Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Allografting

Impact of cytogenetics risk on outcome after reduced intensity conditioning allo-SCT from an HLA-identical sibling for patients with AML in first CR: a report from the acute leukemia working party of EBMT

Abstract

So far the impact of cytogenetics risk on outcome in the context of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) allo-SCT has been poorly studied. We have identified 378 AML patients in first CR who underwent RIC allo-SCT from an HLA-matched sibling donor between 2000 and 2007 reported to the European Group for Bone and Marrow Transplantation and for whom detailed cytogenetics data were available (good risk: n=21; intermediate risk: n=304; and poor risk: n=53). With a median follow-up of 24 months (range: 1–93), 2-year non-relapse mortality, relapse rate (RR), leukemia-free survival (LFS) and OS were 14%, 31%, 55% and 61%, respectively. Cytogenetics was significantly associated with RR (good risk: 10%; intermediate risk: 28%; and poor risk: 55% at 2 years, P<0.0001) and LFS (good risk: 64%; intermediate risk: 57%; and poor risk: 38% at 2 years, P=0.003). In a multivariate analysis, RR and LFS were significantly higher and lower, respectively, in the high-risk cytogenetics group (P=0.001, P=0.004) and in patients with a higher WBC at diagnosis (>10 × 109/L) (P<0.001, P=0.004). As documented in the setting of myeloablative allo-SCT, patients with poor cytogenetics had increased RR and decreased LFS after RIC allo-SCT, requiring new prospective strategies to improve results in this subgroup.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lowenberg B, Downing JR, Burnett A . Acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 1051–1062.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Döhner H, Estey EH, Amadori S, Appelbaum FR, Büchner T, Burnett AK et al. Diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia in adults: recommendations from an international expert panel, on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood 2010; 115: 453–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blaise D, Vey N, Faucher C, Mohty M . Current status of reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica 2007; 92: 533–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ringden O, Labopin M, Ehninger G, Niederwieser D, Olsson R, Basara N et al. Reduced intensity conditioning compared with myeloablative conditioning using unrelated donor transplants in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 4570–4577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gyurkocza B, Storb R, Storer BE, Chauncey TR, Lange T, Shizuru JA et al. Nonmyeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 2859–2867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Grimwade D, Hills RK, Moorman AV, Walker H, Chatters S, Goldstone AH et al. Refinement of cytogenetic classification in acute myeloid leukemia: determination of prognostic significance of rare recurring chromosomal abnormalities among 5876 younger adult patients treated in the United Kingdom Medical Research Council trials. Blood 2010; 116: 354–365.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bacigalupo A, Ballen K, Rizzo D, Giralt S, Lazarus H, Ho V et al. Defining the intensity of conditioning regimens: Working definitions. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2009; 15: 1628–1633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Glucksberg H, Storb R, Fefer A, Buckner CD, Neiman PE, Clift RA et al. Clinical manifestations of graft-versus-host disease in human recipients of marrow from HLA-matched sibling donors. Transplantation 1974; 18: 295–304.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shulman H, Sullivan KM, Weiden PL, McDonald GB, Striker GE, Sale GE et al. Chronic graft-versus-host syndrome in man. A long-term clinicopathologic study of 20 Seattle patients. Am J Med 1980; 69: 204–217.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE . Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Stat Med 1999; 18: 695–706.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Burnett AK, Milligan D, Goldstone A, Prentice A, McMullin MF, Dennis M et al. The impact of dose escalation and resistance modulation in older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: the results of the LRF AML14 trial. Br J Haematol 2009; 145: 318–332.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pigneux A, Harousseau JL, Witz F, Sauvezie M, Bene MC, Luquet I et al. Addition of lomustine to idarubicin and cytarabine improves the outcome of elderly patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the GOELAMS. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 3028–3034.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rölling C, Thiede C, Gramatzki M, Aulitzky W, Bodenstein H, Bornhaüser M et al. A novel prognostic model in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia-results of 909 patients entered into the prospective AML96 trial. Blood 2010; 116: 971–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rowe JM, Tallman MS . How I treat acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2010; 116: 3147–3156.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yacoub-Agha I, Mesnil F, Kuentz M, Boiron JM, Ifrah N, Milpied N et al. Allogeneic marrow stem-cell transplantation from human leukocyte antigen-identical siblings versus human leukocyte antigen-allelic-matched unrelated donors (10/10) in patients with standard-risk hematologic malignancy: a prospective study from the French Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cell Therapy. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 5695–5702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Moore J, Nivison-Smith I, Goh K, Ma D, Bradstock K, Szer J et al. Equivalent survival for sibling and unrelated donor allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myelogeneous leukemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2007; 13: 601–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lioure B, Delaunay J, Blaise D, Milpied N, Guardiola P, Cahn JY et al. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) with non myeloablative conditioning regimen (NST) following intensive consolidation may be equivalent to conventional alloSCT and superior to autoSCT for patients over 50 with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first CR: first results of the AML 2001 trial. Blood (ASH annual meeting abstracts) 2006; 108: p99a, Abstract 319.

  18. Aoudjhane M, Labopin M, Gorin NC, Shimoni A, Ruutu T, Kolb HJ et al. Comparative outcome of reduced intensity and myeloablative conditioning regimen in HLA identical sibling allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients older than 50 years of age with acute myeloblastic leukaemia: a retrospective survey from the Acute Leukaemia Working Party (ALWP) of the European group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). Leukemia 2005; 19: 2304–2312.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chevallier P, Szydlo RM, Blaise D, Tabrizi R, Michallet M, Uzunov M et al. Reduced-intensity conditioning before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients over 60 years: a report from the SFGM-TC. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2012; 18: 289–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Prebet T, Boissel N, Reutenauer S, Thomas X, Delaunay J, Cahn JY et al. Acute myeloid leukemia with translocation (8;21) or inversion (16) in elderly patients treated with conventional chemotherapy: a collaborative study of the French CBF-AML intergroup. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 4747–4753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kirschbaum MH, Stein AS, Popplewell L, Delioukina M, Chen R, Nakamura R et al. A phase I study in adults of Clofarabine combined with high-dose Melphalan as reduced-intensity conditioning for allogeneic transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2012; 18: 432–440.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. McLarnon A, Piper KP, Goodyear OC, Arrazi JM, Mahendra P, Cook M et al. CD8(+) T-cell immunity against cancer-testis antigens develops following allogeneic stem cell transplantation and reveals a potential mechanism for the graft-versus-leukemia effect. Haematologica 2010; 95: 1572–1578.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the participating EBMT centers and national registries, local and national data managers. We also thank Emmanuelle Polge and Benedicte Samey for their help in collecting data.

Author contributions: P Chevallier conceived and designed the study, analyzed data, recruited patients, provided clinical care, performed bibliographic search and wrote the manuscript. M Mohty, V Rocha recruited patients, provided clinical care, analyzed data and performed bibliographic search, helped with the statistical analyses and helped writing the manuscript. M Labopin performed data management, collection and statistical analyses. N Milpied, JJ Cornelissen, D Blaise, E Petersen, N Theorin, H Goker, G Socie and V Rocha recruited patients, provided clinical care and commented on the manuscript. All the above authors approved the manuscript for publication purposes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P Chevallier.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chevallier, P., Labopin, M., Milpied, N. et al. Impact of cytogenetics risk on outcome after reduced intensity conditioning allo-SCT from an HLA-identical sibling for patients with AML in first CR: a report from the acute leukemia working party of EBMT. Bone Marrow Transplant 47, 1442–1447 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.55

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.55

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links