Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Allografting

Allogeneic matched-sibling hematopoietic cell transplantation for AML: comparable outcomes between Eastern Mediterranean (EMBMT) and European (EBMT) centers

Abstract

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) activity significantly increased in the Eastern Mediterranean area over the past decade. However, comparative outcomes with longer established centers, especially European Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) centers, have not been reported. We compared outcomes of matched-sibling allogeneic HCT between East Mediterranean Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EMBMT) and EBMT centers for adult patients with AML in first CR using myeloablative conditioning. We matched 431 patients from EMBMT with 431 patients from EBMT centers according to patient, disease and transplant characteristics. EMBMT recipients and donors were more likely to be CMV seropositive. There were no significant differences in the incidence of acute or chronic GVHD, or the 3-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse incidence (RI) between the two groups (NRM: EMBMT=16% vs EBMT=11), (RI: EMBMT=13% vs EBMT=19%). Notably, the 3-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) and OS were similar between the groups (LFS: EMBMT=70±2% vs EBMT=69±3%), (OS: EMBMT=74±2% vs EBMT=73±2%). Despite differences in socioeconomics, health resources and transplant experience, matched-sibling allogeneic HCT outcomes in emerging centers in the EMBMT region appear similar to EBMT centers.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Juliusson G, Antunovic P, Derolf A, Lehmann S, Mollgard L, Stockelberg D et al. Age and acute myeloid leukemia: real world data on decision to treat and outcomes from the Swedish Acute Leukemia Registry. Blood 2009; 113: 4179–4187.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Buchner T, Berdel WE, Haferlach C, Haferlach T, Schnittger S, Muller-Tidow C et al. Age-related risk profile and chemotherapy dose response in acute myeloid leukemia: a study by the German Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 61–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Grimwade D, Walker H, Oliver F, Wheatley K, Harrison C, Harrison G et al. The importance of diagnostic cytogenetics on outcome in AML: analysis of 1612 patients entered into the MRC AML 10 trial. The Medical Research Council Adult and Children's Leukaemia Working Parties. Blood 1998; 92: 2322–2333.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cornelissen JJ, van Putten WL, Verdonck LF, Theobald M, Jacky E, Daenen SM et al. Results of a HOVON/SAKK donor versus no-donor analysis of myeloablative HLA-identical sibling stem cell transplantation in first remission acute myeloid leukemia in young and middle-aged adults: benefits for whom? Blood 2007; 109: 3658–3666.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Suciu S, Mandelli F, de Witte T, Zittoun R, Gallo E, Labar B et al. Allogeneic compared with autologous stem cell transplantation in the treatment of patients younger than 46 years with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1): an intention-to-treat analysis of the EORTC/GIMEMAAML-10 trial. Blood 2003; 102: 1232–1240.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Koreth J, Schlenk R, Kopecky KJ, Honda S, Sierra J, Djulbegovic BJ et al. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials. JAMA 2009; 301: 2349–2361.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Gratwohl A, Baldomero H, Aljurf M, Pasquini MC, Bouzas LF, Yoshimi A et al. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a global perspective. JAMA 2010; 303: 1617–1624.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Frassoni F, Labopin M, Powles R, Mary JY, Arcese W, Bacigalupo A et al. Effect of centre on outcome of bone-marrow transplantation for acute myeloid leukaemia. Acute Leukaemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Lancet 2000; 355: 1393–1398.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Aljurf M, Zaidi SZ, Hussain F, Ghavamzadeh A, Alimoghaddam K, Jahani M et al. Status of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMRO). Transfus Apher Sci 2010; 42: 169–175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Aljurf MD, Zaidi SZ, El Solh H, Hussain F, Ghavamzadeh A, Mahmoud HK et al. Special issues related to hematopoietic SCT in the Eastern Mediterranean region and the first regional activity report. Bone Marrow Transplant 2009; 43: 1–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Anasetti C . What are the most important donor and recipient factors affecting the outcome of related and unrelated allogeneic transplantation? Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2008; 21: 691–697.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Flowers ME, Inamoto Y, Carpenter PA, Lee SJ, Kiem HP, Petersdorf EW et al. Comparative analysis of risk factors for acute graft-versus-host disease and for chronic graft-versus-host disease according to National Institutes of Health consensus criteria. Blood 2011; 117: 3214–3219.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Al Husain M, Al Bunyan M . Consanguineous marriages in a Saudi population and the effect of inbreeding on prenatal and postnatal mortality. Ann Trop Paediatr 1997; 17: 155–160.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Khoury SA, Massad D . Consanguineous marriage in Jordan. Am J Med Genet 1992; 43: 769–775.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Al-Gazali LI, Bener A, Abdulrazzaq YM, Micallef R, al-Khayat AI, Gaber T . Consanguineous marriages in the United Arab Emirates. J Biosoc Sci 1997; 29: 491–497.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Giebel S, Labopin M, Ehninger G, Beelen D, Blaise D, Ganser A et al. Association of Human Development Index with rates and outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with acute leukemia. Blood 2010; 116: 122–128.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gratwohl A, Brand R, Niederwieser D, Baldomero H, Chabannon C, Cornelissen J et al. Introduction of a quality management system and outcome after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 1980–1986.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A Bazarbachi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bazarbachi, A., Labopin, M., Ghavamzadeh, A. et al. Allogeneic matched-sibling hematopoietic cell transplantation for AML: comparable outcomes between Eastern Mediterranean (EMBMT) and European (EBMT) centers. Bone Marrow Transplant 48, 1065–1069 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2013.1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2013.1

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links