Universities and government research institutes could perhaps learn from the private sector when it comes to curbing research misconduct (Nature 481, 237–238; 2012).
Research entities should undergo independent audits of scientific data annually by certified public scientists, in much the same way as businesses and not-for-profit organizations are independently audited by certified financial accountants (J. L. Glick Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 265, 178–192; 1976). Data audits are common for corporate biotechnology laboratories, but not for academic ones.
I estimated that the costs of funding questionable research practices (such as data misrepresentation and fabrication of results) could be reduced by US$5–10 for each dollar spent on data audits (Account. Res. 2, 153–168; 1992). Besides being a cost-effective way of monitoring the integrity of research organizations, data auditing helps to reveal genuine errors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glick, J. Data audits could curb misconduct. Nature 482, 308 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/482308e
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/482308e
This article is cited by
-
Prior Publication and Redundancy in Contemporary Science: Are Authors and Editors at the Crossroads?
Science and Engineering Ethics (2015)