Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Post-Transplant Events

Lack of utility of chimerism studies obtained 2–3 months after myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation for ALL

Abstract

Lineage-specific chimerism studies are commonly obtained at several time points after nonmyeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation to assess the tempo and degree of engraftment, and to monitor graft rejection. For patients who receive myeloablative transplants, the value of frequent chimerism analyses using sensitive molecular techniques is less certain. In this study, a retrospective analysis was performed to assess the transplant outcome of 89 adult patients with ALL who had chimerism studies of unfractionated BM cells or peripheral blood subsets performed approximately 80 days after transplantation. These patients received unmanipulated, myeloablative transplants using either HLA-identical or HLA-mismatched, related or unrelated donor stem cells. Incomplete donor engraftment was present only in the CD3+ peripheral blood T cells in a small percentage of patients. There was no correlation of mixed chimerism with transplant outcome. Routine ‘day 80’ chimerism studies in this group of patients who receive intensive, myeloablative conditioning regimens are not recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Antin JH, Childs R, Filipovich AH, Giralt S, Mackinnon S, Spitzer T et al. Establishment of complete and mixed donor chimerism after allogeneic lymphohematopoietic transplantation: recommendations from a workshop at the 2001 Tandem Meetings (Review). Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2001; 7: 473–485.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baron F, Sandmaier BM . Chimerism and outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation following nonmyeloablative conditioning (Review). Leukemia 2006; 20: 1690–1700.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Petersdorf EW, Gooley TA, Anasetti C, Martin PJ, Smith AG, Mickelson EM et al. Optimizing outcome after unrelated marrow transplantation by comprehensive matching of HLA class I and II alleles in the donor and recipient. Blood 1998; 92: 3515–3520.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Storb R, Deeg HJ, Pepe M, Appelbaum FR, Anasetti C, Beatty P et al. Methotrexate and cyclosporine versus cyclosporine alone for prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease in patients given HLA-identical marrow grafts for leukemia: long-term follow-up of a controlled trial. Blood 1989; 73: 1729–1734.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dewald GW, Schad CR, Christensen ER, Law ME, Zinsmeister AR, Stalboerger PG et al. Fluorescence in situ hybridization with X and Y chromosome probes for cytogenetic studies on bone marrow cells after opposite sex transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1993; 12: 149–154.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Scharf SJ, Smith AG, Hansen JA, McFarland C, Erlich HA . Quantitative determination of bone marrow transplant engraftment using fluorescent polymerase chain reaction primers for human identity markers. Blood 1995; 85: 1954–1963.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith AG, Martin PJ . Analysis of amplified variable number tandem repeat loci for evaluation of engraftment after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Rev Immunogenet 1999; 1: 255–264.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Thiede C, Bornhauser M, Oelschlagel U, Brendel C, Leo R, Daxberger H et al. Sequential monitoring of chimerism and detection of minimal residual disease after allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation (BSCT) using multiplex PCR amplification of short tandem repeat-markers. Leukemia 2001; 15: 293–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaplan EL, Meier P . Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 53: 457–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bader P, Kreyenberg H, Hoelle W, Dueckers G, Handgretinger R, Lang P et al. Increasing mixed chimerism is an important prognostic factor for unfavorable outcome in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation: possible role for pre-emptive immunotherapy? J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 1696–1705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bryant E, Martin PJ . Documentation of engraftment and characterization of chimerism following hematopoietic cell transplantation. In: Blume KG, Forman SJ, Appelbaum FR (eds). Thomas’ Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 2004, pp 234–243.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Doney K, Hägglund H, Leisenring W, Chauncey T, Appelbaum FR, Storb R . Predictive factors for outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2003; 9: 472–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K C Doney.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Doney, K., Loken, M., Bryant, E. et al. Lack of utility of chimerism studies obtained 2–3 months after myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation for ALL. Bone Marrow Transplant 42, 271–274 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2008.155

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2008.155

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links