Abstract
There is some evidence that birth weight is associated with breast cancer. Whether this association differs between premenopausal and postmenopausal ages is still unclear. The results from this study suggest that higher birth weight is a risk factor for postmenopausal breast cancer (OR 1.06, CI 1.00–1.12, per 100 g), independent of selected early-life and adult factors.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
High birth weight is a risk factor for breast cancer in some, but not all studies (reviewed by Potischman and Troisi, 1999; Okasha et al, 2003). Possible mechanisms for an association between larger size at birth and breast cancer include in utero exposure to high levels of oestrogens and growth hormones (Trichopoulos, 1990, 2003). The positive associations reported to date have been weak to modest and seem more apparent in premenopausal than in postmenopausal women (Potischman and Troisi, 1999; De Stavola et al, 2000; McCormack et al, 2003; Mellemkjaer et al, 2003). Findings from two recent studies suggest that the positive association between birth weight and breast cancer risk is present irrespective of age at diagnosis (Ahlgren et al, 2003; Kaijser et al, 2003).
The present study examines recorded birth weight in relation to breast cancer risk in Swedish women with postmenopausal breast cancer, controlling for other perinatal factors including socioeconomic status (SES) of origin and adulthood, as well as adult body mass index (BMI) measured prior to diagnosis.
Material and methods
This case–control study was nested within the Malmö Diet and Cancer (MDC) cohort study using available birth record data from 131 incident breast cancer cases diagnosed between 1991 and 2001 and 345 age-matched controls. The MDC-study, a collaborative centre of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) (Riboli et al, 2002), comprises 17 035 female participants residing in Malmö, the third largest city in Sweden (Berglund et al, 1993).
The present analysis is restricted to breast cancer incidence in the period from study enrolment (1991–1996) until December 2001 among 5313 women born in Malmö between 1924 and 1950. We further restricted the analysis to 89 singleton female cases aged ⩾55 years at breast cancer diagnosis and age-matched controls without history of breast cancer (n=238), due to low statistical power for the analysis in women aged <55 years. Subjects' hospital delivery records were located in the city archive of Malmö using the civil registration number of the mother, which was available through record linkage to the subject. Cases were matched with controls by age (years) at entry of the MDC-study. We aimed at identifying three controls per case. Due to limited resources, and exclusion of twin births, some cases were matched 1 : 1 (n=11) or 1 : 2 (n=7). The breast cancer cases were identified by active follow-up and by record-linkage with regional and national cancer registries using individual civil registration numbers assigned to all residents in Sweden.
We abstracted birth characteristics as well as maternal information from the available birth records. Gestational age was estimated by using information on last menstrual period and delivery date. Unclassified gestational hypertension and/or proteinuria (Davey and MacGillivray, 1988) was used as proxy for pre-eclampsia, and is referred to as maternal hypertension/proteinuria in this study. Information on parental occupation, a marker of SES at origin, and adult characteristics, specifically BMI and educational level, were obtained from the database of the baseline examination (1991–1996). SES was classified according to the Nordic Occupation Classification System (Statistics Sweden, 1985). The MDC-study and the nested study were both approved by the Ethics Committee at Lund University, Sweden.
We used conditional logistic regression to examine the effect of birth weight on breast cancer risk, adjusting for other perinatal and later-life factors: gestational age (weeks), maternal hypertension/proteinuria (no/yes), birth year, parental occupation (low to high), BMI (kg m−2), educational level (low to high). Birth year was included in all analyses to adjust for cohort effects. Birth weight was modelled both as a categorical (<3000 g reference, 3000–3499 g, 3500–3999 g, ⩾4000 g, or <3000 g reference, ⩾3000 g) and continuous variable.
Results
On average, breast cancer cases had a 93.5 g higher birth weight than controls (Table 1). There were fewer cases with birth weights under 3000 g (15.7%) than controls (22.3%). Most subjects (93%) had been born after 37 completed weeks of gestation irrespective of case status. Mean gestational age in cases and controls were virtually identical. Maternal hypertension/proteinuria tended to be higher in controls than in cases. Neither mean maternal age nor birth order differed between cases and controls (not shown). The 89 cases had a mean age at diagnosis of 63.0 years (range 55–76).
Increased birth weight was significantly associated with elevated risk of postmenopausal breast cancer (Table 2). The risk increased by 6% per 100 g birth weight increase (OR 1.06, 1.00–1.12) adjusted for perinatal factors. Women who weighed over 4000 g at birth had a greater than two-fold excess risk (OR 2.59, CI 0.95–7.12) compared to controls (<3000 g) (model 1). Both gestational age and maternal hypertension/proteinuria were inversely, though not significantly, associated with breast cancer risk, being reduced by 44% (OR=0.56, CI 0.27–1.14). Neither the inclusion of parental occupation (model 2) nor the adjustment for adult risk factors, that is, BMI and educational level (model 3), attenuated the OR for continuous birth weight. Using percentage body fat as adult body measure instead of BMI did not appreciably attenuate the risk estimate for birth weight (data not shown). Similarly, multivariate adjustment for other breast cancer risk factors that were not included in model 3, such as age at menarche, parity, age at first birth, use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT), and usual alcohol consumption, attenuated the risk estimate by only 5%.
Birth weight, adjusted for gestational age, was positively correlated with adult BMI (partial r=0.07, P=0.18), which was itself not a significant risk factor for breast cancer in this study. Other indicators of birth size, such as birth length, ponderal index (g cm−3), and head circumference were positively, but not significantly, associated with postmenopausal breast cancer (data not shown).
Discussion
In this nested case–control study, increasing birth weight was associated with increased risk of postmenopausal breast cancer diagnosed at age 55 years or older, significantly so when birth weight was examined as continuous variable (6% risk increase per 100 g), and persisted after adjustment for other perinatal and adult factors.
Our finding in postmenopausal women may be contrasted with previous studies on premenopausal women. Case–control (Michels et al, 1996; Sanderson et al, 1996; Innes et al, 2000; Mellemkjaer et al, 2003) and prospective studies (De Stavola et al, 2000; McCormack et al, 2003) have generally yielded positive associations between high birth weight and early-onset breast cancer. However, birth weight was not found to be related to premenopausal breast cancer risk in Chinese women, considered a low-risk population (Sanderson et al, 2002). Moreover, Kaijser et al (2003) investigating a Swedish cohort of prematurely born women, found a positive association between birth weight and adult breast cancer risk independent of age at onset.
Of the five studies of birth weight and postmenopausal breast cancer (⩾50 years), only one, conducted in Denmark, indicated a significant positive trend in rates of breast cancer with birth weight (9% per 1000 g) (Ahlgren et al, 2003). A weak J-shaped pattern was noted in US women aged 50–79 years with the highest risk in the birth weight category >4500 g (OR 1.18, CI 0.92–1.51, vs reference group) (Titus-Ernstoff et al, 2002). In the other three studies, nonsignificant positive (Michels et al, 1996) and inverse (Sanderson et al, 1996; McCormack et al, 2003) trends were observed.
Strengths of our study were the availability of data on recorded birth weight as well as gestational age, an important determinant of foetal growth. Therefore data were not subject to recall bias or residual confounding due to lack of adjustment for gestational duration. Only one other study had information on both recorded birth weight and gestational age (McCormack et al, 2003).
Other perinatal factors that correlate with oestrogen level during pregnancy, particularly twinning, pre-eclampsia, maternal age, and birth order are considered early life risk factors for cancer (Ekbom, 1998; Potischman and Troisi, 1999; Okasha et al, 2003). Twin births were excluded from our study. Maternal hypertension/proteinuria was inversely associated with breast cancer, which appears to be in line with earlier Swedish reports indicating that pre-eclampsia reduced breast cancer risk in female offspring (Ekbom et al, 1992, 1997). Maternal age and birth order were not associated with breast cancer in this study (data not shown), and were omitted from the analysis since these factors did not significantly improve the tested models.
Data on birth outcome may be confounded by socioeconomic factors (Joseph and Kramer, 1996). However, in our study, adjustment for parental occupation did not affect the relation between birth weight and cancer risk, corroborating other reports using father's occupation as marker of early life SES (De Stavola et al, 2000; Vatten et al, 2002). In the few studies taking account of adult risk factors, including adult body measures, risk estimates of birth weight were not appreciably altered (Michels et al, 1996; De Stavola et al, 2000). Similarly, adjustment in our study for adult relative weight (BMI) did not change the magnitude of the effect of birth weight on breast cancer.
Despite lack of statistical significance in some of the modelling, there is a strong suggestion of an increase in breast cancer risk with higher birth weight in this population of Swedish postmenopausal women, independent of adult body size. This finding lends support to the importance of prenatal factors in the aetiology of breast cancer.
Change history
16 November 2011
This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication
References
Ahlgren M, Sorensen T, Wohlfahrt J, Haflidadottir A, Holst C, Melbye M (2003) Birth weight and risk of breast cancer in a cohort of 106 504 women. Int J Cancer 107: 997–1000
Berglund G, Elmstahl S, Janzon L, Larsson SA (1993) The Malmo Diet and Cancer Study. Design and feasibility. J Intern Med 233: 45–51
Davey DA, MacGillivray I (1988) The classification and definition of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 158: 892–898
De Stavola BL, Hardy R, Kuh D, Silva IS, Wadsworth M, Swerdlow AJ (2000) Birthweight, childhood growth and risk of breast cancer in a British cohort. Br J Cancer 83: 964–968
Ekbom A (1998) Growing evidence that several human cancers may originate in utero. Semin Cancer Biol 8: 237–244
Ekbom A, Hsieh CC, Lipworth L, Adami HQ, Trichopoulos D (1997) Intrauterine environment and breast cancer risk in women: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 89: 71–76
Ekbom A, Trichopoulos D, Adami HO, Hsieh CC, Lan SJ (1992) Evidence of prenatal influences on breast cancer risk. Lancet 340: 1015–1018
Innes K, Byers T, Schymura M (2000) Birth characteristics and subsequent risk for breast cancer in very young women. Am J Epidemiol 152: 1121–1128
Joseph KS, Kramer MS (1996) Review of the evidence on fetal and early childhood antecedents of adult chronic disease. Epidemiol Rev 18: 158–174
Kaijser M, Akre O, Cnattingius S, Ekbom A (2003) Preterm birth, birth weight, and subsequent risk of female breast cancer. Br J Cancer 89: 1664–1666
McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I, De Stavola BL, Mohsen R, Leon DA, Lithell HO (2003) Fetal growth and subsequent risk of breast cancer: results from long term follow up of Swedish cohort. BMJ 326: 248
Mellemkjaer L, Olsen ML, Sorensen HT, Thulstrup AM, Olsen J, Olsen JH (2003) Birth weight and risk of early-onset breast cancer (Denmark). Cancer Causes Control 14: 61–64
Michels KB, Trichopoulos D, Robins JM, Rosner BA, Manson JE, Hunter DJ, Colditz GA, Hankinson SE, Speizer FE, Willett WC (1996) Birthweight as a risk factor for breast cancer. Lancet 348: 1542–1546
Okasha M, McCarron P, Gunnell D, Smith GD (2003) Exposures in childhood, adolescence and early adulthood and breast cancer risk: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat 78: 223–276
Potischman N, Troisi R (1999) In-utero and early life exposures in relation to risk of breast cancer. Cancer Causes Control 10: 561–573
Riboli E, Hunt KJ, Slimani N, Ferrari P, Norat T, Fahey M, Charrondiere UR, Hemon B, Casagrande C, Vignat J, Overvad K, Tjonneland A, Clavel-Chapelon F, Thiebaut A, Wahrendorf J, Boeing H, Trichopoulos D, Trichopoulou A, Vineis P, Palli D, Bueno-De-Mesquita HB, Peeters PH, Lund E, Engeset D, Gonzalez CA, Barricarte A, Berglund G, Hallmans G, Day NE, Key TJ, Kaaks R, Saracci R (2002) European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC): study populations and data collection. Public Health Nutr 5: 1113–1124
Sanderson M, Shu XO, Jin F, Dai Q, Ruan Z, Gao YT, Zheng W (2002) Weight at birth and adolescence and premenopausal breast cancer risk in a low-risk population. Br J Cancer 86: 84–88
Sanderson M, Williams MA, Malone KE, Stanford JL, Emanuel I, White E, Daling JR (1996) Perinatal factors and risk of breast cancer. Epidemiology 7: 34–37
Statistics Sweden (1985) Occupations in Population and Housing Census 1985. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden
Titus-Ernstoff L, Egan KM, Newcomb PA, Ding J, Trentham-Dietz A, Greenberg ER, Baron JA, Trichopoulos D, Willett WC (2002) Early life factors in relation to breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11: 207–210
Trichopoulos D (1990) Hypothesis: does breast cancer originate in utero? Lancet 335: 939–940
Trichopoulos D (2003) Intrauterine environment, mammary gland mass and breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res 5: 42–44
Vatten LJ, Maehle BO, Lund Nilsen TI, Tretli S, Hsieh CC, Trichopoulos D, Stuver SO (2002) Birth weight as a predictor of breast cancer: a case–control study in Norway. Br J Cancer 86: 89–91
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the Swedish Cancer Society (2684-B93-05XAA) and the Swedish Medical Research Council (B93-39X-09534-03C).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Lahmann, P., Gullberg, B., Olsson, H. et al. Birth weight is associated with postmenopausal breast cancer risk in Swedish women. Br J Cancer 91, 1666–1668 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602203
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602203
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Can birth weight predict offspring’s lung function in adult age? Evidence from two Swedish birth cohorts
Respiratory Research (2022)
-
Early life factors in relation to albuminuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate based on cystatin C and creatinine in adults from a Swedish population-based cohort study
Journal of Nephrology (2022)
-
Pedican: an online gene resource for pediatric cancers with literature evidence
Scientific Reports (2015)
-
Intrauterine environments and breast cancer risk: meta-analysis and systematic review
Breast Cancer Research (2008)
-
Birth weight and breast cancer risk
British Journal of Cancer (2006)