Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Effect of mechanical interactions on the scaling of fracture length and aperture

Abstract

The aperture (or opening) of a fracture indicates the energy available for fracture growth and controls fracture permeability. The relationship between aperture and fracture length can therefore be used to infer the factors affecting fracture formation at different length scales and is of practical importance to hydrogeologists and petroleum engineers. A recent study1 of the scaling properties of tensile fractures in the Krafla fissure swarm, Iceland, revealed a distinct break in slope in the aperture–length scaling relationship, corresponding to fractures a few metres in length: this break in slope was interpreted qualitatively as indicative of non-universal, scale-dependent growth mechanisms1. Here we show, using quantitative fracture simulations, that the observed non-universal scaling of fracture apertures can be reproduced without recourse to multiple growth mechanisms. We argue that the break in slope is instead intrinsic to the fracturing process and represents the maximum length scale at which the apertures of smaller fractures are affected by stress perturbations induced by larger fractures.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hatton, C. G., Main, I. G. & Meredith, P. G. Non-universal scaling of fracture length and opening displacement. Nature 367, 160–162 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pollard, D. D. & Aydin, A. Progress in understanding jointing over the past century. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 100, 1181–1204 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bürgmann, R., Pollard, D. D. & Martel, S. J. Slip distributions on faults: effects of stress gradients, inelastic deformation, heterogenous host-rock stiffness and fault interaction. J. Struct. Geol. 14, 1133–1148 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Delaney, P. T. & Pollard, D. D. Deformation of host rocks and flow of magma during growth of minette dikes and breccia-bearing intrusions near Ship Rock, New Mexico. US Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 1350 (1981).

  5. Thomas, A. L. & Pollard, D. D. The geometry of echelon fractures in rock: Implications from laboratory and numerical experiments. J. Struct. Geol. 15, 323–334 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Renshaw, C. E. & Pollard, D. D. Numerical simulation of fracture set formation: a fracture mechanics model consistent with experimental observations. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 9359–9372 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pollard, D. D. & Segall, P. in Fracture Mechanics of Rock (ed. Atkinson, B. K.) 277–349 (Academic, San Diego, California, 1987).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Vermilye, J. M. & Scholz, C. H. Relation between vein length and aperture. J. Struct. Geol. 17, 423–434 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kachanov, M. Elastic solids with many cracks: A simple method of analysis. Int. J. Solids Structures 23, 23–43 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Broek, D. Elementary Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1–516 (Martinus Nijhoff, Boston, 1986).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Main, I. Prediction of failure times in the Earth for a time-varying stress. Geophys. J. 92, 455–464 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Atkinson, B. K. & Meredith, P. G. in Fracture Mechanics of Rock (ed. Atkinson, B. K.) 111–166 (Academic, New York, 1987).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Main, I. G., Sammonds, P. R. & Meredith, P. G. Application of a modified Griffith criterion to the evolution of fractal damage during compressional rock failure. Geophys. J. Int. 115, 367–380 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Liakopoulou-Morris, F., Main, I. G. & Crawford, B. R. Microseismic properties of homogenous sandstone during fault nucleation and frictional sliding. Geophys. J. Int. 119, 219–230 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Renshaw, C. E. Influence of sub-critical fracture growth on the connectivity of fracture networks. Wat. Resour. Res. 32, 1519–1530 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu, H. & Pollard, D. D. An experimental study of the relationship between joint spacing and layer thickness. J. Struct. Geol. 17, 887–905 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Opheim, J. A. & Gudmundsson, A. Formation and geometry of fractures, and related volcanism, of the Krafla fissure swarm, northeast Iceland. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 101, 1608–1622 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T. & Flannery, B. P. Numerical Recipes in C, The Art of Scientific Computing 1–994 (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1992).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Renshaw, C., Park, J. Effect of mechanical interactions on the scaling of fracture length and aperture. Nature 386, 482–484 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/386482a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/386482a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing