Abstract
CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha (CEBPA) mutations in AML are associated with favourable prognosis and are divided into N- and C-terminal mutations. The majority of AML patients have both types of mutations. We assessed the prognostic significance of single (n=7) and double (n=12) CEBPA mutations among 224 AML patients. Double CEBPA mutations conferred a decisively favourable overall (P=0.006) and disease-free survival (P=0.013). However, clinical outcome of patients with single CEBPA mutations was not different from CEBPA wild-type patients. In a multivariable analysis, only double – but not single – CEBPA mutations were identified as independent prognostic factors. These findings indicate heterogeneity within AML patients with CEBPA mutations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
One of the crucial transcription factors for myeloid cell development is the CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha (CEBPA) (Rosenbauer and Tenen, 2007). Targeted disruption of CEBPA results in a selective block of granulocyte maturation (Zhang et al, 1997), whereas conditional expression of CEBPA in precursor cells is sufficient to trigger granulocytic differentiation (Radomska et al, 1998). In AML patients, deregulation of CEBPA function is a common event comprising of genomic mutations (Pabst et al, 2001a; Frohling et al, 2004; Nerlov, 2004), transcriptional and post-transcriptional suppression (Pabst et al, 2001b; Helbling et al, 2004; Helbling et al, 2005), and inactivation by phosphorylation (Radomska et al, 2006).
Two types of CEBPA mutations are predominantly seen: frame-shift mutations in the N-terminal truncate the wild-type protein, whereas formation of a dominant-negative 30-kDa peptide initiated from an ATG further downstream is not affected. In contrast, C-terminal CEBPA mutations are in-frame insertions or deletions, thereby affecting DNA binding and homo- or heterodimerisation with other CEBP family members (Nerlov, 2004). The majority of AML patients with CEBPA mutations have both types of mutations, usually on different alleles. However, both types can occur as single CEBPA mutations.
Earlier study has indicated that CEBPA mutations in cytogenetically normal AML patients are associated with favourable prognosis (Frohling et al, 2004; Bienz et al, 2005; Gaidzik and Dohner (2008); Marcucci et al, 2008; Schlenk et al, 2008). Here, we assessed the prognostic significance of the different types of CEBPA mutations among a cohort of 224 consecutive AML patients of all subtypes. By direct sequencing, we identified 12 patients with double and 7 with single heterozygous CEBPA mutations. Patients with double CEBPA mutations represented the combination of C- and N-terminal mutation types. We found that favourable prognosis was exclusively associated with the double CEBPA mutation status, whereas the clinical outcome of patients with single CEBPA mutations did not differ from CEBPA wild-type patients.
Materials and methods
Patients
Malignant cells were collected at diagnosis from the Ficoll-separated mononucleated cells of bone marrow aspirates (132 patients) or peripheral blood (92 patients) from consecutive AML patients seen at the Department of Oncology, University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland between 2001 and 2007. Informed consent from all patients was obtained according to the Declaration of Helsinki, and the studies were approved by decisions of the local ethics committee of Bern, Switzerland. Patients were uniformly treated within the HOVON/SAKK 30/00 protocol.
CEBPA mutational analysis
The entire coding region of the CEBPA gene was amplified using three overlapping PCR primer pairs as described earlier (Bienz et al, 2005). Sequences of the primers are listed in Supplementary Table S1. PCR products were sequenced in both directions. Abnormal sequencing results were repeated twice in both directions, including repetitions of PCR.
Reporter gene assays
H1299 cells were transfected with 80 ng of luciferase plasmid encoding an oligomeric CEBPA site, together with 20 ng of pcDNA3-CEBPA or empty pcDNA3 vector along with 1.0 ng of CMV-Renilla plasmid. After 24 h, luciferase activities were determined (Pabst et al, 2001a). Each transfection experiment was repeated at least three times.
Protein isolation and western blot analyses: Fifty micrograms of extracted proteins from whole-cell lysates were analysed with a rabbit polyclonal antibody against CEBPA (1 : 1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.; sc-61).
Statistical Analysis
Patients alive without progression or relapse by the time of analysis were censored at the time of their last follow-up. Time-to-event curves were constructed according to the Kaplan–Meier method and were compared with the log-rank χ2-test.
Results and discussion
By sequencing the entire coding region, we identified 19 patients with CEBPA mutations in our cohort of 224 AML patients at diagnosis. Of these 12 patients had the combination of the N- and the C-terminal type of mutation, further referred here as double CEBPA mutation, and 7 patients had a single CEBPA mutation. Patients with the in-frame insertion polymorphism in the second transactivation domain (Wouters et al, 2007), with base pair variation(s) that did not lead to amino acid changes, or with in-frame sequence variations of unknown significance (one patient), were not considered in the further analysis. All CEBPA mutations are presented in detail in Supplementary Tables S2A and S2B. Two patients with a single point mutation encoding a novel stop codon located downstream of the alternative ATG at position 120 were not of the classic N-terminal mutation type, as formation of the 30-kDa peptide was also affected, but they were classified as having single CEBPA mutations because of the functional relevance of these particular mutations.
We identified CEBPA mutations exclusively in patients below the age of 61 years at diagnosis. Thus, only AML patients in this age range were studied in the control group of CEBPA wild-type patients, allowing comparison of patients treated within the same protocol. We detected no differences between patients with single and double CEBPA mutations with regard to FAB subtypes, leucocytes at diagnosis, percentage of peripheral blasts at diagnosis, bone marrow infiltration at diagnosis, and LDH levels (Supplementary Table S3).
Remarkably, additional molecular abnormalities were exclusively detected in the single CEBPA mutation group, including one patient with FLT3-ITD and one with NPM1 mutation. All patients with CEBPA mutations had a normal karyotype with the exception of one patient with monosomy 7 in the single CEBPA mutation group and one with del6q24 in the double CEBPA mutation group. Results of karyotype and molecular analyses are given in Supplementary Table S4.
Comparing patients with single vs double CEBPA mutations, we found that the clinical outcome differed markedly (Supplementary Table S5). A complete remission after induction chemotherapy was achieved in all the 19 AML patients with CEBPA mutations. However, patients with single CEBPA mutations had a significantly worse median overall survival (OS) of 15 months (Figure 1A; P=0.006) and disease-free survival (DFS) of 12 months (Figure 1B; P=0.013) compared with patients with double CEBPA mutations in whom both median DFS and OS were not reached after a median follow-up of 34 months. Moreover, the course of the disease of patients with single CEBPA mutations was not different both for OS and DFS from CEBPA wild-type patients. Finally, in a multivariable analysis discriminating white blood cell count, age, NPM1 mutations, and FLT3-ITD, only double CEBPA mutations, but not single CEBPA mutations, were identified as independent prognostic factors (Table 1). The CEBPA mutation status per se turned out to be of independent prognostic significance.
To illustrate the consequences of single vs double CEBPA mutations in terms of CEBPA function, we transfected H1299 cells with expression plasmids encoding CEBPA wild-type, an N-terminal frame-shift mutation, a C-terminal in-frame mutation, or the combination of both plasmids, and we determined the potential of these CEBPA peptides to activate a target promoter sequence as present in the G-CSF receptor promoter. As illustrated in Figure 1C, both the N- and the C-terminal CEBPA mutant peptides inhibited wild-type CEBPA protein in a dominant-negative manner, by reducing its activation potential by roughly 70%. However, it is important that the combination of both mutant constructs – in the absence of wild-type protein – failed to activate at all. This suggests that CEBPA activity is completely abolished in malignant cells of patients with double CEBPA mutations, whereas it is retained to some degree in patients with single CEBPA mutations. In addition, Figure 1D presents the various CEBPA peptides made in malignant cells from AML patients with different types of CEBPA mutations. It indicates that N-terminal frame-shift CEBPA mutations, in fact, decisively decrease the amount of wild-type CEBPA protein, whereas the 30-kDa peptide is detectable at a higher amount.
In conclusion, our findings indicate that there is relevant prognostic heterogeneity within AML patients with CEBPA mutations. Double CEBPA mutations are associated with distinctly favourable prognosis, whereas clinical outcome of AML patients with single CEBPA mutations is not different from CEBPA wild-type patients. However, the number of patients with a single CEBPA mutation is limited in our collection of patients, and larger series are needed to definitively assess its prognostic significance.
Change history
16 November 2011
This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication
References
Bienz M, Ludwig M, Oppliger E, Mueller BU, Ratschiller D, Solenthaler M, Fey MF, Pabst T (2005) Risk assessment in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and a normal karyotype. Clin Cancer Res 11: 1416–1425
Frohling S, Schlenk RF, Stolze I, Bihlmayr J, Benner A, Kreitmeier S, Tobis K, Döhner H, Döhner K (2004) CEBPA mutations in younger adults with acute myeloid leukemia and normal cytogenetics: prognostic relevance and analysis of cooperating mutations. J Clin Oncol 22: 624–633
Gaidzik V, Dohner K (2008) Prognostic implications of gene mutations in acute myeloid leukemia with normal cytogenetics. Semin Oncol 35: 346–355
Helbling D, Mueller BU, Timchenko NA, Hagemeijer A, Jotterand M, Meyer-Monard S, Lister A, Rowley JD, Huegli B, Fey MF, Pabst T (2004) The leukemic fusion gene AML1-MDS1-EVI1 suppresses CEBPA in acute myeloid leukemia by activation of Calreticulin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 13312–13317
Helbling D, Mueller BU, Timchenko NA, Schardt J, Eyer M, Betts DR, Jotterand M, Meyer-Monard S, Fey MF, Pabst T (2005) CBFB-SMMHC is correlated with increased calreticulin expression and suppresses the granulocytic differentiation factor CEBPA in AML with inv(16). Blood 106: 1369–1375
Marcucci G, Maharry K, Radmacher MD, Mrozek K, Vukosavljevic T, Paschka P, Whitman SP, Langer C, Baldus CD, Liu CG, Ruppert AS, Powell BL, Carroll AJ, Caligiuri MA, Kolitz JE, Larson RA, Bloomfield CD (2008) Prognostic significance of, and gene and microRNA expression signatures associated with, CEBPA mutations in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia with high-risk molecular features: a cancer and leukemia group B study. J Clin Oncol 26: 5078–5087
Nerlov C (2004) C/EBP alpha mutations in acute myeloid leukaemias. Nat Rev Cancer 4: 394–400
Pabst T, Mueller BU, Zhang P, Radomska HS, Narravula S, Schnittger S, Behre G, Hiddemann W, Tenen DG (2001a) Dominant-negative mutations of CEBPA, encoding CCAAT/enhancer binding protein-alpha (C/EBPalpha), in acute myeloid leukemia. Nat Genet 27: 263–270
Pabst T, Mueller BU, Harakawa N, Schoch C, Haferlach T, Behre G, Hiddemann W, Zhang DE, Tenen DG (2001b) AML1-ETO downregulates the granulocytic differentiation factor C/EBPalpha in t(8;21) myeloid leukemia. Nat Med 7: 444–451
Radomska HS, Huettner CS, Zhang P, Cheng T, Scadden DT, Tenen DG (1998) CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha is a regulatory switch sufficient for induction of granulocytic development from bipotential myeloid progenitors. Mol Cell Biol 18: 4301–4314
Radomska HS, Basseres DS, Zheng R, Zhang P, Dayaram T, Yamamoto Y, Sternberg DW, Lokker N, Giese NA, Bohlander SK, Schnittger S, Delmotte MH, Davis RJ, Small D, Hiddemann W, Gilliland DG, Tenen DG (2006) Block of C/EBP alpha function by phosphorylation in acute myeloid leukemia with FLT3 activating mutations. J Exp Med 203: 371–381
Rosenbauer F, Tenen DG (2007) Transcription factors in myeloid development: balancing differentiation with transformation. Nat Rev Immunol 7: 105–117
Nerlov C (2004) C/EBPalpha mutations in acute myeloid leukaemias. Nat Rev Cancer 4: 394–400
Schlenk RF, Dohner K, Krauter J, Frohling S, Corbacioglu A, Bullinger L, Habdank M, Spath D, Morgan M, Benner A, Schlegelberger B, Heil G, Ganser A, Dohner H (2008) Mutations and treatment outcome in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 358: 1909–1918
Wouters BJ, Louwers I, Valk PJ, Lowenberg B, Delwel R (2007) A recurrent in-frame insertion in a CEBPA transactivation domain is a polymorphism rather than a mutation that does not affect gene expression profiling-based clustering of AML. Blood 109: 389–390
Zhang DE, Zhang P, Wang ND, Hetherington CJ, Darlington GJ, Tenen DG (1997) Absence of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor signaling and neutrophil development in CCAAT enhancer binding protein alpha-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94: 569–574
Acknowledgements
We thank Barbara Huegli and Deborah Shan for help with sample preparation. TP designed and performed the research, and wrote the paper; ME performed the research; JF analysed the data; and BUM designed the research and wrote the paper. This work was supported by grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation SF 310000–109388 (to TP) and SF 310000–113761 (to BUM).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on British Journal of Cancer website (http://www.nature.com/bjc)
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Pabst, T., Eyholzer, M., Fos, J. et al. Heterogeneity within AML with CEBPA mutations; only CEBPA double mutations, but not single CEBPA mutations are associated with favourable prognosis. Br J Cancer 100, 1343–1346 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604977
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604977
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Dysregulated immune and metabolic pathways are associated with poor survival in adult acute myeloid leukemia with CEBPA bZIP in-frame mutations
Blood Cancer Journal (2024)
-
Sporadic and Familial Acute Myeloid Leukemia with CEBPA Mutations
Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports (2023)
-
Gene mutational analysis by NGS and its clinical significance in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia
Experimental Hematology & Oncology (2020)
-
Overexpression of PDK2 and PDK3 reflects poor prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia
Cancer Gene Therapy (2020)
-
Novel DDX41 variants in Thai patients with myeloid neoplasms
International Journal of Hematology (2020)