Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Conditioning

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis using fludarabine-, intravenous busulfan- and low-dose TBI-based conditioning

Abstract

Graft failure is one of the major barriers to the success of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in myelofibrosis (MF). We report our institutional experience with 27 MF patients who underwent HCT using fludarabine-, intravenous BU- and low-dose total body irradiation (FBT)-based reduced-intensity (n=20) or full-intensity (n=7) conditioning regimens. Eight patients had prior exposure to JAK1/2 inhibitor therapy; six patients received JAK1/2 inhibitors leading on to HCT and two patients received transplant at the failure of JAK1/2 inhibitor therapy. No adverse impact of JAK1/2 inhibitor therapy was observed on early post-transplant outcomes. All evaluable patients had neutrophil recovery, and no primary graft failure was observed. Cumulative incidence of grades II–IV acute GVHD at day 100 was 48% (95% confidence interval (CI), 29–67%) and chronic GVHD at 2 years was 66% (95% CI, 49–84%). Cumulative incidences of nonrelapse mortality (NRM), relapse and probability of OS at 2 years were: 43% (95% CI, 12–74%), 10% (95% CI, 0–39%) and 56% (95% CI, 28–77%), respectively. FBT-based conditioning regimen has a favorable impact on engraftment; however, further efforts are required to reduce NRM.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McLornan DP, Mead AJ, Jackson G, Harrison CN . Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis in 2012. Br J Haematol 2012; 157: 413–425.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gupta V, Hari P, Hoffman R . Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis in the era of JAK inhibitors. Blood 2012; 120: 1367–1379.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Alchalby H, Badbaran A, Zabelina T, Kobbe G, Hahn J, Wolff D et al. Impact of JAK2V617F mutation status, allele burden, and clearance after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis. Blood 2010; 116: 3572–3581.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ditschkowski M, Elmaagacli AH, Trenschel R, Gromke T, Steckel NK, Koldehoff M et al. Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System scores, pre-transplant therapy and chronic graft-versus-host disease determine outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis. Haematologica 2012; 97: 1574–1581.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Abelsson J, Merup M, Birgegård G, WeisBjerrum O, Brinch L, Brune M et al. The outcome of allo-HSCT for 92 patients with myelofibrosis in the Nordic countries. Bone Marrow Transplant 2012; 47: 380–386.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Scott BL, Gooley TA, Sorror ML, Rezvani AR, Linenberger ML, Grim J et al. The Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System for myelofibrosis predicts outcomes after hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood 2012; 119: 2657–2664.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kröger N, Holler E, Kobbe G, Bornhäuser M, Schwerdtfeger R, Baurmann H et al. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation after reduced-intensity conditioning in patients with myelofibrosis: a prospective, multicenter study of the Chronic Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Blood 2009; 114: 5264–5270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Daly A, Song K, Nevill T, Nantel S, Toze C, Hogge D et al. Stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis: a report from two Canadian centers. Bone Marrow Transplant 2003; 32: 35–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wong KM, Atenafu EG, Kim D, Kuruvilla J, Lipton JH, Messner H et al. Incidence and risk factors for early hepatotoxicity and its impact on survival in patients with myelofibrosis undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2012; 18: 1589–1599.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Russell JA, Tran HT, Quinlan D, Chaudhry A, Duggan P, Brown C et al. Once-daily intravenous busulfan given with fludarabine as conditioning for allogeneic stem cell transplantation: study of pharmacokinetics and early clinical outcomes. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2002; 8: 468–476.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. de Lima M, Couriel D, Thall PF, Wang X, Madden T, Jones R et al. Once-daily intravenous busulfan and fludarabine: clinical and pharmacokinetic results of a myeloablative, reduced-toxicity conditioning regimen for allogeneic stem cell transplantation in AML and MDS. Blood 2004; 104: 857–864.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Russell JA, Savoie ML, Balogh A, Turner AR, Larratt L, Chaudhry MA et al. Allogeneic transplantation for adult acute leukemia in first and second remission with a novel regimen incorporating daily intravenous busulfan, fludarabine, 400 CGY total-body irradiation, and thymoglobulin. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2007; 13: 814–821.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Russell JA, Irish W, Balogh A, Chaudhry MA, Savoie ML, Turner AR et al. The addition of 400 cGY total body irradiation to a regimen incorporating once-daily intravenous busulfan, fludarabine, and antithymocyte globulin reduces relapse without affecting nonrelapse mortality in acute myelogenous leukemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2010; 16: 509–514.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Daly A, Savoie ML, Geddes M, Chaudhry A, Stewart D, Duggan P et al. Fludarabine, busulfan, antithymocyte globulin, and total body irradiation for pretransplantation conditioning in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: excellent outcomes in all but older patients with comorbidities. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2012; 18: 1921–1926.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Swerdllow SH, Campo E, Harris NL . WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. IARC Press: Lyon, France, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mesa RA, Verstovsek S, Cervantes F, Barosi G, Reilly JT, Dupriez B et al. Primary myelofibrosis (PMF), post polycythemia vera myelofibrosis (post-PV MF), post essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (post-ET MF), blast phase PMF (PMF-BP): Consensus on terminology by the international working group for myelofibrosis research and treatment (IWG-MRT). Leuk Res 2007; 31: 737–740.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Passamonti F, Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, Morra E, Rumi E, Pereira A et al. A dynamic prognostic model to predict survival in primary myelofibrosis: a study by the IWG-MRT (International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment). Blood 2010; 115: 1703–1708.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gangat N, Caramazza D, Vaidya R, George G, Begna K, Schwager S et al. DIPSS plus: a refined Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System for primary myelofibrosis that incorporates prognostic information from karyotype, platelet count, and transfusion status. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 392–397.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sorror ML, Maris MB, Storb R, Baron F, Sandmaier BM, Maloney DG et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)-specific comorbidity index: a new tool for risk assessment before allogeneic HCT. Blood 2005; 106: 2912–2919.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Caramazza D, Begna KH, Gangat N, Vaidya R, Siragusa S, Van Dyke DL et al. Refined cytogenetic-risk categorization for overall and leukemia-free survival in primary myelofibrosis: a single center study of 433 patients. Leukemia 2010; 25: 82–88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ballen KK, Shrestha S, Sobocinski KA, Zhang M-J, Bashey A, Bolwell BJ et al. Outcome of transplantation for myelofibrosis. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2010; 16: 358–367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Avery S, Voss MH, Gonzales AM, Lubin M, Castro-Malaspina H, Giralt S et al. Importance of day 21 BM chimerism in sustained neutrophil engraftment following double-unit cord blood transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2012; 47: 1056–1060.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bearman SI, Appelbaum FR, Buckner CD, Petersen FB, Fisher LD, Clift RA et al. Regimen-related toxicity in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation. J Clin Oncol 1988; 6: 1562–1568.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jones RJ, Lee KS, Beschorner WE, Vogel VG, Grochow LB, Braine HG et al. Venoocclusive disease of the liver following bone marrow transplantation. Transplantation 1987; 44: 778–783.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, Klingemann HG, Beatty P, Hows J et al. 1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading. Bone Marrow Transplant 1995; 15: 825–828.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Filipovich AH, Weisdorf D, Pavletic S, Socie G, Wingard JR, Lee SJ et al. National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: I. Diagnosis and staging working group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2005; 11: 945–956.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. De Pauw B, Walsh TJ, Donnelly JP, Stevens DA, Edwards JE, Calandra T et al. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European organization for research and treatment of cancer/invasive fungal infections cooperative group and the national institute of allergy and infectious diseases mycoses study group (EORTC/MSG) consensus group. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 46: 1813–1821.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tefferi A, Barosi G, Mesa RA, Cervantes F, Deeg HJ, Reilly JT et al. International Working Group (IWG) consensus criteria for treatment response in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia, for the IWG for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT). Blood 2006; 108: 1497–1503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tefferi A, Cervantes F, Mesa R, Passamonti F, Verstovsek S, Vannucchi AM et al. Revised response criteria for myelofibrosis: International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) and European LeukemiaNet (ELN) consensus report. Blood 2013; 122: 1395–1398.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Pardanani A, Gotlib J, Gupta V, Roberts AW, Wadleigh M, Sirhan S et al. Phase I/II study of CYT387, a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor for the treatment of myelofibrosis. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts 2012; 120: 178–178.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rondelli D, Goldberg JD, Marchioli R, Isola L, Shore TB, Prchal JT et al. Results of phase II clinical trial MPD-RC 101: allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation conditioned with fludarabine/melphalan in patients with myelofibrosis. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2012; 18: S216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gupta V, Malone AK, Hari PN, Ahn KW, Hu Z-H, Gale RP et al. Reduced-intensity hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients with primary myelofibrosis: a cohort analysis from the center for international blood and marrow transplant research. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2014; 20: 89–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hill GR, Crawford JM, Cooke KR, Brinson YS, Pan L, Ferrara JL . Total body irradiation and acute graft-versus-host disease: the role of gastrointestinal damage and inflammatory cytokines. Blood 1997; 90: 3204–3213.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rezvani AR, McCune JS, Storer BE, Batchelder A, Kida A, Deeg HJ et al. Cyclophosphamide followed by intravenous targeted busulfan for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2013; 19: 1033–1039.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Verstovsek S, Kantarjian H, Mesa RA, Pardanani AD, Cortes-Franco J, Thomas DA et al. Safety and efficacy of INCB018424, a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, in myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 1117–1127.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Harrison C, Kiladjian J-J, Al-Ali HK, Gisslinger H, Waltzman R, Stalbovskaya V et al. JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 787–798.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Gotlib J, Levy RS, Gupta V, DiPersio JF et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 799–807.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Heine A, Held SAE, Daecke SN, Wallner S, Yajnanarayana SP, Kurts C et al. The JAK-inhibitor ruxolitinib impairs dendritic cell function in vitro and in vivo. Blood 2013; 122: 1192–1202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Robin M, Francois S, Huynh A, Cassinat B, Bay J-O, Cornillon J et al. Ruxolitinib before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with myelofibrosis: a preliminary descriptive report of the JAK ALLO Study, a phase II trial sponsored by Goelams-FIM in collaboration with the Sfgmtc. Blood 2013; 122: 306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Jaekel N, Behre G, Behning A, Wickenhauser C, Lange T, Niederwieser D et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis in patients pretreated with the JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib. Bone Marrow Transplant 2013; 49: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Stübig T, Alchalby H, Ditschkowski M, Wolf D, Wulf G, Zabelina T et al. JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib as pretreatment for allogeneic stem cell transplantation in primary or post-ET/PV myelofibrosis. Leukemia 2014; 28: 1736–1738.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kerbauy DM, Gooley TA, Sale GE, Flowers ME, Doney KC, Georges GE et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantation as curative therapy for idiopathic myelofibrosis, advanced polycythemia vera, and essential thrombocythemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2007; 13: 355–365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Stewart WA, Pearce R, Kirkland KE, Bloor A, Thomson K, Apperley J et al. The role of allogeneic SCT in primary myelofibrosis: a British Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation study. Bone Marrow Transplant 2010; 45: 1587–1593.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kröger N, Badbaran A, Holler E, Hahn J, Kobbe G, Bornhäuser M et al. Monitoring of the JAK2-V617F mutation by highly sensitive quantitative real-time PCR after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood 2007; 109: 1316–1321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V Gupta.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

VG received grant for research studies from Incyte and Novartis through his institution, and has served as a consultant on advisory board for Incyte and Novartis. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shanavas, M., Messner, H., Atenafu, E. et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis using fludarabine-, intravenous busulfan- and low-dose TBI-based conditioning. Bone Marrow Transplant 49, 1162–1169 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2014.131

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2014.131

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links