Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Can neutrophil responses in very low birth weight infants predict the organisms responsible for late-onset bacterial or fungal sepsis?

Journal of Perinatology volume 26, pages 501–505 (2006)Cite this article

Abstract

Objective:

To examine neutrophil counts and various neutrophil indices in preterm very low birth weight (VLBW) newborn infants (birth weight <1500 g) with culture-proven late-onset sepsis to determine whether the neutrophil responses could predict the responsible infectious agent.

Study Design:

Neutrophil parameters were examined during episodes of culture-proven sepsis in a cohort of 1026 VLBW infants, born over a 6-year period and admitted to two different neonatal intensive care units. Revised reference ranges of Mouzinho et al. for circulating neutrophil counts in VLBW infants were used to define the abnormal neutrophil indices.

Results:

One hundred sixty-two of 1026 (15.8%) VLBW infants had blood culture-proven late-onset infection. Infections included Gram-positive bacteria (113/162, 70%), Gram-negative bacteria (30/162, 18%) and fungi (19/162, 12%). Of the 162 sepsis episodes, only nine (5.5%) were associated with neutropenia (absolute total neutrophil (ATN) <1100/mm3). Six of the 30 (20%) infants with Gram-negative bacterial sepsis were neutropenic compared to 2.6% infants with Gram-positive bacterial sepsis and none with fungal sepsis (odds ratio: 11; 95% confidence interval: 2.6, 47.3). Neutrophil counts and various neutrophil indices were similar in infants with late-onset Gram-positive bacterial and fungal sepsis; but total white blood cells, and ATN count were significantly lower (P=0.004 and 0.001, respectively) in infants with late-onset Gram-negative bacterial sepsis.

Conclusions:

In VLBW infants, common organisms causing infection have different effects on neutrophil responses. Occurrence of neutropenia during evaluation of sepsis in sick VLBW infants is more common with Gram-negative bacterial infection.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stoll BJ, Gordon T, Korones SB, Shankaran S, Tyson JE, Bauer CR et al. Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: a report from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. J Pediatr 1996; 129 (1): 63–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rodwell RL, Leslie AL, Tudehope DI . Early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis using a hematologic scoring system. J Pediatr 1988; 112: 761–767.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gerdes JS . Clinicopathologic approach to the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. Clin Perinatol 1991; 18: 361–381.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Escobar GJ . The neonatal ‘sepsis work-up’ personal reflections on the development of an evidence-based approach toward newborn infections in a managed care organization. Pediatrics 1999; 103: 360–373.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Engle WD, Rosenfeld CR, Mouzinho A, Risser RC, Zeray F, Sanchez PJ . Circulating neutrophils in septic preterm neonates: comparison of two reference ranges. Pediatrics 1997; 99 (3): e10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mouzinho A, Rosenfeld CR, Sanchez PJ, Risser R . Revised reference ranges for circulating neutrophils in very low birth weight neonates. Pediatrics 1994; 94: 76–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gessler P, Luders R, Konig S, Haas N, Lasch P, Kachel W . Neonatal neutropenia in low birthweight premature infants. Am J Perinatol 1995; 12 (1): 34–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Manroe BL, Weinberg AG, Rosenfeld CR, Browne R . The neonatal blood count in health and disease. I. Reference values for neutrophilic cells. J Pediatr 1979; 95 (1): 89–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schelonka RL, Yoder BA, desJardins SE, Hall RB, Butler J . Peripheral leukocyte count and leukocyte indexes in healthy newborn term infants. J Pediatr 1994; 125: 603–606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Escobar GJ, Li D, Armstrong MA, Gardner MN, Folck BF, Verdi JE et al. Neonatal sepsis workups in infants &gt;/=2000 grams at birth: a population-based study. Pediatrics 2000; 106: 256–263.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ottolini MC, Lundgren K, Mirkinson LJ, Cason S, Ottolini MG . Utility of complete blood count and blood culture screening to diagnose neonatal sepsis in the asymptomatic at risk newborn. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2003; 22 (5): 430–434.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Funke A, Berner R, Traichel B, Schmeisser D, Leititis JU, Niemeyer CM . Frequency, natural course, and outcome of neonatal neutropenia. Pediatrics 2000; 106 (1 Part 1): 45–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fanaroff AA, Korones SB, Wright LL, Verter J, Poland RL, Bauer CR et al. Incidence, presenting features, risk factors and significance of late onset septicemia in very low birth weight infants. The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1998; 17 (7): 593–598.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Christensen RD, Rothstein G . Exhaustion of mature marrow neutrophils in neonates with sepsis. J Pediatr 1980; 96: 316–319.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kennon C, Overturf G, Bessman S, Sierra E, Smith KJ, Brann B . Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as a marker for bacterial infection in neonates. J Pediatr 1996; 128 (6): 765–769.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sarkar S, Bhagat I, DeCristofaro JD, Wiswell TE, Spitzer AR . A study of the role of multiple site blood cultures in the evaluation of neonatal sepsis. J Perinatol 2006; 26: 18–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA, Wright LL, Carlo WA, Ehrenkranz RA et al. Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: the experience of the NICHD neonatal research network. Pediatrics 2002; 110: 285–291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Karlowicz MG, Buescher ES, Surka AE . Fulminant late-onset sepsis in a neonatal intensive care unit, 1988–1997, and the impact of avoiding empiric vancomycin therapy. Pediatrics 2000; 106: 1387–1390.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Omar SA, Salhadar A, Wooliever DE, Alsgaard PK . Late-onset neutropenia in very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2000; 106 (4): E55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

    S Sarkar, S Hieber & S M Donn

  2. The Department of Pediatrics, Mercy Children's Hospital/Medical University of Ohio, Toledo, Ohio

    I Bhagat

Authors
  1. S Sarkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. I Bhagat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S Hieber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S M Donn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S Sarkar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sarkar, S., Bhagat, I., Hieber, S. et al. Can neutrophil responses in very low birth weight infants predict the organisms responsible for late-onset bacterial or fungal sepsis?. J Perinatol 26, 501–505 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211554

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211554

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links