In the first of two opposing commentaries, Steven Rose argues that studies investigating possible links between race, gender and intelligence do no good. In the second, Stephen Ceci and Wendy M. Williams argue that such research is both morally defensible and important for the pursuit of truth.
Access options
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
220,50 €
only 4,32 € per issue
All prices include VAT for France.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
from$8.99
All prices are NET prices.
Author information
Affiliations
Steven Rose is a neuroscientist and emeritus professor at the Open University, UK. S.P.R.Rose@open.ac.uk
- Steven Rose
Authors
Search for Steven Rose in:
Rights and permissions
To obtain permission to re-use content from this article visit RightsLink.
About this article
See Editorial, page 763, and online at http://www.nature.com/darwin. Discuss this commentary package on Nature Networks.
Further reading
-
1.
Human Biological and Psychological Diversity
Evolutionary Psychological Science (2017)
-
2.
Hardwired for Sexism? Approaches to Sex/Gender in Neuroscience
Neuroethics (2012)
-
3.
Surgical Endoscopy (2011)
-
4.
Research into group differences isn't wrong, just pointless
Nature (2009)
-
5.
Editors’ Overview: Forbidding Science?
Science and Engineering Ethics (2009)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.