Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review
  • Published:

Current status of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in myeloma

Bone Marrow Transplantation volume 42, pages S28–S34 (2008)Cite this article

Abstract

High-dose melphalan with autologous hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) improves response rates and survival in myeloma. This is despite the fact that unlike other hematologic malignancies treated with high-dose therapy and autotransplantation, autografted myeloma patients continue to relapse several years after transplantation and the procedure is not curative in the majority of patients. However, patients surviving for several years with essentially normal quality of life may be considered to be ‘operationally cured.’ Also, unlike with other hematologic malignancies relapsing after an autograft, recurrent disease can be treated with novel agents or repeat high-dose chemotherapy and autologous or allogeneic HSCT—and long-term survival is seen in a number of patients after relapse. Although tandem transplantation is clearly superior to a single autograft, it is unclear if this should be offered to all patients routinely or only to those not attaining CR after one transplant. It is also unclear if novel agents should be used before transplantation or reserved for relapse. Despite their excellent activity, there is no evidence that novel agents such as thalidomide, bortezomib and lenalidomide can replace high-dose chemotherapy and HSCT, and the best strategy is to use all options in all eligible patients at appropriate stages of the disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McElwain TJ, Powles RL . High-dose intravenous melphalan for plasma-cell leukaemia and myeloma. Lancet 1983; 2: 822–824.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Singhal S . High-dose therapy and autologous transplantation. In: Mehta J, Singhal S (eds). Myeloma, Martin Dunitz: London, 2002, pp 327–347.

  3. Barlogie B, Hall R, Zander A, Dicke K, Alexanian R . High-dose melphalan with autologous bone marrow transplantation for multiple myeloma. Blood 1986; 67: 1298–1301.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sirohi B, Powles R, Mehta J, Rudin C, Kulkarni S, Horton C et al. An elective single autograft with high-dose melphalan: single-center study of 451 patients. Bone Marrow Transplant 2005; 36: 19–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mehta J, Singhal S . High-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in myeloma patients under the age of 65 years. Bone Marrow Transplant 2007; 40: 1101–1114.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Powles R, Sirohi B, Treleaven J, Singhal S, Kulkarni S, Lal R et al. Continued first complete remission in multiple myeloma for over 10 years: a series of ‘operationally cured’ patients. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2000; 96: Abstract 2215.

  7. Powles R, Singhal S, Sirohi B, Horton C, Treleaven J, Mehta J . ‘Discontinuous complete remission’: a new endpoint to evaluate the success of therapy in keeping myeloma patients disease-free for extended periods of time. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2001; 98: 166a.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barlogie B, Tricot GJ, van Rhee F, Angtuaco E, Walker R, Epstein J et al. Long-term outcome results of the first tandem autotransplant trial for multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 2006; 135: 158–164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Siegel DS, Desikan KR, Mehta J, Singhal S, Fassas A, Munshi N et al. Age is not a prognostic variable with autotransplants multiple myeloma. Blood 1999; 93: 51–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sirohi B, Powles R, Treleaven J, Mainwaring P, Kulkarni S, Pandha H et al. The role of autologous transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma aged 65 years and over. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000; 25: 533–539.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Attal M, Harousseau JL, Stoppa AM, Sotto JJ, Fuzibet JG, Rossi JF et al. A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma. Intergroupe Français du Myelome. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 91–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Child JA, Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Owen RG, Bell SE, Hawkins K et al. High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 1875–1883.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Petrucci MT, Musto P, Rossini F, Nunzi M et al. Intermediate-dose melphalan improves survival of myeloma patients aged 50–70: results of a randomized controlled trial. Blood 2004; 104: 3052–3057.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bladé J, Rosiñol L, Sureda A, Ribera JM, Díaz-Mediavilla J, García-Laraña J et al. High-dose therapy intensification compared with continued standard chemotherapy in multiple myeloma patients responding to the initial chemotherapy: long-term results from a prospective randomized trial from the Spanish cooperative group PETHEMA. Blood 2005; 106: 3755–3759.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fermand JP, Katsahian S, Divine M, Leblond V, Dreyfus F, Macro M et al. High-dose therapy and autologous blood stem-cell transplantation compared with conventional treatment in myeloma patients aged 55–65 years: long-term results of a randomized control trial from the Group Myelome-Autogreffe. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 9227–9233.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Powles R, Raje N, Milan S, Millar B, Shepherd V, Mehta J et al. Outcome assessment of a population-based group of 195 unselected myeloma patients under 70 years of age offered intensive treatment. Bone Marrow Transplant 1997; 20: 435–443.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Desikan KR, Tricot G, Dhodapkar M, Fassas A, Siegel D, Vesole DH et al. Melphalan plus total body irradiation (MEL-TBI) or cyclophosphamide (MEL-CY) as a conditioning regimen with second autotransplant in responding patients with myeloma is inferior compared to historical controls receiving tandem transplants with melphalan alone. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000; 25: 483–487.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Moreau P, Facon T, Attal M, Hulin C, Michallet M, Maloisel F et al. Comparison of 200 mg/m2 melphalan and 8 Gy total body irradiation plus 140 mg/m2 melphalan as conditioning regimens for peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: final analysis of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome 9502 randomized trial. Blood 2002; 99: 731–735.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fermand JP, Ravaud P, Chevret S, Divine M, Leblond V, Belanger C et al. High-dose therapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: up-front or rescue treatment? Results of a multicenter sequential randomized clinical trial. Blood 1998; 92: 3131–3136.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Barlogie B, Kyle RA, Anderson KC, Greipp PR, Lazarus HM, Hurd DD et al. Standard chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemoradiotherapy for multiple myeloma: final results of phase III US Intergroup Trial S9321. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 929–936.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Singhal S . Treatment of multiple myeloma. BMJ 2003; 327: 575–576.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Barlogie B, Jagannath S, Desikan KR, Mattox S, Vesole D, Siegel D et al. Total therapy with tandem transplants for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood 1999; 93: 55–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Attal M, Harousseau JL, Facon T, Guilhot F, Doyen C, Fuzibet JG et al. Single versus double autologous stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 2495–2502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cavo M, Tosi P, Zamagni E, Cellini C, Tacchetti P, Patriarca F et al. Prospective, randomized study of single compared with double autologous stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: Bologna 96 clinical study. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 2434–2441.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fermand JP . MAG studies (1985–2005). 10th International Myeloma Workshop, Sydney, April 2005 Accessed 2 December 2006. http://myeloma.org/pdfs/Sydney2005_Fermand_P8.pdf.

  26. Goldschmidt H . Single vs double HDT in multiple myeloma: third analysis of the trial GMMG-HD2. 10th International Myeloma Workshop, Sydney, April 2005. Accessed 2 December 2006. http://myeloma.org/pdfs/Sydney2005_Goldschmidt_P8.pdf.

  27. Segeren CM, Sonneveld P, van der Holt B, Vellenga E, Croockewit AJ, Verhoef GE et al. Overall and event-free survival are not improved by the use of myeloablative therapy following intensified chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma: a prospective randomized phase 3 study. Blood 2003; 101: 2144–2151.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sonneveld P, van der Holt B, Vellenga E, Croockewit S, Verhoef G, Segeren C et al. Intensive versus double intensive therapy in untreated multiple myeloma: final analysis of the HOVON 24 trial. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2005; 106: Abstract 2545.

  29. Mehta J, Tricot G, Jagannath S, Ayers D, Singhal S, Siegel D et al. Salvage autologous or allogeneic transplantation for multiple myeloma refractory to or relapsing after a first-line autograft? Bone Marrow Transplant 1998; 21: 887–892.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sirohi B, Powles R, Mehta J, Kulkarni S, Sankpal S, Treleaven J et al. Prognostic factors at the time of single autotransplantation in 451 myeloma patients treated with 200 mg/m2 melphalan: results equivalent to tadem autotransplantation. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2002; 100: Abstract 673.

  31. Singhal S, Powles R, Sirohi B, Treleaven J, Kulkarni S, Mehta J . Response to induction chemotherapy is not essential to obtain survival benefit from high-dose melphalan and autotransplantation in myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant 2002; 30: 673–679.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Powles R, Sirohi B, Kulkarni S, Treleaven J, Rudin C, Sankpal S et al. Collection of peripheral blood stem cells in newly diagnosed myeloma patients without any prior cytoreductive therapy: the first step towards an ‘operational cure’? Bone Marrow Transplant 2002; 30: 479–484.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kumar S, Lacy MQ, Dispenzieri A, Rajkumar SV, Fonseca R, Geyer S et al. Single agent dexamethasone for pre-stem cell transplant induction therapy for multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant 2004; 34: 485–490.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rajkumar SV, Blood E, Vesole D, Fonseca R, Greipp PR . Phase III clinical trial of thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone alone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a clinical trial coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 431–436.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Singhal S, Mehta J . Multiple myeloma. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 1: 1322–1330.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kumar S, Lacy MQ, Dispenzieri A, Hayman SR, Rajkumar SV, Zeldenrust S et al. Analysis of outcome after autologous stem transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma: comparison of different induction regimens. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2006; 108: Abstract 3079.

  37. Barlogie B, Tricot G, Anaissie E, Shaughnessy J, Rasmussen E, van Rhee F et al. Thalidomide and hematopoietic-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 1021–1030.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Cunningham D, Powles R, Malpas J, Raje N, Milan S, Viner C et al. A randomized trial of maintenance interferon following high-dose chemotherapy in multiple myeloma: long-term follow-up results. Br J Haematol 1998; 102: 495–502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Singhal S, Mehta J, Desikan R, Ayers D, Roberson P, Eddlemon P et al. Antitumor activity of thalidomide in refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 1565–1571.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Attal M, Harousseau JL, Leyvraz S, Doyen C, Hulin C, Benboubker L et al. Maintenance therapy with thalidomide improves survival in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood 2006; 108: 3289–3294.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Greipp PR, San Miguel J, Durie BG, Crowley JJ, Barlogie B, Blade J et al. International staging system for multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 3412–3420.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Tricot G, Sawyer JR, Jagannath S, Desikan KR, Siegel D, Naucke S et al. Unique role of cytogenetics in the prognosis of patients with myeloma receiving high-dose therapy and autotransplants. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 2659–2666.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Desikan R, Barlogie B, Sawyer J, Ayers D, Tricot G, Badros A et al. Results of high-dose therapy for 1000 patients with multiple myeloma: durable complete remissions and superior survival in the absence of chromosome 13 abnormalities. Blood 2000; 95: 4008–4010.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Crowley JJ, McCoy J, LeBlanc M, Barlogie B . Extreme regression: a statistical technique for finding good or poor prognostic groups, illustrated using myeloma patient data from intergroup trial S9321. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2004; 102: Abstract 5202.

  45. Barlogie B, Desikan R, Eddlemon P, Spencer T, Zeldis J, Munshi N et al. Extended survival in advanced and refractory multiple myeloma after single-agent thalidomide: identification of prognostic factors in a phase 2 study of 169 patients. Blood 2001; 98: 492–494.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Richardson PG, Barlogie B, Berenson J, Singhal S, Jagannath S, Irwin D et al. A phase 2 study of bortezomib in relapsed, refractory myeloma. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 2609–2617.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Singhal S, Mehta J . Lenalidomide in myeloma. Curr Treatment Options Oncol 2007; 8: 154–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Feinberg School of Medicine, The Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA

    J Mehta & S Singhal

Authors
  1. J Mehta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S Singhal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J Mehta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mehta, J., Singhal, S. Current status of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant 42 (Suppl 1), S28–S34 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2008.109

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2008.109

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links