The idiosyncratic formats required by individual journals make submitting a manuscript a major time sink (see Q. Guo Nature 540, 525; 2016). This is invariably amplified by another wave of amendments after acceptance. Authors are becoming, in effect, desktop publishers.
In the 'good old days', one placed a manuscript in an envelope, found a postage stamp somewhere in the desk drawer and located a post box. If the paper was accepted, a few queries from the subeditor would need attention, and a perfectly decent product would emerge. Journal staff took responsibility for the full production process.
At a time when other pressures on researchers are inexorably increasing, I suggest that journals should take back the formatting baton. This seems more than justified in view of the burgeoning publication charges many of them impose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Contributions For submission details, see http://go.nature.com/cmchno .
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moore, J. Journals, do your own formatting. Nature 542, 31 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/542031e
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/542031e
This article is cited by
-
Saving time and money in biomedical publishing: the case for free-format submissions with minimal requirements
BMC Medicine (2023)
-
One submission to all journals
Nature (2017)
-
Reformatting wastes public funds
Nature (2017)