Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Stem Cell Procurement

Factors impacting stem cell mobilization failure rate and efficiency in multiple myeloma in the era of novel therapies: experience at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Abstract

Thalidomide, lenalidomide and bortezomib have increasingly been incorporated in first-line induction therapies for multiple myeloma. Concerns regarding the impact of these agents, especially lenalidomide, on stem cell mobilization prompted us to re-evaluate the risk factors that impact mobilization, including exposure to novel induction regimens. Among 317 patients who proceeded to stem cell collection after induction therapy between 2000 and 2009, the rate of mobilization failure, defined as the inability to collect 5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg following the first collection attempt, was 13%. By multivariate analysis, independent risk factors associated with mobilization failure included older age (P=0.04), lower platelet count (P=0.002) and use of single-agent G-CSF for mobilization (P<0.0001). When considering for outcome measurement stem cell collection efficiency measured by the number of CD34+ cells yielded per pheresis performed during first collection attempt, lower platelet count, use of single-agent G-CSF and older age were also associated with lower efficiency. In this population mobilized mostly with cyclophosphamide and G-CSF, the use of lenalidomide during induction was not associated with a lower stem cell collection efficiency by multivariate analysis. The data support the current International Multiple Myeloma Working Group guidelines recommending the use of cyclophosphamide and G-CSF based mobilization for patients previously exposed to lenalidomide.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alexanian R, Barlogie B, Tucker S . VAD-based regimens as primary treatment for multiple myeloma. Am J Hematol 1990; 33: 86–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV . Multiple myeloma. Blood 2008; 111: 2962–2972.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Reece DE . Management of multiple myeloma: the changing landscape. Blood Rev 2007; 21: 301–314.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bensinger W, Appelbaum F, Rowley S, Storb R, Sanders J, Lilleby K et al. Factors that influence collection and engraftment of autologous peripheral-blood stem cells. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13: 2547–2555.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Desikan KR, Tricot G, Munshi NC, Anaissie E, Spoon D, Fassas A et al. Preceding chemotherapy, tumour load and age influence engraftment in multiple myeloma patients mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor alone. Br J Haematol 2001; 112: 242–247.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. DiPersio JF, Stadtmauer EA, Nademanee A, Micallef IN, Stiff PJ, Kaufman JL et al. Plerixafor and G-CSF versus placebo and G-CSF to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood 2009; 113: 5720–5726.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Boccadoro M, Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Merletti F, Ciccone G, Richiardi L et al. Oral melphalan at diagnosis hampers adequate collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells in multiple myeloma. Haematologica 2002; 87: 846–850.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Giralt S, Stadtmauer EA, Harousseau JL, Palumbo A, Bensinger W, Comenzo RL et al. (IMWG) consensus statement and guidelines regarding the current status of stem cell collection and high-dose therapy for multiple myeloma and the role of plerixafor (AMD 3100). Leukemia 2009; 23: 1904–1912.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ketterer N, Salles G, Moullet I, Dumontet C, ElJaafari-Corbin A, Tremisi P et al. Factors associated with successful mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in 200 patients with lymphoid malignancies. Br J Haematol 1998; 103: 235–242.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Russell NH, McQuaker G . Stainer C, Byrne JL, Haynes AP. Stem cell mobilisation in lymphoproliferative diseases. Bone Marrow Transplant 1998; 22: 935–940.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Morris CL, Siegel E, Barlogie B, Cottler-Fox M, Lin P, Fassas A et al. Mobilization of CD34+ cells in elderly patients (&gt;/= 70 years) with multiple myeloma: influence of age, prior therapy, platelet count and mobilization regimen. Br J Haematol 2003; 120: 413–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Perea G, Sureda A, Martino R, Altes A, Martinez C, Cabezudo E et al. Predictive factors for a successful mobilization of peripheral blood CD34+ cells in multiple myeloma. Ann Hematol 2001; 80: 592–597.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kumar S, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Hayman SR, Buadi FK, Gastineau DA et al. Impact of lenalidomide therapy on stem cell mobilization and engraftment post-peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. Leukemia 2007; 21: 2035–2042.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mazumder A, Kaufman J, Niesvizky R, Lonial S, Vesole D, Jagannath S . Effect of lenalidomide therapy on mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in previously untreated multiple myeloma patients. Leukemia 2008; 22: 1280–1281.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Paripati H, Stewart AK, Cabou S, Dueck A, Zepeda VJ, Pirooz N et al. Compromised stem cell mobilization following induction therapy with lenalidomide in myeloma. Leukemia 2008; 22: 1282–1284.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Popat U, Saliba R, Thandi R, Hosing C, Qazilbash M, Anderlini P et al. Impairment of filgrastim-induced stem cell mobilization after prior lenalidomide in patients with multiple myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl 2009; 15: 718–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cavallo F, Bringhen S, Milone G, Ben-Yehuda D, Nagler A, Calabrese E et al. Stem cell mobilization in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after lenalidomide induction therapy. Leukemia 2011; 25: 1627–1631.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Breitkreutz I, Lokhorst HM, Raab MS, Holt B, Cremer FW, Herrmann D et al. Thalidomide in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: influence of thalidomide treatment on peripheral blood stem cell collection yield. Leukemia 2007; 21: 1294–1299.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ghobrial IM, Dispenzieri A, Bundy KL, Gastineau DA, Rajkumar SV, Therneau TM et al. Effect of thalidomide on stem cell collection and engraftment in patients with multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant 2003; 32: 587–592.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cavo M, Zamagni E, Tosi P, Cellini C, Cangini D, Tacchetti P et al. First-line therapy with thalidomide and dexamethasone in preparation for autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. Haematologica 2004; 89: 826–831.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cavo M, Zamagni E, Tosi P, Tacchetti P, Cellini C, Cangini D et al. Superiority of thalidomide and dexamethasone over vincristine-doxorubicindexamethasone (VAD) as primary therapy in preparation for autologous transplantation for multiple myeloma. Blood 2005; 106: 35–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dispenzieri A, Rajkumar SV, Gertz MA, Fonseca R, Lacy MQ, Bergsagel PL et al. Treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma based on Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-adapted Therapy (mSMART): consensus statement. Mayo Clinic Proc 2007; 82: 323–341.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Nazha A, Cook R, Vogl DT, Mangan PA, Gardler M, Hummel K et al. Stem cell collection in patients with multiple myeloma: impact of induction therapy and mobilization regimen. Bone Marrow Transplant 2011; 46: 59–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kumar S, Giralt S, Stadtmauer EA, Harousseau JL, Palumbo A, Bensinger W et al. Mobilization in myeloma revisited: IMWG consensus perspectives on stem cell collection following initial therapy with thalidomide-, lenalidomide-, or bortezomib-containing regimens. Blood 2009; 114: 1729–1735.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Micallef IN, Ho AD, Klein LM, Marulkar S, Gandhi PJ, Calandra G et al. Plerixafor (Mozobil) for stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma previously treated with lenalidomide. Bone Marrow Transplant 2011; 46: 350–355.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H Hassoun.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pozotrigo, M., Adel, N., Landau, H. et al. Factors impacting stem cell mobilization failure rate and efficiency in multiple myeloma in the era of novel therapies: experience at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Bone Marrow Transplant 48, 1033–1039 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.281

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.281

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links