Abstract
Background:
Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are heterogeneous cells with immunoregulatory and wound-healing properties. In cancer, they are known to be an essential part of the tumour microenvironment. However, their role in tumour growth and rejection remains unclear. To investigate this, we co-cultured human MSCs, tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), and melanoma cells to investigate the role of MSCs in the tumour environment.
Methods:
Mesenchymal stromal cells were co-cultured with melanoma antigen-specific TIL that were stimulated either with HLA-A*0201+ melanoma cells or with a corresponding clone that had lost HLA-A*0201 expression.
Results:
Activated TIL induced profound pro-inflammatory gene expression signature in MSCs. Analysis of culture supernatant found that MSCs secreted pro-inflammatory cytokines, including TH1 cytokines that have been previously associated with immune-mediated antitumor responses. In addition, immunohistochemical analysis on selected markers revealed that the same activated MSCs secreted both the TH1 cytokine (interleukin-12) and indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase (IDO), a classical immunosuppressive factor.
Conclusions:
This study reflected that the plasticity of MSCs is highly dependent upon microenvironment conditions. Tumour-activated TIL induced TH1 phenotype change in MSCs that is qualitatively similar to the previously described immunologic constant of rejection signature observed during immune-mediated, tissue-specific destruction. This response may be responsible for the in loco amplification of antigen-specific anti-cancer immune response.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are multipotent cells that have a central role in tissue regeneration, wound healing, and maintenance of tissue homeostasis (Prockop, 1997; Pittenger et al, 1999; Jiang et al, 2002). MSCs are found in almost every tissue including the bone marrow, where they are known as bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs).
Previous studies have demonstrated MSCs’ immunoregulatory capabilities. They have been shown in some assays to suppress T- and NK-cell proliferation (Tse et al, 2003; Spaggiari et al, 2008), induce T regulatory differentiation (Maccario et al, 2005), inhibit dendritic cell maturation (Jiang et al, 2005), and suppress B-cell function and maturation (Corcione et al, 2006; Asari et al, 2009). Notably, MSCs are able to migrate into injured tissues to promote wound healing through the secretion of a wide variety of growth factors (Wu et al, 2007; Qu et al, 2008). In consideration of their biological properties, MSCs have been successfully employed as an immune modulator in pilot clinical trials to treat several immune-related diseases including graft- versus-host-disease and multiple sclerosis (Wang et al, 2012; Uccelli et al, 2013).
The immunoregulatory nature of MSCs shows significant clinical relevance, especially in the tumour microenvironment. They are likely the precursor of tumour-associated fibroblasts (Spaeth et al, 2009), which along with multiple types of infiltrating immune cells, are involved in shaping the tumour microenvironment (Bergfeld and Declerck, 2010). Despite extensive investigations, the impact of MSCs on tumour growth or rejection remains unclear. Thus far, investigations performed in animal models have provided inconsistent results. According to a recent literature review, the role of MSCs in promoting or suppressing tumour progression was split equally (Klopp et al, 2011). The inconsistency in published data could be explained, at least in part, by the complexity and plasticity of the tumour microenvironment and the variable response of MSCs to different stimuli.
The mechanism by which MSCs exert their immunomodulatory functions in the tumour microenvironment is complex, but has been shown to be dependent upon the crosstalk between MSCs and immune cells, and involves both direct contact and the release of soluble factors (English, 2013). Among immune cells, T cells may trigger changes in response to antigen-specific stimulation. Our group (Wang et al, 2008) and others (Boon et al, 2006) previously suggested that anti-tumour responses are likely the result of an in loco expansion of pro-inflammatory stimuli triggered by antigen-specific elicitation of T cells that ultimately result in a full-blown acute inflammatory reaction. In steady-state conditions, MSCs constitutively secrete suppressive factors such as transforming growth factor-β1, prostaglandin-E2 (PG-E2) and soluble human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-G5 (Uccelli et al, 2008). However, soluble factors produced by T cells can modulate MSC function. Several studies have found that the ex vivo incubation of MSCs with either interferon (IFN)-γ or tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α can induce phenotype changes in MSCs (Hemeda et al, 2010). These cytokines can increase the constitutive production of PG-E2 (Aggarwal and Pittenger, 2005) and release of indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase (IDO) by MSC (English, 2013). In tumours, cancer cells can modulate T-cell responses (and vice versa), and this complex interaction likely affects MSC function.
To better understand the modulation of the tumour microenvironment induced by MSCs in response to direct interaction with T cells and cancer cells, MSCs and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) activated by cancer cells were tested in a co-culture system that modelled the tumour microenvironment. Melanoma-specific TILs were co-cultured in direct contact with relevant melanoma cells, while MSCs were co-cultured in the transwells that allowed cell to cell interaction through the secretion of soluble factors. We observed that TIL activated in an HLA-restricted fashion by melanoma cells released soluble factors that resulted in a ‘TH1-like’ phenotype change in the MSCs. This induced phenotype is characterised by the coordinated expression of pro-inflammatory genes classically associated with immune-mediated cancer rejection (Wang et al, 2008; Galon et al, 2013). Overall, these results suggest that TIL-activated MSCs can prime the microenvironment to create conditions favourable for tumour regression.
Materials and Methods
Human MSCs
MSCs were isolated from healthy donor bone marrow aspirates at the Department of Transfusion Medicine, Clinical Center, NIH. These cells were expanded and characterised as described in our previous work (Ren et al, 2011). Briefly, cells from the bone marrow aspirates were seeded in complete media (α-minimal essential medium, 2 mM glutamine, 10 μg ml−1 gentamicin and 20% fetal bovine serum) for 24 h, and the non-adherent cells were removed. The adherent cells were expanded until 70–80% confluence was reached. Cells were subcultured and kept in complete media. These BMSCs were >70% viable and expressed CD73, CD90, CD105, and CD146 but not CD11b, CD14, CD19, CD34, or CD45. BMSCs from one healthy donor were used for the studies.
Human TILs
Tumour infiltrating lymphocytes were isolated from metastases of melanoma patients and maintained as previously described (Panelli et al, 2000). We used TIL populations from two melanoma patients: TIL-H1, which recognises antigen gp100 expressed on the surface of melanoma, and TIL-A42, which recognises MART-1, both in an HLA-restricted manner when presented by HLA-A2.
Human melanoma cell lines
Melanoma cell lines, 624.38(M38) and 624.28(M28), were generated by limiting dilution from the metastatic lesions of melanoma patients at the Surgery Branch, NCI, NIH (Rivoltini et al, 1995b). Cell lines M38 and M28 were from the same patient; M38 expressed HLA-A*0201+ while M28 had lost its expression of HLA-A*0201 and was, hence, HLA-A*0201−. They were maintained in RPMI with 10% FBS, 2 mM glutamine, 100 U ml−1 penicillin and 100 μg ml−1 streptomycin.
Co-culture with the transwell system
MSCs were seeded at the bottom of a six-well plate; melanoma cell lines, either M38 or M28, were seeded in the six-well transwells and placed above the MSCs. The TILs were added to the same transwells containing melanoma cells. The TIL and melanoma cells were co-cultured with physical contact while physically separated from the MSCs (Figure 1A). Transwell chambers with 1.0 μm pore size membrane (Corning Costar, Cambridge, MA, USA) were used to separate the cells in co-cultures.
The MSCs used in this study were passage 4 cells. They were initially seeded at 5 × 104 cells per well. Co-cultures were put together when the MSCs reached around 80% confluence. An equal amount of TIL and melanoma cells were seeded (106 cells per well). Cells were cultured with RPMI complete medium supplemented with either FBS or human AB serum. MSC mono-cultures made use of the same culture conditions and served as controls. Cells and supernatant were harvested at 24, 48, and 72 h intervals for gene and protein analysis.
Total RNA purification, amplification, hybridisation, and slide processing
Total RNA from co-cultures and control samples were purified using miRNA Easy Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). The RNA concentration was measured using Nano Drop ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (Nano Drop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA) and RNA quality was assessed with Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). RNA was amplified using an Agilent LowInput QuickAmp Labeling Kit and subsequently hybridised to Universal Human Reference RNA (Stratagene, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with Agilent Chip Whole Human genome, 4 × 44k slides according to the provided protocol. The slides were incubated for at least 17 h at 65 °C.
Statistical and microarray data analysis
Raw images were obtained by scanning the microscope slides with Agilent Scan G2505B and Agilent Scan Control software (version 9.5). The images were extracted using the Feature Extraction Software (Agilent Technologies). Partek Genomic Suite 6.4 (Partek Inc., St Louis, MO, USA) was used for data visualisation, identification of differentially expressed transcripts (P value⩽0.05), and hierarchical cluster analysis. We transformed the fluorescence intensity data to log2 ratios of each sample versus the universal human RNA reference (Stratagene). Then t-tests were used to identify the differentially expressed genes (both P value and false discovery rate (FDR) less than 0.05). The Ingenuity Pathway Analysis tool (http://www.ingenuity.com, Ingenuity System Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA) was used for analysis of functional pathways.
Supernatant cytokine and growth factor analysis using multiplex enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
Supernatants from the samples were evaluated using multiplex ELISA, SearchLight Protein Array Analysis (Aushon Biosystems, Billerica, MA, USA). Forty-two soluble factors were evaluated and Partek Genomic Suite 6.4 (Partek Inc., St Louis, MO, USA) was used for protein data visualisation, identification of differentially expression (P value⩽0.05), and hierarchical cluster analysis. The data were normalised using log(X+offset) and then t-tests were used to identify the differentially expressed soluble factors (both P value and FDR are <0.05).
Immunofluorescence analysis
MSCs were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Science, Hatfield, PA, USA) for 15 min, washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and quenched in 50 mM NH4Cl for 10 min. Cells were washed with PBS and treated with background buster (Innovex Biosciences, Richmond, CA, USA) for 30 min and Fc Receptor blocker (Innovex) for 15 min and permeabilised in PBS containing 0.3% saponin. Cells were subsequently immunolabelled using an indirect procedure in which all incubations (primary, secondary antibodies, and washes) were performed in solution containing 0.3% saponin. The antibodies used in this study were primary: interleukin (IL)-12 and IDO (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), and secondary: AlexaFlour (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA). The images were obtained using AxioVert 200M microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
Melanoma tissue sample microarray analysis
Total RNA from 112 melanoma metastases from patients treated at the Surgery Branch, NCI, was extracted and processed using the same procedures as mentioned above. First- and second-strand cDNA were synthesised from 300 ng of total RNA according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Ambion WT Expression Kit, Grand Island, NY, USA). cDNAs were fragmented, biotinylated, and hybridised to the GeneChip Human Gene 1.0 ST Arrays (Affymetrix WT Terminal Labeling Kit, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The arrays were washed and stained on a GeneChip Fluidics Station 450 (Affymetrix); scanning was carried out with the GeneChip Scanner 3000 and image analysis with the Affymetrix GeneChip Command Console Scan Control. Expression data were normalised, background-corrected, and summarised using the RNA algorithm. Data were log-transformed (base 2) for subsequent statistical analysis. Cluster analysis was performed using Partek software (Partek, St Louis, MO, USA).
Results
Melanoma activated-TIL induce changes in MSC gene expression
To determine the factors present in the tumour microenvironment that could trigger MSCs to exert their immunomodulatory function, we utilised a TIL/melanoma interaction model to mimic the in vivo tumour microenvironment. We used two TIL cell lines from metastatic melanoma patients: TIL cells H1 and A42, which recognise melanoma antigen gp100 and MART-1, respectively, in a HLA-A*0201-restricted manner. The TILs were seeded in the absence of exogenous IL-2 with melanoma cell lines in the same transwell, and the transwells (containing TILs and melanoma in physical contact) were inserted into the six-well plate seeded with BMSCs. The final co-culture consisted of BMSCs on the bottom without physical contact with the TIL and melanoma cells in the transwell (Figure 1A). Two melanoma cell clones derived by limiting dilution from the same cell line were used: M28 (624.28) and M38 (624.38). M38 (624.38) expressed HLA-A*0201, while M28 (624.28) lacked its expression as previously described (Rivoltini et al, 1995a; Wang et al, 1999). When the TILs were co-cultured with M38, but not M28, they recognised the antigens (gp100 or Mart-1) expressed on the melanoma cell surface, destroyed the melanoma cells and released IFN-γ and other factors as previously described
After co-culture, TIL gene expression profiling was performed. The results showed a 20-fold increase in IFN-γ expression in TIL co-cultured with M38 (HLA-A*0201+) compared to those co-cultured with M28 (HLA-A*0201−) (Figure 1C). Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) also showed enhanced expression of genes downstream of interferon signalling by TIL (Figure 1B). In addition, protein profiling analysis revealed a 473-fold increase in IFN-γ levels in the supernatant (Figures 1C and D), while no IFN-γ protein was detected in the supernatant of TILs cultured with M28.
Next, we assessed MSC gene expression after co-culture with TILs and M38. The gene expression pattern of these MSCs differed significantly from MSCs co-cultured with TILs and M28, as well as control MSCs cultured alone. Principal component analysis (PCA) based on the whole transcriptome separated the MSCs co-cultured with TIL+M38 from those co-cultured with TIL+M28 and control MSCs (Figure 2A). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis confirmed that MSCs co-cultured with M28+TIL and control MSCs were mixed within the same cluster, while MSCs co-cultured with M38+TIL formed a distinct cluster (Figure 2B). These results suggest that MSCs detected signals released by activated TILs in the melanoma microenvironment and responded by changing their gene expression patterns.
MSCs are polarised toward TH1 phenotype by activated TIL
We then assessed the transcript activation in MSCs co-cultured with activated TIL by IPA by using the list of genes differentially expressed between MSCs co-cultured with TIL+M38 and the MSC control group (P value and FDR <0.05). The most over-represented pathways included many immune-related functions such as interferon signalling, antigen presentation, dendritic cell maturation, and crosstalk between dendritic cells and natural killer cells (Supplementary Table 1).
The gene expression changes in MSC co-cultured with TIL+M38 appeared to be predominantly interferon signalling transcripts, notably, IFNG-Ra, Jak2, STAT1 and STAT2, and IRF1 (Figure 2C). In addition, many immune-related cytokine and chemokine genes were upregulated (Table 1 and Supplementary Tables 3 and 4). Among these were several factors associated with a TH1 immune response, including CCL5, CCL8, CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, IL-12, and IL-15. Interestingly, the expression of the TH2-associated immunosuppressive factor IDO was also increased 114.69-fold, but other TH2-associated factors such as IL4, IL10, and PG-E2 did not show similar increases.
Analysis of co-culture supernatants shows increased levels of cytokines and chemokines consistent with a TH1 polarisation
We tested the levels of 42 immune-related soluble factors in co-culture supernatants including both TH1 and TH2 cytokines. Hierarchical clustering analysis showed that many of the 42 factors were differentially expressed among MSCs co-cultured with activated TIL and control TIL (Figure 3B). The pattern of expression of the 42 factors in the supernatant of MSCs co-cultured with TIL+M38 was different from that of MSCs co-cultured with TIL+M28 as well as the control MSCs. PCA analysis confirmed that the 42 soluble factors were differently expressed among the three groups (Figure 3A). Consistent with transcriptional results, Student’s t-test analysis showed that in the supernatant from MSCs co-cultured with TIL+M38, the levels of CXCL10, CXCL9, IFN-γ, CXCL11, CCL8, CCL5, TNF-α, IL-12, IL-17, CCL2, IL-8, IL-15, IL-2, IL-7, IL-5, granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), ICAM1, IL-6, CXCL1, CSF1, IL-1A, IL-1B, and VCAM1 were elevated (Figure 3B and Supplementary Table 2).
To evaluate the origin of these cytokines and chemokines, we tested the protein expression in supernatants of each culture: MSC/TIL+M28, TIL+M28, MSC/TIL+M28, TIL+M28, and MSCs alone. The results showed that IFN-γ, TNF-α, M-CSF, GM-CSF, IL-1a, and IL-5 were produced by the activated TIL, while CCL2 (MCP1), CCL8 (MCP2), CCL5 (RANTES), CXCL1 (GROa), CXCL9 (MIG), CXCL10 (IP10), CXCL11 (ITAC), IL-6, IL-8, IL-12, IL-15, IL-17, and VCAM1 were produced specifically by MSCs stimulated by active TIL (Figure 3C and Supplementary Table 5).
Immunofluorescence analysis of stimulated MSCs reveals that one cell population expresses both IL-12 and IDO
Since MSCs are a heterogeneous population of cells, we wondered if two MSCs subpopulations had emerged from the co-cultures with activated TIL: one producing TH1 factors and another producing the TH2-associated immunosuppressive factor IDO, or if a single population produced both TH1 factors and TH2-associated factor IDO. Immunofluorescence staining of MSC for IL-12 and IDO revealed that after co-culture with activated TIL the expression of both IL-12 and IDO increased and that a single population of MSCs expressed both factors (Figure 4).
MSC genes whose expression was induced by active TIL are more likely to be expressed by melanoma samples from patients with a good prognosis
To determine if MSCs within the tumour microenvironment showed TH1 polarisation while concurrently expressing IDO, we assessed the expression of 276 immune-related genes selected from MSC genes differentially expressed after co-culture with activated TIL in 112 melanoma metastases. These 112 melanoma metastases have been previously characterised and found to belong to three phenotypes (Spivey et al, 2012). The first phenotype was characterised by prevalent expression of cancer testes antigens, the WTN signalling gene WNT5A, and a TH17 immune phenotype, ascribed to be a more aggressive cancer (Class A). The second phenotype (Class B) was characterised by the expression of melanoma differentiation antigens and a TH1 immune phenotype. Class B is considered to have better prognosis and be more likely to respond to immunotherapy. Lastly, Class C lies between the two polar groups, Classes A and B. Hierarchical clustering analysis of the 122 samples based on 276 transcripts clustered the metastases into several clusters. Specifically, one of the clusters contained 21 samples that included 9 Class B and 12 Class C samples and was characterised by the expression of TH1 factors, CXCR3 ligands, CCL5 ligands, and IDO (Figure 5A). The expression of TH1 factors, CXCR3 ligands, and CCL5 ligands was enhanced in most of the other samples, but to a lesser extent. In addition, another group with 12 Class A samples and 7 Class B samples was characterised by the expression of TH17 genes in addition to TH1 factors, CXCR ligands, and CCL5 ligands (Figure 5A). The genes that characterise Class A and Class B phenotypes and their expression by MSCs co-cultured with activated TIL are summarised in Supplementary Tables 3 and 4. A more focused analysis showed that in some melanoma samples both pro-inflammatory molecules and IDO are expressed and this concordant expression of divergent function may influence the overall behaviour of such tumours (Figure 5B).
Discussion
This study shows that MSCs are highly plastic, their phenotype is dependent on the state of their microenvironment and they can profoundly affect the tumour microenvironment. We found that activated TIL induce marked pro-inflammatory changes in MSCs, polarising them towards a TH1-like phenotype. These changes were induced by soluble factors produced by activated TIL. While IFN-γ is likely responsible for many of these changes, we found that melanoma-activated TIL produced other pro-inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, IL-1α, and GM-CSF, which may contribute to these changes. The polarisation of MSCs differs from that of mononuclear phagocytes in that some factors considered characteristic of TH2 responses were also produced, but activated MSCs produced far more TH1 factors. These findings suggest that MSC have a more critical role in the tumour microenvironment than previously appreciated.
The tumour microenvironment has an important role in the natural evolution of cancer and its response to immunotherapy. Several investigations conducted in ovarian (Zhang et al, 2003), colorectal (Tosolini et al, 2011), and breast (Ascierto et al, 2012) cancers by evaluating thousands of patients have consistently shown that a TH1 cancer phenotype, characterised by the expression of interferon-stimulated genes and immune-effector mechanisms, is associated with favourable prognosis (Ascierto et al, 2011; Galon et al, 2013). Recently, similar signatures have been associated with favourable prognosis in melanoma (Messina et al, 2012), and they were also observed in pre-treatment lesions as more likely to respond to immunotherapy (Ji et al, 2012; Bedognetti et al, 2013; Ulloa-Montoya et al, 2013; Wang et al, 2013). These signatures overlap with those observed in tumour lesions experiencing rejection following immunotherapy and during other immune-mediated tissue destruction phenomena such as graft-versus-host disease, allograft rejection, and clearance of pathogens (Mantovani et al, 2008; Wang et al, 2008, 2013; Spivey et al, 2011; Galon et al, 2013). These molecular requirements, also called immunologic constant of rejection (ICR), underlie a phenomenon that consists of coordinated activation of the IL-15/IFN-γ/IRF1/STAT1 molecular pathway, the recruitment of cytotoxic cells through the production of specific chemokine ligands (in particular CXCR3 and CCR5 ligands) and the activation of immune-effector function genes (e.g. granzyme A/B, perforin, etc.) (Wang et al, 2008; Bedognetti et al, 2010; Spivey et al, 2011). While there is a growing consensus on the importance of these immune signatures in immune-mediated rejection and in identifying responsiveness to immunotherapy, the exact factors responsible for their coordinated activation are unknown. It is reasonable to conclude that cancer cells, immune cells, and stromal cells collaborate to develop this favourable inflammatory phenotype (Harlin et al, 2009), but the degree of contribution of each is unclear.
In view of the critical role of the ICR pathways, the identification of strategies capable of inducing their enhancement is of great interest. By combining genome-wide analysis and proteomic analysis, we showed that the main consequence of the stimulation of MSCs by melanoma-activated TIL is the potent activation of the IFN signalling (Figures 2 and 3), resulting in the production of several interferon-inducible pro-inflammatory TH1 cytokines and chemokines, including IL-8, CCR5, and CXCR3 ligands (CCL5 and CXCL9-11, respectively). Furthermore, this interaction induced the release of several other pro-inflammatory molecules by MSCs, including the TH1 cytokines IL-15 and IL-12. In addition, gene expression data also showed that TIL-stimulated MSCs overexpress several pro-inflammatory cytokine and chemokine genes (e.g., IL-1B, CCL2, CCL7, CCL8, CCL13, CXCL11, CXCL16), which could in turn lead to the amplification of the inflammatory process at the tumour site and cause a shift toward a TH1-flavoured acute inflammation. It is likely that when T cells within the microenvironment encounter tumour cells, they become active and release IFN-γ and other soluble factors that stimulate MSCs. Interestingly, TIL-stimulated MSCs also overexpress immune-effector genes (e.g., GZMA, GZMB). The functional relevance of this unexpected and not yet described modulation of the immune-effector genes should be assessed in future studies.
Concomitantly with the induction of TH1 pro-inflammatory response, we observed that the overexpression of TH17-related cytokine gene IL-17, the TH2-related genes IL-6, IL-5, and IDO1 by TIL activated MSC. Data from ELISA assays together with data from immunofluorescence confirmed the microarray data. MSCs are a heterogeneous population of cells and one recent study has suggested that they can be polarised toward either a MSC1 (secretes TH1 pro-inflammatory factors) or an MSC2 phenotype (secretes immunosuppressive factors such as IDO) (Waterman et al, 2010). We hypothesised that activated TIL may polarise some MSCs to a TH1 phenotype and others to an immunosuppressive type. However, by using immunofluorescence we observed that, remarkably, a single population of MSCs was producing the TH1 pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-12 and the immune-suppressive factor IDO1. This mixed response suggests that activated TILs induce a complex transcriptional programme in MSC that induces individual cells to produce functionally divergent effects. In future studies, it would be interesting to explore whether MSCs from different individuals are prone to favour the expression of one or the other functional phenotype under identical stimulatory conditions.
The expression of IDO1 by TIL-activated MSCs deserves further discussion. IDO1 (or IDO) is an enzyme that catabolises tryptophan to kynurenine and it represents the first step to the de novo synthesis of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide. It is inducible by viruses, lipopolysaccharide, and pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1, interferon-γ, and tumour necrosis factor-α (Mohib et al, 2007). Based on experimental studies in vitro and in animal models, IDO has been showed to have a crucial role in the induction of immune tolerance during pregnancy, infection, and autoimmunity (Brown et al, 1991; Schrocksnadel et al, 2003; Popov and Schultze, 2008). The induction of IDO is thought to be a central mediator in several aspects of MSC’s interactions with cells of the human immune system, including the induction of immune tolerance. However, in the last few years the role of IDO in suppressing inflammation has been consistently reconsidered. Experiments in models of inflammation-associated arthritis and allergic airway disease have shown that IDO impairment can alleviate disease severity, suggesting that IDO1 is critical in promoting/sustaining inflammatory response (Prendergast et al, 2011). Similarly, investigations employing a classical model of skin cancer have shown that IDO1 can promote cancer-associated inflammation (Prendergast et al, 2011). Interestingly, data from clinical trials assessing the effectiveness of anti-CTLA4 therapy in metastatic melanoma have shown that the overexpression of IDO by infiltrating immune cells in pre-treatment lesions strongly correlates with treatment responsiveness (Hamid et al, 2011). Concordantly, in the same setting, Ji et al (2012) found that the expression of IDO1 in pre-treatment lesions is associated with the activation of the ICR pathways, which in turn predict the responsiveness to ipilimimumab treatment. In line with this observation in the current studies we found that Class B melanoma metastases bearing the favourable TH1 phenotype also overexpress IDO1. The expression of IDO1 could reflect the activation of a counter-regulatory mechanism in the tumour microenvironment and the balance between the divergent effects that determine individual outcomes in natural conditions or in response to therapy. Alternatively it is also possible that IDO1 is directly involved in promoting a cancer-related TH1 inflammation. For instance, it has been recently observed that IDO can induce apoptosis of melanoma tumour cells (Cetindere et al, 2010).
In conclusion, we have observed that the behaviour of MSC is highly dynamic and dependent upon the nature of the microenvironment. For the first time, we show that TIL activated by melanoma cells can trigger MSCs to produce a wide range of pro-inflammatory modulators including TH1 factors that have been invariably associated with immune-mediated antitumor response. This pro-inflammatory activity is, however, not disjointed with the concomitant induction of some factors (e.g., IDO) classically considered as immunosuppressive.
References
Aggarwal S, Pittenger MF (2005) Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate allogeneic immune cell responses. Blood 105: 1815–1822.
Asari S, Itakura S, Ferreri K, Liu CP, Kuroda Y, Kandeel F, Mullen Y (2009) Mesenchymal stem cells suppress B-cell terminal differentiation. Exp Hematol 37: 604–615.
Ascierto ML, Giorgi VD, LIU Q, Bedognetti D, Spivey TL, Murtas D, Uccellini L, Ayotte BD, Stroncek DF, Chouchane L, Manjili MH, Wang E, Marincola FM (2011) An immunologic portrait of cancer. J Transl Med 9: 146.
Ascierto ML, Kmieciak M, Idowu MO, Manjili R, Zhao Y, Grimes M, Dumur C, Wang E, Ramakrishnan V, Wang XY, Bear HD, Marincola FM, Manjili MH (2012) A signature of immune function genes associated with recurrence-free survival in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 131: 871–880.
Bedognetti D, Spivey TL, Zhao Y, Uccellini L, Tomei S, Dudley ME, Ascierto ML, De Giorgi V, Liu Q, Delogu LG, Sommariva M, Sertoli MR, Simon R, Wang E, Rosenberg SA, Marincola FM (2013) CXCR3/CCR5 pathways in metastatic melanoma patients treated with adoptive therapy and interleukin-2. Br J Cancer 109: 2412–2423.
Bedognetti D, Wang E, Sertoli MR, Marincola FM (2010) Gene-expression profiling in vaccine therapy and immunotherapy for cancer. Expert Rev Vaccines 9: 555–565.
Bergfeld SA, Declerck YA (2010) Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Metastasis Rev 29: 249–261.
Boon T, Coulie PG, Van Den Eynde BJ, Van Der Bruggen P (2006) Human T cell responses against melanoma. Annu Rev Immunol 24: 175–208.
Brown RR, Ozaki Y, Datta SP, Borden EC, Sondel PM, Malone DG (1991) Implications of interferon-induced tryptophan catabolism in cancer, auto-immune diseases and AIDS. Adv Exp Med Biol 294: 425–435.
Cetindere T, Nambiar S, Santourlidis S, Essmann F, Hassan M (2010) Induction of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase by death receptor activation contributes to apoptosis of melanoma cells via mitochondrial damage-dependent ROS accumulation. Cell Signal 22: 197–211.
Corcione A, Benvenuto F, Ferretti E, Giunti D, Cappiello V, Cazzanti F, Risso M, Gualandi F, Mancardi GL, Pistoia V, Uccelli A (2006) Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate B-cell functions. Blood 107: 367–372.
English K (2013) Mechanisms of mesenchymal stromal cell immunomodulation. Immunol Cell Biol 91: 19–26.
Galon J, Angell HK, Bedognetti D, Marincola FM (2013) The continuum of cancer immunosurveillance: prognostic, predictive, and mechanistic signatures. Immunity 39: 11–26.
Hamid O, Schmidt H, Nissan A, Ridolfi L, Aamdal S, Hansson J, Guida M, Hyams DM, Gomez H, Bastholt L, Chasalow SD, Berman D (2011) A prospective phase II trial exploring the association between tumor microenvironment biomarkers and clinical activity of ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. J Transl Med 9: 204.
Harlin H, Meng Y, Peterson AC, Zha Y, Tretiakova M, Slingluff C, Mckee M, Gajewski TF (2009) Chemokine expression in melanoma metastases associated with CD8+ T-cell recruitment. Cancer Res 69: 3077–3085.
Hemeda H, Jakob M, Ludwig AK, Giebel B, Lang S, Brandau S (2010) Interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha differentially affect cytokine expression and migration properties of mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Dev 19: 693–706.
Ji RR, Chasalow SD, Wang L, Hamid O, Schmidt H, Cogswell J, Alaparthy S, Berman D, Jure-Kunkel M, Siemers NO, Jackson JR, Shahabi V (2012) An immune-active tumor microenvironment favors clinical response to ipilimumab. Cancer Immunol Immunother 61: 1019–1031.
Jiang XX, Zhang Y, Liu B, Zhang SX, Wu Y, Yu XD, Mao N (2005) Human mesenchymal stem cells inhibit differentiation and function of monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Blood 105: 4120–4126.
Jiang Y, Jahagirdar BN, Reinhardt RL, Schwartz RE, Keene CD, Ortiz-Gonzalez XR, Reyes M, Lenvik T, Lund T, Blackstad M, Du J, Aldrich S, Lisberg A, Low WC, Largaespada DA, Verfaillie CM (2002) Pluripotency of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult marrow. Nature 418: 41–49.
Klopp AH, Gupta A, Spaeth E, Andreeff M, Marini F 3rd (2011) Concise review: dissecting a discrepancy in the literature: do mesenchymal stem cells support or suppress tumor growth? Stem Cells 29: 11–19.
Maccario R, Podesta M, Moretta A, Cometa A, Comoli P, Montagna D, Daudt L, Ibatici A, Piaggio G, Pozzi S, Frassoni F, Locatelli F (2005) Interaction of human mesenchymal stem cells with cells involved in alloantigen-specific immune response favors the differentiation of CD4+ T-cell subsets expressing a regulatory/suppressive phenotype. Haematologica 90: 516–525.
Mantovani A, Romero P, Palucka AK, Marincola FM (2008) Tumour immunity: effector response to tumour and role of the microenvironment. Lancet 371: 771–783.
Messina JL, Fenstermacher DA, Eschrich S, Qu X, Berglund AE, Lloyd MC, Schell MJ, Sondak VK, Weber JS, Mule JJ (2012) 12-chemokine gene signature identifies lymph node-like structures in melanoma: potential for patient selection for immunotherapy? Sci Rep 2: 765.
Mohib K, Guan Q, Diao H, du C, jevnikar AM (2007) Proapoptotic activity of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase expressed in renal tubular epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 293: F801–F812.
Panelli MC, Riker A, Kammula U, wang E, Lee KH, Rosenberg SA, Marincola FM (2000) Expansion of tumor-T cell pairs from fine needle aspirates of melanoma metastases. J Immunol 164: 495–504.
Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, Mosca JD, Moorman MA, Simonetti DW, Craig S, Marshak DR (1999) Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 284: 143–147.
Popov A, Schultze JL (2008) IDO-expressing regulatory dendritic cells in cancer and chronic infection. J Mol Med (Berl) 86: 145–160.
Prendergast GC, Chang MY, Mandik-Nayak L, Metz R, Muller AJ (2011) Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase as a modifier of pathogenic inflammation in cancer and other inflammation-associated diseases. Curr Med Chem 18: 2257–2262.
Prockop DJ (1997) Marrow stromal cells as stem cells for nonhematopoietic tissues. Science 276: 71–74.
Qu C, Mahmood A, Lu D, Goussev A, Xiong Y, Chopp M (2008) Treatment of traumatic brain injury in mice with marrow stromal cells. Brain Res 1208: 234–239.
Ren J, Jin P, Sabatino M, Balakumaran A, Feng J, Kuznetsov SA, Klein HG, Robey PG, Stroncek DF (2011) Global transcriptome analysis of human bone marrow stromal cells (BMSC) reveals proliferative, mobile and interactive cells that produce abundant extracellular matrix proteins, some of which may affect BMSC potency. Cytotherapy 13: 661–674.
Rivoltini L, Barracchini KC, Viggiano V, Kawakami Y, Smith A, Mixon A, Restifo NP, Topalian SL, Simonis TB, Rosenberg SA, Marincola FM (1995a) Quantitative correlation between HLA class I allele expression and recognition of melanoma cells by antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Cancer Res 55: 3149–3157.
Rivoltini L, Kawakami Y, Sakaguchi K, Southwood S, Sette A, Robbins PF, Marincola FM, Salgaller ML, Yannelli JR, Appella E, Rosenberg SA (1995b) Induction of tumor-reactive CTL from peripheral blood and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes of melanoma patients by in vitro stimulation with an immunodominant peptide of the human melanoma antigen MART-1. J Immunol 154: 2257–2265.
Schrocksnadel K, Widner B, Bergant A, Neurauter G, Schennach H, Schrocksnadel H, Fuchs D (2003) Longitudinal study of tryptophan degradation during and after pregnancy. Life Sci 72: 785–793.
Spaeth EL, Dembinski JL, Sasser AK, Watson K, Klopp A, Hall B, Andreeff M, Marini F (2009) Mesenchymal stem cell transition to tumor-associated fibroblasts contributes to fibrovascular network expansion and tumor progression. PLoS One 4: e4992.
Spaggiari GM, Capobianco A, Abdelrazik H, Becchetti F, Mingari MC, Moretta L (2008) Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit natural killer-cell proliferation, cytotoxicity, and cytokine production: role of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase and prostaglandin E2. Blood 111: 1327–1333.
Spivey TL, De Giorgi V, Zhao Y, Bedognetti D, Pos Z, Liu Q, Tomei S, Ascierto ML, Uccellini L, Reinboth J, Chouchane L, Stroncek DF, Wang E, Marincola FM (2012) The stable traits of melanoma genetics: an alternate approach to target discovery. BMC Genomics 13: 156.
Spivey TL, Uccellini L, Ascierto ML, Zoppoli G, De Giorgi V, Delogu LG, Engle AM, Thomas JM, Wang E, Marincola FM, Bedognetti D (2011) Gene expression profiling in acute allograft rejection: challenging the immunologic constant of rejection hypothesis. J Transl Med 9: 174.
Tosolini M, Kirilovsky A, Mlecnik B, Fredriksen T, Mauger S, Bindea G, Berger A, Bruneval P, Fridman WH, Pages F, Galon J (2011) Clinical impact of different classes of infiltrating T cytotoxic and helper cells (Th1, th2, treg, th17) in patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 71: 1263–1271.
Tse WT, Pendleton JD, Beyer WM, Egalka MC, Guinan EC (2003) Suppression of allogeneic T-cell proliferation by human marrow stromal cells: implications in transplantation. Transplantation 75: 389–397.
Uccelli A, Laroni A, Freedman MS (2013) Mesenchymal stem cells as treatment for MS - progress to date. Mult Scler 19: 515–519.
Uccelli A, Moretta L, Pistoia V (2008) Mesenchymal stem cells in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol 8: 726–736.
Ulloa-Montoya F, Louahed J, Dizier B (2013) Predictive gene signature in MAGE-A3 antigen-specific cancer immunotherapy. J Clin Oncol 31: 2388–2395.
Wang E, Bedognetti D, Marincola FM (2013) Prediction of response to anticancer immunotherapy using gene signatures. J Clin Oncol 31: 2369–2371.
Wang E, Worschech A, Marincola FM (2008) The immunologic constant of rejection. Trends Immunol 29: 256–262.
Wang S, Qu X, Zhao RC (2012) Clinical applications of mesenchymal stem cells. J Hematol Oncol 5: 19.
Wang Z, Marincola FM, Rivoltini L, Parmiani G, Ferrone S (1999) Selective histocompatibility leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A2 loss caused by aberrant pre-mRNA splicing in 624MEL28 melanoma cells. J Exp Med 190: 205–215.
Waterman RS, Tomchuck SL, Henkle SL, Betancourt AM (2010) A new mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) paradigm: polarization into a pro-inflammatory MSC1 or an Immunosuppressive MSC2 phenotype. PLoS One 5: e10088.
Wu Y, Chen L, Scott PG, Tredget EE (2007) Mesenchymal stem cells enhance wound healing through differentiation and angiogenesis. Stem Cells 25: 2648–2659.
Zhang L, Conejo-Garcia JR, Katsaros D, Gimotty PA, Massobrio M, Regnani G, Makrigiannakis A, Gray H, Schlienger K, Liebman MN, Rubin SC, Coukos G (2003) Intratumoral T cells, recurrence, and survival in epithelial ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 348: 203–213.
Acknowledgements
These studies were supported by the Department of Transfusion Medicine, Clinical Center, NIH. The MSCs were provided by the BMSC Transplant Center, NIH.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on British Journal of Cancer website
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Jin, P., Civini, S., Zhao, Y. et al. Direct T cell–tumour interaction triggers TH1 phenotype activation through the modification of the mesenchymal stromal cells transcriptional programme. Br J Cancer 110, 2955–2964 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.235
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.235
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Shifting the paradigm: engaging multicellular networks for cancer therapy
Journal of Translational Medicine (2024)
-
Single-cell mass cytometry and transcriptome profiling reveal the impact of graphene on human immune cells
Nature Communications (2017)
-
Interferon-γ and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Polarize Bone Marrow Stromal Cells Uniformly to a Th1 Phenotype
Scientific Reports (2016)