Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Effects of exposure measurement error on particle matter epidemiology: a simulation using data from a panel study in Baltimore, MD

Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology volume 17, pages S2–S10 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

Ascertaining the true risk associated with exposure to particulate matter (PM) is difficult, given the fact that pollutant components are frequently correlated with each other and with other gaseous pollutants; relationships between ambient concentrations and personal exposures are often not well understood; and PM, unlike its gaseous co-pollutants, does not represent a single chemical. In order to examine differences between observed versus true health risk estimate from epidemiologic studies, we conducted a simulation using data from a recent multi-pollutant exposure assessment study in Baltimore, MD. The objectives of the simulation were twofold: (a) to estimate the distribution of personal air pollutant exposures one might expect to observe within a population, given the corresponding ambient concentrations found in that location and; (b) using an assumed true health risk with exposure to one pollutant, to estimate the distribution of health risk estimates likely to be observed in an epidemiologic study using ambient pollutant concentrations as a surrogate of exposure as compared with actual personal pollutant exposures. Results from the simulations showed that PM2.5 was the only pollutant where a true association with its total personal exposures resulted in a significant observed association with its ambient concentrations. The simulated results also showed that true health risks associated with personal exposure to O3 and NO2 would result in no significant observed associations with any of their respective ambient concentrations. Conversely, a true association with PM2.5 would result in a significant, observed association with NO2 (β=0.0115, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.0056, 0.0185) and a true association with exposure to SO42− would result in an observed significant association with O3 (β=0.0035, 95% CI: 0.0021, 0.0051) given the covariance of the ambient pollutant concentrations. The results provide an indication that, in Baltimore during this study period, ambient gaseous concentrations may not have been adequate surrogates for corresponding personal gaseous exposures to allow the question to be investigated using central site monitors. Alternatively, the findings may suggest that in some locations, observed associations with the gaseous pollutants should be interpreted with caution, as they may be reflecting associations with PM or one of its chemical components.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson R.W., Anderson H.R., Sunyer J., Ayres J., Baccini M., Vonk J.M., Boumghar A., Forastiere F., Forsberg B., Touloumi G., Schwartz J., and Katsouyanni K. Acute effects of particulate air pollution on respiratory admissions—results from APHEA 2 project. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001: 164 (10): 1860–1866.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brauer M., and Brook J. Ozone personal exposures and health effects for selected groups residing in the Frazer Valley. Atmos Environ 1997: 31 (14): 2113–2121.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Demokritou P., Kavouras I., Ferguson S., and Koutrakis P. Development and laboratory performance evaluation of a multipollutant sampler for simultaneous measurements for particulate and gaseous pollutants. Aerosol Sci Technol 2001: 35: 741–752.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ebelt S.T., Wilson W.E., and Brauer M. Exposure to ambient and nonambient components of particulate matter—a comparison of health effects. Epidemiology 2005: 16 (3): 396–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller W.A. Measurement Error Models. John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1987.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gamble J.F., and Nicolich M.J. Comparison of ambient PM risk with risks estimated from PM components of smoking and occupational exposures. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 2000: 50 (8): 1514–1531.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gold D.R., Litonjua A., Schwartz J., Lovett E., Larson A., Nearing B., Allen G., Verrier M., Cherry R., and Verrier R. Ambient pollution and heart rate variability. Circulation 2000: 101 (11): 1267–1273.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Katsouyanni K., Touloumi G., Spix C., Schwartz J., Balducci F., Medina S., Rossi G., Wojtyniak B., Sunyer J., Bacharova L., Schouten J.P., Ponka A., and Anderson H.R. Short term effects of ambient sulphur dioxide and particulate matter on mortality in 12 European cities: results from time series data from the APHEA project. Br Med J 1997: 314 (7095): 1658–1663.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koutrakis P. Characterization of Particulate and Gas Exposures of Sensitive Subpopulations Living in Baltimore and Boston. Health Effects Institute: Boston, MA, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koutrakis P., Wolfson J.M., Bunyaviroch A., and Froehlich S. A passive ozone sampler based on a reaction with nitrite. Res Rep Health Eff Inst 1994: (63): 19–47; discussion 67–82.

  • Le Tertre A., Medina S., Samoli E., Forsberg B., Michelozzi P., Boumghar A., Vonk J.M., Bellini A., Atkinson R., Ayres J.G., Sunyer J., Schwartz J., and Katsouyanni K. Short-term effects of particulate air pollution on cardiovascular diseases in eight European cities. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002: 56 (10): 773–779.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Leaderer B.P., Naeher L., Jankun T., Balenger K., Holford T.R., Toth C., Sullivan J., Wolfson J.M., and Koutrakis P. Indoor, outdoor, and regional summer and winter concentrations of PM10, PM2.5, SO4(2)−, H+, NH4+, NO3−, NH3, and nitrous acid in homes with and without kerosene space heaters. Environ Health Perspect 1999: 107 (3): 223–231.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Metzger K.B., Tolbert P.E., Klein M., Flanders W.D., Peel J.L., Mulholland J.A., and Langberg J.J. Ambient air pollution and arrhythmic events in patients with automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillators, Atlanta, 1993–2000 (ARIES/SOPHIA). Epidemiology 2002: 13 (4): S125.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. Research Priorities for Airborne Particulate Matter. I. Immediate Priorities and a Long-Range Research Portfolio. National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 1998.

  • Ogawa & Company. NO, NO2, NOx, and SO2 sampling protocol using the Ogawa sampler. Version 3. Pompano Beach, FL, 1998.

  • Salvi S., Blomberg A., Rudell B., Kelly F., Sandstrom T., Holgate S.T., and Frew A. Acute inflammatory responses in the airways and peripheral blood after short-term exposure to diesel exhaust in healthy human volunteers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999: 159 (3): 702–709.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sarnat J.A., Brown K.W., Schwartz J., Coull B.A., and Koutrakis P. Ambient gas concentrations and personal particulate matter exposures—implications for studying the health effects of particles. Epidemiology 2005: 16 (3): 385–395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sarnat J.A., Koutrakis P., and Suh H.H. Assessing the relationship between personal particulate and gaseous exposures of senior citizens living in Baltimore, MD. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 2000: 50 (7): 1184–1198.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sarnat J.A., Long C.M., Koutrakis P., Coull B.A., Schwartz J., and Suh H.H. Using sulfur as a tracer of outdoor fine particulate matter. Environ Sci Technol 2002: 36 (24): 5305–5314.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sarnat J.A., Schwartz J., Catalano P.J., and Suh H.H. Gaseous pollutants in particulate matter epidemiology: confounders or surrogates? Environ Health Perspect 2001: 109 (10): 1053–1061.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz J., and Dockery D.W. Increased mortality in Philadelphia associated with daily air pollution concentrations. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992: 145 (3): 600–604.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz J., Norris G., Larson T., Sheppard L., Claiborne C., and Koenig J. Episodes of high coarse particle concentrations are not associated with increased mortality [see comments]. Environ Health Perspect 1999: 107 (5): 339–342.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz J. Air pollution and blood markers of cardiovascular risk. Environ Health Perspect 2001: 109: 405–409.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz J. Air pollution and hospital admissions for the elderly in Detroit, Michigan. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994: 150 (3): 648–655.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson W.E., and Brauer M. Estimation of ambient and non-ambient components of particulate matter exposure from a personal monitoring panel study. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2006: 16 (3): 264–274.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson W.E., Mage D.T., and Grant L.D. Estimating separately personal exposure to ambient and nonambient particulate matter for epidemiology and risk assessment: why and how. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 2000: 50 (7): 1167–1183.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zeger S.L., Thomas D., Dominici F., Samet J.M., Schwartz J., Dockery D., and Cohen A. Exposure measurement error in time-series studies of air pollution: concepts and consequences. Environ Health Perspect 2000: 108 (5): 419–426.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

    Joel Schwartz & William E Wilson

  2. Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health of Emory University, Georgia, Atlanta, USA

    Jeremy A Sarnat

  3. Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Massachusetts, USA

    Brent A Coull

Authors
  1. Joel Schwartz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeremy A Sarnat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Brent A Coull
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. William E Wilson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joel Schwartz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schwartz, J., Sarnat, J., Coull, B. et al. Effects of exposure measurement error on particle matter epidemiology: a simulation using data from a panel study in Baltimore, MD. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 17 (Suppl 2), S2–S10 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jes.7500619

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jes.7500619

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links