Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Festschrift Article
  • Published:

Very Low Birth Weight Births At Non-NICU Hospitals: The Role of Sociodemographic, Perinatal, and Geographic Factors

Abstract

PURPOSE:

The purposeof this study was to assess the extent of variation in the percentage of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants born at perinatal Level 1 hospitals (no Neonatal Intensive Care Unit [NICU]) across California’s nine geographic Perinatal regions. The role of sociodemographic, perinatal, and geographic factors was also assessed.

METHODS:

Multivariate analysis of California birth certificate files between 1989 and 1993, for 24,094 live-born infants weighing between 500 and 1499 gm, was conducted to identify factors associated with delivery at a Level 1 hospital. Analyses specific for race and ethnicity were also conducted for Hispanic, African American, and white cohorts.

RESULTS:

In the 5-year study period, 1989 through 1993, 10.5% (24,094) of all live-born VLBW infants were delivered in Level 1 hospitals. Significant variation across regions was evident, ranging from a regional low of 3.1% to a high of 24.3%. After controlling for multiple factors, the odds of delivering at a Level 1 hospital were decreased for African Americans and South East Asians and increased in Hispanic women as compared with white non-Hispanic women. For all women, less then adequate prenatal care, living in a 50% to 75% urban zip code, and living greater then 25 miles from the nearest NICU significantly increased the odds of VLBW delivery at a Level 1 hospital. For Hispanics, teen pregnancy and having two or more prior infant deaths increased the odds, whereas Medi-Cal as the payer source for delivery and two or more pregnancy complications decreased the odds of a Level 1 VLBW delivery. After taking these factors into account, when compared with Los Angeles, the odds of inappropriate delivery site ranged from 0.37 to 2.75 across California’s nine geographic perinatal regions. Of this variation,78% could be accounted for by the percentage of total births that delivered at a region’s Level 1 hospitals.

CONCLUSION:

The overall state average of 10.5% deliveries of VLBW at Level 1 hospitals, although close to the 10% national objective for the year 2000, did not indicate the wide variation seen across California’s nine geographic regions. Risk-adjusted regional differences in the likelihood of inappropriate delivery site for the high-risk VLBW infants suggest that reaching the Healthy People 2000 objective will require further strengthening of California’s perinatal regional networks, especially in those regions where a high percentage of total births deliver at Level 1 hospitals.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gould, J., Sarnoff, R., Liu, H. et al. Very Low Birth Weight Births At Non-NICU Hospitals: The Role of Sociodemographic, Perinatal, and Geographic Factors. J Perinatol 19, 197–205 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7200161

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7200161

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links