Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Quantum oscillations between two weakly coupled reservoirs of superfluid 3He

Abstract

Arguments first proposed over thirty years ago, based on fundamental quantum-mechanical principles, led to the prediction1,2,3 that if macroscopic quantum systems are weakly coupled together, particle currents should oscillate between the two systems. The conditions for these quantum oscillations to occur are that the two systems must both have a well defined quantum phase, φ, and a different average energy per particle, μ: the term ‘weakly coupled’ means that the wavefunctions describing the systems must overlap slightly. The frequency of the resulting oscillations is then given by f = (μ2− μ1)/h, where h is Planck's constant. To date, the only observed example of this phenomenon is the oscillation of electric current between two superconductors coupled by a Josephson tunnelling weak link4. Here we report the observation of oscillating mass currents between two reservoirs of superfluid 3He, the weak link being provided by an array of submicrometre apertures in a membrane separating the reservoirs. An applied pressure difference creates mass-current oscillations, which are detected as sound in a nearby microphone. The sound frequency (typically 6,000–200 Hz) is precisely proportional to the applied pressure difference, in accordance with the above equation. Thesesuperfluid quantum oscillations were first detected while monitoring an amplified microphone signal with the human ear.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: a, Scanning electron micrograph of a small area of the array of apertures in a silicon nitride (SiN) membrane whose thickness is 50.
Figure 2: A graph of the frequency of the quantum oscillation detected at the top membrane as a function of ΔP, the pressure differen.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Josephson, B. D. Possible new effects in superconductive tunneling. Thesis, Cambridge Univ.((1962)).

  2. Anderson, P. W. in Lectures on the Many-Body Problem (ed. Caianello, E. R.) 113–135 (Academic, New York, (1964)).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Feynman, R. P. The Feynman Lectures on Physics Sect. 21-9 (Addison Wesley, New York, (1965)).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Josephson, B. D. Possible new effects in superconductive tunnelling. Phys. Lett. 1, 251–253 (1962).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Reif, F. Fundamentals of Statistical and Thermal Physics Sect. 8-7 (McGraw-Hill, New York, (1965)).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tilley, D. R. & Tilley, J. Superfluidity and Superconductivity (Hilger, New York, (1990)).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vollhardt, D. & Woolfle, P. The Superfluid Phases of Helium-3 Sect. 7-2 (Taylor & Francis, New York, (1990)).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Tilley, D. R. & Tilley, J. Superfluidity and Superconductivity Sect. 7-6 (Hilger, New York, (1990)).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pereverzev, S. V. Toward the Josephson effect in superfluid helium: how to make 20 nm holes in a 10 nm thick membrane. J. Low Temp. Phys. 101, 573–579 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Amar, A., Sasaki, Y., Lozes, R. L., Davis, J. C. & Packard, R. E. Fabrication of submicron apertures in thin membranes of silicon nitride. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 11, 259–262 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Paik, H. J. Superconducting tunable-diaphragm transducer for sensitive acceleration measurements J. Appl. Phys. 47, 1168–1178 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Avenel, O. & Varoquaux, E. in Proc. 10th Int. Cryogenic Eng. Conf. (eds Klipping, G. & Klipping, I.) 587–589 (Butterworths, Guildford, (1986)).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Monien, H. & Tewordt, L. Theory of Josephson flow oscillations in superfluid 3He-B. J. Low Temp. Phys. 62, 277–300 (1986).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hook, J. R. Current-phase relation for flow of an s-wave paired superfluid through a cylindrical channel of finite length. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 26, 159–160 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kurkijärvi, J. Josephson current through a short and narrow orifice in a p-wave superfluid. Phys. Rev. B 38, 11184–11187 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Thuneberg, E. V. Two dimensional simulation of the Josephson Effect in superfluid 3He. Europhys. Lett. 7, 441–446 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ullah, S. & Fetter, A. L. Superfluid 3He-B in a weak link. Phys. Rev. B 39, 4186–4190 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Thuneberg, E. V., Kurkijärvi, J. & Sauls, J. A. Quasiclassical theory of the Josephson effect in superfluid 3He. Physica B 165&166, 755–756 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Avenel, O. & Varoquaux, E. Josephson effect and quantum phase slippage in superfluids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 416–419 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Varoquaux, E., Avenel, O., Ihas, G. & Salmelin, R. Phase slippage in superfluid 3He-B. Physica B 178, 309–316 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Steinhauer, J. The current-pressure relation for a superfluid 3He weak link. Thesis, Univ. California, Berkeley((1995)).

  22. Mukharsky, Yu. M., Loshak, A., Schwab, K., Davis, J. C. & Packard, R. E. Study of an array of superfluid 3He weak links. Czech. J. Phys. 46, 115–116 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Shapiro, S. Josephson currents in superconducting tunnelling; the effect of microwaves and other observations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 80–82 (1963).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Packard, R. E. & Vitale, S. Principles of superfluid-helium gyroscopes. Phys. Rev. B 46, 3540–3549 (1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

In early stages of this work we were helped by J. Steinhauer, K. Schwab, Yu. M. Murkarsky and I. Schuster. E. W. Hudson made important contributions to the data acquisition system. Figure 1b was made by R. Orr. The aperture array was constructed at the Berkeley Microfabrication Laboratory. This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation, the Office of Naval Research, and the Packard Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Author notes

  1. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to R.E.P.

    Authors

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to R. E. Packard.

    Supplementary information

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary material for the article (WAV 712 kb)

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Cite this article

    Pereverzev, S., Loshak, A., Backhaus, S. et al. Quantum oscillations between two weakly coupled reservoirs of superfluid 3He. Nature 388, 449–451 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/41277

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Issue Date:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/41277

    This article is cited by

    Comments

    By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

    Search

    Quick links

    Nature Briefing

    Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

    Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing