Sir,
High myopia (≥5.0 D) occurs in 3% of the population and accounts for up to 55% of patients attending for excimer laser refractive surgery.1 Although laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and related procedures are well proven for the correction of mild-to-moderate myopia, the outcomes for higher levels of myopia are less predictable2 and are dependent on appropriate corneal architecture. Phakic intraocular lenses (PIOL) are an alternative to laser refractive surgery and their efficacy for the correction of high myopia is well reported.3, 4, 5 There are three main types of PIOL: anterior chamber iris fixated, anterior chamber angle fixated, and posterior chamber. Recognised complications of PIOL implantation include pupil ovalisation,6 cataract,7 retinal detachment,8 and endophthalmitis.9 However, very little is known of their susceptibility to dislocation following trauma. We report a case of iris-fixated PIOL dislocation following trauma.
Case report
A 32-year-old woman presented with reduced vision and monocular diplopia in her right eye for 4 days after being accidentally struck by a football. Three years previously she had undergone successful refractive surgery for high myopia with bilateral implantation of Artisan (Ophtec BV, Groningen, The Netherlands) iris-fixated anterior chamber PIOLs.
At presentation, her unaided visual acuity was 6/12 right eye, improving to 6/6 with pinhole, and 6/6 left eye. Slit-lamp examination of her right eye showed a subluxed anterior chamber PIOL with the released temporal claw haptic resting inferotemporally in the angle (Figure 1). The nasal claw remained intact with enclaved iris. Although no direct contact between the PIOL and the corneal endothelium was detectable clinically, the peripheral cornea was oedematous adjacent to the displaced temporal claw haptic. Intraocular pressure was normal and posterior segment examination unremarkable.
Following surgical repositioning of the PIOL with re-enclavation of the iris into the temporal claw, the lens remained stable in the horizontal position. Visual acuity returned to 6/6 unaided with resolution of the corneal oedema.
Comment
There are only a few reports in the literature of iris-claw PIOL dislocation following trauma. In a study by Lombardo et al,10 while examining changes in contrast sensitivity after Artisan PIOL implantation in 49 eyes, one patient was reported to have suffered a blow to the eye, sufficient to cause periorbital ecchymosis, which also resulted in disenclavement of one claw. The second report is of a patient who underwent bilateral implantation of Artisan PIOL as part of the phase III US clinical trials. She was accidentally hit in her left eye by a roll of packing tape thrown by her 4-year-old child.11 This also resulted in detachment of one of the claws. The Artisan PIOL study reports only one case of traumatic dislocation out of 662 subjects.12 We assume that this is the same patient. The study also reports that a further 4 out of the 662 subjects required PIOL repositioning following inadequate fixation. In addition, apparently spontaneous, nontraumatic dislocation of a Worst iris-claw PIOL has been described following initial successful implantation.13, 14
Iris-claw PIOL reattachment requires special instrumentation and a surgeon familiar with the iris enclavement procedure. Additionally, successful repositioning does not exclude future redislocation. The degree of endothelial cell loss following PIOL dislocation and reattachment is not known. In the case reported by Yoon et al11 on traumatic dislocation of an Artisan PIOL, the endothelial cell count fell from 3046 cells/mm2 before placement of the PIOL, to 2700 cells/mm2 following trauma. However, endothelial cell counts are not given following primary placement or reattachment, limiting interpretation of this report.
Current patient and professional product information for iris-claw PIOLs do not mention participation in contact sports as a relative contraindication.12 We recommend that the risk of traumatic dislocation of iris-claw PIOLs is discussed fully with patients at preoperative counselling, especially in those who participate in sports with a high risk of ocular injury.
References
McCarty CA, Livingston PM, Taylor HR . Prevalence of myopia in adults: implications for refractive surgeons. J Refract Surg 1997; 13: 213–215.
Sugar A, Rapuano CJ, Culbertson WW, Huang D, Varley GA, Agapitos PJ et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and astigmatism: safety and efficacy: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2002; 109: 175–187.
Landesz M, Worst JGF, van Rij G . Long-term results of correction of high myopia with an iris claw phakic intraocular lens. J Refract Surg 2000; 16: 310–316.
Budo C, Hessloehl JC, Izak M, Luyten GP, Menezo JL, Sener BA et al. Multicenter study of the artisan phakic intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000; 26: 1163–1171.
Maloney RK, Nguyen LH, John ME . Artisan phakic intraocular lens for myopia; short-term results of a prospective, multicenter study; the Artisan Lens Study Group. Ophthalmology 2002; 109: 1631–1641.
Fellner P, Vidic B, Ramkissoon Y, Fu AD, El-Shabrawi Y, Ardjomand N . Pupil ovalization after phakic intraocular lens implantation is associated with sectorial iris hypoperfusion. Arch Ophthalmol 2005; 123: 1061–1065.
Munoz G, Montes-Mico R, Belda JI, Alio JL . Cataract after minor trauma in a young patient with an iris-fixated intraocular lens for high myopia. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 135: 890–891.
Ruiz-Moreno JM, Alio JL, Perez-Santonja JJ, de al Hoz F . Retinal detachment in phakic eyes with anterior chamber intraocular lens to correct severe myopia. Am J Ophthalmol 1999; 127: 270–275.
Perez-Santonja JJ, Ruiz-Moreno JM, de la Hoz F, Giner-Gorriti C, Alio JL . Endophthalmitis after phakic intraocular lens implantation to correct high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999; 25: 1295–1298.
Lombardo AJ, Hardten DR, McCulloch AG, Demarchi JL, Davis EA, Lindstrom RL . Changes in contrast sensitivity after artisan lens implantation for high myopia. Ophthalmology 2005; 112: 278–285.
Yoon H, Macaluso DC, Moshirfar M, Lundergan M . Traumatic dislocation of an ophtec artisan phakic intraocular lens. J Refract Surg 2002; 18: 481–483.
Professional Labelling. ARTISAN® (Model 206 and 204) Phakic Intraocular Lens (PIOL). Verisyse™ (VRSM5US and VRSM6US) Phakic Intraocular Lens (PIOL)—P030028. US Food and Drug Administration.http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/pdf3/p030028.html.
Risco JM, Cameron JA . Dislocation of a phakic intraocular lens. Am J Ophthalmol 1994; 118: 666–667.
Mertens E, Tassignon MJ . Detachment of an iris claw haptic after implantation of a phakic worst anterior chamber lens: case report. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol 1998; 268: 19–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Day, A., Ramkissoon, Y., George, S. et al. Traumatic dislocation of an iris-fixated phakic intraocular lens. Eye 21, 121–122 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6702425
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6702425