Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Dietary glycaemic index and glycaemic load in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition

Abstract

Objectives:

To describe dietary glycaemic index (GI) and glycaemic load (GL) values in the population participating in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study according to food groups, nutrients and lifestyle characteristics.

Methods:

Single 24-h dietary recalls (24-HDRs) from 33 566 subjects were used to calculate dietary GI and GL, and an ad hoc database was created as the main reference source. Mean GI and GL intakes were adjusted for age, total energy intake, height and weight, and were weighted by season and day of recall.

Results:

GI was the lowest in Spain and Germany, and highest in the Netherlands, United Kingdom and Denmark for both genders. In men, GL was the lowest in Spain and Germany and highest in Italy, whereas in women, it was the lowest in Spain and Greece and highest in the UK health-conscious cohort. Bread was the largest contributor to GL in all centres (15–45%), but it also showed the largest inter-individual variation. GL, but not GI, tended to be lower in the highest body mass index category in both genders. GI was positively correlated with starch and intakes of bread and potatoes, whereas it was correlated negatively with intakes of sugar, fruit and dairy products. GL was positively correlated with all carbohydrate components and intakes of cereals, whereas it was negatively correlated with fat and alcohol and with intakes of wine, with large variations across countries.

Conclusions:

GI means varied modestly across countries and genders, whereas GL means varied more, but it may possibly act as a surrogate of carbohydrate intake.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barclay AW, Petocz P, McMillan-Price J, Flood VM, Prvan T, Mitchell P et al. (2008). Glycemic index, glycemic load, and chronic disease risk–a meta-analysis of observational studies. Am Clin Nutr 87, 627–637.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beulens JW, de Bruijne LM, Stolk RP, Peeters PH, Bots ML, Grobbee DE et al. (2007). High dietary glycemic load and glycemic index increase risk of cardiovascular disease among middle-aged women: a population-based follow-up study. J Am Coll Cardiol 50, 14–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brustad M, Skeie G, Braaten T, Slimani N, Lund E (2003). Comparison of telephone vs face-to-face interviews in the assessment of dietary intake by the 24 h recall EPIC SOFT program–the Norwegian calibration study. Eur J Clin Nutr 57, 107–113.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buyken AE, Toeller M, Heitkamp G, Karamanos B, Rottiers R, Muggeo M et al. (2001). Glycemic index in the diet of European outpatients with type 1 diabetes: relations to glycated hemoglobin and serum lipids. Am J Clin Nutr 73, 574–581.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cho E, Spiegelman D, Hunter DJ, Chen WY, Colditz GA, Willett WC (2003). Premenopausal dietary carbohydrate, glycemic index, glycemic load, and fiber in relation to risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12, 1153–1158.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cust AE, Skilton MR, van Bakel MME, Halkjær J, Olsen A, Agnoli C et al. (2009). Total dietary carbohydrate, sugar, starch and fibre intakes in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Eur J Clin Nutr 63 (Suppl 4), S37–S60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deharveng G, Charrondiere UR, Slimani N, Southgate DA, Riboli E (1999). Comparison of nutrients in the food composition tables available in the nine European countries participating in EPIC. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Eur J Clin Nutr 53, 60–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Du H, van der AD, Feskens EJ (2006). Dietary glycaemic index: a review of the physiological mechanisms and observed health impacts. Acta Cardiol 61, 383–397.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari P, Kaaks R, Fahey MT, Slimani N, Day NE, Pera G et al. (2004). Within- and between-cohort variation in measured macronutrient intakes, taking account of measurement errors, in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study. Am J Epidemiol 160, 814–822.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foster-Powell K, Holt SH, Brand-Miller JC (2002). International table of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2002. Am J Clin Nutr 76, 5–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haftenberger M, Lahmann PH, Panico S, Gonzalez CA, Seidell JC, Boeing H et al. (2002a). Overweight, obesity and fat distribution in 50- to 64-year-old participants in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Public Health Nutr 5 (Suppl), S1147–S1162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haftenberger M, Schuit AJ, Tormo MJ, Boeing H, Wareham N, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB et al. (2002b). Physical activity of subjects aged 50–64 years involved in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Public Health Nutr 5 (Suppl), S1163–S1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry CJ, Lightowler HJ, Strik CM, Storey M (2005). Glycaemic index values for commercially available potatoes in Great Britain. Br J Nutr 94, 917–921.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham S, Zhang ZF, Lee IM, Cook NR, Giovannucci E, Buring JE et al. (2004). Dietary glycemic load and risk of colorectal cancer in the Women's Health Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 96, 229–233.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins DJ, Wolever TM, Collier GR, Ocana A, Rao AV, Buckley G et al. (1987). Metabolic effects of a low-glycemic-index diet. Am J Clin Nutr 46, 968–975.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins DJ, Wolever TM, Taylor RH, Barker H, Fielden H, Baldwin JM et al. (1981). Glycemic index of foods: a physiological basis for carbohydrate exchange. Am J Clin Nutr 34, 362–366.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jonas CR, McCullough ML, Teras LR, Walker-Thurmond KA, Thun MJ, Calle EE (2003). Dietary glycemic index, glycemic load, and risk of incident breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12, 573–577.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liljeberg HG, Lonner CH, Bjorck IM (1995). Sourdough fermentation or addition of organic acids or corresponding salts to bread improves nutritional properties of starch in healthy humans. J Nutr 125, 1503–1511.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Manson JE, Buring JE, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Ridker PM (2002). Relation between a diet with a high glycemic load and plasma concentrations of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in middle-aged women. Am J Clin Nutr 75, 492–498.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Livesey G, Taylor R, Hulshof T, Howlett J (2008). Glycemic response and health–a systematic review and meta-analysis: the database, study characteristics, and macronutrient intakes. Am J Clin Nutr 87, S223–S236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig DS (2003). Dietary glycemic index and the regulation of body weight. Lipids 38, 117–121.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Michaud DS, Liu S, Giovannucci E, Willett WC, Colditz GA, Fuchs CS (2002). Dietary sugar, glycemic load, and pancreatic cancer risk in a prospective study. J Natl Cancer Inst 94, 1293–1300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riboli E, Hunt KJ, Slimani N, Ferrari P, Norat T, Fahey M et al. (2002). European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC): study populations and data collection. Public Health Nutr 5 (Suppl), S1113–S1124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riboli E, Kaaks R (1997). The EPIC Project: rationale and study design. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Int J Epidemiol 26 (Suppl 1), S6–S14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riccardi G, Rivellese AA, Giacco R (2008). Role of glycemic index and glycemic load in the healthy state, in prediabetes, and in diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr 87, S269–S274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahyoun NR, Anderson AL, Tylavsky FA, Lee JS, Sellmeyer DE, Harris TB (2008). Dietary glycemic index and glycemic load and the risk of type 2 diabetes in older adults. Am J Clin Nutr 87, 126–131.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salmeron J, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Wing AL, Willett WC (1997). Dietary fiber, glycemic load, and risk of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in women. J Am Med Assoc 277, 472–477.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scholl TO, Chen X, Khoo CS, Lenders C (2004). The dietary glycemic index during pregnancy: influence on infant birth weight, fetal growth, and biomarkers of carbohydrate metabolism. Am J Epidemiol 159, 467–474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz M, Liese AD, Mayer-Davis EJ, D'Agostino Jr RB, Fang F, Sparks KC et al. (2005). Nutritional correlates of dietary glycaemic index: new aspects from a population perspective. Br J Nutr 94, 397–406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze MB, Liu S, Rimm EB, Manson JE, Willett WC, Hu FB (2004). Glycemic index, glycemic load, and dietary fiber intake and incidence of type 2 diabetes in younger and middle-aged women. Am J Clin Nutr 80, 348–356.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slimani N, Deharveng G, Charrondiere RU, van Kappel AL, Ocke MC, Welch A et al. (1999). Structure of the standardized computerized 24-h diet recall interview used as reference method in the 22 centers participating in the EPIC project. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 58, 251–266.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slimani N, Deharveng G, Unwin I, Southgate DA, Vignat J, Skeie G et al. (2007). The EPIC nutrient database project (ENDB): a first attempt to standardize nutrient databases across the 10 European countries participating in the EPIC study. Eur J Clin Nutr 61, 1037–1056.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slimani N, Ferrari P, Ocke M, Welch A, Boeing H, Liere M et al. (2000). Standardization of the 24-h diet recall calibration method used in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC): general concepts and preliminary results. Eur J Clin Nutr 54, 900–917.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slimani N, Kaaks R, Ferrari P, Casagrande C, Clavel-Chapelon F, Lotze G et al. (2002). European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) calibration study: rationale, design and population characteristics. Public Health Nutr 5 (Suppl), S1125–S1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Bakel MME, Slimani N, Feskens EJM, Du H, Beulens JWJ, van der Schouw YT et al. (2009). Methodological challenges in the application of the glycemic index in epidemiological studies using data from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. J Nutr 139, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willett W (1998). Nutritional Epidemiology. Oxford University Press: New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Willett W, Stampfer MJ (1986). Total energy intake: implications for epidemiologic analyses. Am J Epidemiol 124, 17–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wirfalt E, McTaggart A, Pala V, Gullberg B, Frasca G, Panico S et al. (2002). Food sources of carbohydrates in a European cohort of adults. Public Health Nutr 5 (Suppl), S1197–S1215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolever TM (2000). Dietary carbohydrates and insulin action in humans. Br J Nutr 83 (Suppl 1), S97–S102.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolever TM, Nguyen PM, Chiasson JL, Hunt JA, Josse RG, Palmason C et al. (1994). Determinants of diet glycemic index calculated retrospectively from diet records of 342 individuals with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Am J Clin Nutr 59, 1265–1269.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work described in this paper was carried out with the financial support of the European Commission: Public Health and Consumer Protection Directorate 1993–2004; Research Directorate-General 2005; Ligue contre le Cancer (France); Société 3M (France); Mutuelle Générale de l’Education Nationale; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM); Institut Gustave Roussy; German Cancer Aid; German Cancer Research Center; German Federal Ministry of Education and Research; Danish Cancer Society; Health Research Fund (FIS) of the Spanish Ministry of Health; Spanish Regional Governments of Andalucía, Asturias, Basque Country, Murcia and Navarra and the Catalan Institute of Oncology; and ISCIII RETIC (RD06/0020), Spain; Cancer Research UK; Medical Research Council, UK; the Stroke Association, UK; British Heart Foundation; Department of Health, UK; Food Standards Agency, UK; the Wellcome Trust, UK; Greek Ministry of Health; Hellenic Health Foundation; Italian Association for Research on Cancer; Italian National Research Council, Regione Sicilia (Sicilian government); Associazione Iblea per la Ricerca Epidemiologica—ONLUS (Hyblean association for epidemiological research, NPO); Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport; Dutch Prevention Funds; LK Research Funds; Dutch ZON (Zorg Onderzoek Nederland); World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF); Swedish Cancer Society; Swedish Research Council; Regional Government of Skane and the County Council of Vasterbotten, Sweden; Norwegian Cancer Society; the Norwegian Research Council and the Norwegian Foundation for Health and Rehabilitation. We thank Sarah Somerville, Nicole Suty and Karima Abdedayem for their assistance with editing and Kimberley Bouckaert and Heinz Freisling for technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N Slimani.

Additional information

Guarantor: MME van Bakel.

Contributors: MMEvB wrote the paper and prepared the tables and figures, taking into account comments from all co-authors. MMEvB and CB conducted the statistical analyses. NS was the overall coordinator of this project and was responsible for the EPIC nutritional databases. AEC, JH, JWB, YTvdS, EJMF, DvdA, HD, FB, VP, KA, MJT, PF, CB and NS were members of the ‘GI/GL working group’ and provided input on the statistical analyses, drafting of the paper and interpretation of results. The other co-authors were local EPIC collaborators involved in the collection of dietary and other data and in documenting and compiling the EPIC Nutrient Database (ENDB). ER is the overall coordinator of the EPIC study. All co-authors provided comments and suggestions on the paper and approved the final version.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Bakel, M., Kaaks, R., Feskens, E. et al. Dietary glycaemic index and glycaemic load in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Eur J Clin Nutr 63 (Suppl 4), S188–S205 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2009.81

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2009.81

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links