Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Post-Transplant Events

Uptake and outcome of assisted reproductive techniques in long-term survivors of SCT

Bone Marrow Transplantation volume 47, pages 568–573 (2012)Cite this article

Abstract

We have audited the invitation for uptake and outcome of artificial reproductive techniques in patients undergoing SCT for haematological malignancy, with the aim of improving our pre-transplant counselling. A postal survey was sent to 434 patients in our centre surviving a minimum of 2 years after allo-SCT, of whom 221 patients responded. Of 112 male patients, 79 were offered sperm storage, 42 banked sperm and 25 subsequently attempted parenthood with stored sperm. A total of 18 were successful, with 29 children born a median of 8 years (range 1–22 years) following SCT. Of 72 females <42 years old, 33 were offered storage of embryos/eggs/ovarian tissue and 12 accepted. Following SCT, four women attempted pregnancy using cryopreserved embryos, with two successes. The majority of patients who were not counselled about infertility or not offered fertility-preservation options provided a likely reason, with completion of family being the most frequent. Nonetheless, 16 patients (11/72 women and 5/112 men) could not provide a reason for the lack of information/invitation. In conclusion, uptake of gamete/embryo storage is high when offered and collected material is used frequently. Pregnancies in partners of male patients were usually successful and our data highlight the value of prolonged cryostorage.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Apperley JF (ed.). European School of Haematology. The EBMT Handbook Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Paris, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertility preservation and reproduction in cancer patients. Fertil Steril 2005; 83: 1622–1628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schimmer AD, Quatermain M, Imrie K, Ali V, McCrae J, Stewart AK et al. Ovarian function after autologous bone marrow transplantation. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 2359–2363.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sanders JE, Hawley J, Levy W, Gooley T, Buckner CD, Deeg HJ et al. Pregnancies following high-dose cyclophosphamide with or without high-dose busulfan or total-body irradiation and bone marrow transplantation. Blood 1996; 87: 3045–3052.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schover LR, Rybicki LA, Martin BA, Bringelsen KA . Having children after cancer. Cancer 1999; 86: 697–709.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chatterjee R, Kottaridis PD . Treatment of gonadal damage in recipients of allogeneic or autologous transplantation for haematological malignancies. Bone Marrow Transplant 2002; 30: 629–635.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Maltaris T, Koelbl H, Seufert R, Kiesewetter F, Beckmann MW, Mueller A et al. Gonadal damage and options for fertility preservation in female and male cancer survivors. Asian J Androl 2006; 8: 515–533.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Health NCCfWsaCs. Fertility: assessment and treatment for people with fertility problems. Clinical Guideline, 11 In 2004.

  9. Royal College of Physicians TRCoR, Royal, Gynaecologists. CoOa. The Effects of Cancer Treatment on Reproductive Functions: Guidance on Management. Report of a Working Party. RCP: London, 2007.

  10. Letendre L, Moore SB . Successful pregnancy after conditioning with cyclophosphamide and fractionated total body irradiation. Med Pediatr Oncol 1997; 28: 147–148.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schover LR, Brey K, Lichtin A, Lipshultz LI, Jeha S . Knowledge and experience regarding cancer, infertility, and sperm banking in younger male survivors. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 1880–1889.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schover LR, Brey K, Lichtin A, Lipshultz LI, Jeha S . Oncologists' attitudes and practices regarding banking sperm before cancer treatment. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 1890–1897.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gilbert E, Adams A, Mehanna H, Harrison B, Hartshorne GM . Who should be offered sperm banking for fertility preservation? A survey of UK oncologists and haematologists. Ann Oncol 2011; 22: 1209–1214.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Duffy CM, Allen SM, Clark MA . Discussions regarding reproductive health for young women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 766–773.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Khalifa E, Oehninger S, Acosta AA, Morshedi M, Veeck L, Bryzyski RG et al. Successful fertilization and pregnancy outcome in in-vitro fertilization using cryopreserved/thawed spermatozoa from patients with malignant diseases. Hum Reprod 1992; 7: 105–108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hallak J, Hendin BN, Thomas Jr AJ, Agarwal A . Investigation of fertilizing capacity of cryopreserved spermatozoa from patients with cancer. J Urol 1998; 159: 1217–1220.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Audrins P, Holden CA, McLachlan RI, Kovacs GT . Semen storage for special purposes at Monash IVF from 1977 to 1997. Fertil Steril 1999; 72: 179–181.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lass A, Akagbosu F, Brinsden P . Sperm banking and assisted reproduction treatment for couples following cancer treatment of the male partner. Hum Reprod Update 2001; 7: 370–377.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Agarwal A, Ranganathan P, Kattal N, Pasqualotto F, Hallak J, Khayal S et al. Fertility after cancer: a prospective review of assisted reproductive outcome with banked semen specimens. Fertil Steril 2004; 81: 342–348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. HFEA. Fertility problems and treatment—facts & figures. 2006–2007.

  21. Salooja N, Szydlo RM, Socie G, Rio B, Chatterjee R, Ljungman P et al. Pregnancy outcomes after peripheral blood or bone marrow transplantation: a retrospective survey. Lancet 2001; 358: 271–276.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Urbano MT, Tait DM . Can the irradiated uterus sustain a pregnancy? A literature review. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2004; 16: 24–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Administrative costs were supported by funding from the North West London Cancer Network. We are also grateful for support from the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre funding scheme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Haematology, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK

    A Babb, N Farah, C Lyons, K Lindsay, N Reddy, J Goldman, J F Apperley & N Salooja

Authors
  1. A Babb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N Farah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C Lyons
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. K Lindsay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. N Reddy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. J Goldman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. J F Apperley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. N Salooja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N Salooja.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Babb, A., Farah, N., Lyons, C. et al. Uptake and outcome of assisted reproductive techniques in long-term survivors of SCT. Bone Marrow Transplant 47, 568–573 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2011.134

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2011.134

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links