Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Research Article
  • Published:

Consumer exposure scenarios: development, challenges and possible solutions

Abstract

Exposure scenarios (ES) under REACH (Registration, Evaluation, and Authorisation of Chemicals; new EU legislation) aim to describe safe conditions of product and substance use. Both operational conditions and risk management measures (RMMs) are part of the ES. For consumer use of chemicals, one of the challenges will be to identify all of the consumer uses of a given chemical and then quantify the exposure derived from each of them. Product use categories can be established to identify in a systematic fashion how products are used. These product categories comprise products that are used similarly (e.g. paints, adhesives). They deliver information about product use characteristics, and provide an easy-to-handle tool for exchanging standardised information. For practical reasons, broad ES will have to be developed, which cover a wide range of products and use. The challenge will be to define them broadly, but not in a way that they provide such an overestimation of exposure that a next iteration or a more complex model is always needed. Tiered and targeted approaches for estimation of exposure at the right level of detail may offer the best solution. RMMs relevant for consumers include those inherent to product design (controllable) and those that are communicated to consumers as directions for use (non-controllable). Quantification of the effect of non-controllable RMMs on consumer exposure can prove to be difficult. REACH requires aggregation of exposure from all relevant identified sources. Development of appropriate methodology for realistic aggregation of exposure will be no small challenge and will likely require probabilistic approaches and comprehensive databases on populations' habits, practices and behaviours. REACH regulation aims at controlling the use of chemicals so that exposure to every chemical can be demonstrated to be safe for consumers, workers, and the environment when considered separately, but also when considered in an integrated way. This integration will be another substantial challenge for the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bickers D.R., Calow P., Greim H.A., Hanifin J.M., Rogers A.E., Saurat J.H., Spes G.I., Smith R.L., and Tagami H. The safety assessment of fragrance materials. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2003: 37: 218.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cadby P.A., Troy W.R., and Vey M.G. Consumer exposure to fragrance ingredients: providing estimates for safety evaluation. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2002: 36: 246.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. 2006 Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No. 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC. Off J Eur Union, L 396/1 of 30.12.2006.

  • European Chemicals Bureau. (2005a) WP 1: Development of the concept of exposure scenarios. Scoping study — Final report, “Technical Guidance Document on preparing the Chemical Safety Report under REACH — Scoping Study — Phase 1 A (REACH Implementation Project 3.2-1A)”, Service Contract Number 22551-2004-12 F1SC ISP BE http://ecb.jrc.it/REACH/.

  • European Chemicals Bureau. (2005b) WP 3 — 1b: Technical Guidance Document on preparing the Chemical Safety Report under REACH — Preliminary Guidance Document on preparing the Chemical Safety Assessment under REACH — Phase 1B (REACH Implementation Project 3.2-1B)” Service Contract Number 22552-2004-12 F1SC ISP BE http://ecb.jrc.it/REACH/.

  • Ford R.A., Dormeyer B., Easterday O., Maier K., and Middletown J. Criteria for development of a database for safety evaluation of fragrance ingredients. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2000: 31: 166.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Health Canada. A proposed integrated framework for the health-related components of categorization of the Domestic Substances List under CEPA 1999, 2005: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/alt_formats/hecs-esc/pdf/contaminants/existsub/framework-int-cadre_e.pdf.

  • Heinemeyer G., and Hahn A. Use of product databases for risk assessment purposes. Tox Appl Pharmacol 2005: 207: S636–S644.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heinemeyer G., Lindtner O., Scholz R., and Rüdiger T. Evaluation of behaviour of consumers for exposure assessment by questionnaire studies. Abstract book, International Conference of Environmental Epidemiology and Exposure. Paris, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • http://www.jrc.cec.eu.int/eis-chemrisks.

  • Kovacs D.C, Small M.J., Davidson C.I., and Fischhoff B. Behavioral factors affecting exposure potential for household cleaning products. J Exp Anal Env Epidem 1997: 7: 505–520.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson H., et al. Exposure and prioritization-Human screening data and methods for high production volume chemicals in consumer products: Amine oxides a case study. Risk Anal 2006: 26 (6): 1637–1657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SDA The Soap and Detergent Association. 2005 Exposure and Risk Screening Methods for Consumer Product Ingredients. The SDA, 1500K Street, NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC, USA, 2005.

  • WHO/IPCS. IPCS Risk Assessment Terminology, Part II: IPCS Glossary of Key Exposure Assessment Terminology, 2004: http://www.who.int/ipcs/methods/harmonization/areas/ipcsterminologyparts1and2.pdf.

  • WHO/IPCS. Principles of Characterizing and Applying Human Exposure Models, 2005: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2005/9241563117_eng.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J G M Van Engelen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Engelen, J., Heinemeyer, G. & Rodriguez, C. Consumer exposure scenarios: development, challenges and possible solutions. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 17 (Suppl 1), S26–S33 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jes.7500577

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jes.7500577

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links