Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Nutrient profiling and food label claims: evaluation of dairy products in three major European countries

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition volume 65, pages 1032–1038 (2011)Cite this article

Subjects

A Corrigendum to this article was published on 01 February 2012

Abstract

Background/Objectives:

This study reviews commercially available dairy products with nutrition or health-related on-pack communication against selected nutrient profiling models. It aims to provide guidance on the model characteristics required to appropriately categorise products into those that are suitable for carrying claims, versus those whose overall nutritional composition does not support such product communication.

Subjects/Methods:

More than 300 dairy products carrying claims were identified in Germany, France and the UK and evaluated against six existing nutrient profiling models. All models were assessed regarding their underlying principles, generated results and inter-model agreement levels.

Results:

In most cases, products failed the criteria of a given model because of too high levels of total fat, saturated fatty acids, sugars and/ or sodium. The Swedish Keyhole and the Smart Choices Program were the most restrictive models and showed the highest level of agreement. In general, the application of nutrient profiles helped to select products with significantly lower average levels of nutrients that are linked to chronic diseases when consumed in excess. However, calcium levels were also highly impacted in some cases.

Conclusions:

A nutrient profiling model that targets saturated fatty acids, sugars and sodium can meaningfully and comprehensively identify dairy products with a favourable nutritional composition. However, thresholds have to be set carefully to not reduce the average calcium contribution of the category. The use of separate criteria for cheeses and other dairy products seems necessary to take into account intrinsic compositional differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agence Francaise de Securite Sanitaire des Aliments (2008). Table ciqual 2008—French food composition Table. Available at: http://www.afssa.fr/TableCIQUAL/.

  • Bech-Larsen T, Grunert KG (2003). The perceived healthiness of functional foods: a conjoint study of Danish, Finnish and American consumers’ perception of functional foods. Appetite 40, 9–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choices International Foundation (2009). Qualifying criteria. Available at: http://www.choicesinternational.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=5 (last accessed December 2009).

  • Darmon N, Maillot M, Darmon M, Ambroise M (2007). Le SAIN et le LIM—Un système de profilage nutritionnelle pour orienter favorablement les choix des consommateurs? Le journées de la prevention—3es journées annuelles, 29/30 march 2007 (The SAIN and the LIM—A Nutrient Profiling System to Favourably Guide Consumers’ Choice ?). INPES: Paris. Available at: http://www.inpes.sante.fr/jp/cr/pdf/2007/Session8/session8_2903_mat/N.%20%20Darmon.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Community (2006). Regulation (EC) no. 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods. Official J Eur Union L 404, 9–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Drug Administration (2002a). Code of federal regulations, Title 21-food and drugs, chapter I-food and drug administration, department of health and human services, subchapter B-food for human consumption, part 101-food labeling, subpart A-general provisions, sec. 101.12 reference amounts customarily consumed per eating occasion. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC.

  • Food and Drug Administration (2002b). Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21-Food and drugs, Chapter I-Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Subchapter B-Food for Human Consumption, Part 101-Food Labeling, Subpart A-General Provisions, Sec. 101.13-Nutrient content claims general principles, Sec. 101.14 Health claims: general requirements and Subpart F-Specific Requirements for Descriptive Claims That Are Neither Nutrient Content Claims nor Health Claims. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC.

  • Food Standards Agency (2002). McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods 6th summary edn. Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge.

  • Food Standards Agency (2009). Nutrient Profiling Technical Guidance April 2009. Food Standards Agency: London. Available at: http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/techguidenutprofiling.pdf.

  • Ford GT, Hastak M, Mitra A, Ringold DJ et al. (1996). Can consumers interpret nutrition information in the presence of a health claim? A laboratory investigation. J Public Policy Marketing 15, 16–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger CJ (1998). Health claims: history, current regulatory status and consumer research. J Am Diet Assoc 98, 1312–1322.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grunert KG, Wills JM (2007). A review of European research on consumer response to nutrition information on food labels. J Public Health 15, 385–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchhoff E (2005). Souci-Fachmann-Kraut: Food Composition and Nutrition Tables 7th edn. Medpharm Scientific Publishers: Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livsmedelverket Swedish National Food Administration (2009). LIVSFS 2005:9 (as Last Amended by LIVSFS 2009:6) National Food Administration's Regulations on the use of a Particular Symbol. Livsmedelverket: Stockholm. Available at: http://www.slv.se/upload/nfa/documents/food_regulations/Nyckelh%c3%a5l_dec_2009_6%20eng.pdf.

  • Ooshop (2009). Supermarché en ligne OOSHOP—Achat livraison boissons plats cuisinés produits frais surgelées. Available at: http://www.ooshop.com/Home.aspx (last accessed December 2009).

  • Pothoulaki M, Chryssochoidis G (2009). Health claims: consumers’ matters. J Functional Foods 1, 222–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sainsbury's (2009). Sainsbury's.co.uk—Groceries Available at: http://www.sainsburys.co.uk/groceries/index.jsp (last accessed December 2009).

  • Smart Choices Program (2009). Smart Choices Program—Nutrition Criteria for the Smart Choices Program Version 3, 29 July 2009. Available at: http://www.smartchoicesprogram.com/pdf/SmartChoicesProgramNutritionCriteriaMatrix.pdf.

  • Teratanavat R, Hooker NH (2006). Consumer valuations and preference heterogeneity for a novel functional food. J Food Sci 71, 533–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tesco (2009). Tesco.com—grocery. Available at: https://secure.tesco.com/register/?vstore=99&from=http%3a%2f%2fwww.tesco.com%2fsuperstore%2fdefault.aspx (last accessed December 2009).

  • Trichterborn J, Harzer G, Kunz C (2011). Fine bakery wares with label claims in Europe and their categorisation by nutrient profiling models. Eur J Clin Nutr 65, 307–312.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tuorila H, Cardello AV (2002). Consumer responses to an off-flavour in juice in the presence of specific health claims. Food Qual Prefer 13, 561–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Trijp HCM, Van der Lans IA (2007). Consumer perception of nutrition and health claims. Appetite 48, 305–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Richard M Black for his helpful comments to improve the manuscript and Sabrina Achatz for her support with data collection.

Author information

Author notes

  1. G Harzer and C Kunz: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kraft Foods R&D Inc., Munich, Germany

    J Trichterborn & G Harzer

  2. Institute of Nutrition, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany

    C Kunz

Authors
  1. J Trichterborn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G Harzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C Kunz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J Trichterborn.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Jan Trichterborn and Gerd Harzer are employed by Kraft Foods R&D Inc. Clemens Kunz declares no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trichterborn, J., Harzer, G. & Kunz, C. Nutrient profiling and food label claims: evaluation of dairy products in three major European countries. Eur J Clin Nutr 65, 1032–1038 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2011.52

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2011.52

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links