Sir,
Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common childhood primary soft tissue sarcoma. Ocular lesions represent about 10% of all RMSs. The majority of ocular RMS arises from the orbit and is of the alveolar cell type. Pure eyelid lesion of the pleomorphic cell type is extremely rare especially in children. We would like to present a case of palpebral pleomorphic RMS and its management.
Case report
An 11-year-old Indonesian Chinese boy who was previously well, developed an itchy lump in his left upper lid in December 2004. The lump was excised at a local hospital in February 2005 without histological diagnosis. The lump recurred 3 months later resulting in a mechanical ptosis. The patient consulted a private ophthalmologist in Kuching, Sarawak in August 2005 and the lump was biopsied. Histology showed pleomorphic cells with enlarged hyperchromatic nuclei and eosinophilic cytoplasm. Some tadpole-shaped cells were also seen (Figure 1). The diagnosis of RMS was confirmed with immunohistochemistry, which revealed the presence of desmin (see inset in Figure 1). The patient was referred to the oncologist. CT scan of the orbits and brain showed the tumour was confined to the upper lid measuring 2.5 × 3.0 × 3.5 cm. He was started on chemotherapy and two cycles of uncomplicated chemotherapy were given in August and September 2005. However, the tumour failed to respond to the treatments and doubled in size (Figure 2). Central necrosis also developed on the surface of the tumour.
The patient was referred to our eye centre for further management. Despite difficulty in opening the eye, the patient was able to perceive light in the left eye. A repeated CT scan showed the tumour had extended into the anterior orbit (Figure 3). However, the orbital bone showed no signs of involvement. Using the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS) Group Staging Classification, the tumour was staged as Group III.
The tumour was excised with a narrow margin. Except for a small stump of the lateral eyelid, the whole of the upper eyelid and the upper medial canthus was excised. The globe appeared intact except for a central leucoma from pressure keratopathy. There was no relative afferent papillary defect. Reconstruction of the upper lid was achieved with a combination of Cutler–Beard's technique and glabellar flap. An MRI scan 4 weeks post-surgery showed no recurrence and the eyelid was opened 6 weeks post-surgery. A Frontalis suspension with 2/0 prolene was performed simultaneously. He underwent adjunctive radiotherapy to eradicate any residual tumours. The patient remained well and the MRI scan showed no recurrence at follow-up (Figure 4).
Comment
Ocular RMS is the most common soft tissue malignancy in childhood. Compared with RMS of other parts of the body, ocular RMS has a better prognosis because of its earlier presentation.1 RMS can involve any part of the ocular tissue but pure eyelid involvement as in our patient is rare; most cases of reported eyelid RMS represent subcutaneous extension of the anterior orbital RMS. A recent review of the clinical spectrum of 33 paediatric patients by Shields etc2 showed that the orbit is the most commonly involved (76%) followed by conjunctiva (12%), uveal tract (9%), within the globe (9%), and eyelid (3%). The other unusual aspect of our patient is the pleomorphic cell type; childhood RMS of the orbital region is of either the more common embryonal or the less common alveolar variety. Pleomorphic RMS rarely affects children and its occurrence in the orbit is extremely rare.3 Pleomorphic RMS typically affects adults older than 45 years of age and involves the peripheral skeleton. Histologically, it is important to differentiate pleomorphic RMS from other pleomorphic sarcoma. Histologically, the tumour exhibits tadpole-shaped rhabdomyoblasts with granular cytoplasm. Cross-striations are uncommon. Confirmation of the diagnosis is helped with positive immunohistochemistry stainings for desmin, glycogen, and myoglobin, which indicates the tumour exhibits skeletal muscle differentiation.
Over the past decades, great progress has been made in the treatment of RMS. The 5-year survival rates increased from 25% in 1970 to 73%, as shown in the IRS-IV reported in 2001.4 As most RMS is sensitive to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, exenteration is now rarely performed except for advanced or recurrent cases. The amount of tissue removed during biopsy is controversial but most ophthalmologists believe only a small biopsy is needed as orbital RMS has a favourable prognosis following radiation and chemotherapy, regardless of the amount of tissue removed. However, some prefer complete, or near complete, surgical removal when that can be achieved without major damage to vital structures like the optic nerve and extraocular muscles.5
Our patient with pleomorphic RMS did not respond to chemotherapy and the tumour grew rapidly. Excision of the tumour was the only option to check the relentless growth of the tumour. Although childhood RMS in general has been shown to respond to chemotherapy in IRS trials, most of these RMS are of either the embryonal or alveolar histological types. Studies showed that the presence of pleomorphic cell type is associated with poorer response to chemotherapy and prognosis.6, 7
In summary, this case illustrates our experience in the management of a rare case of palpebral pleomorphic RMS, which failed to respond to chemotherapy and required complete surgical excision to control the disease process.
References
Rousseau P, Flamant F, Quintana E, Voute PA, Gentet JC . Primary chemotherapy in rhabdomyosarcomas and other malignant mesenchymal tumors of the orbit: results of the International Society of Pediatric Oncology MMT 84 Study. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12: 516–522.
Shields CL, Shields JA, Honavar SC, Demirci H . Clinical spectrum of primary ophthalmic rhabdomyosarcoma. Ophthalmology 2001; 108: 2284–2292.
Shields JA, Shields CL . Rhabdomyosarcoma: review for the ophthalmologist. Surv Ophthalmol 2003; 48(1): 39–57.
Crist WM, Anderson JR, Meza JL, Fryer C, Raney RB, Ruymann FB et al. Intergroup rhabdomyosarcoma study IV: results for patients with nonmetastatic disease. J Clin Oncol 2001; 15: 3091–3102.
Lawrence Jr W, Hays DM . Surgical lessons from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1981; 4: 159–163.
Kodet R, Newton Jr WA, Hamoudi AB, Asmar L, Jacobs DL, Maurer HM . Childhood rhabdomyosarcoma with anaplastic (pleomorphic) features. A report of the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study. Am J Surg Pathol 1993; 17(5): 443–453.
Komdeur R, Klunder J, van der Graaf WT, van den Berg E, de Bont ES, Hoekstra HJ, Molenaar WM . Multidrug resistance proteins in rhabdomyosarcomas: comparison between children and adults. Cancer 2003; 97(8): 1999–2005.
Acknowledgements
We have no financial interest in this case and this case has never been published or presented elsewhere.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Department where the work was carried out: Sarawak General Hospital, Kuching Tel: +012 8908877; Fax: +60 82 422564; E-mail: chuaoxford@hotmail.com
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alhady, M., Ngo, C., Tan, A. et al. Palpebral pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma in a teenager. Eye 21, 291–293 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6702541
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6702541