 2008/09 (ANS 08/9) revealed a decrease in reported energy intakes (EIs) compared with the previous 1997 National Nutrition Survey (NNS97). Conversely, measured body weights increased over the same period. We conducted an analysis on the ANS 08/9 data sets to evaluate reported EIs.

Subjects/Methods:

Analysis was conducted on data from 3919 (1715 men and 2204 women aged ⩾15 years) survey participants who completed the 24-h dietary recall in the ANS 08/9. Under-reporting was assessed using the ratio of reported EI to estimated resting metabolic rate (EI:RMRest), and a cutoff limit of <0.9 (EI:RMRest) was used to identify low energy reporters (LERs). Results were examined by gender, body size, age and ethnicity.

Results:

The mean EI:RMRest (s.e.m.) was 1.34 (0.02) for men, and 1.23 (0.02) for women. Overall, 21% of men and 25% of women were classified as LERs. There was a greater prevalence of LERs among people with overweight (25%), or obesity (30%) than people with normal body weight (16%, P<0.001). The oldest age group (⩾65 years) had a greater prevalence of LERs (33%) compared with all other age groups (19–24%, P<0.001). Pacific people had a greater prevalence of LERs (33%) compared with Maori (26%, P=0.007) and European (23%, P<0.001). Compared with the NNS97, a substantial increase in the prevalence of LERs was evident in most subgroups.

Conclusions:

Under-reporting of EI will continue to be a major limitation of nutrition surveys without technological innovation. Care should be taken when interpreting EI data.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Livingstone MB, Black AE . Markers of the validity of reported energy intake. J Nutr 2003; 133 (Suppl 3), 895S–920S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Poslusna K, Ruprich J, De Vries JHM, Jakubikova M, Van't Veer P . Misreporting of energy and micronutrient intake estimated by food records and 24 hour recalls, control and adjustment methods in practice. Br J Nutr 2009; 101 (Suppl 2), S73–S85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schoeller DA . Measurement of energy expenditure in free-living humans by using doubly labeled water. J Nutr 1988; 118: 1278–1289.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schoeller DA . Recent advances from application of doubly labeled water to measurement of human energy expenditure. J Nutr 1999; 129: 1765–1768.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldberg G, Black A, Jebb S, Cole T, Murgatroyd P, Coward W et al. Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology: 1. Derivation of cut-off limits to identify under-recording. Eur J Clin Nutr 1991; 45: 569.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Black AE . Critical evaluation of energy intake using the Goldberg cut-off for energy intake: basal metabolic rate. A practical guide to its calculation, use and limitations. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000; 24: 1119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. University of Otago and Ministry of Health. A Focus on Nutrition: Key Findings from the 2008/09 NZ Adult Nutrition Survey. Ministry of Health: Wellington, 2011.

  8. Bogardus C, Lillioja S, Ravussin E, Abbott W, Zawadzki JK, Young A et al. Familial dependence of the resting metabolic rate. N Engl J Med 1986; 315: 96–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ravussin E, Lillioja S, Anderson TE, Christin L, Bogardus C . Determinants of 24-hour energy expenditure in man. Methods and results using a respiratory chamber. J Clin Invest 1986; 78: 1568.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Diaz EO, Prentice AM, Goldberg GR, Murgatroyd PR, Coward WA . Metabolic response to experimental overfeeding in lean and overweight healthy volunteers. Am J Clin Nutr 1992; 56: 641–655.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hall KD . Predicting metabolic adaptation, body weight change, and energy intake in humans. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2010; 298: E449–E466.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pikholz C, Swinburn B, Metcalf P . Under-reporting of energy intake in the 1997 National Nutrition Survey. N Z Med J 2004; 117: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  13. University of Otago and Ministry of Health. Methodology Report for the 2008/09 New Zealand Adult Nutrition Survey. Ministry of Health: Wellington, 2011.

  14. World Health Organization. Global Database on Body Mass Index. World Health Organization: Geneva, 2007.

  15. Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH . Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: International survey. BMJ 2000; 320: 1240.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Cole TJ, Flegal KM, Nicholls D, Jackson AA . Body mass index cut offs to define thinness in children and adolescents: international survey. BMJ 2007; 335: 194.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Swinburn B . Using the body mass index: weight then weigh up. N Z Med J 1998; 111: 377–379.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Swinburn B, Ley S, Carmichael H, Plank L . Body size and composition in Polynesians. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1999; 23: 1178.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. World Health Organization. Obesity: prevention and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation. World Health Organization: Geneva, 2000.

  20. Schofield W, Schofield C, James WPT . Basal metabolic rate: review and prediction, together with an annotated bibliography of source material. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr 1985; 39C (Suppl 1), 5–96.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Black AE . The sensitivity and specificity of the Goldberg cut-off for EI:BMR for identifying diet reports of poor validity. Eur J Clin Nutr 2000; 54: 395–404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Briefel R, Sempos CT, McDowell M, Chien S, Alaimo K . Dietary methods research in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: underreporting of energy intake. Am J Clin Nutr 1997; 65: 1203S–1209S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Johnson RK, Soultanakis RP, Matthews DE . Literacy and body fatness are associated with underreporting of energy intake in US low-income women using the multiple-pass 24-hour recall: a doubly labeled water study. J Am Diet Assoc 1998; 98: 1136–1140.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Price G, Paul A, Cole T, Wadsworth M . Characteristics of the low-energy reporters in a longitudinal national dietary survey. Br J Nutr 1997; 77: 833–851.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Johansson L, Solvoll K, Bjørneboe G-E, Drevon CA . Under-and overreporting of energy intake related to weight status and lifestyle in a nationwide sample. Am J Clin Nutr 1998; 68: 266–274.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hall KD, Sacks G, Chandramohan D, Chow CC, Wang YC, Gortmaker SL et al. Quantification of the effect of energy imbalance on bodyweight. Lancet 2011; 378: 826–837.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Maurer J, Taren DL, Teixeira PJ, Thomson CA, Lohman TG, Going SB et al. The psychosocial and behavioral characteristics related to energy misreporting. Nutr Rev 2006; 64: 53–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Grabe S, Ward LM, Hyde JS . The role of the media in body image concerns among women: A meta-analysis of experimental and correlational studies. Psychol Bull 2008; 134: 460.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kubic KN, Chory RM . Exposure to television makeover programs and perceptions of self. Commun Res Rep 2007; 24: 283–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ministry of Health. Healthy Eating – Healthy Action Oranga Kai – Oranga Pumau: A Strategic Framework. Ministry of Health: Wellington, 2003.

  31. The official website of the New Zealand Government. Home; Releases; Mission-On: healthy lifestyles for young Kiwi. 2007 [cited 18 March 2013]. Available from http://www.beehive.govt.nz/?q=node/27181.

  32. Bauman A, McLean G, Hurdle D, Walker S, Boyd J, van Aalst I et al. Evaluation of the national ‘Push Play’campaign in New Zealand–creating population awareness of physical activity. J N Z Med Assoc 2003; 116: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Heywood P, Harvey P, Marks GC . An evaluation of energy intakes in the 1983 Australian National Dietary Survey of Adults. Eur J Clin Nutr 1993; 47: 604–606.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Klesges RC, Eck LH, Ray JW . Who underreports dietary intake in a dietary recall? Evidence from the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Consult Clin Psychol 1995; 63: 438–444.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. O’Loughlin G, Cullen SJ, McGoldrick A, O’Connor S, Warrington GD . Using a wearable camera to increase the accuracy of dietary analysis. Am J Prev Med 2013; 44: 297–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gemming L, Doherty A, Kelly P, Utter J, Ni Mhurchu C . Feasibility of a SenseCam-assisted 24-h recall to reduce under-reporting of energy intake. Eur J Clin Nutr 2013; 67: 1095–1099.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sun M, Fernstrom JD, Jia W, Hackworth SA, Yao N, Li Y et al. A wearable electronic system for objective dietary assessment. J Am Diet Assoc 2010; 110: 45–47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Thompson FE, Subar AF, Loria CM, Reedy JL, Baranowski T . Need for technological innovation in dietary assessment. J Am Diet Assoc 2010; 110: 48–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Ministry of Health. Food Comes First: Methodologies for the National Nutrition Survey of New Zealand. Ministry of Health: Wellington, New Zealand, 1997.

  40. Black A, Goldberg G, Jebb S, Livingstone M, Cole T, Prentice A . Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology: 2. Evaluating the results of published surveys. Eur J Clin Nutr 1991; 45: 583.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ravussin E, Bogardus C . A brief overview of human energy metabolism and its relationship to essential obesity. Am J Clin Nutr 1992; 55: 242S–245S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Weyer C, Snitker S, Rising R, Bogardus C, Ravussin E . Determinants of energy expenditure and fuel utilization in man: effects of body composition, age, sex, ethnicity and glucose tolerance in 916 subjects. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1999; 23: 715.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ministry of Health. The Health of New Zealand Adults 2011/12: Key Findings of the New Zealand Health Survey. Ministry of Health: Wellington, 2012.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Access to the data in this study was provided by Statistics New Zealand in accordance with security and confidentiality provisions of the Statistics Act 1994. The results in this paper have been confidentialised to protect individuals from identification.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Institute for Health Innovation, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

    L Gemming, Y Jiang & C Ni Mhurchu

  2. Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

    B Swinburn & J Utter

Authors
  1. L Gemming
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Y Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B Swinburn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J Utter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. C Ni Mhurchu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L Gemming.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gemming, L., Jiang, Y., Swinburn, B. et al. Under-reporting remains a key limitation of self-reported dietary intake: an analysis of the 2008/09 New Zealand Adult Nutrition Survey. Eur J Clin Nutr 68, 259–264 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2013.242

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2013.242

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links