Your News Feature on South African science (Nature 463, 726–728; 2010) suggests that without financial support from abroad, research endeavours would all but collapse. But there are positive developments.
For example, instead of the poorly funded young researcher you describe, you could have selected at least three others from the same field, cohort, gender and institution who are comparatively well funded by the National Research Foundation (NRF).
It is also worth pointing out that the Department of Science and Technology, through the NRF, is supporting seven centres of excellence, amounting to a total of hundreds of millions of rands over their lifetimes. Five of these (three directly and two indirectly) are concerned with biodiversity research — identified as one of the country's major strengths.
Most of my research is funded by national sources and, acknowledging the confounding impact of career progression, has grown exponentially since 1994. More research opportunities have been created as spending on research and development increased by nearly 50% over this period to 2007. The global financial crisis notwithstanding, 'big science' aspirations should stay on South Africa's agenda.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
See also South Africa: telescopes raise the nation's sights.
See also South Africa: aiming to be premier global astronomy hub.
Contributions to Correspondence may be submitted to correspondence@nature.com . Please see the Guide to Authors at http://go.nature.com/cMCHno . Science publishing issues that may be of interest to authors are regularly featured at our blog Nautilus ( http://blogs.nature.com/nautilus ), where we welcome comments and debate.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chown, S. South Africa: big science should stay on the agenda. Nature 464, 30 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/464030c
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/464030c