Main

Ki67 is a labile, nonhistone nuclear protein that is tightly linked to the cell cycle. It is expressed in proliferating cells during mid G1 phase, increasing in level through S and G2, and peaking in the M phase of the cell cycle.1 It is rapidly catabolized at the end of the M phase, and is undetectable in resting (G0 and early G1) cells.2 Ki67 expression shows a good relationship with growth fraction in several model systems,3, 4 and does not appear to be expressed during DNA repair processes. Hence, it is regarded as a marker of cell proliferation, and in invasive breast cancer, has been used to stratify patients into good and poor prognostic categories.2 It has also been reported to correlate with clinical response to chemotherapy.5, 6

The appropriate cutoff values that distinguish between high and low proliferative activity in a clinically relevant manner using Ki67 immunohistochemistry in breast cancer, however, has not been universally established.7, 8 The relationship of Ki67 protein expression with gene expression profiles is also not fully investigated. In this study, we evaluate Ki67 immunohistochemical protein detection in a series of invasive breast cancers using the MIB-1 antibody that recognizes Ki67 in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue,4 and compare the findings against expression profiles using high-density oligonucleotide microarrays.

Materials and methods

Patients and Tumors

Breast tissues were obtained from the National Cancer Centre (NCC) Tissue Repository, with approvals from both the NCC Tissue Repository and Ethics committees. There was informed patient consent. The breast specimens were macroscopically assessed immediately after surgery, and a portion of tumor was flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen. The tissues were then fixed in 10% buffered formalin and subjected to routine pathological examination. Tumor size, histological subtype and grade,9 lymph node stage and lymphovascular invasion were documented. Histological grading was based on a composite score derived from assessment of three parameters: mitotic activity, nuclear pleomorphism and the extent of tubule formation.9, 10 A mitotic count of 0–4, 5–9, ≥10 mitoses per 10 high power fields (hpfs) gave mitotic scores of 1, 2 and 3, respectively, calibrated from the diameter of the microscope high-power field.9 An aggregate score of 3–5 was regarded as grade 1, 6–7 as grade 2, and 8–9 as grade 3. Lymph node stage was defined as 1 for node-negative disease, stage 2 for up to three axillary nodes involved by metastases, and stage 3 for 4 or more positive nodes.11

Immunohistochemistry

Sections of 4 μm thickness were cut from representative paraffin blocks containing invasive cancer, and immunohistochemistry for Ki67 (clone MIB-1, DAKO M7240, dilution 1:70) was carried out, with antigen retrieval using pressure cooking in 0.01 M citrate buffer at pH 6.0, and detection via DAKOCytomation envision/HRP kit K5007. Only distinct nuclear staining of invasive carcinoma cells was used for scoring via the light microscope, which was determined semiquantitatively as nil (no immunostaining), low (10% or less immunopositivity) or high (>10% immunoreactive cells) respectively.12 Assessment was carried out on the entire tumor represented in the section.

Immunohistochemistry for estrogen receptor (ER, Clone 6F11, Ventana 760-2596, prediluted), progesterone receptor (PR, Clone 1A6, Ventana 760-2547, prediluted) and cerbB2 (NeoMarker MS730-P, Clone e2-4001+3B5, 1:700 dilution) was also determined. For ER and PR, antigen retrieval was accomplished by pressure cooking in a microwave oven (using milestone T/T Mega) at 120°C for 4 min in citrate buffer at pH 6; while that for cerbB2 involved microwaving for 20 min in citrate buffer at pH 6. The proportion and intensity (0, 1+, 2+ and 3+) of immunostaining was evaluated. For ER and PR, ≥10% nuclear staining of at least 2+ intensity was required for a positive result.13 CerbB2 immunostaining was classified following the criteria recommended by the DAKO protocol.14

Appropriate positive and negative controls were run with each batch; benign breast epithelium within the sections served as internal positive controls for ER and PR.

Microarray Hybridization

RNA was extracted from frozen tumor tissue using TRIzol, and processed according to the manufacturer's instructions (Affymetrix). The extracted RNA was first passed through a Qiagen polymerase chain reaction (PCR) purification spin column, and the quality checked by OD258/280, which was >1.8.

Affymetrix chips were processed according to standard procedures. Raw chip scans were quality controlled using Genedata Refiner, and analyzed using Genedata Expressionist. With these Affymetrix U133A GeneChips, expression profiles for the tumors were generated and correlated with the Ki67 status as determined on immunohistochemistry.

Quality Controls and Normalization of Expression

After generating expression profiles of these tumors, the overall profile of each tumor was checked against one another to confirm that the range of expression values for each sample was comparable. These profiles were then internally normalized so that the median expression value of each profile was 750.

Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase (RT)-PCR

Appropriate primers were selected using the primer design software PRIMER3. The primer sequence for bcl2 was: forward primer: 5′-TCATGAAATATGCA TCTCACTGG-3′, reverse primer: 5′-AAATGCAATC CACTGTCACTCTT-3′. BLASTing of primers was carried out to confirm uniqueness. Reverse transcription using commercially available reverse transcriptase (Gibco-BRL) was carried out with 2 μg total RNA, 2 μl random hexamer (50 ng/μl), 1 μl oligo-dT15 (0.5 μg/μl), and topped up with DEPC H2O to 10 μl. The mixture was then heated to 70°C for 10 min, with subsequent cooling to room temperature. Optimization of PCR was carried out using different concentrations of MgCl2 and primers. PCR was performed using a Light Cycler (Roche) in a total reaction mixture containing Lightcycler-FastStart DNA Master SYBR Green I. After denaturation at 95°C for 10 min, 45 cycles were carried out at 95°C for 10 s, 58°C for 5 s, and 72°C for 8 s. A no template control was included in each run and 18 s rRNA control from genomic DNA isolated from human placenta was used for normalization of target genes. To verify the specificity of the amplification reaction, melting curve analysis was performed. Relative quantification was calculated using the comparative threshold (CT) method where ΔCT equals the difference between the CT values of the target gene and 18 s RNA. The CT value is taken as the fractional cycle number at which the emitted fluorescence of the sample passes a fixed threshold above the baseline. A series of samples corresponding to high and nil Ki67 immunostaining were selected for the real-time PCR assay.

Computational Analysis with STRING Database

The STRING database15 was used to predict if there were any functional associations of differentially regulated genes with Ki67 protein and gene expression. This database uses three predicting algorithms that are based on: (a) discovering gene fusion events;16, 17 (b) similar species coverage for functionally associated genes18 and (c) identification of genes that are close neighbors in a genome.19 STRING implements a scoring-framework based on benchmarks of the different types of associations. The database contains 444 238 genes in 110 species as of May 2004.

Statistical Analysis

The results were analyzed using the statistical software SPSS for Windows, version 11. The association of Ki-67 immunohistochemical detection with clinicopathologic parameters was studied using the χ2 test and frequency distributions were carried out using descriptive statistics. (Analysis of variance) ANOVA was used to define genes that were differentially regulated between the groups.

Results

The clinicopathologic parameters and Ki67 immunohistochemical results of the breast tumors are detailed in Table 1. All the women were of Chinese ethnicity except for one Malay (case 12). Their ages ranged from 40 to 79 years (mean and median 56 years). Mean and median tumor sizes were 38.5 and 40 mm, respectively. The tumor subtype was infiltrative ductal carcinoma in all but one (case 17), which was an invasive lobular carcinoma. Ki67 immunostaining scores revealed a mean of 22% and a median of 10% (Figure 1).

Table 1 Clinicopathologic parameters of 21 women with invasive breast cancer
Figure 1
figure 1

(a) High Ki67 immunostaining in case 8, showing nuclear positivity of the invasive breast carcinoma cells (hematoxylin counterstain; original magnification × 310). (b) Negative control by omission of primary antibody (hematoxylin counterstain; original magnification × 310).

Correlation of Ki67 Immunostaining with Clinicopathologic Parameters

There was a statistically significant association of Ki67 immunohistochemical staining with mitotic score (P=0.001), histologic grade (P=0.02) and ER status (P=0.002). No correlation was found with age, tumor size, lymphovascular invasion, axillary nodal status, PR or cerbB2 status. As the patients were predominantly of Chinese ethnicity and tumors of infiltrative ductal subtype, statistical correlations were not pursued for these two variables.

Correlation of Gene Expression to Ki67 Immunohistochemistry

The Ki67 gene was identified in the tumor profiles and compared against the three categories of Ki67 protein expression as detected by immunohistochemistry: nil, low and high proliferative activity, respectively. These expression profiles are depicted in Figure 2. There was a correlation between Ki67 gene and protein expression. The Ki67 gene was most highly expressed in case 8, which demonstrated the highest percentage of Ki67 positive cells (90%) on immunohistochemistry. Among cases classified as showing high proliferative activity (>10% Ki67 immunostained cells), we observed a decrease in Ki67 gene expression as the percentage of Ki67 immunopositive cells diminished (P<0.05). This trend, however, was less evident in tumors immunohistochemically classified as disclosing low proliferative activity, while three cases without detectable Ki67 immunopositivity did not express the Ki67 gene.

Figure 2
figure 2

Expression profiles of the Ki67 gene in 21 cases of invasive breast cancer.

To identify genes that were correlated to Ki67 protein expression, we defined two groups of tumors, one consisting of tumors containing ≥40% Ki67 positive cells (cases 1, 2, 3, 4, 8) and another group comprising tumors in which Ki67 immunohistochemistry was negative (cases 17, 18, 20). Based on the range of Ki67 protein expression values attained in the series, an arbitrary cutoff of 40% immunostained cells was used in order to include approximately half of the tumors categorized into the high proliferative activity group for identification of correlated genes.

ANOVA was utilized to define genes which were differentially regulated between these two groups at a confidence level of P<0.001 and which exhibited a mean-fold change of 2 between the groups.

A total of 28 genes were identified, of which five were upregulated in tumors demonstrating ≥40% Ki67 immunopositivity, while the remaining 23 genes were downregulated. These genes are listed in Table 2. Among the downregulated genes, many were related to cell death (bcl2, MAP2K4, TNFSF10).

Table 2 Genes differentially expressed in tumors showing high Ki67 immunohistochemical protein detection

Verification of bcl2 Messenger RNA Downregulation by Real-Time PCR

This was used to confirm one of the downregulated genes, bcl2 (Figures 3 and 4), with the real-time data correlating very well with the Affymetrix results. Table 3 shows the relative quantification of bcl2 and 18S rRNA on three cases classified as high proliferative activity, and two cases without Ki67 immunostaining, respectively.

Figure 3
figure 3

Gel photograph depicting PCR products of placenta genomic DNA with 18S and bcl2 primers, respectively.

Figure 4
figure 4

Graphical illustration of real-time PCR and affymetrix data for the bcl2 gene.

Table 3 Relative quantification of bcl2 and 18S RNA on three cases with high proliferative activity (Ki67 immunopositivity ≥10%) and two cases without Ki67 immunopositivity

Functional Associations of bcl2 in Tumors with Upregulation of the Ki67 Gene by Computational Analysis

Using computational analysis for the three cell-death-associated downregulated genes, those genes predicted to have functional associations with bcl2 in highly proliferative tumors are shown in Table 4, with scores derived from ‘text mining’. STRING did not find evidence of interaction from either ‘neighborhood’, ‘fusion’ or ‘occurrence’ methods. No significant functional predictions were found for MAP2K4 and TNFSF10.

Table 4 Genes functionally associated with bcl2 oncogene as predicted by STRING database

Discussion

Routine assessment of cell proliferation is recommended in the pathologic evaluation for all breast cancers.2 This has traditionally taken the form of mitotic activity scoring, which is an integral component of histologic grading, an established prognostic marker in breast cancer.20 While the role of Ki67 immunohistochemistry as a prognostic and predictive marker in breast cancer has been widely investigated,5, 6, 8, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 staining thresholds and cutoffs have been mostly arbitrary and are not universally standardized. Percent positively stained nuclei,26, 27 number of nuclei stained per 10 high power fields,5 stratification of MIB-1 staining in tertiles8 have been described. Some authors use Ki67 staining of 20% or more to define a high level,6 while others advocate segregating high from low staining via the median of positively stained cells as the distinguishing value.25 Recently, Spyratos et al7 have suggested that the optimal threshold level should be 25% based on multivariate analyses of MIB-1 immunostaining at different cutoffs. Additional variation issues include selection of the appropriate area for evaluation of immunostaining, be it the center or periphery of the tumor; area of highest cell density; or zone of highest tumor cell immunohistochemical reactivity.2

In this study, we used a scoring system described previously in our experience with Ki67 immunohistochemistry in breast ductal carcinoma in situ.12 Interestingly, the cutoff of 10% as the threshold between high and low proliferative activity coincided with the median value of immunostaining in this current series. With this scheme, we found a statistically significant association of Ki67 protein expression with mitotic score, histologic grade and negative ER status. The correlation with mitotic score and histologic grade is expected, as both Ki67 and mitotic activity are parallel markers of cell proliferation, and histologic grade has mitotic score as one of its component elements. The inverse relationship of high Ki67 immunostaining with negative ER immunohistochemistry is also consonant with higher grade, highly proliferative tumors being less likely to express ER; and our previous study of invasive breast cancers in our local population had confirmed a statistically significant inverse association between histological grade and ER status.13

Among the cases that demonstrated high proliferative activity based on Ki67 immunostaining of >10%, case 5 showed a very low mitotic score of only 1 mitosis per 10 hpfs, despite a Ki67 immunoscore of 30%. That the Ki67 immunostaining was a true reflection of protein expression may be partly substantiated by a corresponding increase in gene expression. One possible reason for this discordance between mitotic score vs Ki67 protein and gene expression is fixation delay, which is known to lead to loss of mitotic figures on histology.28 Also, the mitotic phase represents the smallest portion of cycling cells, and Ki67 immunohistochemistry, which detects cells from mid-G1 through S and G2 phases, will also decorate cells that do not manifest mitotic figures.

While our somewhat arbitrary scheme is validated by the association with morphologic and biological (ER) parameters, the correlation with Ki67 gene expression also lends weight to the basis for this scoring method. Nevertheless, the trend for a direct correlation between gene and protein expression appears to be more robust only for cases that were scored as displaying >10% Ki67 immunopositivity.

When Ki67 immunohistochemical staining results were compared against other genes that were differentially regulated, it was found that at a cutoff of 40% Ki67 immunopositivity, intriguingly, a number of genes related to cell death (bcl2, MAP2K4, TNFSF10) were downregulated. The differential regulation of these genes may contribute to the biological nature of the high Ki67 tumors, which are regarded as clinically more aggressive.2, 8

As bcl2 is a well-established gene that has been reported to be of prognostic import in breast cancer,2 we decided to study its association with Ki67 expression further by verifying its downregulation by real-time RT-PCR, which showed good correlation with the expression profiles. The bcl2 proto-oncogene was first described in follicular B-cell lines as a result of a translocation that juxtaposed the bcl2 gene on chromosome 18 with the immunoglobulin heavy-chain (IgH) gene on chromosome 14, t(14;18); leading to bcl2 protein overexpression due to deregulation of the bcl2–IgH fusion gene, allowing lymphocytes to become resistant to apoptosis or programmed cell death.29 However, bcl2 is also known to have an inhibitory effect on the cell cycle.30, 31, 32 It has been suggested that bcl2 represses growth by either lengthening the G1 phase30 or the rate at which cells transit from G0 into S phase.31, 33 It is also plausible that the growth inhibitory function of bcl2 is mediated by its functional association with molecules predicted by the STRING database such as cyclin D1, which is known to cause growth suppression.34 It has been previously demonstrated that besides enhancing mitogen-independent cell proliferation, c-myc, another gene that is functionally related to bcl2 according to the STRING database, can also suppress bcl2 expression.35, 36 In light of the above, a decrease in bcl2 would promote cell proliferation, which is in accord with our finding that this oncogene is downregulated in highly proliferative breast tumors. Conversely, bcl2 overexpression would therefore be a marker of improved prognosis in breast cancer, a finding that has been confirmed by other investigators.37

MAP2K4 is a mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MAPKK) homolog, which is a mediator of the stress-activated protein kinase (SAPK) pathways.38 However the SAPK pathways' role as a tumor-suppressive system, although promising, is still not well defined. The TNFSF10 gene that encodes tumor necrosis factor (ligand) superfamily, member 10, and also known as tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), has been shown to suppress the outgrowth of human prostate tumor xenografts in SCID mice.39 By binding selectively to death receptors in cancer cells, the cytotoxic activity of TRAIL holds promise as an anticancer agent.40 It is interesting that TNFSF10 is downregulated in highly proliferative breast cancers and more work should be done to explore this new finding.

In conclusion, our study has shown that immunohistochemical protein detection of Ki67 in invasive breast cancer correlates with Ki67 gene expression profiles only when immunohistochemical reactivity is >10% of tumor cell nuclei stained, validating at the molecular level, the usage of this cutoff in immunohistochemical scoring systems for Ki67. However, the association with downregulation of bcl2, MAP2K4 and TNFSF10 is observed only beyond a threshold of 40%, suggesting that a certain level of proliferative activity has to be achieved in order to activate the trigger for downregulation of genes related to apoptosis and cell death. Further studies to investigate this relationship between cell proliferation as defined by Ki67 expression, and such apoptotic and cell death-related genes, will enhance understanding of the pathogenesis of breast cancer, and lend insights into potential therapeutic modulations.