Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

The radiation dose-regulated AND gate genetic circuit, a novel targeted and real-time monitoring strategy for cancer gene therapy

A Corrigendum to this article was published on 18 July 2012

Abstract

The AND gate functions such that when all inputs are activated the downstream gene will be transcribed and it is off otherwise. To accomplish optimal and targeted gene therapy in solid tumor patients, we have constructed an AND gate genetic circuit and investigated whether it could be activated by low-dose radiation in vitro and in vivo. The enhancement green fluorescent protein (EGFP) expression in different tumor cells transfected with control vector plxsn-EGFP confirmed that 2 Gy of radiation and 1% O2 for 3 h could activate our AND gate. Besides, the obvious different levels of EGFP expression between 2 and 6 Gy of radiation demonstrated that the AND gate could be regulated by radiation doses. Additionally, through EGFP expression and the codistribution of p53 and HIF-1α in xenografts, we illustrated the targeted activation property of the AND gate and real-time monitoring to hypoxic districts in vivo. Moreover, significant growth inhibition and cell cycle arrest in vitro and apoptosis-inducing effects in vitro and in vivo proved that the AND gate induced ideal antitumor effects. In conclusion, the radiation dose-regulated AND gate genetic circuit could not only effectively monitor the therapeutic process in real-time but also induce ideal antitumor efficacy, and can be further exploited for personal therapy in clinical tumor patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun JM . Cancer statistics. CA-Cancer J Clin 2009; 59: 225–249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hofman V, Bonnetaud C, Ilie MI, Vielh P, Vignaud JM, Fléjou JF et al. Preoperative circulating tumor cell detection using the isolation by size of epithelial tumor cell method for patients with lung cancer is a new prognostic biomarker. Clin Cancer Res 2011; 17: 827–835.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barnett GC, West CML, Dunning AM, Elliott RM, Coles CE, Pharoah PDP et al. Normal tissue reactions to radiotherapy: towards tailoring treatment dose by genotype. Nat Rev Cancer 2009; 9: 134–142.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Henríquez-Hernández LA, Bordón E, Pinar B, Lloret M, Rodríguez-Gallego C, Lara PC . Prediction of normal tissue toxicity as part of the individualized treatment with radiotherapy in oncology patients. Surg Oncol 2012 (in press).

  5. Abdollahi A, Folkman J . Evading tumor evasion: current concepts and perspectives of anti-angiogenic cancer therapy. Drug Resist Updat 2010; 13: 16–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Velez JM, Miriyala S, Nithipongvanitch R, Noel T, Plabplueng CD, Oberley T et al. p53 regulates oxidative stress-mediated retrograde signaling: a novel mechanism for chemotherapy-induced cardiac injury. PLoS ONE 2011; 6: e18005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Citrin D, Cotrim AP, Hyodo F, Baum BJ, Krishna MC, Mitchell JB . Radioprotectors and mitigators of radiation-induced normal tissue injury. Oncologist 2010; 15: 360–371.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lo HW, Day CP, Hung MC . Cancer-specific gene therapy. Adv Genet 2005; 54: 235–255.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pennacchietti S, Michieli P, Galluzzo M, Mazzone M, Giordano S, Comoglio PM . Hypoxia promotes invasive growth by transcriptional activation of the met protooncogene. Cancer Cell 2003; 3: 347–361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stewart GD, Nanda J, Katz E, Bowman KJ, Christie JG, Brown DJG et al. DNA strand breaks and hypoxia response inhibition mediate the radiosensitisation effect of nitric oxide donors on prostate cancer under varying oxygen conditions. Biochem Pharmacol 2011; 81: 203–210.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pawlik TM, Keyomarsi K . Role of cell cycle in mediating sensitivity to radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol 2004; 59: 928–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Martin JB . Tumor hypoxia in cancer therapy. Methods Enzymol 2007; 435: 295–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hockel M, Vaupel P . Biological consequences of tumor hypoxia. Semin Oncol 2001; 28: 36–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Greco O, Joiner MC, Doleh A, Powell AD, Hillman GG, Scott SD . Hypoxia- and radiation-activated Cre//loxP ‘molecular switch’ vectors for gene therapy of cancer. Gene Ther 2005; 13: 206–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang W, Chen Z, Li R, Li D, Duan Y, Cao Z . Enhanced efficacy of radiation-induced gene therapy in mice bearing lung adenocarcinoma xenografts using hypoxia responsive elements. Cancer Sci 2005; 96: 918–924.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Greco O, Marples B, Dachs GU, Williams KJ, Patterson AV, Scott SD . Novel chimeric gene promoters responsive to hypoxia and ionizing radiation. Gene Ther 2002; 9: 1403–1411.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mayr NA, Huang Z, Sohn JW, Lo SS, Teh BS, Lu JJ et al. Emerging application of stereotactic body radiation therapy for gynecologic malignancies. Expert Rev Anticancer 2011; 11: 1071–1077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vujaskovic Z, Willett CG, Tepper JE, Kinsella TJ, Gunderson LL . Normal-tissue tolerance to IOERT, EBRT, or both: animal and clinical studies. In: Gunderson LL, Willett CG, Calvo FA, Harrison LB (eds). Current Clinical Oncology, 2nd edn. Humana Press: Totowa, 2011, pp 119–138.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zelefsky MJ, Levin EJ, Hunt M, Yamada Y, Shippy AM, Jackson A et al. Incidence of late rectal and urinary toxicities after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol 2008; 70: 1124–1129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Maingon P, Marchesi V, Crehange G . Intensity modulated radiation therapy. Br J Cancer 2010; 97: 759–768.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yu ST, Li C, Lu MH, Liang GP, Li N, Tang XD et al. Noninvasive and real-time monitoring of the therapeutic response of tumors in vivo with an optimized hTERT promoter. Cancer 2012; 118: 1884–1893.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Asano S . Gene therapy as translational research. Mol Urol 2000; 4: 41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chang Q, Jurisica I, Do T, Hedley DW . Hypoxia predicts aggressive growth and spontaneous metastasis formation from orthotopically grown primary xenografts of human pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res 2011; 71: 3110–3120.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ammoun S, Zhou L, Barczyk M, Hilton D, Hafizi S, Hanemann C et al. Gas6/axl-family receptors in schwannoma pathological proliferation, adhesion and survival. Neuro Oncol 2011; 13: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Crosby ME, Kulshreshtha R, Ivan M, Glazer PM . MicroRNA regulation of DNA repair gene expression in hypoxic stress. Cancer Res 2009; 69: 1221–1229.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Avalosse B, Dupont F, Burny A . Gene therapy for cancer. Curr Opin Oncol 1995; 7: 94–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Baum C, Dullmann J, Li Z, Fehse B, Meyer J, Williams DA et al. Side effects of retroviral gene transfer into hematopoietic stem cells. Blood 2003; 101: 2099–2113.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fukazawa T, Matsuoka J, Yamatsuji T, Maeda Y, Durbin ML, Nanomato et al. Adenovirus mediated cancer gene therapy and virotherapy. Int J Mol Med 2010; 25: 3–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang W, Li R, Chen Z, Li D, Duan Y, Cao Z . Cisplatin-controlled p53 gene therapy for human non-small cell lung cancer xenografts in athymic nude mice via the CArG elements. Cancer Sci 2005; 96: 706–712.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pines A, Bivi N, Romanello M, Damante G, Kelley MR, Adamson ED et al. Cross-regulation between Egr-1 and APE/Ref-1 during early response to oxidative stress in the human osteoblastic HOBIT cell line: evidence for an autoregulatory loop. Free Radical Res 2005; 39: 269–281.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the College of High Altitude Military Medicine of Third Military Medical University for support. This work was supported by the Chongqing Science Fund (CSCT2008BB5024) and the National Natural Science Fund of China (NSFC30670625, 30500144).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to M Ding, W Wang or Q Yi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ding, M., Zhang, E., He, R. et al. The radiation dose-regulated AND gate genetic circuit, a novel targeted and real-time monitoring strategy for cancer gene therapy. Cancer Gene Ther 19, 382–392 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/cgt.2012.11

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/cgt.2012.11

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links