Abstract
Regionalization of perinatal health care has offered appropriate services to mothers and babies as close to their homes as possible. The need for regionalized service has not changed, but the concept has been challenged by the managed care dictate that patients receive referral services at the least expensive option available that qualifies to give that service by virtue of an assigned designation of level of care.
When regionalization first became extant, hospitals qualified as tertiary (highest level) perinatal centers if they had neonatologists on staff. Now, however, far more is required of a hospital if it is to qualify to provide the highest level of care available. The so-called national guidelines of perinatal health care do not clearly specify this, and thus hospitals with limited scopes of perinatal services may still be recognized as tertiary or subspecialty centers. Third-party payers contract with such hospitals to provide tertiary care and are able to do so at a lower cost because these hospitals are not capable of offering more complex and thus more expensive services.
However, some patients require the more comprehensive services and are at least initially denied them because of the costs involved. I believe it is improper for third-party payers to dictate what services patients receive and where they receive them. This has been and should be the province of physicians and physicians alone. Furthermore, I believe that a more detailed and descriptive system of guidelines for perinatal health care at the state level could help to clarify the true level of functioning of any hospital and thus make it more difficult for third-party payers to opt only for the least expensive services.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hein, H. Regionalization of Perinatal Health Care: A Lesson Learned but Lost. J Perinatol 19, 584–588 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7200275
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7200275
This article is cited by
-
Telemedicine collaboration improves perinatal regionalization and lowers statewide infant mortality
Journal of Perinatology (2013)
-
Hospital Factors and Nontransfer of Small Babies: A Marker of Deregionalized Perinatal Care?
Journal of Perinatology (2004)
-
Local Health Department Perspectives on Linkages Among Birthing Hospitals
Journal of Perinatology (2003)
-
The Constantly Changing Neonatal Health Care Paradigm in California
Journal of Perinatology (2002)
-
Expansion of Community-Based Perinatal Care in California
Journal of Perinatology (2002)