Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Clinical Oncology/Epidemiology
  • Published:

Clinical Oncology/Epidemiology

Explanation at the opioid receptor level for differing toxicity of morphine and morphine 6-glucuronide

Abstract

The radiolabelled opioid receptor binding affinities of morphine and its active metabolite morphine 6-glucuronide at the total mu, mu 1, mu 2 and delta receptors were determined. Morphine 6-glucuronide was found to have a 4-fold lower affinity for the mu 2 receptor (IC50 17 nM and 82 nM for morphine and morphine 6-glucuronide respectively, P = 0.01), the receptor postulated to be responsible for mediating the respiratory depression and gastrointestinal effects after morphine. This provides a possible explanation for the reduced respiratory depression and vomiting seen following morphine 6-glucuronide in man. A similar reduction in affinity of morphine 6-glucuronide was seen at the total mu receptor whilst there was no significant difference seen at the mu 1 or delta receptor. Hence the increased analgesic potency of morphine 6-glucuronide over morphine remains unexplained.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hucks, D., Thompson, P., McLoughlin, L. et al. Explanation at the opioid receptor level for differing toxicity of morphine and morphine 6-glucuronide. Br J Cancer 65, 122–126 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1992.23

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1992.23

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links