Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

Prostate cancer screening at an equal access tertiary care center: its impact 10 years after the introduction of PSA

Abstract

Introduction and Objectives: Dwight D. Eisenhower Army Medical Center has been involved in Prostate Cancer Awareness Week (PCAW) screening during the period 1995–2000. The purpose of this study is to review the results of screening in a self-selected population of military beneficiaries at our institution.

Materials and Methods: Screening involving a brief urologic history, digital rectal examination (DRE) and serum prostatic specific antigen (PSA) measurement was offered to our screening population. Patients with an elevated PSA (>4.0 ng/ml) and/or a suspicious DRE were considered for transrectal ultrasonography with prostate needle biopsy (TRUS/PNB). Patient health records were reviewed retrospectively and analyzed to determine patient demographic characteristics, PSA distribution, DRE results and cancer detection rates.

Results: A total of 455 screening visits were performed from 1995 to 2000, of which 426 visits were included for analysis. Mean age of the study population was 57.4 y (40–83). Seventy-one percent of the patients reported prior PSA screening visits. Forty-four patients met indications for biopsy. A total of 30 TRUS/PNB were performed demonstrating presence of cancer in three patients for an overall cancer detection rate of 0.7%.

Conclusions: Our study shows that the overall prostate cancer detection rate at our institution is lower than detection rates previously reported in the literature. Potential reasons for this finding may include that the subjects participating in PCAW screening tended to be younger than in other series and that a majority of them had already undergone prior screening. These findings suggest the need to modify prostate cancer screening recommendations and to improve prostate cancer screening efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Greenlee RT, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo P. . Cancer statistics, 2000. Cancer J Clin 2000 50: 7–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Keetch DW, Andriole GL. . Prostate cancer screening: what are physicians to do? What have we learned? Monographs in Urology 1996 17: 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Presti JC, Schröeder FH, Albert PS, Lynch J. . Early diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer. 10th International Prostate Cancer Update. Rev Urol 2000 2: 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Etzioni R et al. Cancer surveillance series: interpreting trends in prostate cancer--part III: quantifying the link between population prostate-specific antigen testing and recent declines in prostate cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999 91: 1033–1039.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schröder FH, Bangma CH. . The European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer. Br J Urol 1997 79: Suppl 1 68–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Babaian RJ et al. The relationship of prostate specific antigen to digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography. Cancer 1992 69: 1195–1200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bretton PR. . Prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination in screening for prostate cancer. Southern Med J 1994 87: 720–723.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Catalona WJ et al. Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer. J Urol 1994 151: 1283–1290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rietbergen JB et al. The changing pattern of prostate cancer at the time of diagnosis. J Urol 1999 161: 1192–1198.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brawer MK et al. Screening for prostatic carcinoma with prostate specific antigen. J Urol 1992 147: 841–845.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Eskew LA, Bare RL, McCullough DL. . Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 1997 157: 199–202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Oesterling JE et al. Serum prostate specific antigen in a community-based population of healthy men. Establishment of age-specific reference ranges. JAMA 1993 270: 860–865.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Meigs JB et al. High rates of prostate specific antigen testing in men with evidence of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Am J Med 1998 104: 517–525.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Carter HB et al. Recommended prostate specific antigen testing intervals for the detection of curable prostate cancer. JAMA 1997 277: 1456–1460.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gann PH. . Interpreting recent trends in prostate cancer incidence and mortality. Epidemiology 1997 8: 117–120.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Thompson IM, Optenberg SA. . An overview cost-utility analysis of prostate cancer screening. Oncology (Huntingt) 1995 9: Suppl 11 141–145.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pearson JD et al. When is PSA testing no longer necessary? J Urol 1998 159: 178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D W Soderdahl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soderdahl, D., Hernandez, J. Prostate cancer screening at an equal access tertiary care center: its impact 10 years after the introduction of PSA. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 5, 32–35 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500555

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500555

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links