Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Clinical nutrition, enteral and parenteral nutrition

Home enteral nutrition in children: a 14-year multicenter survey

Abstract

Background/Objectives:

The practice of home enteral nutrition (HEN) represents a relevant aspect of the clinical management of both malnourished children and well-nourished children unable to be fed using an oral diet. The aim of this study was to estimate in an Italian paediatric population over a 14-year period (1996–2009), the clinical relevance and results over time of HEN activity.

Subjects/methods:

HEN-computerized database and medical/dietetic charts were evaluated for patients aged at start of HEN <18 years and HEN duration >1 month.

Results:

During the study period, we recorded 757 HEN programs. HEN began at a median age of 2 years for a median duration of 8.1 months. The complication rate was 14.8%. In the second period of the survey (2003–2009), the main changes concerned the underlying diseases requiring HEN, choice of formula feeding and access route. In 2009, the estimated overall prevalence of HEN was 3.47 and the incidence 2.45 per 100 000 inhabitants from 0 to 18 years of age.

Conclusions:

The epidemiological data of this study demonstrate that HEN concerns a growing number of Italian children and families. Some aspects of HEN clinical management should be modified to reach the recommended standards.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Braegger C, Decsi D, Dias JA, Hartman C, Kolacek S, Koletzko B et alESPGHAN Committee on nutrition. Practical approach to paediatric enteral nutrition: a comment by the ESPGHAN Committee on nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2010; 51: 110–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Axelrod D, Kazmerski K, Iyer K . Pediatric enteral nutrition. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2006; 30 (1 Suppl), S21–S26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Elia M . An international perspective on artificial nutrition support in the community. Lancet 1995; 345: 1345–1349.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pironi L, Candusso M, Biondo A, Bosco A, Castaldi P, Contaldo F et alItalian Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Executive Committee. Prevalence of home artificial nutrition in Italy in 2005: A survey by the Italian Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (SINPE). Clin Nutr 2007; 26: 123–132.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Daveluy W, Guimber D, Mention K, Lescut D, Michaud L, Turck D et al. Home enteral nutrition in children: an 11-year experience with 416 patients. Clin Nutr 2005; 24: 48–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gómez-López L, Martínez-Costa C, Pedrón-Giner C, Calderón-Garrido C, Navas López VM, Martínez Zazo A et al. Current status of pediatric enteral nutrition in Spain: the importance of the NEPAD register. Nutr Hosp 2010; 25: 810–813.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Szlagatys-Sidorkiewicz A, Popińska K, Toporowska-Kowalska E, Borkowska A, Sibilska M, Gębora-Kowalska B et al. Home enteral nutrition in children—2010 nationwide survey of the Polish Society for Clinical Nutrition of Children. Eur J Pediatr 2012; 171: 719–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Daveluy W, Guimber D, Uhlen S, Lescut D, Michaud L, Turck D et al. Dramatic changes in home-based enteral nutrition practices in children during an 11-year period. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2006; 43: 240–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. National Institute of Statistics. Popolazione Residente e Abitazioni Nelle Province italiane. 14° Censimento Generale Della Popolazione e Delle Abitazioni. ISTAT: Rome, 2001.

  10. National Institute of Statistics. Popolazione Comunale per sesso età e stato civile. Anni 2002–2005. ISTAT: Rome, 2006.

  11. Howard L, Ament M, Fleming CR, Shike M, Steiger E . Current use and clinical outcome of home parenteral and enteral nutrition therapies in the United States. Gastroenterology 1995; 109: 355–365.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. DeLegge M, Wooley JA, Guenter P, Wright S, Brill J, Andris D et alA.S.P.E.N. Practice Management Task Force; A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directors. The state of nutrition support teams and update on current models for providing nutrition support therapy to patients. Nutr Clin Pract 2010; 25: 76–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Klek S, Szybinski P, Sierzega M, Szczepanek K, Sumlet M, Kupiec M et al. Commercial enteral formulas and nutrition support teams improve the outcome of home enteral tube feeding. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2011; 35: 380–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Paccagnella A, Baruffi C, Pizzolato D, Favaro V, Marcon ML, Morello M et al. Home enteral nutrition in adults: a five-year (2001-2005) epidemiological analysis. Clin Nutr 2008; 27: 378–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Buchman AL . Ethical and economics in nutrition support. In: Lochs H, Thomas DR, (eds.) Home Care Enteral Feeding. NestléNutrition Workshop Series Clinical & Performance Program. Nestlé Ltd vol. 10, Vevey/S. Karger AG: Basel, 2005 pp 143–166.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cawsey SI, Soo J, Gramlich LM . Home enteral nutrition: outcomes relative to indication. Nutr Clin Pract 2010; 25: 296–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cuerda C, Planas M, Gomez-Candela C, Luengo LM, NADYA-SENPE group. Trends in home enteral nutrition in Spain; analysis of the NADYA registry 1992-2007. Nutr Hosp 2009; 24: 347–353.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Song J, Wolf SE, Wu X, Finnerty CC, Gauglitz GG, Herndon DN et al. Starvation-induced proximal gut mucosal atrophy diminished with aging. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2009; 33: 411–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chappel VL, Thopson MD, Jeschke MG, Chung DH, Thompson JC, Wolf SE . Effects of incremental starvation on gut mucosa. Dig Dis Sci 2003; 48: 765–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zachos M, Tondeur M, Griffiths AM . Enteral nutrition therapy for induction of remission in Crohn’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007 (1): CD000542.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Maddalena Grisoni, nurse coordinator of the nutritional team of the ‘Bambino Gesù’ Children’s Hospital, for her relevant help in collecting the data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A Diamanti.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Diamanti, A., Di Ciommo, V., Tentolini, A. et al. Home enteral nutrition in children: a 14-year multicenter survey. Eur J Clin Nutr 67, 53–57 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2012.184

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2012.184

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links