Introduction

Androgen is essential for the development, growth and function of its target organs by controlling the expression of a limited number of specific genes in different directions and to different extents. Our work on rat prostatic steroid-binding protein (PSBP) genes has shown the androgen induction of these proteins to be a good model for the study of the mechanism of the positive modulation of gene transcription by this hormone1, 2, 3. However, not much is known about the mechanism of hormonal repression. To understand how the same androgen receptor can direct the expression of target genes in opposite ways, the search for a suitable model of negative control has become essential. In this respect, our previous studies with dot blot analysis which showed GST Yb1 subunit gene expression to be negatively regulated by androgen in the rat ventral prostate seemed promising4, 5, 6.

The rat glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are a family of isozymes which catalyze the nucleophilic attack of the thiol of glutathione on various electrophilic acceptors7, 8. In addition, the transferases bind a number of hydrophobic compounds such as heme, bilirubin and dexamethasone. Their expression can be induced by various xenobiotics such as transstilbene oxide9, 10 and for many toxic xenobioties, glutathione S-conjugate formation represents a detoxication pathway7, 8. The GSTs are either homodimers or heterodimers composed of at least eight subunits (Ya, Yb1, Yb2, Yb3, Yc, Yk, Yn and Yp) which are expressed tissue-specifically and can be distinguished according to their substrate specificity. The Yb1 subunit gene is one of the three cloned Yb cDNAs isolated and characterised. This paper reports our studies on the androgen effects on the tissue-specific expression of the GST Yb1 gene.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Adult male and female Sprague-Dawley rats (250 - 300g) were bought from Shanghai Animal Center of Academia Sinica. For androgen withdrawal of the male rats by castration, male rats were anesthetized by the administration of 40 - 60mg of pentobarbital sodium per kilogram of body weight and castrated by the scrotal route. For androgen manipulation by Ethylene Dimethane Sulfonate (EDS) treatment, male rats received a single EDS injection (75mg EDS in DMSO/kg body weight). Animal experiments were carried out twice. Serum for testosterone determination by Kit and ventral prostate for RNA preparation were collected from the animals before and after EDS treatment at different time intervals. At least five rats were involved in each point.

Reagents

Guanidinium thiocyanate and sarkosyl were obtained from Sigma, α-32p dATP (3000 μCi/mmol) from Amersham.

RNA extraction and northern blot analysis

Total RNA were isolated from rat tissues by the single-step acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction as described by Chomzynski and Sacchif11. The RNA preparations were qualified with A260/A280 = 1.8 - 1.9, with no DNA contamination as checked by DABA DNA assay12 and of high integrity as judged by sharp bands for 28S and 18S rRNAs shown on the gel by ethidium bromide staining. So the concentration of each RNA sample can be determined directly by spectrophotometry. Equal amounts of total RNA were eletrophoresed on the 1.2% formaldehyde agarose gel13. The quality and the quantity of the loaded samples were rechecked by the integrity and the intensity of the 28S and 18S rRNA bands. Then, RNAs were transferred and fixed on the nylon membrane, hybridized with 32p-GST Yb1 cDNA, β-actin cDNA or GAPDH cDNA (labelled by random primer labelling Kit) overnight at 65 °C as described previously14. Autoradiography was carried out at −80 °C and the intensity of the signals was measured by densitometric scanning with a C3-930 Shimadzu Dual-wavelength Scanner. For reprobing, the damp blots were washed at 95 °C for 20 min in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA and 0.1% (w/v) SDS to remove the previous signals and be ready for re-prehybridization. Northern blot analysis was repeated at least twice.

Results and Discussion

GST Yb1 gene was highly expressed in the three main target tissues of steroid hormones (androgen, estrogen and glucocorticoid)

GST Yb1 mRNAs were investigated by Northern blot analysis of total RNA extracted from different rat tissues with 32p labelled cDNA as a probe. The results are shown in Fig 1. Usually, the mRNA for β-actin was used as an internal control to normalize the tested mRNAs determination. Unfortunately, the steady state of β-actin mRNAs were varied greatly in the tissues tested and even with different size in some tissues as the case of heart, coagulating gland and seminal vesicle which were its cross-hybridizing signals for α- or γ-actin mRNAs15. When choosing another popular house-keeping gene GAPDH (Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate- dehydrogenase) as internal control, the situation seemed to be not improved (Fig 1). As stated in the Materials and Methods, several reference parameters were provided to ensure the quality and quantity of the total RNA and the reproducibility of experiments. Additionally, our results of β-actin gene expression in different tissues agreed with those of other reports15, 16, thus supporting the conviction that there were no problem with RNA loading variations.

Fig 1
figure 1

Tissue-specificity of GST Yb1 gene expression in the male and female rats.

(A) Northern blot analysis: 30 μg of total RNA in each lane from different tissues were run on the 1.2% formaldehyde agarose gel, transferred to nylon membrane and hybridized with 32P- labeled probes as indicated. Due to the limitation of the tank size, all RNA preparations were analyzed on two blots on which duplicate samples were loaded in parellel (lanes cut) to make the data from two blots comparable.

(B) Relative levels of GST Yb1 mRNA in different tissues were determined by densitometric scanning and indicated as black bars. The level in kidney of female rats was set to 1. V.P. ventral prostate; S. V. seminal vesicle; C.G. coagulating gland.

The expression of the GSTs genes has been reported to be tissue-specific, e.g. subunit Ya and Yc are not expressed in heart and testis, Yp not in liver, Yb1 not in kidney4, 20, while Yb3 is brain specific21. Our experiment amply illustrated this point. It is of interest to note that the highest level of expression was found in the chief target organs of three steroid hormones, i.e. ventral prostate (androgen), uterus (estrogen) and liver (glucocorticoid), followed by other classical androgen target tissues such as testis and coagulating gland. Of the tissues with only low levels of expression, brain ranks higher and spleen the lowest, while barely detectable in kidney. This result indicated strongly that the expression of GST Yb1 gene must be somehow influenced by these steroid hormones.

Androgen regulation of GST Yb1 mRNA in rat ventral prostate, liver and brain

As an active expression of the GST Yb1 gene was found in the androgen target tissues, the role of androgen in three tissues was investigated, the ventral prostste as one of the classical androgen target tissue; the liver as an important tissue concerned with detoxication and the brain a third tissue with an average level of expression. The results with the ventral prostate were in agreement with those by dot blot analysis reported previously4, 5, 17. The GST Yb1 mRNA level increased after androgen withdrawal by castration and reached the highest level on day 3 postoperation, then gradually decreased until down to 50 % of the normal by the 10th day as indicated in Fig 2. Two internal standards, the β-actin and GAPDH mRNAs were not affected by castration as expected. In order to get an overview of the regulation feature of GST Yb1 mRNA in the ventral prostate by androgen manipulation, EDS treatment of the animal was carried out to address this subject. It was well documented that EDS could specifically eliminate the Leydig cells in testis which were the main source of testosterone secretion. Moreover, the effects were gradually reversed two weeks after EDS administration18, 19. Fig 3 showed the correlation of the rat serum testosterone concentration with the GST Ybl mRNA in the ventral prostate after EDS treatment. The result from EDS treated animals strengthened the conclusion obtained by castration that the expression of GST Yb1 gene was down-regulated by androgen in ventral prostate.

Fig 2
figure 2

The effect of castration on the GST Yb1 mRNA in the rat ventral prostate.

(A) Northern blot analysis: 20 μg of total RNA from normal and 1, 2, 3, 5 and 10 days post-castration rats were processed as described in Fig 1(A).

(B) Diagram for the changes of GST Yb1 mRNA in ventral prostate upon castration. The GST Yb1 mRNA levels (•) were determined by densitometric scanning and normalized with GAPDH mRNA. The level for normal rats (day 0) was set to 100.

Fig 3
figure 3

The effect of EDS treatment on the GST Yb1 mRNA in the rat ventral prostate.

(A) Northern blot analysis: 20 μg of tatal RNA were loaded in each lane.

(B) Changes in levels of serum testosterone (▪) and GST Yb1 mRNA (•) in rats injected with 75 mg EDS/Kg (—) or DMSO-vehicle (——) The levels of GST Yb1 mRNA were normalized with those of GAPDH mRNA.

Surprisingly, quite opposite results were observed with liver upon castration. Both the GST Yb1 gene and those internal standards, β-actin and GAPDH gene expressions showed a transient decrease as shown in Fig 4. It suggested that androgen withdrawl might give rise to a non-specific inhibition of gene transcription in liver. The brain, on the other hand, was not sensitive to such androgen manipulation as shown in Fig 5.

Fig 4
figure 4

The effect of castration on the GST Yb1 mRNA in the rat liver.

(A) Northern blot analysis: 20 μg of total RNA were run in each lane.

(B) Diagram for the changes of GST Yb1 mRNA in liver.

Fig 5
figure 5

The effect of castration on the GST Yb1 mRNA in the rat brain.

(A) Northern blot analysis: 30 ug of total RNA were run in each lane.

(B) Diagram for the changes of GST Yb1 mRNA in brain upon castration. The levels of GST Yb1 mRNA were normalized with those of GAPDH mRNA.

The above experiments further suggested that the regulation of GST Yb1 gene was tissue-specific and occured in a diversified pattern. Since androgen withdrawal caused the up-regulation of GST Yb1 gene expression in ventral prostate but down-regulation in liver and produced no effect in brain, this system would be a very interesting one for the study of different mechanisms by which androgen exerts its different effects. But the fact that only transient changes occured in the expression level upon androgen manipulation suggests that androgen evidently cannot be the unique factor involved. Therefore, this system is not a simple model of androgen regulation as the case of PSBP gene induction. However, as the interplay of steroid hormones with different tissue- specific transcription factors in the regulation of gene expression becomes elucidated more clearly, the GSTs gene model would still merit detailed study to improve our understanding of the complicated regulation of life processes.