Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Comparative genomics

Two worms are better than one

The genome of the microscopic worm Caenorhabditis briggsae has been sequenced, and shows some remarkable differences from the genome of the better known — and physically similar — C. elegans.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Rapid genome change and physical conservation in nematodes.

References

  1. Wood, W. B. (ed.) The Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans (Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press, New York, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. The C. elegans Genome Sequencing Consortium Science 282, 2012–2018 (1998).

  3. Stein, L. D. et al. PLoS Biol. 1, 166–192 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. http://www.wormbase.org

  5. Mounsey, A., Bauer, P. & Hope, I. A. Genome Res. 12, 770–775 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Celniker, S. E. et al. Genome Biol. 3, research0079.1–0079.14 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium Nature 409, 860–921 (2001).

  8. Venter, J. C. et al. Science 291, 1304–1351 (2001).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium Nature 420, 520–562 (2002).

  10. Holt, R. A. et al. Science 298, 129–149 (2002).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kamath, R. S. et al. Nature 421, 231–237 (2003).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Guiliano, D. B. et al. Genome Biol. 3, research0057.1–0057.14 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Blaxter, M. L. Int. J. Parasitol. 30, 347–355 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. http://wormlab.caltech.edu/briggsae/index.html

  15. http://www.tigr.org/tdb/e2k1/bma1

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blaxter, M. Two worms are better than one. Nature 426, 395–396 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/426395a

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/426395a

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing