Abstract
Development of multiple embryos from a single zygote, the phenomenon called monozygotic polyembryony, is a widespread reproductive strategy found in higher plants and especially in gymnosperms. The enigma of plant monozygotic polyembryony is that only one embryo in a polyembryonic seed usually survives while the others are eliminated at an early stage. Here we report that programmed cell death (PCD) is the major mechanism responsible for elimination of subordinate embryos in a polyembryonic seed. Using post-fertilized pine (Pinus sylvestris) ovules, we show that once the dominant embryo is selected and, subsequently, the entire female gametophyte is affected by PCD, the cells of subordinate embryos initiate an autolytic self-destruction program. The progression of embryonic PCD follows a rigid basal-apical pattern, first killing the most basally situated cells, adjacent to the suspensor, and then proceeding towards the apical region until all cells in the embryonal mass are doomed. Our data demonstrate that during polyembryony, PCD serves to halt competition among monozygotic embryos in order to ensure survival of one embryo.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
During evolution of multicellular eukaryotes, certain approaches to clonal propagation have been developed. Some species have embryogenesis programs involving physical splitting of cells, after the first few mitotic divisions, into separate embryos. Other species show self-cloning at the level of post-embryonic, but pre-adult, individual (larva). In both cases of monozygotic polyembryony, offspring are derived from the same zygote and therefore are genetically identical to each other, but distinct from their parent(s). In animals, obligate monozygotic polyembryony has been documented on at least 18 occasions within bryozoans, hydrozoans, parasitoid wasps, flatworms and armadillos.1 Furthermore, accidental or ‘sporadic’ polyembryony in a form of monozygotic twinning occurs at a very low frequency in humans and some other mammals.2 In plants, monozygotic polyembryony is a more widespread reproductive strategy,3 being especially common among gymnosperms where at least 20 genera have evolved so called ‘cleavage polyembryony’.4 One embryo in a polyembryonic seed usually develops to maturity and gives rise to a viable plant while all the other embryos are eliminated at early developmental stages.4,5,6,7 The mechanism responsible for eliminating plant embryos is unknown.
The developing pine seed represents a good model system for studying plant embryo elimination, because multiple pine embryos which arise from the same zygote through obligate cleavage polyembryony4,5,7 coexist in the same environment (in a corrosion cavity within the female gametophyte4), and develop in close proximity to each other during early and late embryogeny. Here we show that programmed cell death (PCD) is the major mechanism responsible for elimination of all but one embryo in a polyembryonic pine seed.
Results and Discussion
Programmed cell death eliminates subordinate embryos
A hallmark feature of pine embryogeny is that a single, zygote-derived early embryo (Figure 1; 1 week after fertilization (waf)) cleaves to form multiple (in the range from four to several dozen) embryos of equal size (Figure 1; 2 waf). One embryo becomes dominant (Figure 1; 3 and 4 waf) while the subordinate embryos are eliminated (Figure 1; 6 and 11 waf). The entire period of post-fertilized pine ovule development can be divided into three phases, in terms of embryo competition. During the first, brief phase, all the embryos in an ovule have similar growth rates and thus have an equal opportunity for dominance (Figure 1; 2 waf). The onset of the second, longer phase, coincides with one embryo ‘gaining a victory’ in the competition and becoming dominant (Figure 1; 3 waf). The growth of remaining, subordinate embryos, is progressively reduced (Figure 1; 4 waf) until it stops completely when the dominant embryo has reached the cotyledonary stage (Figure 1; 6 waf). During the third phase, subordinate embryos are progressively eliminated, while the mature dominant embryo enters the dormancy period (Figure 1; from 6 waf onward).
To determine the kinetics of the elimination of subordinate embryos, we scored the number of polyembryonic ovules at different times after fertilization. We defined a 3-week period (between 8 and 11 waf) during which about 80% of the ovules were completely cleared of subordinate embryos, thus becoming monoembryonic. The clearance of remaining polyembryonic ovules (about 20%, most of which tended to contain subordinate embryos of greater size) was slow and asynchronous, sometimes being delayed until seed germination (data not shown, see also refs5,8).
Is elimination of subordinate pine embryos another example of developmental PCD?9,10,11,12 We analyzed nuclear DNA integrity in embryos at different times during ovule development using terminal deoxynucleotydil transferase (TdT)-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL). A highly ordered pattern of DNA fragmentation was detected in subordinate embryos (Figure 2) but not in the dominant embryo (data not shown). The embryo suspensor was the only embryonic structure undergoing DNA fragmentation during embryo competition, as no TUNEL positive cells were found in embryonal masses at 2 and 4 waf (Figure 2). Once the dominant embryo had reached the cotyledonary stage at 6 waf (Figure 1), a small subset of the most basally situated cells within the embryonal mass of subordinate embryos displayed DNA fragmentation (Figure 2; 6 waf). This seemed to determine the major ‘course’ of nuclear degradation, as it progressively spread towards the apical region of the subordinate embryos until all the cells of the embryonal masses were doomed (Figure 2; 8 and 10 waf). Such a regular pattern of DNA fragmentation was invariably followed by all the subordinate embryos analyzed, indicating its programmed nature. Rapid accumulation of subordinate embryos with fragmented DNA was clearly followed by a drop in the frequency of polyembryonic ovules (Figure 3).
Since the presence of nuclear DNA fragmentation did not explain the way subordinate embryos are eliminated from the ovules, we analyzed the ultrastructure of dying cells in the embryonal masses. These cells displayed cooperative autolytic and autophagic mechanisms of protoplast degradation (Figure 4). The cytoplasm and organelles were gradually engulfed and lysed by a high number of growing vacuoles (Figure 4A,B). This slow phase of cell degradation was followed by a brief culminate phase triggered by vacuole collapse and leading to complete protoplast removal (Figure 4C). This pathway of cell dismantling is known to be activated in those plant developmental deaths, including embryo suspensor death,13 which require substantial or complete processing of cell corpses.12,14 Thus it is not altogether surprising that most pine ovules do not contain subordinate embryos at late stages.
Dying cells of female gametophyte are not subjected to rapid destruction
Our data do not currently allow us to determine the signal triggering cell death in subordinate embryos in a pine seed. We, however, speculate that this signal might be given by the female gametophyte (haploid maternal tissue which has similar functions as the endosperm in angiosperm seeds4,15) as a response to depletion of a pool of growth factors which becomes too low to support complete development of all embryos in a seed.15,16,17,18 If so, the viability of the female gametophyte would cease prior to cell death in subordinate embryos. Noteworthy, PCD in a gymnosperm female gametophyte has not previously been identified, whereas angiosperm endosperm has been shown to initiate suicide program either before or during seed germination.19,20
Indeed, we did find a highly organized pattern of progression of nuclear DNA fragmentation (one of the well-known hallmarks of endosperm PCD19) throughout the female gametophyte (Figure 5A). At the time when the dominant embryo has been selected and started active growth, all the cells in the female gametophyte seem to be viable (Figure 5A; 3 waf, upper row), except for a narrow, unicellular layer that lines the corrosion cavity (Figure 5A; 3 waf, second row). These cells are thought to function in embryo nutrition.21 Thereafter the cone-shaped zone in front of the dominant embryo began to degenerate making room for the actively growing embryo (Figure 5A; 4 waf). The entire female gametophyte was affected by DNA fragmentation shortly before the first signs of PCD in the embryonal masses of subordinate embryos (Figure 5A; 5 waf). Like in the case of a well-described PCD pathway of maize endosperm,19 it requires approximately 2 weeks to program all the cells within a pine female gametophyte to die. Unlike full-blown cell corpses of subordinate embryos, the dying cells of the female gametophyte are not subjected to rapid destruction but rather persist as depositories of carbon (in lipid bodies22) and nitrogen (in protein storage vacuoles23) that will be used by the embryo upon germination (Figure 5B).
Cooperation of two distinct cell death programs in polyembryonic seed
Our results provide the first evidence that PCD plays a central role in the regulation of embryo number in polyembryonic seeds (Figure 6). Like animal apoptosis, which acts as a part of quality-control mechanism by compensating for genetic or stochastic developmental errors11 as well as by controlling cell numbers under limiting amounts of survival signals,9 embryonic cell death in the pine seed ablates surplus embryos and so adjusts embryo number to the net amounts of growth factors supplied by the female gametophyte, thus providing a free avenue for one embryo to develop into a plant. The pathway ‘all but one embryo die’ described in the present study does not, however, seem to be an absolute rule for development of polyembryonic pine seeds. Certain conditions, including growth in arctic regions5,7 and the presence of massive female gametophyte,8 can allow complete development of more than one embryo in a single pine seed, indicating a high level of plasticity in the activation of embryo autodestruct mechanism.
Being in its infancy, PCD research in plants has however already demonstrated that different cell types can recruit different down-stream death execution programs resulting in different magnitudes of cell corpse autoprocessing.12,14,24 As shown in this study, developing pine seed coordinates two death programs that are initiated in tandem in two different structures displaying two contrasting pathways of cell dismantling. One program, affecting the female gametophyte, is likely triggered by a cue given by rapidly growing embryos (Figure 6, stage II), and its developmental roles are to make room for the dominant embryo (Figure 6, stage III) and to prepare functional cell corpses to store nutrients (Figure 6, stage IV) necessary to support germination and seedling growth. This program is followed by a second cell death program that acts to ablate surplus embryos in a seed through complete autolytic destruction of cell protoplasts (Figure 6, stages V–VII). Orchestrated action of these two death programs creates a viable seed containing both a single well-developed living embryo and nutrient reserves packed within preserved cell corpses in the female gametophyte (Figure 6, stage VIII). This work provides the first experimental system to study molecular mechanisms of natural embryonic cell death in plants.
Materials and Methods
The donor of plant material was a 30-year-old Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) tree growing at a local dendrarium (Uppsala, Sweden, latitude 59°31′, longitude 17°31′). The ovules were collected for analyses during the period June–December on two successive years (2000, 2001). Fertilization time was determined through day-by-day microscopy inspection of 50 ovules at a time. Considering a small variation in fertilization dynamics between different ovules, ‘the weeks after fertilization (waf)’ were counted from the day when half of the ovules were fertilized (June 13, 2000 and June 21, 2001). The counts for the frequencies of polyembryonic ovules, as well as TUNEL analysis of embryos and female gametophytes were made during two successive years, first on a weekly basis, from 1 t/o 11 waf, and then additionally at 19 and 27 waf during seed dormancy. For TUNEL, whole mounts of monozygotic embryos and serial sections of female gametophytes were prepared from at least 20 polyembryonic ovules at each sampling time. All the procedures for fixation, embedding and TUNEL were previously described,13 the only difference being that TMR red (red fluorescence) in situ cell death detection kit (Boehringer Mannheim) was used in the present study. Transmission electron microscopy was carried out essentially as described,13 with at least 10 samples of subordinate embryos or female gametophytes analysed at distinct developmental stages, between 5 and 10 waf.
Abbreviations
- DAPI:
-
4′-6-diamino-2-phenylindole
- PCD:
-
programmed cell death
- TUNEL:
-
terminal deoxynucleotydil transferase (TdT)-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling
- waf:
-
weeks after fertilization
References
Craig SF, Slobodkin LB, Wray GA, Biermann CH . 1997 The ‘paradox’ of polyembryony: A review of the cases and a hypothesis for its evolution Evol. Ecol. 11: 127–143
Gleeson SK, Clark AB, Dugatkin LE . 1994 Monozygotic twinning: An evolutionary hypothesis Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 11363–11367
Tisserat B, Esau EB, Murashige T . 1979 Somatic embryogenesis in angiosperms Hortic. Rev. 1: 1–78
Singh H . 1978 Embryology of Gymnosperms Berlin: Borntrager
Dogra PD . 1967 Seed sterility and disturbances in embryogeny in conifers with particular reference to seed testing and tree breeding in Pinaceae Stud. For. Suec. 45: 1–96
Bawa KS, Hedge SG, Ganeshaiah KN, Uma Shaanker R . 1989 Embryo and seed abortion in plants Nature 342: 625
Krutovskii KV, Politov DV . 1995 Allozyme evidence for polyzygotic polyembryony in Siberian stone pine (Pinus sibirica Du Tour) Theor. Appl. Genet. 90: 811–818
Bozhkov PV, Ahn IS, Park YG . 1997 Two alternative pathways of somatic embryo origin from polyembryonic mature stored seeds of Pinus koraiensis Sieb et Zucc Can. J. Bot. 75: 509–512
Raff MC . 1992 Social controls on cell survival and cell death Nature 356: 397–400
Conlon I, Raff M . 1999 Size control in animal development Cell 96: 235–244
Meier P, Finch A, Evan G . 2000 Apoptosis in development Nature 407: 796–801
Beers EP, McDowell JM . 2001 Regulation and execution of programmed cell death in response to pathogens, stress and developmental cues Cur. Opin. Plant Biol. 4: 561–567
Filonova LH, Bozhkov PV, Brukhin VB, Daniel G, Zhivotovsky B, von Arnold S . 2000 Two waves of programmed cell death occur during formation and development of somatic embryos in the gymnosperm, Norway spruce J Cell Sci. 113: 4399–4411
Jones AM . 2001 Programmed cell death in development and defense Plant Physiol. 125: 94–97
Lopes MA, Larkins BA . 1993 Endosperm origin, development and function Plant Cell 5: 1383–1399
Kapik RH, Dinus RJ, Dean JFD . 1995 Abscisic acid and zygotic embryogenesis in Pinus taeda Tree Physiol. 15: 485–490
Hong SK, Kitano H, Satoh H, Nagato Y . 1996 How is embryo size genetically regulated in rice? Development 122: 2051–2058
Chaudhury AM, Koltunow A, Payne T, Luo M, Tucker MR, Dennis ES, Peacock WJ . 2001 Control of early seed development Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 17: 677–699
Young TE, Gallie DR . 2000 Programmed cell death during endosperm development Plant Mol. Biol. 44: 283–301
Schmid M, Simpson D, Gietl C . 1999 Programmed cell death in castor bean endosperm is associated with the accumulation and release of a cysteine endopeptidase from ricinosomes Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 14159–14164
Olsen O-A . 2001 Endosperm development: Cellularization and cell fate specification Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 52: 233–267
Feussner I, Wasternack C, Kindl H, Kuhn H . 1995 Lipoxygenase-catalysed oxygenation of storage lipids is implicated in lipid mobilization during germination Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 11849–11853
Jiang LW, Phillips TE, Hamm CA, Drozdowicz YM, Rea PA, Maeshima M, Rogers SW, Rogers JC . 2001 The protein storage vacuole: a unique compound organelle J. Cell Biol. 155: 991–1002
Jones A . 2000 Does the plant mitochondrion integrate cellular stress and regulate programmed cell death? Trends Plant Sci. 5: 225–230
Acknowledgements
We thank I Ekberg and L Grönroos for useful comments. This work was supported by The Troedssons Fund.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Edited by M Piacentini
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Filonova, L., von Arnold, S., Daniel, G. et al. Programmed cell death eliminates all but one embryo in a polyembryonic plant seed. Cell Death Differ 9, 1057–1062 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4401068
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4401068
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Insights into the molecular evolution of fertilization mechanism in land plants
Plant Reproduction (2021)
-
Updating embryonic ontogenesis in Araucaria angustifolia: from Burlingame (1915) to the present
Protoplasma (2020)
-
Advances and constraints in somatic embryogenesis of Araucaria angustifolia, Acca sellowiana, and Bactris gasipaes
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) (2020)
-
Rapid genotype “independent” Zea mays L. (maize) transformation via direct somatic embryogenesis
In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant (2018)
-
Identification of molecular processes that differ among Scots pine somatic embryogenic cell lines leading to the development of normal or abnormal cotyledonary embryos
Tree Genetics & Genomes (2018)