Abstract
Tumour resistance to chemotherapy involving methylating agents such as DTIC (dacarbazine) and temozolomide is linked to expression of the DNA repair protein O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (MGMT). There is considerable interest in improving the efficacy of such O6-alkylating chemotherapy by the prior inactivation of MGMT. We have examined the effect of the modified guanine base, O6-(4-bromothenyl)guanine (PaTrin-2, Patrin™, Lomeguatrib) on MGMT activity and cell or xenograft tumour growth inhibition by temozolomide in the human breast carcinosarcoma cell line, MCF-7. PaTrin-2 effectively inactivated MGMT in MCF-7 cells (IC50 ∼6 nM) and in xenografts there was complete inactivation of MGMT within 2 h of dosing (20 mg kg−1 i.p.) and only slight recovery by 24 h. MGMT inactivation in a range of murine host tissues varied between complete and ∼60%, with extensive recovery by 24 h. PaTrin-2 (10 μ M) substantially increased the growth inhibitory effects of temozolomide in MCF-7 cells (D60=10 μ M with PaTrin-2 vs 400 μ M without). In MCF-7 xenografts, neither temozolomide (100 mg kg−1 day−1 for 5 days) nor PaTrin-2 (20 mg kg−1 day−1 for 5 days) had any significant effect on tumour growth. In contrast, the PaTrin-2–temozolomide combination produced a substantial tumour growth delay: median tumour quintupling time was increase by 22 days (P<0.005) without any significant increase in toxicity as assessed from animal weight. A PaTrin-2–temozolomide combination may therefore be beneficial in the treatment of human breast cancers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
Standard first-line chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer results in disease regression in the majority of patients, but these responses are rarely complete or sustained (Clemons et al, 1997). There is, therefore, a continuing need to develop new treatments and one potential strategy is the biochemical modulation of tumour drug resistance.
The chemotherapeutic methylating (e.g. dimethyltriazenoimidazole-4-carboxamide (DTIC)) and chloroethylating (e.g. bischloroethylnitrosourea (BCNU)) agents are well established in oncology and are a component of high-dose therapy regimens used in the treatment of breast cancer (Peters et al, 1994; Antman, 2001; Bengala et al, 2001). These agents are cytotoxic principally by virtue of their ability to alkylate DNA at the O6 position of guanine, and there is now considerable evidence that the DNA repair protein O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (MGMT) plays a key role in determining tumour resistance to these drugs (Margison and Santibáñez Koref, 2002; Gerson, 2002, 2004). MGMT repairs alkylation at the O6 position on guanine by accepting the alkyl group onto a cysteine residue in its active site in a stoichiometric and autoinactivating reaction. Cellular resistance in vitro and in vivo is correlated with elevated MGMT expression, and can be achieved in previously susceptible cell lines and organisms by transfer and expression of cDNAs or genes encoding MGMT. Furthermore, inactivation of MGMT, or gene deletion in mice, renders resistant cells and tissues sensitive to O6-alkylating agents (Pegg, 1990; Margison et al, 2002, 2003; Margison and Santibáñez Koref, 2002; Gerson, 2002, 2004).
Attempts to exploit this clinically have used methylating agents to deplete MGMT, via the formation of O6-methylguanine (O6-meG) in DNA, prior to the administration of a chloroethylating drug (e.g. Clemons et al, 2003). These have been hampered by the similar toxicities of the two agents, and no useful increase in therapeutic index has been demonstrated (Micetich et al, 1992; Lee et al, 1993; Smith et al, 1996; Hammond et al, 2004). Because of this, interest has turned to inactivation of MGMT using inherently nontoxic pseudosubstrates for the protein, such as O6-benzylguanine (O6-BeG; reviewed in Pegg et al, 1995; Dolan and Pegg, 1997) and O6-(4-bromothenyl)guanine (PaTrin-2, Lomeguatrib; McElhinney et al, 1998; Middleton et al, 2002; Middleton and Margison, 2003).
Temozolomide has recently been tested in breast cancer patients using a 5-day regimen and was found to be ineffective (NCIC, 2001). In order to establish if this resistance can be reversed in model systems, we have used the human breast adenocarcinoma cell line, MCF-7, that, like many of the breast tumours we have examined, expresses very high levels of MGMT. We show that PaTrin-2 inactivates MGMT in cells and xenografts and that this results in substantial increases in their sensitivity to growth inhibition by temozolomide.
Materials and methods
Drugs
PaTrin-2 and temozolomide were provided by the Cancer Research Campaign Drug Formulation Unit, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK. For cell culture studies, a stock solution of PaTrin-2 (20 mM) was prepared in dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO; Sigma, Poole, Dorset, UK) and diluted into culture medium just prior to use. For animal studies, PaTrin-2 was ground to a fine powder and suspended in corn oil at 4 mg ml−1 immediately prior to intra-peritoneal (i.p.) injection. Temozolomide was freshly prepared at 40 mg ml−1 in 20% DMSO/80% phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and diluted in 0.9% NaCl solution.
Cell culture studies
MCF-7 cells (a human breast adenocarcinoma cell line) were grown as a monolayer in RPMI medium containing 10% foetal bovine serum (Gibco BRL, Paisley, Scotland), at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2/95% air.
To determine MGMT inactivation, cells (5 × 106) were incubated in the presence of increasing concentrations of PaTrin-2 at 37°C, 5% CO2. After 2 h, cells were pelleted and resuspended in 10 ml PBS. This was repeated three times in order to remove any residual PaTrin-2. Finally, cells were pelleted and assayed for MGMT activity as previously described (Watson and Margison, 2000). Activity remaining, based on at least three points on the linear part of the protein-dependence curve, was calculated as a percentage of the activity in untreated cells.
To determine toxicity, the MTT [3′ (4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide] growth inhibition assay, based on the method of Carmichael et al (1987) was employed. Cells (1000 per well) were plated into a 96-well plate and following a 24 h attachment period, PaTrin-2 was added to the cells. After 2 h incubation with PaTrin-2 (10 μ M) at 37°C, 5% CO2, increasing doses of temozolomide or vehicle were added and the cells were incubated for a further 4–5 days. At the end of the exposure period, 150 μg MTT was added to each well and plates were incubated for 3 h at 37°C, 5% CO2. The media were removed and the formazan crystals formed in the viable cells were solubilised in 200 μl DMSO. The absorbances at 540 and 690 nm were determined using a Titertek Multiscan ELISA plate reader and growth inhibition calculated as a percentage of the A540–A690 of untreated wells.
Animal studies
Male nude mice (O/Nu: outbred ALPK Nu/Nu) were purchased from Zeneca (Macclesfield, UK). Animals were housed in a sterile environment and allowed free access to food and water. MCF-7 human breast tumour xenograft samples (1–2 mm3) were implanted in the right flank while the mice were under ethrane and halothane anaesthesia and the experiments begun when tumour volumes had reached a suitable size (see below). As MCF-7 tumours are oestrogen receptor positive, they required additional oestrogen for growth. To prepare oestrogen pellets, β-oestradiol (468 mg) was added to 9.7 g silastic and mixed. Curing agent (1.1 g) was added and the mixture spread into three (26 mm × 12 mm × 1 mm) glass formers. These were then incubated at 42°C overnight before being cut into 2 mm × 2 mm × 1 mm cubes (∼2 mg oestradiol per pellet). The pellets were stored at 4°C until insertion subcutaneously at the tail base, simultaneously with the tumour implant and monthly thereafter. Agents were injected i.p. within 15 min of preparation: Temozolomide was injected 1 h after PaTrin-2 or the vehicle control. Animals were cared for in accordance with Home Office guidelines
To measure MGMT depletion following PaTrin-2, six groups of mice with at least five mice in each group received PaTrin-2 20 mg kg−1 i.p. as a single dose. At varying times after dosing, animals were terminated by cervical dislocation, and the tissues (xenograft, kidneys, liver and lungs) dissected out and immediately frozen in dry ice. Bone marrow was collected from femora, which were dissected from each mouse. A minimum amount of bone was trimmed from each end and a 21-gauge needle inserted through the epiphyseal cartilage and the bone marrow flushed into an appropriate volume of PBS. Tissue was stored at −70°C until assayed for MGMT activity.
To assess the ability of PaTrin-2 to sensitise human breast tumour xenografts to the tumour growth inhibitory effects of temozolomide, groups of at least six nude mice were treated as follows: the vehicle control group were given corn oil then 20% DMSO in PBS; the temozolomide only group were given corn oil then temozolomide (100 mg kg−1 day−1); the PaTrin-2 only group were given PaTrin-2 (20 mg kg−1 day−1) then DMSO in PBS, and the PaTrin-2 plus temozolomide group were given PaTrin-2 (20 mg kg−1 day−1) then temozolomide (100 mg kg−1 day−1). Drugs or vehicles were administered i.p. once daily for 5 days with a separation of 1 h. Up to 10 and at least six animals were assigned to each group, and mean tumour volume was standardised across the groups at the start of the experiment: thus the control, PaTrin-2, temozolomide and PaTrin-2 plus temozolomide groups had mean tumour volumes of 29.8±7.6 (range 19.0–38.7), 33.2±14.7 (range 16.5–58.7), 35.1±10.9 (range 20.9–52.4) and 30.3±10.0 (range 20.7–44.5) mm3, respectively.
In all the tumour growth delay experiments, animal weights and tumour volumes were measured twice per week. Tumour volumes were calculated using the formula (length × height × width × Π/6) with measurements taken using digital calipers.
The relative tumour volumes were plotted for each animal and tumour quintupling times (tqt) determined. The statistical significance of differences between treatment groups was evaluated using the Mann–Whitney test. The maximum relative weight losses observed in each group were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test.
Results
Effect of PaTrin-2 on MGMT activity and temozolomide sensitivity in MCF-7 cells
MCF-7 cells expressed high levels of MGMT (∼1540 fmoles mg−1 total protein). Exposure to PaTrin-2 for 2 h resulted in extensive inactivation of MGMT in MCF-7 cells: the concentration required to inactivate 50% of the MGMT was around 6 nM (Figure 1).
The sensitivity of the MCF-7 cells to the growth inhibitory effects of temozolomide was substantially increased by PaTrin-2. Growth amounting to 60% of control was seen after 400 μ M temozolomide alone but following preincubation with 10 μ M PaTrin-2, 60% growth occurred at 10 μ M temozolomide (Figure 2), indicating a 40-fold increase in sensitivity. PaTrin-2 itself had no growth inhibitory effect.
Effect of PaTrin-2 on MGMT activity in host tissues and tumour
Extensive depletion of MGMT activity was seen in all host tissues measured after a single i.p. dose of 20 mg kg−1 PaTrin-2 (Figure 3). Depletion to below the limits of detection occurred in the kidney, while it was to ∼20, ∼35 and ∼40% of pretreatment values in liver, lung and bone marrow, respectively. The nadir was generally between 2 and 8 h and substantial activity (to over 50% of pretreatment levels) had returned by 24 h after dosing. In the MCF-7 xenografts, complete MGMT inactivation was seen between 2 and 8 h, and recovery of levels was only to ∼20% of pretreatment levels by 24 h after dosing. Slower recovery in the xenograft might reflect the relative strength of the human MGMT promoter or that the human protein is more extensively inactivated by PaTrin-2 or its putative metabolites.
Effect of PaTrin-2 and temozolomide on MCF-7 tumour growth
The median MCF-7 tqt in the vehicle control and PaTrin-2 only groups were ∼21 and ∼17 days, respectively. Neither temozolomide (tqt∼17 days) nor PaTrin-2 alone had any significant effect on xenograft growth. However, the combination of PaTrin-2 and temozolomide resulted in a median tumour quintupling time of ∼43 days representing an increase of ∼22 days (P<0.005; Figure 4, Table 1). Toxicity, as measured by weight loss, was essentially unaffected by the addition of PaTrin-2 to the temozolomide treatment regimen. At the end of the treatment period, weight loss was ∼5% in both the temozolomide alone and combination groups (Figure 5, Table 1).
Discussion
The O6-alkylating agent, temozolomide has been approved for the treatment of malignant glioma and is under consideration for use in melanoma, for which it is extensively prescribed, off license (e.g. Kiebert et al, 2003). It has also been tested in patients with metastatic breast cancer (NCIC, 2001) and prostate cancer (van Brussel et al, 2000) but inherent drug resistance has resulted in no clinical benefit. Several groups have measured MGMT expression in human breast tumours and report activity that is low (Cao et al, 1991), moderate (Chen et al, 1992) or high (Musarrat et al, 1995). High levels of MGMT expression in the primary tumour have been correlated with a poor prognosis in early breast cancer, irrespective of the treatment regimen (Citron et al, 1994). We have previously reported almost uniformly high levels of MGMT in breast tumours as determined by functional assay and immunohistochemical analysis (Clemons et al, 2002). It seems reasonable to suggest that resistance to temozolomde was mediated by these high levels of expression of MGMT.
While the O6-alkylating agents are currently not as widely used in the management of breast cancer as they are in glioma, malignant melanoma and lymphoma, the possibility of overcoming alkylating agent resistance would make these agents useful additions to the chemotherapeutic management of this much more common malignancy. Attempts to improve the effectiveness of O6-alkylating agents therapy by prior inactivation of MGMT using methylating agents have foundered owing to the similar, and hence cumulative, toxicities of the inactivating and treatment drugs (Lee et al, 1993; Smith et al, 1996; Clemons et al, 2002; Hammond et al, 2004).
Strategies have therefore focussed on the use of nontoxic MGMT inactivators and it has been shown that O6-BeG and PaTrin-2, which very effectively inactivate MGMT in cells and tumours, improve the therapeutic effect of alkylating agents in a number of tumour models (Dolan and Pegg, 1997; Wedge et al, 1997; Middleton et al, 2002). Phase I clinical trials of O6-BeG in combination with BCNU have shown increased myelosuppression, requiring reduced doses for phase II studies (Spiro et al, 1999; Schilsky et al, 2000; Friedman et al, 2000). Indeed, Chinnasamy et al (1997) found that O6-BeG pretreatment of mice significantly increased the in vivo cytotoxicity and clastogenic effects of BCNU in bone marrow. It has also been shown that the granulocyte–macrophage precursor cells of primary human bone marrow samples are dramatically sensitised to the toxic effects of temozolomide by pre-exposure to O6-BeG (Fairbairn et al, 1995; Clemons et al, 2000). So far, phase II clinical trials have yet to demonstrate that O6-BeG provides an increase in therapeutic index, that is, that the improvement in efficacy outweighs any additional toxicity (Quinn et al, 2002).
PaTrin-2 is a more potent MGMT inactivator in vitro than O6-BeG, and we considered it worthwhile to examine the extent to which PaTrin-2 could inactivate MGMT and increase sensitivity to temozolomide in a human breast tumour model as a prerequisite for any potential clinical trial in breast cancer. Our results show that PaTrin-2 is also a potent inactivator of MGMT in MCF-7 cells both in culture and in xenografts in vivo. Tumour MGMT depletion by PaTrin-2 was as extensive as was reported with O6-BeG in other tumour types (see Dolan and Pegg, 1997). We also showed that MGMT was inactivated in all host tissues with complete inactivation in kidney and extensive inactivation in other tissues. This collateral depletion again raises the concern about the potentiation of toxicity in healthy tissues following PaTrin-2/alkylating agent combinations.
The MGMT inactivation by PaTrin-2 in MCF-7 cells resulted in marked sensitisation to temozolomide growth inhibition. Following implantation into immune deficient mice, the resulting xenografts are completely resistant to growth inhibition by a 5-day treatment regimen using temozolomide alone. This was probably a result of the resistance conferred by high levels of expression of MGMT. PaTrin-2 alone had, as anticipated, no effect on tumour growth rates. However, PaTrin-2 overcame the resistance to temozolomide producing highly significant tumour growth delays, but without increasing toxicity as judged by animal weights. Thus, the therapeutic index of temozolomide is increased by PaTrin-2 in this animal model. We have previously shown that human melanoma xenografts expressing moderate levels of MGMT do respond to growth inhibition by temozolomide, but this is considerably enhanced by pretreatment with PaTrin-2 (Middleton et al, 2000, 2002). Current phase I studies are investigating the dose of PaTrin-2 that is necessary for complete inactivation of MGMT in patients with a variety of cancer types, prior to phase II studies.
Given the results of the xenograft studies with melanoma, and now breast cancer, it seems reasonable to speculate that the greatest benefit from PaTrin-2-mediated inactivation of MGMT might be seen in tumours with the highest levels of MGMT expression and inherent resistance to temozolomide. This might best be assessed in a phase II clinical trial in breast cancer, particularly since temozolomide alone has been shown to be ineffective in the MCIC trial. However, given the variable levels of expression of MGMT in this tumour type, it would be beneficial to assess MGMT levels in tumour biopsies from all patients in such a study so that the hypothesis that MGMT inactivation will be beneficial can be effectively tested.
Change history
16 November 2011
This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication
References
Antman KH (2001) Randomized trials of high dose chemotherapy for breast cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta 1471: 89–98
Bengala C, Pazzagli I, Innocenti F, Donati S, Favre C, Menconi MC, Greco F, Danesi R, Orlandini C, Guarneri V, Del Tacca M, Conte PF (2001) High-dose thiotepa and melphalan with hemopoietic progenitor support following induction therapy with epirubicin-paclitaxel-containing regimens in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Ann Oncol 12: 69–74
Cao E-H, Fan XJ, Yuan XH, Xin SM, Liu YY, Yu HT (1991) Levels of O6-methylguanine acceptor protein in extracts of human breast tumour tissues. Cancer Biochem Biophys 121: 53–58
Carmichael J, De Giagg WG, Gazdav AF, Mina JD, Mitchell JB (1987) Evaluation of a tetrazolium-based semiautomated colorimetric assay; assessment of chemosensitivity testing. Cancer Res 47: 936–942
Chen JM, Zhang YP, Wang C, Sun Y, Fujimoto J, Ikenega M (1992) O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase activity in human tumours. Carcinogenesis 13 (9): 1503–1507
Chinnasamy N, Rafferty JA, Hickson I, Ashby J, Tinwell H, Margison GP, Dexter TM, Fairbairn LJ (1997) O6-benzylguanine potentiates the in vivo toxicity and clastogenicity of temozolomide and BCNU in mouse bone marrow. Blood 89: 1566–1573
Citron M, Schoenhaus M, Rothenberg H, Kostroff K, Wasserman P, Kahn L, White A, Burns G, Held D, Yarosh D (1994) O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in normal and malignant-tissue of the breast. Cancer Invest 12: 605–610
Clemons MJ, Bibby MC, El Teraifi H, Forster G, Kelly J, Banerjee S, Cadman B, Ryder WD, Howell A, Margison GP (2002) Heterogeneity of O6-alkylguanine DNA-alkyltransferase expression in human breast tumours. Br J Cancer 86: 1797–1802
Clemons MJ, Leahy MG, Valle J, Jayson G, Ranson M, Hayes S, Howell A (1997) Review of recent trials for advanced breast cancer. Part I: Studies excluding taxanes. Eur J Cancer 33: 2171–2182
Clemons M, Ranson M, Margison JM, El Teraifi H, Griffiths A, Kelly J, Morris CQ, Howell A, Margison GP (2003) Pharmacokinetic, biochemical and clinical effects of dimethyltriazenoimidazole-4-carboxamide-bischloroethylnitrosourea combination therapy in patients with advanced breast cancer. Int J Cancer 103: 686–692
Clemons M, Watson A, Howell A, Chang J, Heyworth C, Lord B, Testa N, Dexter TM, Margison G (2000) Macrophage inflammatory protein 1alpha attenuates the toxic effects of temozolomide in human bone marrow granulocyte–macrophage colony-forming cells. Clin Cancer Res 6: 966–970
Dolan ME, Pegg AE (1997) O6-Benzylguanine and its role in chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 16: 837–847
Fairbairn L, Watson AJ, Rafferty J, Elder RH, Margison GP (1995) O6-benzylguanine increases the sensitivity of human primary bone marrow cells to the cytotoxic effects of temozolomide. Exp Haematol 23: 112–116
Friedman HS, Pluda J, Quinn JA, Ewesuedo RB, Long L, Friedman AH, Cokgor I, Colvin OM, Haglund MM, Ashley DM, Rich JN, Sampson J, Pegg AE, Moschel RC, McLendon RE, Provenzale JM, Stewart ES, Tourt-Uhlig S, Garcia-Turner AM, Herndon II JE, Bigner DD, Dolan ME (2000) Phase I trial of carmustine plus O6-benzylguanine for patients with recurrent or progressive malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 18: 3522–3528
Gerson SL (2002) Clinical relevance of MGMT in the treatment of cancer. J Clin Oncol 20: 2388–2399
Gerson SL (2004) MGMT: its role in cancer aetiology and cancer therapeutics. Nat Rev Cancer 4: 296–307
Hammond LA, Eckardt JR, Kuhn JG, Gerson SL, Johnson T, Smith L, Drengler RL, Campbell E, Weiss GR, Von Hoff DD, Rowinsky EK (2004) A randomized phase I and pharmacological trial of sequences of 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea and temozolomide in patients with advanced solid neoplasms. Clin Cancer Res 10: 1645–1656
Kiebert GM, Jonas DL, Middleton MR (2003) Health-related quality of life in patients with advanced metastatic melanoma: results of a randomized phase III study comparing temozolomide with dacarbazine. Cancer Invest 21: 821–829
Lee S-M, Thatcher N, Dougal M, Margison GP (1993) Dosage and cycle effects of dacarbazine (DTIC) and fotemustine on O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Br J Cancer 67: 216–221
Margison GP, Povey AC, Kaina B, Santibáñez-Koref MF (2003) Variability and regulation of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase. Carcinogenesis 24: 625–635
Margison GP, Santibáñez-Koref MF (2002) O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase: role in carcinogenesis and chemotherapy. Bioessays 24: 255–266
Margison GP, Santibáñez-Koref MF, Povey AC (2002) Mechanisms of carcinogenicity/chemotherapy by O6-methylguanine. Mutagenesis 17: 483–487
McElhinney RS, Donnelly DJ, McCormick JE, Kelly J, Watson AJ, Rafferty JA, Elder RH, Middleton MR, Willington MA, McMurry TB, Margison GP (1998) Inactivation of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase. 1. Novel O6-(hetarylmethyl)guanines having basic rings in the side chain. J Med Chem 41 (26): 5265–5271
Micetich KC, Futscher B, Koch D, Fisher RI, Erickson LC (1992) Phase I study of streptozocin- and carmustine-sequenced administration in patients with advanced cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 84: 256–260
Middleton MR, Kelly J, Thatcher N, Donnelly DJ, McElhinney RS, McMurry TB, McCormick JE, Margison GP (2000) O(6)-(4-bromothenyl)guanine improves the therapeutic index of temozolomide against A375M melanoma xenografts. Int J Cancer 85 (2): 248–252
Middleton MR, Margison GP (2003) Improvement of chemotherapy efficacy by inactivation of a DNA-repair pathway. Lancet Oncol 4: 37–44
Middleton MR, Thatcher N, McMurry TB, McElhinney RS, Donnelly DJ, Margison GP (2002) Effect of O6-(4-bromothenyl)guanine on different temozolomide schedules in a human melanoma xenograft model. Int J Cancer 100 (5): 615–617
Musarrat J, Wilson JA, Abou-Issa H, Wani AA (1995) O6-alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase activity levels in normal, benign and malignant human female breast. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 208: 688–696
National Cancer Institute of Canada (2001) Phase II study of temozolomide given in a 7 days on, 7 days off oral schedule to patients with advanced breast cancer. http://www.ctg.queensu.ca/public/Clinical_Trials/ind_trial_summ.htm #breast
Pegg AE (1990) Mammalian O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase: regulation and Importance in response to alkylating carcinogenic and therapeutic agents. Cancer Res 50: 6119–6129
Pegg AE, Dolan ME, Moschel RC (1995) Structure, function and inhibition of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 51: 167–223
Peters WP, Ross M, Vredenburgh JJ, Hussein A, Rubin P, Dukelow K, Cavanaugh C, Beauvais R, Kasprzak S (1994) The use of intensive clinic support to permit outpatient autologous bone marrow transplantation for breast cancer. Semin Oncol 21 (4 Suppl 7): 25–31
Quinn JA, Pluda J, Dolan ME, Delaney S, Kaplan R, Rich JN, Friedman AH, Reardon DA, Sampson JH, Colvin OM, Haglund MM, Pegg AE, Moschel RC, McLendon RE, Provenzale JM, Gururangan S, Tourt-Uhlig S, Herndon II JE, Bigner DD, Friedman HS (2002) Phase II trial of carmustine plus O(6)-benzylguanine for patients with nitrosourea-resistant recurrent or progressive malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 20: 2277–2283
Schilsky RL, Dolan ME, Bertucci D, Ewesuedo RB, Vogelzang NJ, Mani S, Wilson LR, Ratain MJ (2000) Phase I clinical and pharmacological study of O6-benzylguanine followed by carmustine in patients with advanced cancer. Clin Cancer Res 6: 3025–3031
Smith DC, Gerson SL, Liu L, Donnelly S, Day R, Trump DL, Kirkwood JM (1996) Carmustine and streptozocin in refractory melanoma: an attempt at modulation of O6-alkylguanine-DNA-alkyltransferase. Clin Cancer Res 2: 1129–1134
Spiro TP, Gerson SL, Liu L, Majka S, Haaga J, Hoppel CL, Ingalls ST, Pluda JM, Willson JK (1999) O6-benzylguanine: a clinical trial establishing the biochemical modulatory dose in tumor tissue for alkyltransferase-directed DNA repair. Cancer Res 59: 2402–2410
van Brussel JP, Busstra MB, Lang MS, Catsburg T, Schroder FH, Mickisch GH (2000) A phase II study of temozolomide in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 45: 509–512
Watson AJ, Margison GP (2000) O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase assay. Methods Mol Biol 152: 49–61
Wedge SR, Porteous JK, Newlands ES (1997) Effect of single and multiple administration of an O6-benzylguanine/temozolomide combination: an evaluation in a human melanoma xenograft model. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 40: 266–272
Acknowledgements
MC was supported by a Leukemia Research Clinical Fellowship. We thank Cancer Research-UK for support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Clemons, M., Kelly, J., Watson, A. et al. O6-(4-bromothenyl)guanine reverses temozolomide resistance in human breast tumour MCF-7 cells and xenografts. Br J Cancer 93, 1152–1156 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602833
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602833
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Investigating a signature of temozolomide resistance in GBM cell lines using metabolomics
Journal of Neuro-Oncology (2015)
-
Chemotherapeutic resistance in anaplastic astrocytoma cell lines treated with a temozolomide–lomeguatrib combination
Molecular Biology Reports (2014)
-
O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase as a promising target for the treatment of temozolomide-resistant gliomas
Cell Death & Disease (2013)
-
Effect of lomeguatrib–temozolomide combination on MGMT promoter methylation and expression in primary glioblastoma tumor cells
Tumor Biology (2013)
-
NF-κB is activated in response to temozolomide in an AKT-dependent manner and confers protection against the growth suppressive effect of the drug
Journal of Translational Medicine (2012)