Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Research
  • Published:

Validity of the Arabic version of the sexual health inventory for men among Egyptians

Abstract

The objective of this study is to assess the validity of Arabic version of the abridged International Index of Erectile Function among a sample from the Egyptian populace. Two groups were included in this study. Group A included 68 patients complaining of erectile dysfunction (ED) >1 y, who failed oral treatment and accepted intracavernous self-injection. All patients of group A were previously clinically diagnosed as having ED. Group B included 68 men not complaining of ED and not suffering from any major chronic or acute illness. The mean (s.d.) age of all 136 patients was 52±5.7 y. Candidates of both groups were requested to complete the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to assess the internal consistency of the SHIM. The items of maintenance ability, erection confidence, maintenance frequency, erection firmness and intercourse satisfaction showed an overall ICC of 0.92. Internal consistency for the whole scale was 0.91. In conclusion, the Arabic version of the SHIM administered to 136 Egyptian men proved to be reliable and valid. It also showed a high degree of specificity and sensitivity among the Egyptian population.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rosen RC et al. The international Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). A multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 1997; 49: 822–830.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Gendrano N . The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): A state-of-the-science review. Int J Impot Res 2002; 14: 226–244.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosen RC et al. Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 1999; 11: 319–326.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cappelleri JC et al. Relationship between patient self-assessment of erectile function and the Sexual Health Inventory for Men. Clin Ther 2001; 23: 1707–1719.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brislin RW . Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J Cross-Cultural Psychol 1970; 1: 185–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cronbach LJ . Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of test. Psychometrika 1951; 16: 297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Deyo RA, Dichr P, Patrick DL . Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation. Control Clin Trials 1991; 12(Suppl 1): 142S–158S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Quek KF et al. Reliability and validity of the Malay version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15) in the Malaysian population. Int J Impot Res 2002; 14: 310–315.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wiltink J et al. Validation of the German version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) in patients with erectile dysfunction, Peyronie's disease and controls. Int J Impot Res 2003; 15: 192–197.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R Shamloul.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shamloul, R., Ghanem, H. & Abou-zeid, A. Validity of the Arabic version of the sexual health inventory for men among Egyptians. Int J Impot Res 16, 452–455 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901248

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901248

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links